 Welcome to the 21 convention. We're in Orlando, Florida. The year is 2020 and you're in for a treat. I'm going to be bringing Steve Brule on stage in just a second. He has the YouTube channel called Studio Brule, B-R-U-L-E, and he talks about freedom of speech and presumption of innocence, an important topic on a global level for men. Please welcome with me Steve Brule. Thank you. Tess, are we working? Can you hear me? Okay, thank you very much for that introduction and thanks to Anthony for hosting this conference and giving me a chance to talk here today. I'm going to be referring to my notes on Kindle here quite a lot because I actually switched this from a different presentation late in the game and just finishing this up over the over the last few days at the conference here. But because I think this is a very important topic, more important than my original, which was about alternatives to a traditional marriage for men looking for to pursue their reproductive urges. That one will be at the International Conference for Men in online this year, 2020 International Conference on Men's Issues. But having said that, my topic, you can see here feminism and the one-world government and why we must prepare and how. There's a full court press on to create a one-world government right now where they once used climate change as justification. They are now using the excuse of the pandemic, suggesting that we cannot move forward without full vaccination of everyone in the world and without resetting, quote, resetting the global economy. Can we move this slide? Oh, I have a clicker up here, right? Yes. Which button do I use? Okay, you got it. All right. You're going to see some slides of backup and refer to what I'm saying here. And this is right. Okay, President Trump stands in the way of this leftist agenda, which is why the Democrats support both Black Lives Matter and Antifa and encourage the escalating violence, race war, riots and looting, hoping to pin it on Trump. But for some reason, did that go? Nope. It's going backwards. No, no, no. Here we go. I'm sorry about this. Okay. But for some reason, the idea that the powerful of the world want to create a one-world government is seen as a conspiracy theory. It's anything but. The idea of a one-world government or a world government goes back to the Egyptian kings whose stated desire was to rule all that in the sun in circles. Similar sentiments were expressed by Chinese and Japanese emperors, and this has been presented in various forms ever since. Writers, rulers, philosophers from Dante, Kant, Lord Tennyson, Ulysses Grant and more have also pined for a world under one government, arguing that there would be increased cooperation and no need for armies. And many of the institutions needed for a one, a global governance are already in place. You're familiar with most of these probably. We've got the United Nations founded in 1945, almost immediately. World figures like Einstein, Winston Churchill and others argued that the UN's power was insufficient and that a federal world government was needed. Since then, the idea of a United Nations parliamentary assembly resurfaced from its original proposition in the 1920s by the now defunct League of Nations. On top of this, we've got an international criminal court at The Hague, World Trade Organization, the World Bank. We've got the World Police Force, Interpol. And the law of the sea was moved recently, about 30, 40 years ago, under the United Nations as well as now known as a convention on the high seas. There's even a non-profit organization called the World Service Authority that provides a world passport on the strength of an article in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and is intermittently accepted by over 170 countries today. A one world government will form one day and it will mark the beginning of a very long period of ever-increasing tyranny if we're not prepared. Let me move this one forward here. That a one world government will grow increasingly corrupt over time is guaranteed. All powerful organizations grow corrupt, those with no opponents grow so faster and worse. The one thing that keeps wayward governments of the world somewhat in check today is international pressure through trade sanctions and the threat of war from the other nations of the world. There will be none of that under a one world government, which will have control of the global military slash police force and the global economy through the monetary system. Today, political prisoners are held in Russia, China, North Korea, Cuba and more despite international scrutiny and pressure, which is why most nations of the world offer refugee programs. Under our present system, political dissidents whose lives are at risk for nothing more than their ideas can seek asylum in a friendly country and approximately 40,000 people seek asylum in the U.S. alone every year and there's a lot more in all the other countries as well. The acceptance rates for seeking asylum is 40 to 55 percent. That is a lot of people who are deemed to be fleeing for their lives due to nothing more than their ideas. Where would they go under a one world government? They will have nowhere to go. There will be no more political dissidents, not because the world is safe from corrupt governments, but because the entire world would be one enormous corrupt government with no place to escape. It's apocalyptic, but I feel strongly about this. We need to prepare for that now. As governments unite under one power structure with global reach, so must men unite in order to have the strength to resist the urge of those governments to grab crushing levels of power. The human rights of men have been under attack globally for many decades. Under the guise of equality, feminists have systematically been systematically dehumanizing white men, which was their original sworn enemy, since the formal launch of the feminist movement at the Seneca Falls Convention of 1848. And I suggest you watch this video if you're interested in how the feminist movement formed in the birth of feminism for more details on Studio Berlet. Ideological feminists have since fully adopted Marxist theory, almost in its entirety, starting in the late 1960s, as Aaron Pizzi frequently points out, replacing class with gender and capitalism with patriarchy. Black Lives Matter and Antifa have recently emerged as the militant wing of ideological feminism, while the Democratic Party has become its political muscle. And they are sowing hatred and violence for a reason. In this talk, I hope to convince you or show you why feminism and its subsidiaries like Black Lives Matter and Antifa are so powerful. And I hope to describe that role that feminism, which has taken control of the