 Stories and content in Weird Darkness can be disturbing for some listeners and is intended for mature audiences only. Parental discretion is strongly advised. Welcome Weirdos, I'm Darren Marlar and this is Weird Darkness. Here you'll find stories of the paranormal, supernatural, legends, lore, crime, conspiracy, mysterious, macabre, unsolved and unexplained. Coming up in this episode of Weird Darkness. On Easter Sunday, 1475, in the city of Trent, a two-year-old boy named Simon was found dead. This one act triggered a wave of anti-Semitism that wiped out a community of Jewish males and threatened the power of a pope, all from the death of one child. I am innocent, that mark of mine will never be wiped out. It will remain forever to shame the county for hanging an innocent man. Alexander Campbell said these words on June 21st, 1877, shortly before his hanging. And true to his word, the handprint he left behind refuses to fade away, no matter how hard people try to remove it. A century ago, in July 1920, the illustrated police news ran a single story on its front page, complete with a drawing of a man lying on top of a woman, both surrounded in blood. But even more disturbing, a young boy, very much alive and apparently watching the whole thing. It took a while before the first woman to be hanged would take place in the USA. But in 1778, it finally happened. And her name was Bathsheba Spooner. But first, the scientist Isaac Newton is best known for his being the first to create the theory of gravity. But now we've learned it's very possible that would never have happened had this scientist not had a bit of sorcerer in him as well. We begin there. While you're listening, you might want to check out the Weird Darkness website. At WeirdDarkness.com you can find paranormal and horror audiobooks I've narrated, 24-7 streaming video of horror hosts and classic horror movies. You can find my other podcast, Church of the Undead. Plus, you can visit the Hope in the Darkness page if you're struggling with depression, anxiety or thoughts of suicide. And you can also shop the Weird Darkness store where all profits go to support depression, awareness and relief. You can find all of that and more at WeirdDarkness.com. Now, bolt your doors, lock your windows, turn off your lights and come with me into the Weird Darkness. Often wrongly portrayed as a cold rationalist, Isaac Newton is one of history's most compelling figures. It is true that he was capable of the most precise and logical thought it is possible for a human to achieve. His three years of obsessive work that gave birth to the Principia, containing his theory of gravity, stands as the greatest achievement in science. Just as certainly though, he was also consumed with what we would now view as completely unscientific pursuits, alchemy and biblical prophecy. Alchemy was a major passion of Newton's. In a footnote on page 21 of Richard Westfall's meticulous biography, Never at Rest, which I've linked to in the show notes, the author states, my modes of thought are so far removed from those of alchemy that I am constantly uneasy in writing on the subject. Nevertheless, my personal preferences cannot make more than a million words he wrote in the study of alchemy disappear. Historian and novelist Rebecca Stott wrote in her novel Ghost Walk, which I've also included in the show notes, that with those words, Westfall admitted to wishing that he could make those million words disappear. That may be stretching it somewhat, but clearly Newton's alchemy is a bit of an embarrassment to modern scholars. Then there was Newton's biblical prophecy. In almost the same years that he was working on the Principia, he also wrote a treatise on Revelation in which he talked about souls burning in lakes of fire. With talk like that, he could have been the lyricist for Iron Maiden. He had the hair too. Tempting as it is to dismiss all of this as somehow removed from Newton's science, his belief in spirits and what the alchemists called active principles almost certainly allowed him to conceive gravity in the mathematical form that we still use today. In Newton's time, the natural philosophers had turned their backs on astrology and with it the idea that influences could simply leap across empty space. Instead, impulses had to be transmitted through things touching one another. So if there was a force coming from the sun that moved the planets, then it had to do so through a medium. Perhaps it was a fluid driven to circulate the rotation of the sun which carried the planets around. This was the thinking of French philosopher René Descartes. Yet Newton could not make the mechanical solution of Descartes work. The vortices simply