 Hallo und herzlich willkommen auf der Bühne der Chaoszone. Hallo und willkommen auf der Stelle der KSZN TV. Ich komme aus Füstenberg, der Havel River in Brandenburg-Brangburg, in Anker Domuscheidberg. Sie wird uns bald mit der Bundestag, der deutschen Parlament, über die nette politische Arbeit und die digitale politische Arbeit. Sie wird in den letzten vier Jahren verheiratet. Sie würde uns über das Insid, was wir von der Aussage sehen, informieren. Ich freue mich sehr, dass Anker, der Arbeit ist, Teil unserer Team zu haben. Ich weiß, was ungefähr kommt. Es wird sehr interessant sein. Wir sehen uns bald wieder. Wir sehen uns bald wieder. Und von der Interpretation. Willkommen zum Gespräch. Wir werden das mit Zebelis und Lukas, siehst du den Hashtag? Ja, und ich will? Ich sage etwas über mich selbst. Ich habe ein netter Aktivist, netter politischer Aktivist im Hintergrund. Ich war Publisist. Ich habe den deutschen Parlament in 2017 geleitet. Und bevor das, habe ich viel Zeit in IT. Ich habe ein paar Politiker im Parlament, ich hatte viel zu tun mit Digital. Ich habe jetzt vier Jahre dort geleitet. Ich bin dieses Jahr reelektiert. Es war zuerst eine Erleichterung. Ich habe diese Zeit, als netter politischer Speaker für die Rechtspartei, die Parlamentarierpartei, und natürlich sind es all kinds der Committees, die ihr habt. Zuerst sind es die Subject-Committees. Sie haben einen Digital-Committee. Ich war die responsibelte Person für die Rechtspartei. Aber ich war auch der Deputy-Member für die Rechtspartei. In anderen Committees sind es die, die für die Transport- und Digital-Infrastruktur für die Transport- und Digital-Infrastruktur sind. Sie haben eine Broadband- und 5G-Lizenz und Forschung und Technologie. Ich bin auch ein Mitglied der Information- und Kommunikation-Technologie-Kommission, was die Mitglieder und die Mitglieder der Parlamentarier-Infrastruktur und die Teams, was sie arbeiten, und Hacker-Attacks, die nicht so oft passieren, aber es hat geschehen. Ich bin auch ein Mitglieder-Infrastruktur der Kommittees, die die Lizenz für die 5G-Infrastruktur und die 4G-Infrastruktur und die 4G-Infrastruktur und die 4G-Infrastruktur sind. Ich habe die Lizenz für die 5G-Infrastruktur und ich war auch in der Kommission im Inquiry auf Artificial Intelligenz. Es gibt viele Überraschungen, die nicht viele erfüllt haben, aber ich werde nicht darüber reden. Also, das ist einer der Passagier in der Parlamentarier-Infrastruktur und ich musste immer mein Weg verlieren. Das ist eigentlich einer der größten rücknehmenden Passagier. Es sieht sehr effizient, sehr analog und sehr chaotisch. Es hat ein paar Framwork-Listikten, die sehr erneuert sind. Man kann nicht sogar ein Bier haben, um Essen zu lernen. Es gibt Pluggen für Laptops. Laptops-Use sind verbitten und man hat viel Zeit. Man wird sitzen, dass die Agenda 5 oder 4 Uhr im Morgen ist. Auf jeden Fall gab es nur 5 Minuten zwischen dem Ende der Agenda und dem Nächsten, die 9 Uhr starten. Aber viele Sprecher sind nicht behauptet, dass sie den Protokoll vermittelt haben. Aber das ist kein Weg. Ich musste die Fax-Maschinen in die Fax-Maschinen. Man muss nur ein kurzer Zeit die System vermitteln. Die Fragen zu den Fax-Maschinen waren nur ein paar Wochen ago verwechseln. Ich erinnere mich, wenn die Fax-Maschinen in Bundestag vorgenommen sind. Wenn Sie aus der Seite kommen, ist es schwierig, zu erst mal zu werden. Aber das war ein Teil der Regierung. Ich bin ein Opposition-Politiker. Das bedeutet, dass man andere Dinge macht, als die Regierung zu unterstützen. Das wichtigste Task ist, die Regierung zu kontrollieren, um die Regierung zu behaupten. Aber das ist eigentlich das Task für alle Parteien, die sich als Opposition-Politiker aktiv sind. Ich bin ein Mitglied der only left Opposition-Politiker in dieser Legislaturperiode, die interessant wird, um Transparenz zu schaffen. Das ist etwas, was ich finde, sehr wichtig, um die Entscheidungen zu machen, die Parlament zu beeinflussen. Man kann natürlich nicht alles bemerken, aber was ich bemerke, ist, dass man für die Außenwelt vielleicht verändern kann, wie das Parlament funktioniert. Das ist eines der Goals, die ich selbst setze. Das easieste Weg ist die Information und die Kommunikation-Technologie, wo man sagen kann, in welchen openen Daten das Parlament bietet, dass es nicht viel progressiv ist. Trigoghese von der left-party hat gesagt, dass die Opposition besser funktioniert, wenn es die Zeitgeist, die Zeitgeistung, die Agenda-Settingen, wenn man einen bestimmten Reiz hat, wenn man mit Medien sprechen kann, wenn man viele öffentliche Relations arbeiten kann. Und wenn man sich auf bestimmte Themen betrifft, dann hat man die Agenda für die Kommitte zu reden, in den Geistungen, zum Beispiel. Und last, aber nicht least, ich habe mich als die longarm der Agenda getroffen, die Antworten können nicht länger als 28 Teilen sein. Vielleicht gibt es 50 Antworten, die man getroffen hat. Vielleicht 40. Das ist mehr als 28 Antworten. Wenn Sie das aussehen, dass die Antworten mehr als 28 Teilen sind, dann werden sie verabschiedet. Es kann nur noch ein paar Fragen für jedes Thema bedeuten. Es kann nur noch ein paar Fragen beitragen, damit um sampf und dunkelsten Fragen kommen. Es kommt alles, was sie da hinwärts gibt, auf der Telekommunikation Networking und als Mitglieder der Advisory Board auf den Lizenzen, habe ich einiges zu schreiben, ein paar Lieds da, dann natürlich die Agenda in Kommissionen, Debatten, man kann auch eine Agenda da in den Hörungen setzten, aber man kann auch versuchen, einen bestimmten Werten zu erheben, weil man die Experten, die die Hörungen zu den Hörungen erheben, und was du talked about, oder was Proposals du machst, das ist etwas, wo du ein kleines Einfluss haben kannst, was passiert, und natürlich Networking mit der Kommunität ist eine wichtige Stelle, weil ich viel Input bekommen habe für das, was ich mache. Also, was machst du? Ich habe eine Legislaturperiode, ich habe es erhebt. Ich habe 42 Gespräche erhebt, ich habe 137 Fragen erhebt. Es könnte noch mehr sein, aber zuerst war ich so busy, einfach zu verstehen, wie das Parlament funktioniert, dass ich einfach nicht mehr umgekommen bin, um es zu tun. Also, ich habe 8 dieser kleinen