Democratic Party, plays in the long-running effort to forge a one world government. That men dominated and oppressed women throughout history as feminist claim is an abject lie, which I've dealt with in this particular video, The Birth of Feminism. What I'd like to highlight now is how men have been attacked and marginalized, not just in the public square with juvenile nonsense like man-spreading and mansplaining, but in law and public policy to such a degree that we must conclude that men's basic humanity has been deeply undermined. And this has been going on for a very long time, as evidenced by E. Elford Bax and his book, The Fraud of Feminism, written in 1913. I highly recommend you read that because this has been going on since for more than a hundred years. And humorously illustrated by Esther Viller, a woman, in the Manipulated Man first published in 1971. Both books highly recommended. Now, this is not by any means a comprehensive list, but just a selection of the systematic disadvantages that men face. I don't expect you to read all that, but, you know, glance over it if you will. All around the world, in the interest of time, not going to read it, but it's just to remind you yourself, if you need to remind yourself of these injustices, any one of these issues, and there are a lot more, if they affected women, would spark a global movement and generate billions of dollars in support, but nothing at all is forthcoming for men. The dehumanization of males is accelerating as feminism spreads around the world, and it is facilitated by the widely accepted idea that men are disposable. You've probably heard of this idea, this term before. Where does this idea come from? I want to talk about that for a minute. The idea that men, males are disposable is described in detail by Warren Farrell in The Myth of Male Power, and is the subject and title of a book by Michael Gilbert, the disposable male. This attitude is revealed on a daily basis and in no uncertain terms by our responses to serious events like the Boko Haram incidents. I don't know if you folks here remember that. It goes back about six years, I think. Did that go forward? No. Here we go. Since their formation in 2002, that's 18 years ago, Boko Haram has kidnapped young boys and forced them to become soldiers, child soldiers, and has slaughtered men and boys by the thousands, often burning them alive. And yet there was no broad public outcry until 276 girls were not burned alive, but merely kidnapped in 2014. Now obviously that's a bad thing as well. But burning people alive, why is there such silence on that? For so many years, 12 years of it. Their kidnapping led almost immediately to a global campaign called Bring Back Our Girls, and this which attracted celebrities, business leaders, national governments alike, including the White House. There's still no concern over the fate of boys and men at the hands of Boko Haram today. This is six years later. And there likely never will be unless men organize globally. Governments have proven that they will not take action. Why is this happening? It has to do with the moral basis for moral disposability, which I mentioned just a few minutes ago. Warren Farrell and others argue that in every culture throughout history, what is moral is behavior that is thought to promote the survival of the group. And what is immoral is the opposite. It's behavior that could or thought that could threaten the survival of the group. So this is the basis of every moral code in every culture throughout history. And it is consistent with the idea of survival of the fittest in the theory of evolution. Groups that survive enforce behaviors that benefit the group and prohibit behaviors that place the group at risk. In early history, the survival of humanity depended upon males being put in harm's way for the sake of the group. That's why males are considered disposable to this day. Males in all cultures were taught or forced to do this and they still do. If there was an early civilization that didn't, well, it's not here for that very reason. The males could not or would not defend it. This naturally led to the realization coded in almost every culture that for the sake of the survival of the group, the males must be disposable. Now control of a territory and therefore its resources is also a necessity for all living things. It is not optional. Wolves do it, monkeys do it, and as Jordan Peterson points out, even lobsters do it. It has been the reason for countless wars and rivers of blood because death awaits those who lack resources. The history of humanity is a story of men forced into competing for territory and resources and building and protecting the societies that they created. This necessity compelled men to build this world almost entirely unassisted by women whose main responsibilities necessarily lay in the domestic sphere throughout most of human history. Even today, it is men who invent, build, protect, and maintain virtually everything despite the near infinite and aggressive attempts to encourage and support those women who do want to contribute. There are women who want to contribute. But it's men that are building everything. To females, the human male is the resource. They compete for men in the way that men compete for resources. This is why women were not as loyal to their country and land as our men. First of all, women did not risk their lives acquiring, building, and protecting the country that provided them with absolutely everything they needed. So they were not as psychologically invested in it. But more importantly, they knew that if the men of their tribe lost to the men of another tribe, they would not only be spared but would be able to mate with and would be protected by even stronger men. They would still have children and their lives may even improve after their original providers were slaughtered. Most of this is subconscious, but history bears this out. In the Viking slaughter of early Britain, as Warren Farrell points out in one of his books, where women fell in love and married the conquerors who slaughtered their husbands. And the truth of this is seen in the way that women compulsively present themselves to sports heroes, political leaders, and wealthy businessmen, and in the way that women trade up in partnerships to more powerful men and almost force themselves on the ultra powerful. Move forward a little bit here. Power obsessed megalomaniacs have always been a part of humanity, and they always will be. From Genghis Khan to Alexander the Great, the Farrows of Egypt, and the Emperors of Rome, each of the top rulers saw themselves, not just as powerful men in their communities, but as the rightful emperor of the entire known world. They were not driven merely