could not reproduce the changes in speed of the planets as they approached the sun. Alchemy offered a way out by having a philosophical underpinning that non-material influences, spirits, existed. These needed no physical contact and could induce transformations or movement through the triggering of active principles within an object. Primed to believe in these ideas, Newton discovered a simple, elegant mathematical equation that described the behavior of gravity without the need for an intervening fluid. Gravity apparently worked across empty space. He called this principle action at a distance and instead of spirit began using the word force to better reflect its mathematical character. His equation also reveals the active principle that governs an object's response to gravity, its mass. With such direct analogies to spirits and active principles, Newton must surely have felt some sort of indication for his alchemical beliefs. The theory of gravity was so successful that it became one of the triggers for the age of enlightenment. Although hardly anyone now believes in the concept of alchemy, we do still believe that gravity can exert an influence across empty space. Engineers still use Newton's maths to launch satellites and send spacecraft to distant planets. So was Sir Isaac a scientist or a sorcerer? In truth, he was a bit of both. And that was why he could succeed where others had to. On Easter Sunday, 1475, in the city of Trent, a two-year-old boy named Simon was found dead. This one act triggered a wave of anti-Semitism that wiped out a community of Jewish males and threatened the power of a pope, all from the death of one child. Plus, Alexander Campbell said, I am innocent, that Mark of Vine will never be wiped out. That was in 1877, and the handprint he left behind refuses to fade away, and no one knows why it keeps reappearing. These stories and more when Weird Darkness returns. My doc agrees that I need to lose a few pounds. I knew that going in, but he also told me that the meds I'm taking for my type 2 diabetes aren't going to do me much good if I finish each meal with ice cream or cheesecake. I kind of knew that in advance too. But cutting back on carbs and sugars is a lot easier said than done. I've tried a lot of protein bars while on the road, but I swear it's like eating non-sweetened chocolate-dusted particle board. But now I travel with built bars. Built bars taste like candy bars. In fact, I'm now using them for my dessert. And at about 150 calories per bar, less than 3 grams of sugar, up to 19 grams of protein, I can satisfy my sweet cravings guilt-free. Visit WeirdDarkness.com slash Built in Try a Box. You can go for a variety pack of several flavors to try or pick and choose to build a box of your own. Use the promo code WeirdDarkness at checkout and get 10% off your entire purchase. That's WeirdDarkness.com slash Built. On Easter Sunday, 1475, in the city of Trent, a German-Italian city in what is now northern Italy, a tragedy occurred. A 2-year-old boy named Simon was found dead. His death, a devastating blow to his family, would set in motion a chain of events that would leave almost all of the male members of the Jewish community in Trent dead. Create an almost heretical flock of devoted followers who saw him as the new baby Jesus, and perpetuate and foster widespread anti-Semitism in the region for hundreds of years. According to historian Pochia Xia in his book Trent 1475 Stories of a Ritual Murder Drial, which I have leaked to in the show notes, Simon went missing in the early evening of Thursday, the 23rd of March, and the following day, Good Friday, the boy's father had asked the prince-bishop of the city, Johannes Hinderbach, for help in locating his missing son. Searches ensued and by Easter Saturday, Simon had lightened on the small Jewish community in the city. The chief magistrate, Giovanni De Salis, had the households of the three main Jewish families searched, but Simon was not to be found. Then on Easter Sunday, Seligman, a cook in the household of Samuel, a money lender, discovered Simon's body in a water cellar on Samuel's extensive property. As all historians agree, the body had clearly been planted there. Samuel could have fled, had up until this point enjoyed an amical relationship with the city's authorities, so instead he trusted the system and reported the discovery. He also insisted that all members of the community stay put, including visitors who just happened to be in town for the Jewish Passover. That Samuel came forward and complied with the authorities was never mentioned in the ensuing trials. In the aftermath of the discovery, things escalated quickly. Anti-Jewish feeling in the city had