 Thank you very much, and let me say a warm hello to all colleagues and friends, and congratulations and thanks to University of Siena, the Santa Chiara Lab for the fantastic report, and the great work, and all of you for the efforts at organizing a unique initiative that I think is incredibly promising and incredibly exciting. Let me make just some very brief remarks. First, thank you for this idea of the leadership of the different SDSN country networks on the six transformations. I think the six transformations are an exciting and potentially a very important way to view the SDG challenge, because what we're really saying in the six transformations is we need deep and long-term change, long-term meaning at the scale beyond the political cycle, change at the scale of 20, 30, 40 years. And a lot of our work, I think, is setting that direction and emphasizing the fundamental changes that will need to be made for building the future that we want. We see that very clearly in the case of energy, for example, and the work that De Feebe is leading on the energy transformation and the pathways to get to net zero by 2050. But I would say that every one of the six transformations in education and innovation, in health and well-being, in the industrial transformation, in sustainable land use, in sustainable cities and in the digital transformation, should be viewed at this 10 to 30 year perspective to appreciate how deep is the change that we're really aiming for and therefore how different it is from a normal political business cycle, a normal policy cycle. It's not a short-term initiative. It's not a one-time investment to address a problem or to patch up a problem. It is aiming to entrain our business, political, academic, and civil society sectors of broad society in the same direction and to help create a vision of where we want to be and then to create a process of how to get there. And in this regard, it's, to my mind, a different kind of policymaking and a different kind of politics and an exciting prospect if we can really help to bring it about because it is lengthening the time horizons, deepening the objectives, looking more holistically, looking at technological transformations, really a more imaginative and creative process than normal policymaking. So that's the first point I want to emphasize. And please, let's think about ways to support each of these national networks in their championing of one of the transformations. And let's be meeting a lot this coming year to make this real. Just as Arato told us about the digital initiatives in Cyprus, which are very, very exciting, that's so essential, the digital revolution, that let's have some meetings about that and try to scope out this deep, transformative, longer term vision and how to get there. Second point that for me is thrilling and basic and very much in line with what Julian just said as well. This is truly Mediterranean wide and that's exciting because these regions are really different. The European, North Africa, Eastern Mediterranean regions face different challenges. The indicators make this very clear, but it is one integrated region for the Mediterranean to be healthy. We need a helpful societies all around the Mediterranean. And of course, all of the countries share the vulnerabilities to the ecological changes to the pollution, the overfishing, the direct damages taking place in the Mediterranean Sea itself and also the benefits of interconnection. When it comes to renewable energy systems, for example, we really want to interconnect North Africa with Europe as we've talked about for decades, but now as energy transformation is truly underway, we need to turn those long held ideas into practical realities. So I would like to encourage and emphasize every way that we can bring more colleagues from North Africa and from the Middle Eastern, Mediterranean countries, Syria, Jordan, Israel, Egypt, Palestine into these active discussions with us because I think that this is really crucial and I don't think they're as deeply institutionalized as they should be. Budgets tend to stop at the European boundary more or less except in very notable programs like Angelo's Prima program, which is designed specifically for the Mediterranean wide reach. And we want more of that and we want each of the areas of the European Green Deal to include a Mediterranean component that doesn't only stop in Southern Europe, but includes the Eastern Mediterranean and North Africa as well. So I'm very excited about that and any ways in the coming year that we can deepen our consultations so that all of the countries that are in this report are also at the now virtual table. We'll do it online no doubt, but at the virtual table will be a big plus and I think help us to move ahead. And I firmly believe that also even in conflict zone areas like Libya or in contested spaces like Israel and Palestine, if we're thinking about practical issues of climate, food production, energy systems and so forth, we can get to practical answers that move beyond political bottlenecks right now. I know it's not so easy, but I think that it's probably the most important way to do that, which is to focus on common interests and therefore practical solutions. The third point that I would emphasize is how crucial is the European Green Deal right now? It is, in my view, the best we have in the world of a transformation agenda that really looks at transformation in depth, in scope, in holism and in time dimension. It's really well done. As I like to say, it's totally bureaucratic, but in the Weberian rational bureaucratic mold. In other words, it's really thinking through systematic processes to make change in the best of the bureaucratic sense. Who has responsibility? Who needs to do what? What are the timelines? What are the processes? But it's not a plan, it's a process right now. The European Green Deal is not a plan. I want us to help fill in the plans at the country level, at the regional level, what really to do, because what the European Green Deal is, is a set of timelines, milestones in an absolutely desirable, holistic approach, but it doesn't have underneath it the what to do in detail. And Europe still too much then leaves the what to do at the country level rather than really regional investment strategies, though that's getting better. It's still not enough, in my view. We need a regional energy system. We need a regional food, production, distribution, use, management system. We really need regional systems for the ecology of the region, for the health of the Mediterranean Sea, and so forth. So I think the European Green Deal is a huge plus, and it is already having its global diplomatic effect. Definitely Europe brought the East Asian countries into the recent announcements of China net climate neutrality by 2060, Japan under new Prime Minister Suga announcing very quickly upon his new prime ministership climate neutrality by 2050, Korea the same. So we really have a lot of partners, and once we pry Trump's finger from his Oval Office desk and carry that man out of his office, we're going to have a good president in the United States and there will be a U.S. Green Deal in effect to join this. So I think we're going to have a lot of opportunity diplomatically for the European Green Deal to be applied first in the European countries at 27. I hope we can find ways to extend this to North Africa and the Eastern Mediterranean because it's a framework, not only European policy, but a very well designed framework, and then as part of global diplomacy. And I'll just end at that point to say that 2021 is potentially shaping up as a breakthrough year. I don't think that's just a cliche. I think it's actually real. This has been a very, very tough year with COVID, with Trump, with just an extraordinarily difficult year. 2021 should be much better. Our governments by then first should figure out how to contain this pandemic. They've not quite done so. Unfortunately, that's why the second wave is so terrible. But the knowledge of what to do is much better. There will be vaccines coming, which will help probably in mass use by the second half of 2021 and partial use before then that will help. There will be President Biden. That will help a lot because the madness from the United States was the greatest distraction to global policymaking in the world in recent years. It just stopped logical thinking in the G20 and in so many other processes. That will improve dramatically. And colleagues, we have at least three major global events next year that we should be present at in a very active way. The first is COP 15 of the Convention on Biological Diversity in Kunming, China, in May, which should set ground rules for biodiversity conservation for years ahead. The second is the World Food System Summit, called by the UN Secretary General in the fall. Very important opportunity for us. And if the SDSN Europe and SDSN Mediterranean works closely with FAO, WFP, the Rome-based institutions, I think we can end all of the initiatives that we have with Barilla and the food industry and Regeneration 2030 with Andrea Illy. We really can contribute to the World Food Summit in an important way. And then of course we have COP 26 in Glasgow in November, which needs to be the time in which every country has committed to decarbonization by mid-century so that there finally is the global understanding and orientation of how to get to net zero in a timely way. This is all going to be on the agenda. I think we have a big leadership role to play because of your leadership and because of Europe's unique leadership role in the global agenda. And this I find very promising. So let me conclude where I started with great thanks for a wonderful report and a wonderful initiative. Thanks to Angelo for your leadership on all of this. It's a tremendous contribution and a very exciting one. Thank you.