 That's because you can't satiate to a green yes because you're not consuming it. You all catch on what we're talking about. The point is here, satiation, there's some argument in the field, although I don't believe there's an argument or there should be. I've been swayed by the evidence overwhelmingly. But the point is that satiation is a decreased effectiveness of a reinforcer, right? It specifically needs to be a consumatory reinforcer or an repetitive reinforcer. It needs to be one that has to do with food, okay? So if I give you a bag of chips and a bag of chips and a bag of chips and a bag of chips as a reinforcer all day long, you're going to get fricked full. That's called satiation. You are satiated. You're full. You've had enough. It's no longer an effective reinforcer. Why? Because you satiated to it. That's a tricky... Anyway, so you satiate to it, right? So a reinforcer that is decreased in value simply due to satiation or presenting too much, eating it too much, loses its effectiveness. That's satiation. It's closely related to habituation, although not on my hands.