recently been inflamed by the arrival of an itinerant Franciscan preacher, Bernardino de Feltre, who had spent the Lenten season railing against Jewish usury and amplifying local hostilities. There were others in the local community, Shah writes, who had exploited the vulnerability of this small religious minority in order to blackmail members of the Jewish community. All of these elements coupled with centuries-old rumors of blood libel, the dangerous myth that Jews used the blood of Christian children in their religious rituals, combined to create a kind of tinderbox of hatred that was sparked by Simon's death. Over the course of several months, the entire Jewish community were arrested and tortured and were forced to confess to having murdered Simon in order to use his blood in their Passover rituals. At first, Samuel was stood several bouts of torture and protested that Jews simply did not use human blood in their rituals. When he reached the limits of his endurance and in an effort to spare others, he confessed that only he and one other had suffocated Simon with a handkerchief. Other members of the community were forced both to confess and to invent fictitious religious motivations for exaggonating the child. By the time the torture was over, 15 male members of the Jewish community were sentenced to death. They were subsequently burned to death. Interestingly, female members of the community escaped on the grounds that, as women, they were unable to participate in these rituals. They were eventually freed in 1478 after the Pope intervened. The news of the trials spread throughout Northern Italy to Veneto, Lombardi and Tyrol. By 1479, Jewish moneylending had been banned and by 1486, Jews were expelled from the region. While Hinderbach supported the trials and even forged documents to promote the idea that Jews in Trent were responsible for Simon's death, the Pope was not so sure. In early August 1475, Pope Sixtus IV commanded Hinderbach to suspend the trials until his representative, Battista De Giudisi, arrived in Trent. At every turn, Hinderbach thwarted De Giudisi's attempts to investigate. De Giudisi was not granted access to those accused and was denied proper access to the original trial documents. When De Giudisi voiced concerns about the process at Rome, he was accused of being paid off by Jews. He eventually wrote several treatises, including an apology for the Jews, defending himself and the Jewish community of any wrongdoing. In 1478, Sixtus IV issued a papal bull on the matter that was something of a political compromise. He accepted that the trials in Trent had been legal but did not acknowledge either the conclusions of the trial or the supposed cause of death of the child. He also reasserted papal protections for Jews and reiterated the ban on blood libel trials. While his power struggle played out in the halls of ecclesial power, a different, more popular movement was gaining support in northern Italy. There were many who wanted to canonize the murdered toddler. Within three weeks of Simon's death, a Paseo, an account of his martyrdom, was circulating throughout the region. Hinderbach gathered together documentation that included over a hundred miracles supposedly performed by the boy martyr and support for his canonization as a saint gathered steam in Austria, Italy, and Germany. Sixtus IV, however, was having none of it. The Simon of Trent cult was dangerous and a threat to his authority. He forbade the production of images of Simon, although many grisly, violence-induced woodcuts of his murder have survived. He was also understandably alarmed by the ferocity of devotion Simon inspired. De Judici reported in his Apology for the Jews that the people in Trent adored their blessed one as a second Christ and as a second Messiah. Statements like this, which border on heresy, were troubling to the Franciscan pope who correctly noted that toddlers are incapable of choosing to die as martyrs. As Christopher McKevitt, a professor at Dartmouth, told the Daily Beast, Sixtus IV did not canonize Simon of Trent, not because he was particularly sympathetic to the plight of Jewish communities, but because he was determined to uphold papal authority. The popes had made clear that accusations of blood libel and putting Jews on trial for such claims was unacceptable. Part of Sixtus IV's refusal to canonize the child as a martyr was motivated by what was in his mind a far more pressing problem involving non-Christian murderers and persecutors. In 1480, the Ottomans invaded southern Italy and drew steadily closer to Rome, the pope, and the heart of Christianity. It was a political and military threat as much as a religious one. Sixtus IV wanted