 Good afternoon. And once again, it is my pleasure to be able to participate in these conferences. And I have ten minutes to do my presentation. So let's start. So we talk about the social isolation and suicide. So I think just put you on a global map. I think that there's a suicide situation released by the WHO, and then we are in this red area. So I think that this where the area which have the above the average suicide rate. So what we're talking about, I mean in Asia, Hong Kong. So we are talking about, we have about 40% of the population, but it account for 60% of the world death about suicide. So I think at the rate, we are talking about 13.5 per 100,000 is about 1,000 people to kill them. So every year in Hong Kong is about three or four per days. I think that is where we can beat the Australian and American and Australian. So and whenever we'd like to bring the suicide prevention, I think to the government, I think we'd like to bring in a cost element there. I think we told the government that actually, I think every 1,000 death, it costs about 1.6 billion dollars as a potential economic loss and also another 100 millions in providing the mental health care for treating the double self harm. So I think that there's a situation in Hong Kong. I think the elderly, we have a high rate, I mean the young people here and then the middle age are here. But what's something go into this three age group? I think what we, before we go into that, then we look at the 10 leading cost of death again. So it ranged at number nine, number eight and number six. So it actually, it is getting more and more serious. But that is only in terms of the number count. But if you look at what we call the year of life loss, so I think if someone we expected to live until 75, if someone died at the age of 60, so we lose 15 years. But if someone died at the age of 15, then we lose 60 years of the lifetime. So when you look at it from that perspective, eight from five to four. Now actually when you look at this one, so it actually this proper health aspect or the disease burden itself, it becomes more significant. Now we have been talking about about the digestive system, infectious disease. The government spending huge of money. I mean doing the SARS, I mean the billions of dollars. But now we are talking about every year we have 1,000 people, they kill themselves. It's three jumbo jack, it crashed. Okay, using a really key comments. But when we look at this three age group, what are common? I mean what we call the risk and the protective factors. I think in one of the study we do among the older adults, I think there's the psychiatric illness, I think Gene Wu will give an expert to this. But when we look through all this sort of thing, and then the last thing we say that, well the lack of the social support, it's just one of the risk factors for the older people that commit suicide. What happened to the 20 to 59? Okay, I mean the presence of psychiatric disorder is also one of the high risks. But at the end, when we go into it down there, when you have social support, it shows that the societal risk, it actually reduces societal risk. I mean if you have the social support, so the odd ratio as well 0.27, what it means is about four times less likely that you have the suicide ideation. Now when we go to the youth, I mean when we youth itself, I think we look at the family dispute, the financial difficulties, the relationship problem, I think all these are the significant factors. Now actually when we look at deeply, when you look at the family dispute, financial difficulties, and all these somehow it is related to the social isolation. So that is the, in Hong Kong, you represent 18 districts, I mean that is what we talk about. Now Yunlong and Chi-moon, I mean these are two districts, I think they are at the western side of the Hong Kong, I think they are more disadvantaged, they are more vulnerable people here. Actually you can see the changes from 2008 to 2009 and then to 2010. I think between the metropolitan area, there's some hotspots or there's this area with experience higher societal risk than the others. So what we have found out when we compute the SMR, the standard mortality rate, which when you're above one, you mean you have higher than average, the suicide rate below one is less than the average. We have found out that all these, some Singapore, Wontai, Xin, Guntong, Kuaicheng, and Chi-moon. But what are the commonalities among this sort of district? Now if you look very carefully, there's Wontai, Xin, Guntong, now that is the overall what we have seen. I think the household side is more or less the same, it's still about three people per household. But the median income, what you can see, this group itself, they actually they have about 20% or something more, less household income than the average. The unemployment rate itself, they also have a higher unemployment rate than the average. I think the median age, well I think it's more or less the same, the elderly population, yeah the divided, we showed that the elderly population, the proportion itself is not significant. Then we look at this one, the dependency ratio. But what we have seen is the median income, the unemployment rate, they are, they have some sort of overrepresented in this, these high risk area. So when we look at the unemployment rate, these are the 18th district, I think this is the unemployment rate, this is the suicide rate, it actually, there's some strong correlation. By the same token, when you have a smaller household income, you have a higher rate. Okay, so then we look at the mental stages, and then that is the widow group, and then that is the divorce group as well, and there's a strong correlation. So if you look at the 18th district where we're trying to compare this 15 to 24, 25 to 59, and 60 or