Inquiries geschrieben, und die Wordcloud hier hat die Themen in diesen. Ich habe mit Kollegen von der Parlamentarierpartei gearbeitet, also 10 mehr dieser Inquiries, die ich verzeichnete, und 8, die ich als Initiator rutsche. Es gab 1 Draft-Law, und 44 Beratungen von Kommittees, die ich später übernommen werde, und ich sage auch, warum ich das mache. Ich möchte dir etwas mehr über das Content erzählen, in den 4 Jahren, dass es unvergessliche Probleme gab. Ich beginne mit der Frage der IT-Sicherheit, und die Frage, die mich über mehrere Jahre zuvor hat, wie sicher ist die Parlamentarierartigkeit eigentlich? Das betrifft Hardware, Software, aber auch Kompetenz auf der IT-Sicherheit. Und ich war natürlich interessiert in die Situation, dass ich nicht nur die Parlamentarierartigkeit betreibe, aber auch was das der federalen Regierung für die IT-Sicherheit macht. Ich hatte eine Frage, die ich in 2020 betrifft. Und ich denke, dass ich sagen kann, dass die federalen Administration selbst eine Sicherheitsriske ist, weil es natürlich nicht genug Kompetenz hat, weil es zu viele Wenn du nur die richtigen Statistiken ermitteln musst, wird es dann schwer, gute Menschen auf dem Markt zu finden. So, jedes vierte Job in der Regierung, in den subsidiären Autoritäts- oder Departementen, ist nicht verabschiedet. Und in den niedrigen Departementen gibt es sogar jedes dritte Job. Und viele Ministries haben less than ten Jobs for IT Security, five of fourteen. I don't think that that's enough. And the media picked up on that at the time. This is the German public broadcaster ZDF. And I found this unbelievable at the time when ransomware attacks are a daily norm. And the German agency on IT Security reports so many weak vulnerabilities every day almost. All kinds of players in society are targeted, including government departments. Then you can't do something like that, can you? So, one year later, February 2021 is where we are at. Within the pandemic of course, I have resubmitted the same question. And lo and behold, every fourth job has not been fulfilled, but something has changed. More than 700 Jobs have been created within that one year. So they recognize the value of IT Security, more positions were created, and almost 700 were actually filled. So it's more or less the same number of newly created and newly filled positions. But there is an incredible imbalance because 86% of these new jobs were created in the Defense Ministry and their surroundings. And the same goes for the new positions that were filled, the new hirings. So only 20% or 15% of these are in the civil sections of government. All the other departments, ministries, be it social services, pensions, they share 14% of the newly created positions. That is such an imbalance, I think, and that is just not on. So, who holds the negative record in unfilled positions? In the middle of the pandemic, Jens Spahn, the then Health Minister in both these inquiries, 2020 and 2021, he only has 11 Jobs. And of these, 80% are currently not staffed. They are only, since one year, two actually are the two are filled because, of course, they only have little things like electronic patients, file, Corona apps, all these huge projects where privacy and data protection and security of health data is so vitally important. He doesn't have the people that can judge when something is commissioned to the private sector, whether it's done well or not, it's completely unacceptable. But people are hired, people are sought and the BND, the exterior secret service, the foreign secret service, are looking for a cyber programmer, may be female diverse, they've come that far, but you then ask, what the heck is a cyber programmer? So I thought I can ask four questions that I can write every month. So I wrote this small letter, a written inquiry. What does the German government understand to be, how does the German government understand the German cyber programmer? The answer was very small, a very simple focus and the profile of the cyber programmers you can find from the hiring, from the job application, the job posting that you know of. So, now for you further insights, cyber, cyber, cyber, but that doesn't make good digitalisation. So, how good is the hardware? You remember in the last legislative period there were the extremely widespread hardware gaps, vulnerability spectrum meltdown, so let's ask, I thought, what is the share in absolute and percentage figures I thought I could ask of the hardware that is potentially vulnerable and earned by the federal government to these two vulnerabilities and what measures have been taken that really are effective in protecting and I said, please break it down by ministries and lower departments and there was a very typical response, strange kind of response, but that's how many of these answers are, they just don't answer what you ask, they simply read it out, even if you complain, you don't get more detail. So, 100% of the computers of the agency on information security are secure law. You can speculate why the others have not been mentioned in the... So, Chief Information Security Officers don't seem to exist in the federal government. You can also conclude that from a small inquiry with my colleague, Victor Perli, where I asked, what kinds of server do these people use? What's the maintenance situation? And it turns out that many of the departments still work with Windows Server 2003, this was in 2019 and that extended support for that was actually ended in 2015. But that wasn't the worst. They actually said that they had servers with Debian 3.1 that were still in use where the last security updates at the time of the reply was more than 10 years ago. You really don't worry, I'm not surprised about anything after that, but you hear about more things where you can say, it could unsettle you to think about this. This is the government, it's authorities, departments that deal with all our data. If you know that there is no kind of professional life-cycle management anywhere, so they... That would make them know when doesn't do maintenance periods or support periods, and when do you have to find replacements? That doesn't exist. In some of the network of the federal government that should be