martyrs to rally Christians to the anti-Ottoman cause. He turned to five Franciscans who had died attempting to evangelize in Muslim countries roughly a century earlier. There was very little popular interest or support for these martyrs. They had been demonstrably unsuccessful and had failed to convert any Muslims whatsoever. On the contrary, as Macavit tells it, when Franciscans engaged in efforts to evangelize in Muslim countries, they tended to focus on fellow Christians living in Muslim lands, merchants, mercenaries, and captives. But these martyrs, who, like Sixtus IV, were Franciscans, were politically and religiously useful. In his exquisitely written and recently published The Martyrdom of the Franciscans, Islam, the Papacy, and an Order of Conflict, link in the show notes, Macavit shows that Sixtus IV found that martyrdom was useful for Christians as a way to depict the Ottomans not as a rival for political and economic power in the Mediterranean and Eastern Europe, but as a primordial threat to Christians and Christendom. Stories of martyrdom assimilated the Ottomans with demonic forces that were the enemy of goodness, virtue, and salvation. Over time, Macavit shows, death by Saracen came to rival other definitions of what made someone a martyr. All of Sixtus IV's power, however, could not crush the cult of Simon the Child martyr. Stories, poems, and images of his supposed martyrdom continued to circulate. In 1588, Pope Sixtus V beatified him, he was never made a saint, and approved his veneration and Trent. It was only in 1965, in the wake of the Holocaust and Vatican II that Pope Paul VI removed Simon of Trent from the Roman Martyrology and formally tried to suppress his cult. Yet most of the statues and images of Simon in the city of Trent are, as Sarah Lipton has noted, unaccompanied by placards explaining the anti-Semitic history of his veneration. A few years ago, a Reddit thread for traditional Catholics discussed the feast day of Simon of Trent, and there is even a wildly anti-Semitic webpage bearing his name. Five hundred years after his death, slanderous propaganda about the tragic death of this abducted child continues to languish online and among conservative groups. As children, we are taught that justice will always prevail, but when we grow up, we notice far too often this is not the case. There is injustice everywhere, and it should be our responsibility to fight for those who have suffered without being guilty of doing anything wrong. Sometimes we notice injustice, but it is much too late to change the course of events. People often say one should never judge another person without knowing the whole truth, but sometimes judgment is inevitable, and in worse cases, the results of our interactions can have fatal consequences. This story is about a mysterious handprint that has remained an unexplained mystery up to today. Experts have analyzed the handprint using sophisticated technology, but no one can answer why this handprint keeps reappearing. We discuss a man whose frightening cry for justice can still be heard, and we can only wonder if a horrible mistake took place many years ago. I am innocent and let this be my testimony. I was nowhere near the scene of the crime. That mark of mine will never be wiped out. It will remain forever to shame the county for hanging an innocent man. These ominous words were the last words of Alexander Campbell, a man who was hanged on the prison's gallows on Black Thursday, June 21, 1877. This remarkable and tragic incident happened more than 140 years ago, but every day since then Alexander Campbell is still trying to tell us that he is innocent. Campbell was a tavern owner who, with three other convicted Molly McGuire's, was hanged for the murders of two mine operatives, but was he really guilty? Moments before his death, as he was led out of his jail cell, Alexander Campbell slammed his open hand against the wall of his cell and left his handprint on it. It was his only way to say that he was innocent. Campbell also said the handprint would remain forever on the wall to prove his innocence, and it remained just as he said it would. Along with him, three other very brave Irish coal miners were hanged that day in the athrocyte coal region of Pennsylvania. John Donahue, Michael Doyle, and Edward Kelly all convicted of conspiracy to murder two of their foremen. The investigation, prosecution, and arrests were carried out by representatives of the mine owners who had money, power, and of course the law on their side. No one of the convicted expected mercy from them, and so they were executed. The men were also associated with the Molly McGuire's pro-union organization and anyone who was