 Well, we'd like to say that we're happy to be aboard Columbia on this very successful mission. This flight has shown us that every once in a while life throws you a little bit of a curve, and we would like to think that it's not the curve that counts but how we react to it. I think we're going to take advantage of having this mechanical failure on board to teach us more about hatches and make us better prepared for future flights. And on the other side, on the other hand, we're having an extremely successful science flight. Orpheus Paz and the Wake Shield satellites both have performed flawlessly. The space vision system experiment has performed flawlessly, and we've gotten a lot of mid-deck science experiments and work done that will be very beneficial to the space program and to the U.S. and to the world population. So, we're very happy about the way things have gone, and we're going to react to and work with what we've seen happen already in a very positive way. And we're ready for your questions now. This is Marsha Dunn in the Associated Press for Dr. Jones or Dr. Jernigan. I realize it's a remote possibility, but how much thought have you given to what you'd need to do to open that hatch in case an emergency spacewalk is needed? What would it take to get it open, and how nervous would you be forcing it open and knowing it might not so properly on your way back in? Then the risk reward turned out to be a little different, and so we would work hard to get that hatch open, and even if we do have a mechanism that would stick, we could remove the rigging from the exterior of the drone if we had to and use the Delta P across the hatch in order to hold it on once we repressurize the airlock. So, if we got into that very remote possibility, then we would work very hard to get that hatch open and very hard to get it sealed back. This is Phil Chen, EarthNews, Phil Chen, EarthNews, for TACO. I realize you didn't want to fire the thrusters when the wake show was deployed to prevent contaminating it, but how much closer would you have let it come to the shuttle and feel comfortable before you would have finally cried uncle and hit the thrusters to get out of the way? We lost the roof of the crew cabin, and the closure rate was extremely slow, so we could have taken it right down to probably a foot or several inches, so we had quite a bit of clearance, and I think we might have even gotten away with firing a forward firing thruster that wouldn't have contaminated it too much, so perhaps the science mission wasn't as much risk as it could have been. But we had margin, we had plenty of margin, and again, I'd like to emphasize that we were excited over the fact that we might have to fire the thrusters, not over the fact that the wake show was about to hit us, which it was not. Closure rate was so slow that everything was a very slow drama unfolding, and the whole drama point was that we didn't want to fire the thrusters. This is Irene Brown with UPI for a story in Musgrave. It must have gone through your mind with the hatch jam if that had happened on your last flight, and I was just wondering what your personal thoughts on lessons learned from this is. For anybody in the crew who wants to take it, how well have you adjusted circadian shifting on this mission? Any problems with not falling asleep when you're supposed to fall asleep, waking up too early? Would you prefer to just slam shift a couple of nights before landing or are you adjusting to the cycles? And then sleep in an extra hour and get up later. And human nature being that it is, that is the easiest way to shift, and originally we were planning to shift eight hours, and we packed a couple more onto that because we are shifting so well, and it's easy to stay up late, especially here in space with the tremendous views. And then once you go to sleep, we all have been sleeping very, very well, and we don't have any problems sleeping the eight or nine hours that they're giving us. And so the shift has really been, in essence, a non-event and invisible to us on our work day. Bill Harvey with CBS again for Dr. Musgrave. This is an out of the blue question because I don't know if anybody's passed this up, but there's been a discovery today announced that there is evidence of ice on the moon in the South Polar Caps, which is pretty interesting stuff. And I know you've given a lot of thought to exploration in general since we're talking about Mars tonight, but what does that say to you that if there was in fact ice on the moon, what sort of an advantage that being, or a leg up anyway down the road to colonizing or having long term bases there? I do, they've probably done more thinking about that, but clearly if there is ice and there is water out there, that is a natural resource which is extraordinarily important to establishing, you know, a permanent thing such as an observatory on the moon or some kind of colony. We need to eventually find the natural resources, be a mining community out there, extract the oxygen manufacturing and the materials we need out there as opposed to carrying them out there. I think it's an extraordinarily important finding and Mission Control did send it up to us early this morning though. This is Stephen Young with Reuters to finish up here on a light-hearted note for Story. I'm wondering, Story, if you would feel an immense sense of irony if on your last mission you finally made contact with extraterrestrials and they came along to pick you up, but you couldn't get outside because the hatch is stuck. We're approaching Sunset, and I'm hopeful as the Sunset will get much better acuity with the spotlight on the end effector. Here's the cycle now. Columbia Houston for Rommel. Thank you for cycling. We are now convinced that there is no binding in that area and those pictures you've provided us confirm that. This is Columbia, the first guide we picked to look at. Picture is available. What do you think of it? And that's a great picture, Taco. We couldn't see that on the first survey before and so that's a good data point and if we could move around to the other ones, but you've angled the end effector camera perfectly for that one. Houston, this is the lower starboard guide and we're looking at it upside down. And we copy, Taco, and you're moving there. Rommel's moving that arm around like a fine micro surgeon. We really appreciate those views. Columbia, we're going to roll the end effector and translate up to get the next one on the port side. While we're up on the port side, would you like to look at the foot on that side as well? Yes, please, Taco. Okay, we'll look at the first thing that comes in the field of view. I think it may be another guide. Now as Ron, here's the foot. Get the picture stable, would you like some? Columbia Houston for Taco and Rommel. That completes our survey. Thank you for a really outstanding job. This is an important visual record for when we get back on the ground. And we also now have an accurate record of the situation on orbit. So we've completed the survey and you're free to cradle the arm. Specialist Tammy Jernigan, aboard the Spaceship Columbia. I'm mission FTS80. I'm Tom Jones. The Oregon donor program has the potential to benefit millions of Americans. We're here to show our support for this program by signing Oregon donor cards in space. To give a part of you to someone who is in need is one of the most generous and caring things that you can do. You continue to live in the life of someone else. By becoming an organic tissue donor, you can directly help friends, relatives, neighbors, all across America. You can touch lives in ways you've never imagined. Let's sign those cards. Specialist TTS80, we thank you for considering the Oregon donor program. Probably not. Go ahead. America, I'm Captain Ken Cockrell and I'm Commander Kent Roemlinger aboard the United States Space Shuttle Columbia, orbiting 195 nautical miles above the Earth. I have the following message to pass. Navy, Pete... Columbia Houston, In Your Dreams.