 I cannot think of any. This is the dirty truth about the Equality Act. So he's going to tell us what this bill is really about. If you're correct, if he says special rights at all, I will not be shocked. I mean, an underpending of our very existence as a country is all men are created equal, endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights. I mean, what's not to embrace in those words? But when politicians start redefining what equal or what a right means, the very meaning of such words are turned inside out. He's going to say special rights. Our culture and our country. President Biden has made the passage of the so-called Equality Act to be one of his highest priorities. I mean, it sounds pretty innocuous since equality is a good thing. It's coming. But the Equality Act introduced last year by Nancy Pelosi is not as it sounds. It adds two new designations in the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Let me just stop here. Is that actually introduced by Nancy Pelosi? It's David Ceciline. He's the sponsor. He introduced this legislation. Nancy Pelosi is a co-sponsor of this bill. So what he's trying to do is tie Nancy Pelosi to this because Nancy Pelosi bad and she is bad. I also agree that Nancy Pelosi sucks, but for different reasons than he's stating here. But you can see the manipulation that he's trying to do here. He's trying to say, look, this is something that Nancy Pelosi or radical socialist communist support. So do you really want to support something that Nancy Pelosi supports because Nancy Pelosi bad? Or which was and remains landmark legislation to end racial discrimination and voting, housing, employment and participation in civic affairs. The Equality Act would add sexual orientation and gender identity to classes of protected civil rights. Now, let me be very clear. This is not a minor adjustment. This would mean that a person who declares oneself to be homosexual or transgender would be given protections that are given to those special rights biologically black or Asian, Native American or female, or who despite being a biological male would have to be treated as a biological female merely on the basis of declaring one's gender as female. Now, you may say, this doesn't concern me. Think again. If you're a business owner, you could lose your business license and be prosecuted for a hate crime and or discrimination for adhering to biblical marriage standards and declining to print wedding invitations for a same-sex couple. What he's trying to do is he's trying to basically say, listen, this will affect you because you don't get to treat gay people and trans people like shit. And we all like treating them like shit, right? Or if you're a doctor and you refuse to perform a double mastectomy and hysterectomy on a 14-year-old gender dysphoric girl who for some reason decides to an absolutely, positively, completely made up bullshit. Completely, completely made up bullshit. That is not what the Equality Act does. He was disingenuous arguing about what it would entail. It does stop businesses from discriminating against people because discrimination is a bad thing, but this is bullshit right here. And this is the same fucking thing that Tucker Carlson was saying. I forgot what specifically he said, but he was challenging the Republican governor of Arkansas, Asa Hutchinson, about why he vetoed the bill that would ban gender-affirming care for trans youth. And he said something to the effect of, it was chemical castration. I think that's what he used. Really quick, 10 years ago, if somebody had said, hey, Asa Hutchinson, you're gonna be governor of Arkansas and you're gonna veto a bill that would have protected children from chemical castration. What do you think he would have said? They literally have to just lie about trans youth and transgender people. That's the only way that they can convince you that trans is bad. They have to lie. It's embarrassing. Identify as a boy, you're in trouble. If her parents forbid the surgery, they could actually lose custody of their daughter. You say, well, that never happened. It already has. Any time you have a trans young person receive gender-affirming care, this isn't like some 15-year-old that just goes to a doctor and says, hey, I wanna transition, give me drugs, give me surgery right now. That's not the way that this works. They make a decision in concert with the child's parents, in concert with medical experts, pediatricians. This isn't some willy-nilly thing. It's absolutely bizarre that he fear mongers about this. And he's about to cite some anecdote here. That I'm sure is completely either misrepresented or made up. But this doesn't happen. And puberty blockers are reversible. So it's not like we're giving teenagers and children bottom surgery or any surgery. He's lying to you. And the only way that he can convince you that trans people and gender-affirming care is bad is by just straight-up lying. The parents of a 17-year-old girl in Ohio who refused to put their daughter on body... Right, you made such a great point. So that's from two random words. If only it were that easy for trans adults. Exactly, exactly. I can name multiple people that I know personally that have to do GoFundMe to get bottom surgery. These are trans adults who, because we live in a for-profit healthcare system, they actually can't afford the surgeries that my cock-a-bee claims are so easily accessible. I mean, it's just astonishing how they don't even get... They just straight-up lie easily, willy-nilly. Don't even care at all. Don't even care at all. Doesn't feel like shit about lying. Just straight-up lies makes things