 First outcome was real clarification that tenure reform and its implementation must be prioritized within the ministry. With regard to land reform in Uganda, my message is we need to make an effort in ensuring that the good policies in place are implemented. Time and again we have seen the policies are in place but implementation is quite lacking. When we look at all the three planting and land act, the issue has been implementation of these otherwise well thought through policy statements. If government can take up what the NGOs are doing and at a much higher level and maybe join hands much more with NGOs than what it has been, I believe we are going to reach a much wider audience. Of course, government is not doing it on one extent could be due to lack of resources in terms of financial and human resource but that is an area where we need to put more emphasis. If it remains the national level, it remains disorganized, this will fit us through up to the lowest level. If, for example, corruption starts from the upper levels, it is filtering through up to the resource level. Once the resources degraded, the first tenure security of the community is so much threatened. So we need we need to work at organizing ourselves at national level. For us to have a declared community forest, which is a strong case for security of tenure for communities that are using a forest, we must have a statutory instrument endorsed by the minister. But it is another sector, the justice sector through the Ministry of Justice and Affairs that actually prepares the instrument that is the mandate. So this process has delayed because this instrument is with them for, you know, it's with them for purposes of review and then they bring it back to the minister of what an environment. So the argument is that we write, we write again reminding because we've done that before, reminding them to fast track the process so that we can have this come out as soon as possible.