by the accumulation of wealth and luxury. They were driven by something much deeper in the human psyche, the lust to be the one top dog, king and emperor of all, a god-like ruler of the universe against whom no man may stand. It is this same psychic force that drives a prized fighter to reach for world champion status, but on a much larger scale. The super wealthy are compelled to battle for domination of the world, as certainly as a lobster is compelled to battle to expand and dominate its territory, as Jordan Peterson points out, which is its world. Success in competition triggers a positive feedback response in the individual that encourages not just satisfaction and a sense of accomplishment, but an increased drive to even greater competitiveness and aggression. The drive to compete is such a powerful obsession that it expresses itself in almost every social activity, even in casual conversations. And to these top human males, the entire globe is the territory under dispute. The earth itself, everything on it, including us, are the disputed resources. Humanity has not changed since the ancient days of emperors and pharaohs, and each of the ultra powerful in the world today sees himself as the first emperor of earth. But you cannot be an emperor unless the world is unified under one governing body, a one world government in the new world order to bring about a one world government if need to convince people that it's necessary. Lo and behold, we have been told that there are multiple crisis facing all of humanity that can only be addressed by, you guessed it, an organization with global reach. First we had climate change, and now the pandemic. This is not clicking properly through here. Here we go. Okay, we talked about that. Now, I don't believe that the pandemic or the corona coronavirus was deliberately created and released. There's no need to create a crisis because there's always a crisis at hand that can be used as an excuse or a weapon to whip up fear and justify the sort of lockdowns and loss of freedom that we are now seeing, like monkeys in the jungle, the ultra powerful just pick up a nearby rocker stick from the ground and use it as a weapon because they are everywhere. Crises like this are everywhere. They've always been with us. They always will be. The left has been trying to usher in their new green global utopia for decades. But the public has been lukewarm to their fear mongering. The fear of climate change has not been enough to motivate the public to accept the totalitarian vision of the globalist. They needed something bigger and the coronavirus presented them with an opportunity to bring the hammer down and force their agenda upon the entire world. Jordan Peterson says that if you can't understand why someone is doing something, look at the consequences of their actions, whatever they might be, and then infer the motivations from their consequences. I'm going to rely on this and I keep this in mind as we go through the rest of this presentation. Is this skipping two? It is skipping two at a time here. Okay, the coronavirus lockdown has shut down air travel for the masses. It has greatly reduced car traffic. It has greatly, and oil consumption is way down. It has given the masses a taste of universal basic income, destroyed small businesses, making workers beholden to large corporations. It has radically boosted the profits of the large corporations, radically increased the power of the super wealthy, and it is being used to rationalize green agendas and to make people accept that this is the new normal. The ultra powerful are pushing for health passports to be used, even for entry into supermarkets and public buildings. People are being arrested for not wearing a mask. Many jurisdictions are under quarantine with people only allowed to out of their homes in order to go to work or buy supplies. It has caused people to start policing their own neighbors. Just like previous, just like in previous murderous regimes, they have made people too frightened of each other even to gather, much less resist this massive takeover. In short, the consequences of the response to the scam has been the realization of the very goals that the radical left have unsuccessfully pursued for decades to a tee. A radical socialist world controlled almost entirely by a small group of extraordinarily wealthy and powerful people. It is globalism. This is not a coincidence. I hope this went too now. Maybe you can help me with this over there for just leave it where it is there now. Just one forward. Okay. Furthermore, the major global players like George Soros, Bill Gates, Henry Kissinger, Prince Charles and many others started insisting that the global economy be reset in accordance with you guessed it, the exact globalist goals that they failed to implement through negotiation. Almost as soon as the quarantines over the scam Demek began, it's almost as if they had their arguments prepared in advance, article after article in the mainstream media is pushing for this. And take a look at this tweet here next. Notice these are in March and April. Pandemic, a chance to reset the global economy. Get your company is ready for the great reset. Could you push it forward one place? Take a look at this tweet here from the United States and this, the United Nations, which is a glow, a radical feminist organization. I'm going to read it here for you because you probably can't read it at the back. The COVID-19 pandemic is demonstrating what we all know, millennia of patriarchy have resulted in a male dominated world with male dominated culture, which damages everyone, women, men, girls and boys. This is the time to rebuild more equal, inclusive and resilient societies. What they've been pushing for since the very beginning, that they were unsuccessful before the pandemic. Can you hit the next one please? As if on cue, global leaders like former British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and Henry Kissinger and many other world leaders began to insist we need the world, the global government in order to combat coronavirus within weeks of the start of the quarantines. Look at the dates of these here. This is Kissinger, April 6th, Gordon Brown, March 26th, we were barely into the quarantines before they were telling us we needed a one-world government. Flatten the curve was a blatant lie from the beginning and at this year's World Government Summit, as Salam alaykum, insists, quote, a world, a whole of government and a whole of society approach is essential not only for defeating the pandemic but for the recovery. Resetting the global economy under a one-world government has always been the goal of climate change activists and the scam DEMIC is being used to scare the world into