particularly secure in transporting A to B. There are components there that for years have had neither maintenance nor replacement parts. They're just impossible, really. Or they can. Or so you think. But I said, I also want to tell you what the federal government or the old one, has done looking outside and not just inside. And there was this IT Security by law. We've waited for it for years and it's still happened. Kind of. So there was the IT Security law 2.0. And the report from my parliamentary committee looked like this on its starting page because there was a hearing and at this hearing each parliamentary group sends their experts including the grant collision and they send their own experts and even their experts completely took apart this IT Security law 2.0. The CSU one said it's kind of an anti IT Security law. So that was not very nice. And it definitely belongs in the bin. It contains a lot of weird things which don't really have anything such as the IT Security seal. So kind of like the energy labels you have on fridges which you hopefully look at before you buy them to see if they are A or B. But this mark is different because it is a voluntary B according to the own declaration so they say oh I have a nice electronic radio here it's super safe. I would like to have the energy label A for IT Security. Sometimes occasionally it's supposed to be controlled but according to the paper trail and I asked at some other opportunity at the interior security cyber security thing if they think you might have found security vulnerabilities based on the paper trail before or based on documents because they ought to know what they are talking about and they said nah not really but that is the intended process here. So you declared yourself according to the company it is voluntary anyways so only the ones who feel up to it will do it and if it's tested at all it's checked based on the documents of course it's not surprise that according to the U-Cyber Security Act the trustworthiness of this label which has yet to be created is going to be low and so the great coalition sold us this as finally consumers know when buying which products are safe and which aren't. Yeah. So this is why this law was frozen for a year they kind of wanted to ban Huawei products in a very complicated way you can't do this directly of course and now it was done differently so this is just for core infrastructure and the experts said you can't really do that but it's still in the law and there's a lot of things that are not in the law which are things that it would have needed to be a real benefit for RT Security such as if the toaster burns your house then there's an obligation on the manufacturer because that's not supposed to happen but if there's an IT security leak then there's no kind of refundability for the manufacturer and nobody can understand why there's supposed to be this obligation in one case and not in the other and this of course means that the company is going to be more sloppy in the IT security because there's no consequences so no requirement for updates so I bought a cheap product and then maybe there are no security updates at all or for one or two years if it's for one or two years no if I buy a new smartphone I don't want to do it every one or two years but if there are no more updates for my smartphone then that's an IT security problem so it would have been a very important rule for consumer protection and this did not happen sadly agency for cyber security did not get more independent either it was promised but not really specifically and then of course because it always happens with other security laws but it didn't happen here that the previous law had been evaluated so you didn't even know did the previous law help and in which places did it help how much and where did it not help and why might it even have done damage this was not evaluated it was just replaced with a new one expanded and also there was no participation of third parties it's supposed to include some participation of civil societies and the economy there's some kind of process there but it's not really a participation process if nothing happens to the law for one year and then four weeks before Christmas there are four drafts in sequence and the last one, the most important one has 24 hours of deadline for commons where the one group said this is a middle finger into the face of democracy I thought it was a very nicely phrased it goes to the point but even industry associations like Bigcom who have people on staff full time to comment on laws like this and they said you can't do it like that this was fairly often with the telecommunication process also in the same four weeks resubmitted and there there were over 400 pages and you still only had one or two days to comment and that's not only some issue for the civil society but also for the industry because they're supposed to comment on it and members of parliament are also supposed to debate on this and they have only had two days to read it in most cases even without any summary so nobody tells you on which page anything was changed so you're supposed to find that out yourself so the traffic light collusion is supposed to change that as well but also didn't happen in this law is to decriminalize IT security research we've seen this recently in the when the CDU sued Lilith Wittmann because she showed there were not only security holes but security barn doors and it's not, it can't be that IT security research is criminalized like this and this would have been really important because then you can report security vulnerabilities to the developers responsibly alright, how does a typical dialogue with coalition representatives look like so there was an expert no there was a report saying that ransomware attacks are the greatest threat for IT security so I asked Seehofer, the minister who was a guest in the commission what's your strategy regarding this especially great threats and Seehofer didn't have to think for a long time he immediately knew his strategy is which is no tolerance so that's what he said about refugees at the border but what on earth is zero tolerance supposed to mean as a tolerance against ransomware