 This statement's all right. Thank you, Mr. President. Now, let me ask you this. Is Shambi not aboard on this thing? No, Shambi's aboard. But what he's given is authorization rather than a request, which was the best that could be done in the haggling with him in the last two or three days. Well, now, what's he going to denounce us and say this is a great... Is he going to say this is aggression? No, he's not, Mr. President. He's actually very strong for the operation. That was my impression, but the papers indicate that he says any unilateral decision made without his agreement will be regarded as aggression. No, that is not correct. We checked that out, and that was a statement by an informer. That was a New York Times story, at least the one I saw. And we checked it out, and it was an information officer going off half-cocked at a time before we'd been able to get into Chombi. He does have a political problem, and that he doesn't want to be the fellow who couldn't do it himself. But he has given a written authorization, and we have documents to prove it, and those documents are available both to us and to the United Nations. And there isn't any problem in terms of the legal authorization of the Belgians and ourselves to operate under the Geneva Conventions and our own obligations toward our own nationals. But there is a doubt as to whether he really urges us to do this. He hasn't asked us to do it. He's authorized us to do it. That's right. Now, why do we think that I'm just getting prepared? I want to get a good background on why do we think this is essential? We see no hope of being able to negotiate it out. There's no hope of negotiating it out. What about the United Nations? Well, we've been in and out of every forum.