above, and then in terms of this, I think the correlation itself, it does suggest that there is some relationship between this at a population level, at a, at a population level. So we also, we have, we have identified some hospital as well. I think this GIS is, is really important, such that when we do suicide prevention, and then we can go to the right to that district or the block of the building itself, having to do the work. So I think that when we look at the social ashrine indicator, unemployed, elderly population, next household income, divorced single parents, the recent migrants, the ethnic minority, and living unknown. Now, what the challenge in Hong Kong, I think what we have seen, it is there, there's disconnection in our community. And then the challenging way now is how do we identify the effective way to connect them together. And I think what we see this physical isolation, the isolation itself, it could lead to the social isolation. And then now we say that how can we reconnect them. So I think we cover de-stigmatization of the district. I think in this morning, I think our secretary Carol Lam said that there's a sadness district, the Tinsui Wai. And how to de-stigmatize this? I mean, those people who live in Tinsui Wai, they're not necessarily, they are sadness. And how to go into, at a community-based response, and how to make these not to be the people who are staying there, and who feel that they are disadvantaged. So we look at the enhanced understanding of the need of the vulnerable and the disadvantage in the community, and then try to remove the myth and also their prejudice as well. I think in our study with the Learner School of Economics and what we feel that it is a space, I think what you have been talking about, the Hong Kong, we have been deprived of this space. But now how can we create a space for these people? Now, I think once we talk about this split threat with 120 square feet, but they only take 30 minutes to go to work. Or you have a choice to have a 500 square feet, but you take one hour or more than one hour to do the traveling. Now, this morning, we are talking about the equity. I think in Hong Kong, I don't think we're talking about equity. Actually, you do not have a choice. You do not have a choice, we just have to live with it. We have to live with what we are given. And it's just like when you come home and then you have the food on the table and then you say, I do not like the food. Then they say, you still have a choice. You eat it or you don't eat it. So I think there's a correction at page 28 here. I think this is one of the articles. I think it is not 1,036 feet. Now, I understand why there is a misprint. There could be the people from the Learner School of Economics they couldn't believe. How come half of the household, I think we are talking about 1.2 million of a household who live in a less than 500 square feet, which is less than a garage size, you know, in one of the home in Australia. But you are talking about 3.1 people in one household. I think that's what we're talking about. Now, we are trying to work with the government saying that if we do not have the private space, what can we do? Can we use the school playground? I think in the school, during the weekend, which can be open to the community, I mean, which is accessible and then they can do it. So I think we have done a mentorship program and not doing the living space of these people. They are fiscally very, very close, I think, but emotionally we are quite disconnected, although they are very self-sufficient and that has worked. So we went to the school, we tried to help these young people, we bring them to our university and then we enlarge their living space. So at the end, I think we talk about in Hong Kong, if we really want to do it, do a suicide prevention successfully, I think strengthening the social support is very important, enhancing the coping and the problem-solving skill and also the partnership with the family and the community is important and we cannot just rely on the government to do anything. So I think we saw the GIS is good and then the community ownership is very important. At the end, I'd like to show you this as a hand, hands to go there to connect the disconnected. And at the end, I'd like to show you this curve. This curve, we have a group of people who are vulnerable, who are disadvantaged, who are suicidal. If you want to reach out to identify these group of people to make a change, it is difficult. But according to the Ross theorem, we say that if you can reduce a small risk to a large population, it will be more defective than to do a high risk with a small population, how it could be done. Now, if we can manage to move the population health to the left-hand side, so the number of people actually have problems will be less. So I think what we believe that a strong population health program is good. So at the end, to finish my talk, that's the tip of the iceberg. I mean, suicide is a great event, but actually it is just a realization of a much larger problem in our community. Now, how can we make our iceberg smaller? Climate change. Yeah, exactly. There's a change in your environment, change to make it a warmer environment than that. So that is the good thing about the global warming. Make it smaller, then I think we will be better. Now, in Hong Kong, I was told by the minister that you have to tell something good about our government. Anyway, so actually, we are looking good. Actually, the suicide rate at the historical high here, I think within the five years, our suicide rate has come down by 30%. Now, we have not seen it in any part of the world. I think Hong Kong has done it. Why? Hong Kong has done it is because those who morph in this, including the government, I mean, who make the differences here. Thank you.