attacks so if someone sitting in Thailand and has a randomware attack start remotely what is zero tolerance supposed to mean and how does it protect anyone what does it change so sometimes you really don't know what you're supposed to reply to this and I'm sitting in that um commission and can really only face form a second example I was also busy with the interesting subject of how sustainable is the federal IT and what does the federal government in this case the old one do to combine sustainability and digitalisation is also a great driver for CO2 carbon footprint it's supposed to cause more carbon or CO2 than the international air traffic and that's an exponential growth so I also sent a very large small inquiry there with 42 individual questions and sub questions asking about all kinds of things and there again you can have probably the greatest thing so the federal environment ministry had a 70 point agenda which read very well but which had nothing to do with what happens in reality so that was just the environment ministry and I asked what happens with the 70 measures so I asked can you please for each of the 70 measures tell me what's the current status which milestones were reached not reached of course they didn't do this I wanted to know what happened to these recommendations for acting also from this environment ministry what happened to the data center register for federal agencies but also all data centers in Germany are there any planned efficiency criteria by building houses for instance is that planned I asked about the blue angel for data centers or for software this does exist was created by this federal government this blue angel do they have that themselves do they want to have those for their data centers so all kinds of questions like this and it was kind of remarkable I am used to a lot of things after four years how bad answers of the federal government can be to very simple questions and not all of those questions were simple but one of my first questions was how many data centers does the federal government have please split it by ministry and the further agencies I had asked a similar question earlier on its own how many data centers does the federal government have again ministries and everything and I got an answer there I will show it now at the time December 2020 I had asked this and the answer was 177 but now I have asked again in question 10 of this small inquiry fairly similar question how many data centers does the federal government have I would like to compare this 110 so some got lost and then I ask a lot of detailed questions such as for each of those data centers I always wrote the data centers mentioned in question 10 do they have cooling coolants that are damaged the environment do they fulfill the blue angel criteria and everything so you would see the same 110 data centers but they were only 107 maybe they left out 3 of them but they didn't so they named some of them twice what you notice but they weren't the same one so if you look at it closely you notice that the Ministry of the Interior had 2020 with my single question that 85 themselves and in question 10 of my small inquiry they had 14 and in this table were asked for the details of those 14 there were none at all of the Interior Ministry and they were all gone or they didn't know anything about them I don't know they didn't say I think this is the economy ministry they had it the other way around so 17 data centers somehow appeared there out of thin air between questions 10 and 12 I do not know how they do this but just for fun I checked for each ministry in this question in the same answer on the question took the smallest answer and the smallest number and the largest number and thought the federal government has something between 77 and 110 data centers we don't know exactly how many and the Defense Ministry so I also asked how did it develop the past 5 years and the next 5 years was the plan and the Defense Ministry only could give the numbers for the current year because they didn't know how many data centers they had in 2020 or 2019 and they also don't know how many they will have next year no idea Defense Ministry weird very strange but they also don't know a lot of other things so I said in this long table there were 107 data centers which were listed individually 21% of those had no answer or the entry no answer about the energy usage and with the next question how many data centers they only known by ourselves or is it outside and someone else operated they don't know that they don't know for 21% of them they don't know if they operate the data center themselves almost 40% they don't know if use the waste heat with 44% they don't know what kind of coolant they use if they damage it Ich konnte nicht sagen, ob es diese Blühangele oder die Kriterie erfüllt für jedes 2. Datacenter. Und für die, die ich die Daten des Spezifischen habe, habe ich diese natürlich zuschaut. Und es sieht nicht wirklich so blühangele aus. Also, nur 7 der 107 Datacentröten benutzen diese Erleichterung. Wir können betrachten, dass diejenigen, die nicht sagen, dass sie nicht der größte sind, nur 48 aus der 107 benutzen Kuhlen, die das Klima verabschieden haben, das ist, was sie selbst gesagt haben. Ich habe mich gefragt, ob sie ein Klima verabschieden haben, und sie haben gesagt, 28, nur 28, haben 100% renewable Energie. Und nicht nur 1 erfüllt diese Kriterie für die Blühangele oder die Datacentröten. Auch, dass dieser federalen Regierung mit diesem Blühangele selbst kam. Also, das ist, ähm, das ist etwas, was sie zu verabschieden haben. Ich habe auch gefragt, ob sich der federalen Regierung eine minimal effizienten Kriterie für Datacentröten tun. Und die Antwort war sehr typisch, weil es etwas sagt, Datacentröten sind sehr komplexe Systeme. Und, ja, natürlich. Und dann eine sehr schöne Sendung hier. Die technologische Entwicklung von dem Markt, war auch so dynamisch so weit, mit der kommentationellen Power of Service, dass eine Regulierung hier keine Werte hat. Also, du willst keine Minimumkriterie, du könntest auch das schreiben, aber es gibt keine Werte, die den großen Konditionen glauben. Aber wir erinnern uns, dass wir das Voluntäre-Sekurität-Label