pro-union was a Molly. Those so-called Molly's were the immigrants who fought for better conditions in the mines. Today it's hard to say whether the four men were guilty of the murders or not. However, one can guess that their trial was certainly unfair. The nineteen men who were convicted of Molly Crimes and executed during 1877 were James Boyle, Alexander Campbell, James Carroll, John Donahue, Michael J. Doyle, Thomas Duffy, Thomas P. Fisher, Patrick Hester, John Kehoe, Edward J. Kelly, Andrew Lanahan, Q. McGeehan, Peter McHugh, Peter McManus, Thomas Mundley, James Rourdie, and Patrick Tully. All of these men had been practicing Catholics and were excommunicated from the church before the trials and denied a Christian burial. On Black Thursday, June 21, 1877, the day of execution, Donahue, Doyle, and Kelly were calm and ready to face the death penalty with dignity. They expected nothing from their prosecutors. Alexander Campbell's behavior was different. Already earlier during the trial he declared his innocence but was sentenced to death anyway. No one listened to him though. Just minutes before his death he declared once again his innocence, but this time not only in words. He picked up some dirt from his cell's floor and slammed his open hand against the wall of his cell. His handprint would remain there forever as a reminder of the injustice that took his life. His handprint still remains on the wall of cell 17 in the Carbon County Jail House. It has baffled and fascinated both sheriffs and prisoners over the years. The authorities have tried to wipe it out. The handprint was scrubbed off, cleaned, painted over, later concreted over. All efforts have proved to be impossible to get rid of the print. In fact, in 1930 the original wall was taken off and changed to a new one, but the print still reappeared. The strange mark made all those years ago was thoroughly analyzed by experts using infrared photography and other high-tech equipment. Exactly nothing was found that would explain the handprint's very existence. It still persists until today. As David Pietras writes in his book Most Haunted Crime Scenes in the World, which I will place a link to in the show notes, according to the legend, as recounted in Weird Pennsylvania after over a century and several coats of paint on that wall, the handprint is still visible to this day. For some, it is the sight of death and carnage that draws a person to crime scenes, and others prefer to visit famous crime scenes from the past. The morbid curiosity of the human race is a force that is so strong that even scientists cannot explain it. But what causes the dead to return to the scene of their demise? Some believe that they are searching for something, while others claim that these spirits do not know that they are dead. No matter what causes the dead to return to their crime scenes, it is a known fact that most crime scenes today have some kind of residual hauntings. Supposedly, each time there is an attempt to cover it up, within a few days it mysteriously reappears to remind people of the tragedy of executing an innocent man, especially in the name of greed. It can be seen on tours of the old jail museum, housed in the former Carbon County Jail. Reportedly, some high-tech equipment occasionally fails when trying to capture the image. Feuds and violence appear to breed ghosts, or at least ghost stories, and sometimes indirect victims are the ones who suffer. Is the handprint a miracle? One could say it is a true phenomenon. That mark of mind will never be wiped out. It will remain forever to shame the county for hanging an innocent man. When Weird Darkness returns, a century ago, in July 1920, the illustrated police news ran a single story on its front page, complete with the drawing of a man lying on top of a woman, both covered in blood, but even more disturbing. A young boy, very much alive and apparently watching the whole thing. And it took a while before the first woman to be hanged would take place in the USA, but in 1778 it finally happened, and her name was Bathsheba Spooner. These stories are up next. Here it comes, my favorite part. Have you ever noticed that when George Bailey is on the bridge, it doesn't start snowing again until after he says, aww man, the power's out. No problem, because you're prepared with the Patriot Power Generator from Four Patriots. While the rest of the city's dealing with the weather outside is frightful, you can have the power that's so delightful inside your home. Flip the switch and suddenly you're back to the TV and radio for weather updates, your space heaters are keeping you toasty warm, your phones and laptops are charged, your fridge is still running, and