compliance. But these leftist goals cannot be advanced without the cooperation of the United States. In other words, Trump is just about the only thing that stands in the way of a one-world government. The Democratic Party is the party of the leftists, the feminists, Black Lives Matter, Antifa and the globalists and they are encouraging and promoting riots, violence, looting and race war and trying to blame it on Trump in order to win the November election. With Trump out of the way, there is virtually no major public voice in the world that stands in the way of a one-world government in a new world order. The fall of the US to the globalist will be the fall of humanity into tyranny. What role does feminism play in all of this? It's an important question I think. Throughout history, the very powerful rulers of the world, without exception, needed and sought a secure, cheap and reliable workforce. Slavery was a common way to achieve this, but other mechanisms were also employed like indentured servitude, creation of caste systems, and the exploitation of workers who had no other options but to starve and let their families die. The only alternative to a system of compelled labor is for all citizens to have the right and responsibilities to take control of their own futures with the incentive that their right to enjoy the fruits of their own labor be protected by law as citizens with individual rights. These are the very things that leftists are attacking today. Using the coronavirus as an excuse, thousands of small businesses have been forced to shut down, and a great many will never reopen. While the mega corporations owned by the ultra wealthy were allowed to continue to operate, the profits of Amazon, Google, Walmart, Costco, and the other tech monopolies like Facebook, Twitter, and Zoom and many others have gone through the roof, while regular middle class business owners have been driven into bankruptcy, and this was predicted in advance. The low cost workforce now swells with the ranks of those whose businesses have been destroyed, and whose jobs at smaller competitor companies have been eliminated. So remember what Jordan Pearson says, infer the motivations from their consequences, and these are the consequences of this total global shutdown. The coalition of the super wealthy knows that they need to cooperate with one another at this stage in order to crush those who opposed a one-world government like Trump, and they all know that each of them sees themselves as a first emperor of earth. They know that there will eventually be a battle for power at the top after the world is brought to heel, but the coalition is a necessary stepping stone in the quest for ever more power. They have self selected for this battle. Non-megalomaniacs have dropped out of this race long ago, and what remains are the truly deeply lustful power mongers who feel so close to success that they can taste it. They are reaching for the highest level of power and status ever available in human history. Can you click at one? And they are fighting for a legacy for themselves and their descendants to be recognized as the first dynasties and the first true emperors of the entire planet earth. They also know that control of the world will be divided up among them even if they do not become the first emperor, just like the mafia divides up its territories among the top bosses after the bloodshed in the battle for leadership is over. And these megalomaniacs see all other men at best as work slaves peasants and pawns or perhaps even more accurately as a farmer sees his livestock. They nurture those that serve their purpose even with a convincing display of false respect and slaughter them without a second thought when it is profitable to do so or when they become a burden. They see you as they see their other assets forest resources oil resources and mineral resources to them you are merely human resources to be used. They view all women as potential harem members and play things. Can you click that for me? But more importantly they understand the power of using women to control the male work slave population. That's the main reason that the ultra wealthy support feminism sold strongly with untold billions or trillions of dollars. That is why feminism is their queen the most powerful piece on the chessboard. Feminism has been eroding the status of men for many generations a trick that wealthy powerful men could never have pulled off on their own. They could not have done this on their own. So how does this work? Largely due to lobbying by feminist organizations a woman today has the power to destroy a man's life upon her word. In many jurisdictions a single accusation of domestic violence or sexual assault even without evidence kicks in an entire team of professionals into action the net result of which is that the man loses his children his home much of his income his reputation and most of his friends and a lot of you guys know people either in that situation or you know someone who is. Think about this case of Johnny Depp whom we only know about because of his celebrity status Amber Heard was absolutely correct when she said that no one will believe you because you are a man it took 20 or 30 40 50 years to get to this point but that is absolutely true even after Johnny Depp's case no one will believe you because you're a man that's what feminism is doing to men. This is a result of five decades of feminism. Amber Heard's power came from feminism. Her power over Johnny Depp was nearly absolute and without proof of innocence Johnny would have been utterly destroyed like so many other men. Many men never recover from this and those that do are so focused upon protecting what they have managed to rebuild that they will not even speak about the abuse done to them for fear of being targeted a second time. No man is safe from the power of the false accusation as Strauss Khan former president of the international monetary fund found out in 2011. Christina Lagarde was installed as his replacement and women enjoy this power over their husbands and partners even without divorcing. This is the law. The mere hint that she is upset and might consider divorce is enough to make a great many men recoil in horror and give his wife literally anything she asks no matter the personal or family sacrifice required because every man knows about the horror of divorce court and each time the husband caves in he loses a little more of his will to resist. By her often ridiculous demands like remodeling the kitchen a third time or going on an overpriced luxury vacation she is pushing her husband's retirement further into the future and sentencing him to a life in which he will never escape his economic slavery a benefit that to enjoy a