wollen. Wir wollen das Voluntäre-Energie-Label für Datacentröten. Also, ich denke nicht, dass das Klimat zu saving ist. Transparent, da komme ich gerade zu einem ganz anderen Thema, ist die Politik? Ja, und Transparency, das gibt es für mich für eine sehr andere Sache. Ich habe gesagt am Anfang, ich habe mir meine Aufgabe, um Transparenz zu kreieren, über wie das Parlament sich betrifft. Also, ich habe all diese Fragen, die ich ermittelt habe. Und ich habe alle diese, ich habe für die Kommission, um öffentlich zu werden, open zu werden. Und das war immer verabschiedet. Aber, das heißt, man kann da reingehen, und es gibt ein paar Sessionen, die zu öffentlich werden, so dass man sie füllen kann, durch ein Live-Stream, das heißt aber, das bedeutet nicht Live-Stream, denn es gibt nur zwei Optionen, zwei Spaces für das Live-Streamen im Parlament, aber viele mehr Events, wie Hörungen oder Sessionen. Also, man hat das Live-Stream am Montag und am Thursday. Es ist ein Broadcast. Es gibt keine Interaktivität, wie man eigentlich wie ein Citizen-Zitizen vermitteln kann, das ist nicht möglich. Und, wenn die Kommission so nahe ist wie das, dann, vielleicht, jemand, der mich interessiert, ich dachte, also, ich versuche, live-Tweet zu versuchen, ich dachte, ich würde also ein paar Ripporte über die Video-Ripporte, über meine Arbeit in den Kommittees und Ripporte, über die previous Sessionen, z.B. es gibt Videos, über die IT-Security Law, über State Georgians, über Micro-Targeting in Cookies, so diese Videos sind 10-15 Minuten lang und ich denke, ich versuche, in anderen Weise zu sein, wie gesagt, ich komme aus einem aktivisten Background und meine Fokuss, bevor ich in den Parlament elect war, war die Frage des öffentlichen Governments. Wie conductest du Politik und Government-Work in eine mehr participative und öffentliche Weise und auf meinem eigenen Website, leider ist es keine Rolle, die Mitglieder des Parlamentes zu machen, aber auf meinem Website habe ich die Zeit, in der ich mit den Zeiternen, wie ich diese Ernehmungen doniere und was ich erneuere. Also, ihr könnt euch das sehen, wenn ihr das interessiert. Und ihr könnt natürlich alleine arbeiten in Politik. Wenn ihr eine seriöse Arbeit als Repräsentative der Menschen, wie ich meine Rolle finde. Also, ich bin nicht nur für euch da, aber auch für meine Arbeit in Parlament. Zum Beispiel, mehrere Mal, habe ich Experte, die von den Berichtern, die mir helfen. Ich habe auch Briefungen bekommen, auf alle Dinge, wie die Corona-Warning-App, die IT-Sicherheit, das Cookie-Topic, das Wettbewerb für die schnellste Brotband. Ich habe von ihr von euch da, manchmal zu vorbereiten, meine Kommission zu vorbereiten. Ich würde sagen, ich habe diese Fragen in die Session oder für Fragen, die ich von der Sensor-Kommunität bekommen habe. Es war über Umweltdaten. Ich war froh, diese Fragen zu fragen. Das ist auch für euch, wenn ihr coolen Ideen habt, über Fragen, und andere Themen, und auch meine kleine Inquiries. Ich habe Inputsbewerbe bekommen und manchmal habe ich eine Advice diskutiert. Und ich brauche manchmal ein paar Rückgründe, für ein Interview oder so, auf ein Thema, das ihr nicht so tief hinbekommen habt. Wenn ihr die Papers, die ihr findest, ihr wollt nicht mit die Paula pfischos machen. Es wurde sehr hilfreich, die Lillet bei der Online-Axis-Lauden mir godfippen. Aber die Es hat mir mit Cybersecurity geholfen und es gab eine Endlösliste, die ich auslesen konnte. Aber vielen Dank an alle. Vielen Dank an alle, dass Sie es nicht möglich sind. Ein kleines Beispiel. In dem Jahr 2021 habe ich über das Digital-Komitee beantwortet. Das Bundesamt des Bundes, das Bundesamt des Bundes, auf die Schutz der Population und des Desaster-Reliefes vorliegen. Ich habe mich gefragt, was ich ihm fragen sollte. Es geht um die NENA-App. Und das Warnendeig, als die Alarmsystem festgestellt wurde, und es war eine sehr interessante Antwort. Wie geht es um die Cell Broadcast? Wann werden wir es endlich bekommen? Und das EU-Alertsystem, wo sie die Guidelines gesagt haben, dass das System in 2022 etwas wie die Cell Broadcast ist, ist nichts in Ordnung. Was ging da eigentlich schief? Was ist eigentlich falsch? Mit diesem Warnendeig, was sind die Konsequenzen? Was passiert, ob es eine große Powerkette gibt? In der Mobile-Network, ob sie eine uninterruptive Power-Supply haben? Und ich habe interessante Dinge gefunden. Zum Beispiel, die Federal- und Federal-State-Levelen haben ihre Prozesse nicht verabschiedet. Die Idee war, dass jemand einen Button auf die Federal-Level präsentiert. Aber die Staates präsentierten auch ihre eigenen Buttonen. Und die Städte präsentierten auch die Buttonen. Es war also viel Chaos. Und das System war überlebt. Google und Apple waren die Systeme verabschiedet. Es gab niemanden, und sie dachten, dass es Millionen Messen gibt. Es muss Spam sein. Sie sprachen das. Das ist nicht sehr hilfreich, wenn die Zeit des Essens ist, mit Warnendeigungen. Und es wurde turned out, dass das System nie in einem realen Testenvironment testet. Das war im Januar. Der Eingang von dem Sonnen-Test hat vor dem Sommer stattgefunden. Dann, in Janeu, dachten sie, dass es so ein Testenvironment zu entwickeln. Aber es würde bis zum Ende 2021, um 12 Monate mehr für es zu werden, und ich dachte, das ist selten. Warum? Wir hatten den Warnendeig in September. Warum? Und du weißt, warum? Oh, du gehst, dass du diesen Jahr im September hast, Dann war das Warnendag der Warnendag im Jahr 2021 cancelled. So, Dinge wie das sind in meinen Video- und Video-Rapporten. Diesen in den Rapporten von 1. Februar 2021. Und dann hatten wir natürlich die Flutzen in Deutschland. Eine halbe Jahr später. Ihr würdet gerne die eine Katastrophik- oder andere Warnungssysteme haben. Ich fragte mich, was die SEL-Broadcast der Warnendage war. In den Kommissionen habe ich gesagt, dass es nur in der Präzise der Warnendage war. Aber die Telekom-Provider würden sagen, dass es in Höhe von Millionen Euro ist. Und ich dachte, dass sie vielleicht eine halbe Jahr später etwas wissen. Ich wollte ein Update haben und habe es gefragt. Und die Antwort war, dass wir uns noch verurteilt haben und schauen. Das war die Entscheidung, seit der Regierung checkt, wie eine Erleichterung von Artikel 