 This is absolutely one of the best if not the best eviscerations of the past year. And it comes from Florida Congressman Byron Donald, who Joy Reed accused of being not authentically black because he doesn't subscribe to her ideology or party. And it does not take long to see who the bigger brain is. My friend Jody Arrington, who's going to chair a budget. He wants to look into the budget and also look into entitlements. Do you know that Social Security is going to be insolvent in 2030? It is not going to be. That is not true. That is actually not true. No, it's actually not true. It's actually not true. It's actually not true. But it's actually not true to the financial community. That's actually not true. Social Security will go insolvent. That's actually not true. Those are the facts. That's not true. Should we not pay for that? What the Republican Party and what the Tea Party have proposed is privatizing Social Security. Okay, so like he knows what he's talking about. She doesn't. She doesn't offer anything in response. All she does is talk over him saying it's not true. Very like juvenile, what you would expect to find on the playground when you were in 1st or 2nd grade. It's really embarrassing. And just the fact that he immediately drove her to acting like that shows what a clown she is. Which would actually subject Social Security to the whims of the market, which I don't think that people... If you actually look at the returns of the S&P 500 since 2006, the returns of the S&P 500 since 2006 includes 2000. Okay, so you support privatizing Social Security. I want to explain to you. I am a financial professional. I'm a securities license. Actually, I just lost my licenses because I'm not allowed to trade anymore because I'm a member of Congress. But let me assure you, if you look at the S&P 500 from 2006 until today, the growth rate in the S&P 500 would have more than taken care of Social Security, way more than the federal government asked. And each time they had a crash, it would subject people's Social Security funds to crash. Hold on a second. So let me just... Hold on a second. We're not going to have a whole long thing on Social Security. But let me just be clear. You are in favor of privatizing Social Security. No, I'm not in favor of privatizing Social Security. I said, you brought it up and I brought you the facts. But you are... So if a bill came forward to privatize Social Security before? No, because what we should be doing... Okay, then it's a move point. Then it's a move point. It's not a move point. You're trying to put words in my mouth. I'm trying to explain to you policies. But you just explained that the S&P would be a better return than Social Security. The S&P 500 will have given better returns than the federal government asked. That is a fact. Don't cheap in privatization when the data is crystal clear that the returns would have been better. Okay, you're for it. You said that you're for it. That means that it would have been a better situation than what we've seen to this point. I mean, that's so childish. Her entire tactic there. It's like she's not interested in an actual back and forth based on facts, a discussion. She's not interested in that. All she's interested is pinning a policy, a vote on him for a completely hypothetical privatization of Social Security. And he obviously can't do that. But he's just making the argument that privatization actually would be a better idea to what we have right now. Now, I'm not an expert on this particular thing, so I'm not going to say it one way or the other. But he seems to know what he's talking about. And the privatization idea has been around for a while. If you remember back during George W. Bush, he, I believe, is the first one to suggest that. And he was pummeled for it. They love George W. Bush now. But back then, they thought it was all the same stuff that they say with Trump. Now, it was exactly the same thing. And they said he was a racist moron, didn't know what he was talking about. He was going to wipe out Social Security. And so I think the idea of privatization is at least, I mean, it should be up for debate. The next thing here is CRT. And she actually did once bring on Chris Rufo, who is probably like the premier figure on knowledge about CRT and how it's been disseminated out into the school system. And how it's actually like CRT derived materials that are getting into the curriculums. Now it's not the actual theory of CRT. It's just the curriculum that is derived from that ideology. And when Joy Reid had Chris Rufo on, it did not go well for her. I don't think she's had anybody on since. Until this guy who actually knows what he's talking about. One start. You defend voting laws that said getting rid of ballot harvesting is a good thing that we did. So you've defended the Florida voting laws. You have the best election laws in the country. The Florida voting laws. Florida election laws are the best election laws in the country. Go ask Arizona, go ask California, go ask New York. We do it the best. Okay, all right. You know, the fact of the matter is, is they keep on with this voter suppression narrative. Despite the fact that we've had in Florida and Georgia, they had record numbers of voter turnout. So the voter suppression did not occur. It is literally a blue and on conspiracy theory that they trot out. And you've defended and actually have cosponsored two pieces of legislation opposing critical race theory. What is critical race theory in your view? Oh, critical race theory actually is goes comes from critical theory. And essentially what it does at the graduate level, it talks about the implications of racial policies in the past in American history, their impact on society today. The impact on the law. Hold on, hold on. The issue with critical race theory, if you distill it down into K-12 education, is you do not have the ability to have the detailed conversation of critical race theory at the graduate level. And so here's my question. If it seeps down into K-12 education, is it stuff that students are not prepared to be dealing with? Shouldn't students just be learning about reading, writing and arithmetic? And so you don't believe that students should be learning about the racial history of the country? Because here we go. So Joy Reid always goes here. All the people who are trying to give cover to CRT and the education system, that's what all of them say. You remember Malcolm Nance got destroyed by Ben Shapiro when he tried to make this argument that CRT is just teaching about history in America. That's not what it's about. That's not what it's ever been about. Unless we're talking about the revision of history, like the 1619 project. The fact of the matter is the people who are opposing CRT in schools do not oppose teaching the history of America in racism. I always learned about that. I think that you should learn about that because you don't want to make the same mistakes of the past. And I think that's a lot of why we oppose CRT is because it looks to us like we're making the same mistakes of the past. When you're otherizing a group which would be white people and you're casting them as the source of everything that's wrong in your life, well, that's not going to end well. Critical race theory is not taught. Hold on. Critical race theory is not taught in a single K-12. One moment. It's a legal theory that's taught in law schools. We're going to have to come back and continue this conversation. We're actually literally outside and it's telling me you have to go. Critical race theory is not taught in our schools. And learning about racial history. Wait, she just said, no, no, no, you can't answer me because they're telling me in my ear that I got to go. And then she just continues to berate him without letting him respond. I'm going to kick him back a little bit here, but look how she does that. It's so immature. Everything she does here is like what I would expect from a teenager interviewing somebody that they're just getting destroyed by. And so they start reacting this way. You would not expect this from somebody who's a supposed professional. So watch this again. Because critical race theory is not taught. Hold on. Critical race theory is not taught in a single K-12. That's not true. One moment. It's a legal theory that's taught in law schools. We're going to have to come back and continue this conversation. We're actually literally outside and it's telling me you have to go. Okay. Critical race theory is not taught in our schools. And learning about racial history actually would be good for you. I'm going to give you the last word, but we're going to do this again. It's just such slimy tactics. She would not let him respond. She just wanted to make sure that she got the last word in there. Accusing him of not wanting to teach racial history when it's never been about that. All right, folks. I hope you enjoyed that. If you did, please hit that like button, share and subscribe. And I'll see you all in the next video.