smidgen of retirement a benefit that she may have enjoyed her entire life at his expense and feminism is largely responsible for the greatly reduced human rights of men but why do the wealthy powerful men donate such an enormous amount of money to feminist organizations that openly hate men by the way as an aside I looked into these some global feminist organizations and there's uncountable numbers of them all of them well funded that the the amount of money that goes to feminism globally is gotta be in the multiple trillions of dollars but why remember that Juris Pearson said that if you can't understand what someone is doing something look at the consequences of their actions whatever they might be and then infer the motivations from their consequences the consequence of dehumanization of men is a submissive secure entrapped and reliable workforce but there's more a man with wealth and therefore independence is a potential competitor men by and large try to build their own wealth often with the goal of making themselves independent of the workforce and leaving a legacy for their children this wealth is no longer circulates in the economy but represents a man's part ownership in the means of production through his investments and through inheritance it can provide economic independence to future men who would otherwise be bound to submit themselves to the general pool of working man slaves economically free men are not only potential competitors but their absence from the slave pool pushes the cost of labor up women on the other hand are net consumers they are more likely to buy the latest glitzy bobble and since their wealth is usually not earned but granted to them through divorce or inheritance the labor of men in other words they often do not have the same sense of prudence about finances that men have who have had to earn every dollar so prices that can be grossly inflated as we see with the majority of products targeted at women it is also for this reason that women are so strongly targeted in advertising they control the majority of discretionary spending the wealthy the super wealthy know this and so it is very important to them to encourage a sense of dissatisfaction with life in women a dissatisfaction which can be remedied by purchasing new stuff and if that's not enough then divorce ensures the transfer of wealth from men to spend thrift women often even to the point of utterly destroying the man furthermore even though men pay the majority of the taxes collected by governments this money is overwhelmingly spent on women imagine how much worse that would be under a one world government a one world government will be a feminist government just like the united nations which will almost oh i had that here which will almost certainly be controlled by feminists so one world government will be much worse impoverishing the men who might otherwise climb to economic independence has other easily recognizable benefits for those at the very top an impoverished man is no threat as a competitor an impoverished man needs his job often right up to the end of his life he cannot afford to complain or make waves he cannot afford to upset his boss he is now a compliant work slave for life and i have witnessed this exact change in newly divorced men that i've worked with a man who is forced to work to the end of his days is more likely to die soon after retirement thereby reducing the cost of pensions paid out a man is often well past his prime when everything he has sacrificed for is torn from him he is more costly to the business and may not be as productive as a younger man if he falls into depression and commits suicide the business may not have to pay any pension at all and they will replace him with a younger cheaper worker remember if you can't understand infer the motivations from their consequences and these are the consequences of dehumanizing men destroying men who have mostly served their purpose has no downside for the ultra powerful the destroyed man's resources are recirculated into the economy as he sells his investments in order to survive and so his part ownership in the means of production returns into the hands of the ultra powerful the number of potential competitors by the way the share of ownership basically all the major corporations of the world the share percentage of ownership has increased in the hands of the already ultra powerful as a direct result of this crackdown the destroyed the number of potential competitors is reduced and another female is released into the haram pool with her ex-husband's money to spend feminism has also successfully lobbied to lower job entry and promotional requirements for females while maintaining higher standards for men or even barring men from consideration in many cases this is part of an effort to place as many women as possible in charge of as much of society as possible and as quickly as possible often favoring comically incompetent women over extraordinarily qualified men in other words feminism has resulted in women being given near absolute power over men in private and public life and in the workplace and this effort is accelerating again the question is why the super wealthy are super wealthy only only because they have an incredibly sharp and well-tuned sense of where the levers of power truly lie that's why they're powerful and wealthy they know where those levers are they are not fooled by flashy cars wild claims big muscles or ego trips the ultra wealthy never foolishly waste their money this is important they never foolishly waste their money and they are spending uncountable billions if not trillions of dollars promoting feminism everywhere in the world they have a nose for power and there's not a single chance in an infinite universe that the wealthy and powerful are unaware of the power and control available by elevating women over men through feminism there is not one sliver of humanitarianism goodwill or altruism involved and even though our culture is deeply gynocentric they are not even motivated by gynocentrism it is but a circumstance that they take advantage of everyday people are gynocentric but the ultra powerful are strategic and they are fully focused on the levers of power one of which is feminism's incredible ability to subdue and subjugate men the workhorses of society and civilization so let me ask you this how do the most notorious organized criminals in the world control the men in their circle they threaten their families and the men fall completely in line the wealthy fund feminism and feminism threatens a man's deepest men's connection with his family the deepest and most powerful connection a man will ever feel in his life and men fall in line the super wealthy fund feminism because it is