110 ist. Das ist die EU-Erleichterung, die either Direktive oder Regulation ist. Das kann nicht über Nacht gemacht werden. Sie checken, wie die Artikel 110 implementiert wird. Und wie unter welchen Legal-Framework-Konditionen eine Obligatorie-Introduktion der SEL-Broadcasts möglich wäre. Das war sechs Monate später. Das war frustrierend und sehr, sehr typisch. Ich kann nicht alle die Zillions von Details erzählen. Aber es war ein Quatsch. Und dann hatten wir etwas wie die Pandemie. Und das hat sich viel geändert in Parlaments. Einige Committees waren notarisch in einer Session in einem analogen Weg. Die Digital-Kommission, das war etwas seltsam. Sie waren der erste, die Digital-Sessionen zu haben. Und es gab sehr wenige Optionen für Teamwork. Es gab zu wenige Provisionen für Telefonkonditionen. Es gab nicht genug. Es gab eine Parlament-Klaude, die noch nicht funktionell ist. Ich werde sie benutzen, weil es sogar schlimmer ist, keine Klaude zu haben, aber in eine produktive Weise zu koalibrieren, ist sehr schwer mit diesem System. Und natürlich haben wir viele unkompetente Leute, die mitgehen. Die head of the committee perhaps would say, Digital. No, don't like that. And they decide whether it's hybrid, decisions should be hybrid or analog or digital. So you might be finding yourself, explaining what a video conference is and telling them, you can just write into the chat, if you have a question and you have questions, what is a chat? What is a chat? You really don't know where to start. And that did not happen in the Digital Committee, fortunately, but due to many sessions being cancelled, you had a bit more time to go back to your constituency. And of course there weren't so many presence events there either, but I was active in the Verstiehbahnhof, the Digital Craftsroom in the understanding station. We built the Digital Craftsroom in the basement there and the photo here, where I work on that wall here. This is the wall that I am behind right now, in front of right now. And you don't see what I see if I look forward. So that's where I am right now. And you see a few pictures from the space in the Verstiehbahnhof and the temporary production site for face visors. This was as well. Now with the new legislative period, of course the grand coalition that we had is thankfully now over. We have the traffic light coalition, red-stitium Democrats, yellow liberals and green party. So we have issues like digitalisation and sustainability. The government wants to observe what's happening across the nation. IT security becomes still an issue of digital education and machine readable parliament. It's something I would like to have in the information and communication technology. I would still like to be a member. It hasn't been decided yet, but I am pretty certain that I will be able to represent the left party in that. And if the coalition treaty yields certain issues of digital politics, of course there's always nice things in coalition treaties and the issue is what comes out of those treaties. So I will look at that and keep observing and keep accompanying that. And that gets me to the end. I have a very fast ride. I can say, even as an opposition politician, you can influence things. Maybe you cannot pass laws because you don't have the majority, but you can have an effect. You can make a difference. I can't do it alone, of course, but you are there. You helped me. And for that, again, I would really thank you for four years of support by you for my work, which you hopefully will gain from as well. And that gets me to the end. There are some contact details here, and I am now looking forward to your questions. Da sind wir auch wieder aus dem... All right. Hello. Okay. Here we are. Here we are back in the Verstehbahnhof. Now in Kalle and synchronous. Was interessant, Anke. Es sind auch relativ viele Fragen. That was an interesting talk, Anke. There are many questions in the pad. Now, the most obvious question, of course, is about food and drink. And, of course, you can't really imagine the question, then if you, as MPs, cannot change that, who can? Who is responsible for changing this? And why hasn't it happened yet? I wish I could answer this question really in a really good way. There are, of course, answers. One of them is that the Council of Elders is responsible for it, which is formed out of members of parliament. So they have it, can't do it themselves. But I think the fact that some members of parliament are okay with not being able to drink in parliament is that they've gotten used to it, or too many of them think that's normal. And if when new people come into the parliament, they think, what? But Wolfgang Povicki was Vice-President in the last legislative period already. And he was extremely upset when he was in the presiding council, I think. And one or two days earlier I tweeted about how stupid I think this water ban is. And two members of parliament had fallen over the previous day. And when I was in front of his eyes the next time in the plenary, he interrupted the debate, talked to me and said, this member of parliament, Anke Domscheidberg, wants to turn the plenary hall into a dining hall. And what can you say to that? It's completely absurd. What I've just told the Council of Elders is that there is a small cafeteria in close to the plenary hall. And when there are 600-700 people there, that's a cafeteria with maybe 30 people to eat. And that's not really enough. And if you can't get bread already after at 9.30 or 10.30. And I made a formal complaint there to the Council of Elders. You need to have water to concentrate, to drink something. And so this is something of a personal project in this legislative period. And I would say it's looking promising. The new President of the Bundestag, Schleuble, was a guest in the left parliamentary group. And we asked her, of course, what does she think about drinking water in the parliament. And she promised me to have a positive influence there. And the parliamentary leader of the left group also promised this, which was different last year. So hopefully drinking water will be allowed one day and I will live to see the day. And that's good because we want to have you for longer. And then