 It's so true, I just, I feel so emotional just sitting here and listening to that subhanallah. Looking at the examples of our imams alayhim as-salam, each of them had a slightly different approach when it came to opposing the oppressive governments of their time. So for example, take imams hassan and imam hussein alayhim as-salam. Imam al-hasan alayhim, he is criticised for signing the peace treaty with Muawiyah, even though he was following in the footsteps of his grandfather, the Prophet sallallahu alayhi wa alayhi, who signed the peace treaty of Hudaybiyyah. Whereas imam al-hasayn alayhim as-salam, alayhim as-salam, he stood up on the plains of Qadbala even though he knew that his companions and his family were going to be slain and he knew that his women, his daughters were going to be taken prisoner. Now, why is that, why are, why are their approaches so different? If it's different, it's because of the circumstances. In fact, imam hassan alayhim as-salam, he, he, eventually he signed the truth, if you like, it wasn't a peace treaty. But if imam hassan resorted to that, was because he was about to go and if you like to go to war, because Muawiyah had made sure that he wanted to put imam al-hasayn in a position so that he can fight him, because he knew he had far more resources and so on. And imam hassan, what he did at the last hour, if you like the last minute, he started buying off the personalities or if you like the senior figures in the army of imam hassan alayhim, and they betrayed their imam and they sold out and they accepted the money from Muawiyah and, and betrayed imam hassan. That's why imam hassan was left with no option but to accept the truth, because, because if he hadn't done that, the shia would have been massacred, because the, if you like, the his generals, his army, senior army figures, they betrayed him and they sold out to Muawiyah, he had to accept the truth so that the blood of the shia would be saved.