one of the best tools to control men and keep them trapped to the workforce through economic slavery demanding women with the power to destroy the men in their lives will keep those men under control far better than an army of brutal overseers ever could the brilliance of feminism is that it turns every woman into an unpaid overseer of the men in her life constantly told that she is oppressed on all sides she is ever vigilant ever watchful quick to complain quick to make demands quick to punish and quicker to destroy every man is now scrutinized and controlled in the workplace in public and in his own home not only are these overseers unpaid but they extort men's money through the threat of divorce or false accusations they put it and put it back into the hands of the super wealthy by buying mountains of worthless glitzy baubles every dollar spent supporting feminism likely returns ten dollars through women's obsession with buying new shiny objects and remodeling the home and by going on overpriced vacations with her use of the divorce industry which chains impoverished men to a workforce from which death is the only escape by amping up women's desire to acquire using men's money they ensure that very few men ever escape economic slavery much less become a threatening competitor if feminists secretly understand any of this it is to their delight because they are consumed with the hatred of men their sense of inferiority their anger and lust for power even blinds them to the ultimate fate of women in the future one world world government that they are helping to create which is sex slave once they have served their purpose helping to usher in a one world government these powerful men will see women in the same way that all powerful men in history have viewed peasant women as harem members for the most beautiful and domestic servants for the plane even the most beautiful woman will be sent back to endure the mercies of their families once their beauty fades exactly as it has happened in the past and women will compete for a spot they will compete for a spot in a wealthy man's harem in droves women throughout history have gone for the most powerful man they can get and that means upwards in social status a woman sees powerful man as being at her back extending his power and status onto herself which by the way is how Kamala Harris achieved her success the overwhelming majority of women will happily share a bed with a powerful super powerful man with a thousand other women rather than stoop to commit herself to a man below her status level and under a one world government all men will have been forced below her status level all men all working men once and once in place this will last a thousand years or more let's talk about the upcoming election did that go oh there we go for decades the democrats have portrayed the republicans as the party of white people but how did democrats sell racism against white people as virtue and why first of all we need to recognize that the democratic party might as well be called the feminist party of the united states because it is the party of radical feminism much like the united nations and the feminist dehumanization of men began a transformation decades ago when they tried to explain that it was privilege that gave men power privilege the wealthy women who dominated the feminist movement decades ago could not deny that they too held privilege and this started a procession of enemy labels a practice by the way that feminists deride as othering and these can you okay here we go the sin of privilege evolved from male privilege to white privilege the white guilt white fragility and now most recently just plain whiteness this went too far there we go it's not stopping on one can you click it once please here we go and this last step was their most powerful invention for stirring up hatred racism and violence to date feminists go to great lengths to disguise this racist invention by claiming that whiteness doesn't refer to the color of your skin but to white culture by which they then claim to mean western culture and they further clarify this to mean patriarchy capitalism and and democracy the problem with western culture and this is important is that it does not have a face and it is very hard to get angry hysterical and murderously violent over complex all-encompassing and abstract concept like culture when you hear the term culture you quite rightly think of western music from jazz classical blues hip-hop rap you think of sports like basketball football baseball hockey uh all kinds of sports you think of science you think of film and theater and industry language literature politics and law et cetera et cetera et cetera in other words you think of all the things that make up a culture which includes all of the races of people both male and female straight and gay who live and thrive within that culture western and culture western culture includes everything and everyone that lives and thrives within western society western culture does not have an identifiable face on the street a whiteness does whiteness has a face you see on the street whiteness is in clearly identifiable on the street on television in the workplace and in political office whiteness is an identifiable cohort of people the very fact the very fact that feminists had to go to great lengths to justify the use of their term whiteness instead of western culture reveals that they know they know that they are deliberately targeting white people to inflame a violent racist uprising on the street these feminists call themselves scholars and they know that a scholar's primary concern and duty is specificity in the use of words they did not embrace the term whiteness because it was the only or even the best term to describe the issues that they critique they embrace the term whiteness because they know that it will inflame a race war and it is no accident that the term whiteness miraculously appeared in feminist discourse only after black lives matter emerged to claim that the united states is saturated in anti-black racism which it is not black lives matter which is a feminist movement not a black movement it is a verifiable feminist movement as their website made clear until they recently scrubbed the content also went to great lengths to create a victim story and even though their victims are almost without exception violent criminals the narrative stuck because the liberal controlled mainstream media promotes it heavily and the democrat party embraces it once they had created a victim narrative surrounded around blackness surrounding centered around blackness they needed a villain narrative centered around whiteness and it was duly created the term whiteness was deliberately chosen