of course some questions about the new coalition. And maybe what you can do in cooperation with them maybe. So, introductory question, what in your view are the differences in digital politics between the left party and the Greens and the FDP, the Liberals? And are these unsurmountable or is that something where you could maybe work together and try to achieve the same goals? Because you have the expertise, maybe you have common goals. Well, there are, with any other party in the coalition, common things and differences. With the SPD, the Social Democrats, the large differences are probably in terms of security. Not all of them think like Saskia Esken, who is more compatible with us. There are SPD-Polished Titians, who are more like Züder or Zeehofer, so more conservative. And they also want to do hackback and things like that. So that's the issue there. With the Greens, we're probably compatible on the subject of sustainability. When being oriented towards the public good, it's going to be a bit more difficult and a huge problem with the Liberals, with the FDP. And they say the market is supposed to handle this and we see that the market doesn't handle this. We see this with education, with health, with fiber, optics, networking. And I think in other subjects here, the FDP is going to be the break then. And so we have to see first what is going to come there. They announced a lot of intentions about this very digital new government. I was very concerned that the new chancellor's office just handed away all the tasks about digitalization. And I expected that they would build out the resources they had. So what couldn't be done before out of lack of resources, that they would add some power there. Because in every ministry, or which is called a resort in the government, in each of them there is a lot of digitalization, which you can't operate out of it. But you have to see that even in the capacity to divide these resources, where they have to be compatible with digitalization about common goals, common standards, common processes. So this has to work together. And so you have a lot of projects, but no project program management. You don't have decent monitoring, no common strategy. And I don't see how this is supposed to change now under the new coalition. This was my first large frustration that they blocked any kind of leadership there, where you could have the leadership in the chancellor's office and they decided against it. And I thought that was a bad idea. But still, it looks overall for digitalization, I'm not going to be silent about it. It does look better than before. So a lot of things that I fought for a very long time are now at least in the coalition agreement. But I am still a bit cautious, because in the previous coalition agreement and in the one before, and in many of the state ones, they wrote the nicest things and then they didn't have more. They happened differently, so we still have to watch out. Yeah, you've just mentioned that the Liberals, in some of the issues that you find important, and many of the viewers probably find importance. The FTP is the one, the other one is on the brakes. And the Liberals are now in the Transport Ministry, which also is the digitalization industry. He is the kind of friend of the car drivers. What do you think of him? Oh, I haven't met him before. So he has nothing that has anything to do with digital. So I've looked him up, of course, on the search engine of my choice. I mean, it's that financial politic. Taxpolitiz, und then Trafficpolitiz, and also Agriculturalpolitiz. So digitalization is supposed to be everywhere in there, but this person hasn't had it as their subject really so far. I don't really know what I can expect from there. It's the first signals that came out of the new government. They haven't been the worst, so regarding data retention. In the coalition agreement, it still was pretty vague, and I thought, well, they will still keep it. But the law minister said, no, that's going to be abolished, which would be very nice if it happens. How the traffic minister, who has now the digital stuff in the name, at the beginning, we will have to watch out. He already made two statements, where he put a strong focus on the digital things, and it didn't sound too bad, so let's give him his 100 days, and then we will see. But with bandwidth expansion, I'm very skeptical, which is where I believe in the power of the communal expansion, and I don't think the companies can do this very well. So let's see what the FTP does. You mentioned telecommunications data retention. There was a question on that. What do you think about quick freeze? Is that a sensible compromise? Is it bullshit? Well, quick freeze is not saving things for no reason, but it is saving things for some reason. So I have a certain person for a certain reason under suspicion for a certain time, and I might not be able to prove it yet, because things are still going on. But I want to make sure that the data is not vanishing, because the communication companies will only save data for a few days. I think this makes some sense, if it's limited to a certain reason. The main problem we always had is that it's supposed to be saved for everyone for no reason. So if this goes away, that's already a good thing. The signals so far are not that great, but the government is also fairly new. You have to acknowledge that. But the Digital Services Act of the European Union is starting to take shape on the subject of cookies or ads that are based on your behavior. And I think those ads based on behavior are a very dangerous thing to all of us, because an incredible amount of, including trying to be sensitive data for all of us is being collected, and we don't even know what happens to this data. This is, in theory, constant GDPR-Violation. And we have to act against this on the European level. And this can only be possible with a ban of these kind of ads. And I would like for our federal government to be very active and vocal against this, and I have not seen that yet. There are some other questions about the general frustration tolerance that you need in parliament. The question of how you actually work with the lack of digital