you're back to watching It's a Wonderful Life in time to hear out of Boy Clarence. The Patriot Power Generator has zero fumes, so you can use it indoors, and it's solar, so if the outage lasts a while, you're still good to go. Grab a Patriot Power Cell CX2, and everybody can charge up at the same time. Don't let the unexpected put your family in danger. Grab a Patriot Power Generator today at fourpatriots.com slash weird. That's the number for Patriots dot com slash weird. Free shipping for orders over $97. Have a merry little Christmas, not a scary little Christmas. Visit fourpatriots.com slash weird for the Patriot Power Generator, the Patriot Power Cell CX, and more. That's the number for Patriots dot com slash weird. Exactly 100 years ago, in July 1920, the illustrated police news had one story dominating its front page. This was the death of two individuals in Essex that was described as a double domestic crime at East Ham. As usual with the illustrated police news, the crime was illustrated with a dramatic picture of a man lying over the body of a woman, blood pooling around both bodies, and a small razor visible on the floor in front of the male. The domestic nature of the deaths is highlighted by the surroundings themselves, a room with clothing hung up on the door, a jug or ure on the table, and a dresser full of crockery. There's also a sobbing little boy on his own on one side of the door, and a rather worn looking woman in her outdoor clothes pushing that door open, an older boy by her side in his hat and cap. Even without looking any further, we can hazard a guess at what has happened, for the drawing is explicit. A couple dying, the wife presumably murdered by her husband who then kills himself, while their little son looks on. Their deaths are then discovered by a relative or neighbor and her child. On page two, the story emerged. The domestic scene was a depiction of the kitchen at 8 Gooseley Lane, East Ham, home to the Engel family. This was a solid working class family. Father Frederick Engel, 35, worked as a purifier at the Bekdon Gas Works. He lived with his wife Daisy and their four sons, aged between three and thirteen. They were happy. The neighbors had never heard Frederick and Daisy quarrel, and they were seen to be a contented couple. Things were not going well for the family in 1920, however. Frederick had been ill and off work for some time, receiving medical care. It is not clear how the family were maintaining themselves while he was unable to work or earn. One morning Frederick acted oddly. He sent the eldest son out of the house, telling him to go and fetch a relative. Other family members lived locally. In the time it took for the boy to go to his aunt's house and bring her back to his own, Frederick had slit Daisy's throat and then his own. The son and aunt were faced not only with the vision of this couple lying in the kitchen doorway surrounded by blood, but also with the fact that the youngest son, aged three, had witnessed the events. When the first two ran screaming out of the house, the little boy followed them, his face covered with the blood that had splashed up onto him as he watched his father kill his mother and then himself. This was all the detail the IPN gave a hundred years ago. However, a check of the archival records shows that Frederick Engle had married Daisy Rosalyn Harriet-Merican at St. Bartholomew's Church in East Ham on 10 February 1906. Frederick was the son of Matthew and Rosetta Engle, Daisy the daughter of James Merican, a blacksmith, and his wife Eliza. Daisy was just 21 at the time of her marriage. Frederick's age at marriage was given as 24, which would actually make him 38 when he died rather than the 35 published by IPN. Although both Daisy and Frederick were born in the local area, Daisy in East Ham, Frederick slightly further out in barking, their parents were not. Daisy's father had come to the area from Norfolk, while her mother was from Westminster. Frederick's father was from Lincolnshire, but they had made East Ham their home, with siblings and aunts and uncles populating the area and making it feel as though they had always been there. They therefore stayed in the area after their marriage and the 1911 census shows them living at 72 Eastbourne Road, with Frederick working at that time as a general labourer, as his father was also doing. It already had two sons at this point, Frederick James born in 1907 and Alfred Matthew two years later, and Daisy's older brother Alfred was also living with them. They would go on to have Ernest William in early 1914 and then finally Albert Edward in the autumn of 1916. It was little Albert who was splashed with his parents blood when he