knowing that it would be understood by the already violent and angry segment of our culture as justification to and permission to eliminate the newly identified problem eliminate whiteness eliminate white people and thus start a race war and that's exactly what we're seeing smash the patriarchy feminist lingo has transformed into smash whiteness and there's a reason for inciting over a race war we will see in a second the authors and preachers of whiteness is the problem are very smart and powerfully supported they are smart enough and well funded enough to successfully turn male privilege white privilege white guilt white fragility and now just plain whiteness into household terms heard and understood throughout the western world they have been perfecting this game for many decades read this headline here and there are many more like it why we need more than speeches about the problem of whiteness what they don't speech is not enough for them they want action and that action they're getting is violence violence in the street we're seeing white people being attacked in the street you've probably seen the videos just for being white casually beat up an 87-year-old woman in new york city was slammed pause for a moment and reflect on this claim whiteness is the problem where have we heard similar sentiments before and wasn't that regime intent on global domination the goal of the left is to destroy western culture so that they can usher in their utopian new world order provoking a race war goes a long way towards smashing the patriarchy which now means smashing whiteness whoops one back there's hold it there so 21 forward please yeah so to answer the question how did feminist democrats semi-slash democrats start a race war first they sold the public the idea that western culture meaning patriarchy capitalism and democracy were responsible for all of the problems of the world then they replaced western culture with whiteness which is an easily identifiable face on the street then the idea that whiteness is the problem naturally became the rallying cry for all of their duped supporters the democrats now sit back and watch the violence and destruction with glee pretending to be innocent and why in order to provoke a race war and spin the republican party as the party of whiteness the party of racism and therefore the party that represents all of the problems in the world in their wildly bigoted imagination whiteness is the problem therefore trump and the republicans are the problem oops back one there the ultimate goal is to replace trump with an easily controlled puppet thus removing all resistance to the formation of a one world government they will have that puppet in kamala harris who has a long history of corruption in the pursuit of personal power and was hand-picked to be president it is clear that biden will not serve at full term if elected everybody can see that so harris is the globalist candidate this is a decidedly tricky anti-democratic move knowingly putting kamala harris into power kamala harris like christine legard of the imf before her becomes a next in a long line of women hand-picked and placed in prominent positions of power by the ultra wealthy who support feminism globally feminism is their queen with the power to subjugate men all of humanity will suffer under one more government but none more so than men men are seen as a giant pool of work slaves who must be prevented from becoming competitors and thus a risk to the ultra powerful but that is also our strength because this world cannot run without men's labor in fact if even half of the world's working men of the world walked off the job at 10 a.m the world would grind to a halt before lunch but we must be organized human rights especially for men were never granted willingly but were fought for at the cost of millions of lives and rivers of blood over thousands of years these rights are under attack and in a one world government there will be no international community to object there will be no safe havens to run towards for a taste we've gone too far can you back up a bit here no one forward okay for a taste of what a one more government without a global union of men would look like consider how the companies now owned by these globalists treat their employees in third world countries the idea that corporations like Nike and tech companies that run out of india for example would voluntarily share any of their profits where their workers is laughable even when faced with international pressure today these companies continue to use slave like labor and ignore legitimate needs of their workers and it will be much worse under a one world government a one world government would have no opposing countries that could sanction them for human rights abuses and political dissidents would have no sanctuary countries to run to as refugees we are looking at the worst possible nightmare and it will come to pass if we remain complacent our mission today and this will sound uh excessively uh ambitious to a lot of you I agree it is but it's to form a global union of men all of these multiple multiple men's groups there's already it's already kind of started you know there isn't a uh uh overriding umbrella to organize all this but we need a global union of men complete with dues global and local organization benefits for members funds available to defend members and legal attack teams to take on spearhead issues like the strategy modeled by the national coalition for men that the ultra wealthy will succeed in the end I think is inevitable and I hope to convince you that we need to stand up for our human rights where they will disappear our quality of life will dramatically decline and this brief post world war two period will fade into the history books as an aberration this brief period that we live in is the only period in history in which significant numbers of people enjoyed a modicum of prosperity and freedom this period we live in is the aberration now and it's under threat this is not about one industry or one country the very humanity of men is under attack globally all men of all races globally and we are being dehumanized and acclimated to that dehumanization feminism's role in the one world government is to turn all women into an army that will control the male work slaves of the world women become a shield women become a shield protecting the ultra powerful from men who might otherwise rise up as competitors and they become an army of unpaid overseers who scrutinize men in every sphere of their lives even in their own homes this is a hard pill to swallow for some men because we often think of ourselves as rugged individualists but it is the height of naivety to believe that an all-powerful elite will voluntarily