competency. Do you have any ideas of what you would like to push and what your colleagues in parliament across parliamentary parties and groups, how they could become more enthusiastic about these issues? How can the awareness of digital politics or digitalization can be increased and what lobbying might be necessary? So, lobbying work is in the digital sector being done very well for a few years now. Especially that certain things with a specific wording were found in the coalition agreement is due to very effective lobby work. So the suggestions that came from the CCC, but also some others such as the F5. Die Association also hat einen Impact. All of us, members of parliament, get something there during the electoral fight. And it was, for some of us, the first thing we dealt with these subjects. So this makes some sense and keeping it short and brief makes a lot of sense, because what we don't have a lot of, as members of parliament, is time. And what we have a lot is information overflow. So we have thousands of pages, then we don't have time to read it. If it fits onto a single page, then a lot of people might have still time to take it in. And otherwise, I think the most effective work can happen in the parliamentary group itself. So for a long time, within my own parliamentary group, I had some complaints and then eventually I was allowed to do a presentation internally. But I think we need this for all parliamentary groups. There are too many members of parliament who say, oh, I'm an agricultural politician, I'm a traffic politician. I'm all of this. And digitalisation is only going to be done by the network politicians. And that's not how it should work in a digital society. Everyone has to understand that it can't be like this. And we noticed this in the last legislative period as well, because between us, in a lot of subjects, the differences were a lot smaller than between the different parties and also between smaller than possibly within our own parliamentary group. So the network politicians could have one position there, which was compatible, compatible between us, such as upload filter, representatives of all parties found that was a bad idea. But if the parliamentary groups, which have the majority when they don't understand this and they just fall for three lobby lines, which some old industry dictates to them, then you have a problem. So you need, I would almost like to have an obligatory digitalisation training, but network politicians of all countries should be active within your parliamentary groups and educate your colleagues and the civil society can also do that part. Okay, maybe three short questions. We have actually passed a lot of time. What do you think about many electric vehicles, skateboards, things like that? Do you believe it's just e-cars that are needed on the streets? But what about others? Well, with electronic mobility, I am already annoyed for a while. And I think that's also in the coalition agreement that it's focused on cars. And it should, for instance, also look more towards bicycles. If it needs to include skateboards, electric ones, I wouldn't go that far, but definitely bicycles. So bicycles with which you can carry broader loads are also important, but also I think pedestrians should play a large role, which are also always forgotten. Good. Well, the health ministry now can employ more IT security people, perhaps with the new minister in place, Schultz-Hanzer. In the last days before Christmas, Karl Lauterbach told me in the plenary and asked me if I would be ready to work together with him across party borders, and I said yes, of course. And if there is going to be an appointment with him, then this will be one of the things that I will suggest to have more IT security people there. Also, you talked about the government, the parliament cloud. Can you briefly say what software is used there, the one that's not working? How does it work? Maybe could things change there? I don't know how the telephone conferences work, which services they use there, but this is being redone anyways. And there's currently no lack of solutions. So, for video conferences, we have used a lot of Webex in the digital commission, for instance. There are a lot of licenses there now. We still work on having a messenger, with which you can separately securely talk with one another. So, there should be an extra wire messenger being set up there. And I think there was another partial question. Yes, the cloud. The cloud is so terrible, because it keeps, if you are working together with another person, which a lot of people do, and then someone updates something and you see it, and then the other person opens and closes the dock and the new thing is there, but when I do it the next day, it's all gone, and this is, of course, very unfortunate. So, it is not funny and has caused a lot of grief already. But that doesn't matter now, because this is going to be redone. We get a new cloud. They've asked me, for instance, if I have a hint, or if someone has a great hint, what you should recommend to the Bundestag IT. I don't know. I have seen the systems. I don't know if it's well done, but we have to come to the end. This was very, very interesting. Of course, I know many of these things, but I'm supposed to tell you a lot of applause and love from the chat to you and for your work. And I'm very glad to hear all that. Of course, I'm very close. I know how much passion he's suffering. Yeah, because these are husband and wife talking right now, a wife and husband, I should perhaps say. Now, talking about the legacy website of Anke, has an expired certificate, I was told, and this has been repaired, as this was said. Sorry about that, and thank you. And I'm also supposed to tell you that after this, the stage at Klaus-Sauder will feature a spontaneous Zone-Chaos with the radio crew of the Casey Computer Club of Potsdam. Great people, all of them, and this is all great. And you should stay with us and see that and stay healthy. And thanks to Anke. And thank you for me too. And if there was any question that you weren't able to pose, please contact me. Ankedomuscheidberg.de with the new certificate will give you all the details. Goodbye.