 Good evening, everyone. My name is Dr. Akrashatthi from CI Signal Medical Academy. I'll be presenting the paper titled, Unveiling the MRA Insights, Assessing Postural Latent and Postural Medial Corner Injuries, under the guidance of Dr. Amrit Ayesha. Coming to the introduction, injuries to postural medial and postural lateral coronal of the knee represent a significant challenge in orthopedic practice, particularly in the context of monthly women's knee injuries. Despite their clinical importance, the injuries are prone to being overlooked in imaging studies, leading to potential delays in diagnosis and treatment initiation. Of particular concern is the postural lateral corner, which can pose diagnostic challenges, especially when part of broader multi-legal medial injury, often associated with antiretrician ligament health. Now, coming to the brief anatomy, the postural lateral corner is made up of lateral-collateral ligament, popliteal mytheninus complex, archivate ligament, iliotabial band, biceps femoris tendon, and popliteal fibular ligament. Whereas the postural medial corner is made up of postural oblique ligament, oblique popliteal ligament, postural horn of the medial menaceus, and medial collateral ligament. These structures collectively provide schedule to the knee joint, resisting varus and external rotational forces in the postural lateral corner and valgus and internal rotational forces in the postural medial corner. Failure to recognize and address these injuries promptly can disrupt knee biomechanics, delay repair, and predispose patients to osteoarthritis. The aims and objectives are to see the role of MRI in ascertaining the prevalence and characterize the most frequent types of injuries in postural lateral and postural medial corners of the knee. The objectives are to identify the location of injury and assess the frequency of occurrence across different structures within the postural lateral and postural medial corners, and establishing correlations between various pattern of injuries commonly seen in these areas. Next is the resource methodology. This is the retrospective study conducted in the department of radio diagnosis and justice KSI of the hospital in Mangalok on patients who are referred for knee joint injury. Informed consent was taken from all these patients. Patients were examined in their fine position, ensuring the knees were positioned within the extremity coin and supported by foam pads to maintain proper alignment. The sample size was 50, while patients were evaluated with seen and smacked in Tom Alonzo 1.5 Tesla using standard protocols. It was a retrospective descriptive study for the duration of two months. The infusion criteria for the study was all the patients left with history of knee injury and the exclusion criteria was any patient who had any contraindications to MRA. And to the image gallery, the first image on the left is a proton density fat that has a limit showing tear of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. As the image on the right is a proton density fat that has two limits showing tear in the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus. Next is the image on the left is a proton density fat that has a normal image showing medial collateral ligament tear. The image on the right is a proton density coronary image showing lateral collateral ligament tear. The image on the left is a proton density fat that has an image showing partial tear of the medial retinaculum and medial pettuloframural ligament. Whereas the image on the right is a proton density fat that has a limit showing signal changes in the properties muscle. Now the image on the left is a proton density fat that has a limit showing complete tear of the ACL. The image on the right is a proton density fat that has a limit showing complete tear of the ACL. Coming to the observation and results, based on the findings of a study involving 50 cases, it was determined that 23 cases exhibited injuries in the posterior lateral corner, while 39 cases presented with injuries in the posterior medial corner, of which 15 patients at both posterior medial and posterior lateral corner injuries. Among the observed cases, further patients had injuries to ACL or ACL, which four of these patients have injuries to both ACL and PCU simultaneous. 14 patients presented with concurrent fractures. There were 10 cases where posterior medial corner injuries were coupled with fractures. Compared to six cases, where posterior lateral corner injuries were associated with fractures. Four cases of fractures had injuries to the posterior medial and posterior lateral corners concurrently. Among the third nine cases presenting with posterior medial corner injuries, all of them had involvement of the posterior horn of medial mesquise. 35% had involvement of the medial collateral ligament. 15% had involvement of the posterior oblique ligament and 10% had involvement of the oblique occipital ligament. Of the 23 cases presenting with posterior lateral corner injuries, 30% had involvement of the lateral collateral ligament. 34% had involvement of the propritil maintenance complex and the propritil cerebellar ligament each. 30% had involvement of archery ligament. 26% had involvement of aortic build-in and 17% had involvement of the bicep femoris tendon. Out of the 14 patients presenting with concurrent fractures, 21% had fractures of the medial and lateral ligament each. 14% had fractures of the tibial ligament, anterior lateral and posterior lateral femoral condi each and 17% had fractures of anterior medial and posterior medial femoral condi each. Out of the summary, the posterior lateral and posterior medial corners of the knee present unique challenges in musculoskeletal imaging. MRI is commonly preferred for its ability to assess soft tissue structures effectively. Understanding the intricate anatomy of these regions for accurate interpretation as misinterpretation can have significant consequences such as chronic instability or field reconstruction. Therefore, a thorough MRI evaluation is crucial for guiding clinical or surgical decisions and ultimately improving patient outcomes. So, these are my references. Thank you.