was just three months short of his fourth birthday. Albert would grow up to become a brickmaker and moved to Buckinghamshire, but never married. One wonders how the events he witnessed as a little boy affected him in adulthood. A century ago, his parents died. His father may have been more deeply affected by his poor health and job loss than friends and neighbors realized, suddenly finding that he could no longer cope. For his wife Daisy, his sudden loss of control may have been just as much a shock for her as for her children and the aunt who was called by Frederick to take care of his children. He planning in some strange way to ensure that they were looked after from the moment he died. Bathsheba Spooner, the first woman executed in the Post Declaration of Independence, that is post-July 4th 1776 United States. The daughter of one of Massachusetts most prominent Tory loyalists. The latter fled to Nova Scotia during the events comprising this story, owing to the ongoing American Revolution. Spooner was married to a wealthy Brookfield gentleman whom she utterly despised. From late 1777 into 1778, Bathsheba beguiled three young would-be Davids, Ezra Ross, a wounded former Continental Army soldier whom she nursed back to health, and James Buchanan and William Brooks, two red-coat deserters, into getting rid of Mr. Joshua Spooner. Ross, she sent on a February 1778 business trip with her hubby and instructions to dose him with nitric acid. The youth chickened out and didn't do it, but neither did he warn his proposed victim what was afoot. Couple of weeks later, the Brits achieved by main force what their American opposite dared not attempt by stealth, and on the evening of the 1st of March, about nine o'clock, being returning home from his neighbors nearby his own door, was feloniously assaulted by one or more Ruffians, knocked down by a club, beat and bruised and thrown into his well with water in it. Ross, importantly, had been invited by his lover slash sponsor to return and he helped to dispose of the body. They had not a day's liberty after this shocking crime, evidently having thought little beyond the deed, the very young Ross especially stands out for his naivete, certainly mingled with lust and cupidity as he contemplated the prospect of attaining a frolicsome wealthy widow when the wife went to work on him. As she was going to Hardwick, she asked me the reason of my being so low-spirited. I made answer it was my long absence from home. She replied that her opinion was I wanted someone to lodge with. I told her it would be agreeable. She asked me if such a one as herself would do. I made answer if she was agreeable I was. Marginal notation, the dialect was so. Upon which she said, after she came off her journey, she would see. And B, after her return, she gave me an invitation to defile her marriage bed, which I expected, accepted. And after that she proposed constantly every scheme, scheme for her husband's death. Marginal notation, the spelling is so. Ezra Ross. That quoted section is a written account given in jail to the preacher Ebenezer Parkman, who preached a thundering sermon three days after the executions titled, The adulterous shall hunt for the precious life. Here's a section of that sermon, as quoted in Deborah Navasse's book about the affair, Murdered by His Wife, which I'll link to in the show notes. A woman who allows her loose imagination to range and wander after others, nay, not a few, enrove from her husband to pollute and defile the marriage bed, indulging her own wanton salacious desires. How loathsome are all such, and how directly opposite the pure and holy nature, law and will of God. So keep thee from the evil woman from the flattery of the tongue of a strange woman. Neither let her take thee with her eyelids. There are a thousand dangers that poor young wretches are in by reason of the snares and traps which are everywhere laid, particularly the poor, beardless youth not quite eighteen. Side note, Deborah Navasse also wrote a full-length novel about Bathsheba, called simply Bathsheba Spooner, a novel which I've also included a link to in the show notes. Mrs. Spooner, whose loyalist family ties did her no favors in this moment, sought a reprieve on grounds of pregnancy. Many condemned women in those days made such requests. More often than not, they were temporizing devices that brought no more than the time needed for a panel of matrons to examine them and dismiss the claim. In her case, four examiners submitted a dissenting opinion to the effect that we have reason to think that she is now quick with child. Although overruled, they were correct. After the dramatic quadruple execution under a thunderstorm at