restrain themselves from rebuilding a system of slavery they will not they must be restrained by force and that force is you and me the men who invent design build and maintain everything and that's all i have for you today so i'll happily take questions if you have some i have a question uh am i on can you do you can you shed some light on what would happen with our financial system if a one world government were to take place and would that perhaps topple the economy in our stock market and the financial system as we know it that's way outside of my field of research i couldn't guess i i would guess that they're going to try and and keep things functioning along smoothly as possible but the pressure will be to keep the men down and and ultimately feminism plays that role for them you know so putting women in positions of power feminism places men under scrutiny everywhere when it comes to the financial systems of the world they will do whatever they think is necessary to keep themselves and keep the economy rolling they're not going to permanently crush the economy in my opinion they want to they want a good world to live in for themselves they just don't want the working class in you know threatening them or competing with them or demanding higher wages or a good quality of life or any of that thank you how's it going uh i thought that was a really good uh presentation um thank you my question was um would you think that the new world older new world order is synonymous synonymous with the one world order one world government yeah it's the same it's one and the same pretty much okay because like when i think of like a new world order i kind of think of like this more of a patriarchy than a matriarchy so it's kind of more eye-opening because i've always thought like the top one or like one percent of one percent are like more so guys and you know feminists so i just like you know it's more eye-opening to me that way yeah the new world order and one world government efforts have been around for a long long time i mean it's pretty much right after world war two when the present crop of people in power uh started uh lobbying and pushing towards that unifying the whole world under a one world government and the term new world order to my understanding is pretty much interchangeable okay the new world order is to have a one world government all right thank you for that hi uh thank you i like to hear uh speech it was uh eye-opening to me i didn't know most of that stuff honestly but um i wanted to ask you said you wanted to like have more men understand this like i didn't understand this before and like reaching across like i'm young i'm 21 years old so like a lot of my friends they're in relationships or ignorant they don't understand a lot and you want to form a community of men so like how would like i got i found this out through my mom so like i guess i'm blessed with the opportunity but how do you how do we plan on forming like getting more men to understand this keep putting the message out there events like this um speak about it with your friends you see a you see a video or a presentation that really strikes you know speaks to you ask your buddies to look at it you know then you can talk about it as groups you know that helps to get people more familiar with the issues all right thank you hi i wanted to ask you more about the um the tie-in with uh harems and the connection with the one world government right um i'm sure you're familiar with a lot of human trafficking that like goes on and it's so potentially a worldwide opera operation uh by these same groups potentially uh that might be a rabbit hole but what do you think of the theory that um you know like we're kind of only getting more exposure of this because we're kind of blessed with the internet uh for all of its cons um it's easier for the masses to get exposed to this information that it's ever been in human history i wonder um i've heard a theory that uh wars are kind of started and perpetuated so that human trafficking can take place because you know men are all mobilized and tied up nations are preoccupied with the war you know a bread and circuses style um what do you think of the theory that like wars are not for anything other than the ultra international pseudo one world powers to make human trafficking more fluid and increase their operation and hold on that well i'm not i haven't been exposed to that material but it doesn't sound very likely to me okay you know um the wars have been fought over resources and territory just like the animals do you know uh you can't survive without a territory you can't survive without resources when it comes to for the ultra powerful that's their interest they they have no problem finding sexual partners you know they don't have to create the ultra powerful don't have to create a human trafficking situation in order to have sexual partners they're everywhere for them you know um the the issue there's another issue of the pedophilia rings that are coming to light which is different as well if that's if that pans out to be true i think the motivation behind that is to um get dirt on one another it's insurance policies like the organized criminals have you know you you get incriminated by being in a group that has pedophilic relationships they document it and everybody has the same insurance policy so nobody nobody um rats anybody out because they can release this information you know for instance of bill clinton's with a 14 year old girl i'm speculating here i don't i don't know i haven't seen that these pedophilia accusations have been proven there's a lot of research and talk about it but one of the reasons i would speculate that they would have that kind of ring is not so much for the sex but for the insurance that it gives everybody in that powerful group over everybody else in that powerful group you know in an organized crime ring every every initiate might have to vote and shoot somebody and they document it right and if he decides to rat out uh one of his buddies well they they get rid of i think that's the if from what i've heard that is the significance of the whole epstein thing yeah that's what i was referring to yeah it's like how do you trust anything that's going on globally when there might be a concentration of blackmail material that could have been heavily influencing all these really important decisions that are you know trickling down to us and uh as a last thing i'm glad you mentioned the pedophilic angle on this just with that that new netflix show cuties and there's like that agenda is kind of getting a little bit more bold uh perhaps um so i just wanted to leave with that and uh thanks yeah thank you thank you okay once again thank you very much folks