Worcester's Washington Square, an autopsy found that Spooner was about five months along with what would have been her fifth child. According to an early 20th century Chicago Chronicle retrospective, her grave can be located on a manor at Worcester that formerly belonged to the great New York City planner Andrew Haswell Green. Bathsheba Spooner's sister was Green's grandmother. A full original record of the proceedings does not survive for us, but this public domain volume has a lengthy chapter about events with an appendix preserving some of the original documents. We're at the mercy of uncertain documentation in this context, of course, but there are at least none whose executions can be established that predate Spooners within the infant republic. Per the SB file, a woman named Anne Wiley was hanged in Detroit in 1777, but at the time that city was under British administration as part of the province of Quebec. For its part, Massachusetts hanged several more women in the 1780s, but has not executed any other women since the George Washington Presidential Administration. It's presently a death penalty abolitionist jurisdiction. Thanks for listening! If you liked the podcast, please share a link to this episode and recommend Weird Darkness to your friends, family and co-workers who love the paranormal, horror stories or a true crime like you do. Every time you share a link to the podcast, it helps spread the word about it, growing our weirdo family, and also helps get the word out about resources available for those who suffer from depression. So please, share the podcast with others. Do you have a dark tale to tell of your own? Fact or fiction, click on Tell Your Story at WeirdDarkness.com and I might use it in a future episode. All stories in Weird Darkness are purported to be true unless stated otherwise, and you can find source links or links to the authors in the show notes. Ghosts, Gravity and Isaac Newton was written by Stuart Clark for The Guardian. History's most dangerous toddler was written by Candida Moss for The Daily Beast. The reappearing handprint is by Ellen Lloyd for Ancient Pages. The little boy who watched his parents die is by Dr. Nell Darby for Criminal Historian, and the hanging of Bathsheba Spooner was posted at Executed Today. Weird Darkness Theme by Alibi Music Weird Darkness is a registered trademark, and now that we're coming out of the dark, I'll leave you with a little light. Proverbs 11 verse 18, The wicked man earns deceptive wages, but he who sows righteousness reaps a sure reward. And a final thought, the strongest people are not those who show strength in front of us, but those who win battles we know nothing about. I'm Darren Marlar. Thanks for joining me in the Weird Darkness. Newton must surely have felt some sort of indication for his alchemical beliefs. Here's a word you don't say often. Alchemical. Alchemicle. Alchemy. Alchemical. Alchemical. It's alchemy, so it'd be alchemeal. Alchemical. I'm going to change that to say it is alchemy beliefs. Why must people use 20-dollar words? We're going to go with alchemical. Newton must surely have felt some sort of indication for his alchemical beliefs. According to historian Pochia Hesia. Pochia Hesia. Here is a name for you. Pochia Hesia. Pochia Hesia. How do you pronounce H-S-I-A? Pochia. Pochia Hesia. Pochia Hesia. Pochia Hesia. From what I could find, half of the people say Hesah, half of the people say Shah. I'm going to go with Shah, because it sounds better. Okay, I only have to say it once anyway, so what does it matter? According to historian Pochia. According to historian Pochia Hesia in his book, were forced both to confess and to invent fictitious religious motivations for exangu... exanguinating. Exanguinating means bleeding to death, but we're not going to say that because that's not what the author says. He says exanguinating. Why, I can't say it when he writes it. I don't know. I can say it now. Exanguinating. Forced both to confess and to invent fictitious religious motivations for exanguinating the child. Sixtus IV commanded Hinderbach to suspend the trials until his representative, Batista de... Giyadushi. Udisi. Until his representative, Batista de... de Udisi. De Udisi. Until his representative, Batista de... Hate foreign pronunciations. Representative Batista de... De Udisi. Representative Batista de Udisi. Batista de... Batista de Udisi. To suspend the trials until his representative, Batista de Udisi arrived in Trent. At every turn, Hinderbach thwarted de Jaduci... At every turn, Hinderbach thwarted de Judisi... At every turn, Hinderbach thwarted de Judisi's... De Judisi's... At every turn, Hinderbach thwarted de Judisi's attempts to investigate.