up on the spot. They altering testosterone when she wanted to be a boy. Men would be allowed to sleep, shower, disrobe, and live with biological females at a battered women's shelter. Men TSA agents who identify as women would perform strip searches. By the way, does this sound familiar to you? So back when we were having the gay marriage, gay rights, gay quality arguments back in like the mid-2000s, mid-2010s, the same argument was used. Hey, if we give gay people rights and stop treating them like shit, can you imagine what could happen? Then we have gay sports players who are in the locker room with straight men. But what if they look at their penises? What if they check out the straight men? What? What if they're hitting on straight men in bathrooms? Bathroom panic was the thing for gay people as well, believe it or not. The arguments are just moronic. They concoct these weird hypothetical situations in their head to get you to be worried about the fact that, oh my God, these gay people, these trans people, they're predators. But understand why he's not citing real evidence, real examples. He uses anecdotes and hypotheticals because everything he's saying is motherfucking bullshit. On females, churches would be forced to allow boys to occupy girls' dorms and showers at church camps or Christian colleges. And boys who declare themselves to be the girls are already participating in women's sports, by the way, dominating the sports and demoralizing the women and destroying any of their chances of athletic scholarships for college. And if, cite the examples, cite the examples. Maybe he could point to one news story that he saw from a small town in Arkansas. Maybe he could point to one particular anecdote. Is this a really widespread issue? Are trans high school athletes dominating women's sports, male to female trans athletes in high school? Are they dominating women's sports to the extent that all the scholarships are dried up and there's nothing left? Is this really an issue that's happening? Is this actually happening? Hey, Mike, you're full of shit. You're lying. This isn't happening. This isn't happening at all. And let me just point out, side issue, it's kind of bullshit that you have to compete in a sport to try to get a scholarship or try to go out of your way to pay for college. College should be free. Why do we have to make children jump through hoops to get into college in the first place? All right, moving on. I simply say, God created male and female and it says so in the Bible, I could be sued for discrimination, lose. How would you be sued? Who's gonna sue you for saying that? If that were the case, wouldn't the Civil Rights Act already make lots of people? Because he said he kind of equated this to the Civil Rights Act, but he explained how this is different. But if this type of legislation, civil rights legislation, made somebody who exercised their speech subject to lawsuits, if he were to say, well, you know what, I don't think that interracial marriage should be a thing because God created different continents and he separated the races. This is the dissenting opinion, by the way, in loving Virginia, which is the Supreme Court case from 1967, 1969, that legalized interracial marriage. People can say that and they're not gonna get sued in America with the Civil Rights Act. And if he says that God created a man and a woman and all that bullshit religious dogma, that's not gonna make you get sued. Like somebody might call you a dipshit and an idiot for believing in fairy tales, but you're not gonna get sued. Has this happened? It's just, it's honestly insane. Yeah, great point to 182 Kiro. If every Christian read the Bible, we'd have way less Christians. That's precisely how I became an atheist because I was raised evangelical, just like my cock-a-bee. But the more I read the Bible, the more confused I was. And upon talking to my pastor when I was in the youth programs at my church as a young man, I was even more disillusioned with the church because it was all, there's so many contradictions. I remember asking my pastor the question, look, I don't understand who created God because if God created me and you and everything, then the creator of everything had to have had a creator. So who created God? And furthermore, if there was somebody that created God, who created the guy that created God? And then who created the guy that created the guy that created the guy that created God? And so on and so forth. It was kind of this weird conundrum and I didn't know how to solve it. And the pastor just gave me some like dismissive bullshit answer about, well, there were some things that God just doesn't explain. But that's not convincing. I'm trying to seek the truth here, right? So why can't you give me a straightforward answer? It's so weird. Anyways, let's get back to my cock-a-bee. Just whatever business I'm in and be labeled guilty of a hate crime. A teacher. If you say something homophobic, you're not going to be labeled guilty of a hate crime. Otherwise, so many members of my own family would have been in jail for committing hate crimes against me, for using homophobic slurs against me. This is so stupid. It's fear-mongering that it's so intellectually dishonest that it's just downright stupid. Was actually fired for refusing to use masculine pronouns for a female student who wanted to be treated as a male. Wait, who is the teacher? And be labeled guilty of a hate crime. What does he say? A teacher was actually fired for refusing to use masculine pronouns for a female student who wanted to be treated as a male. So he's not citing any specifics here. He's just kind of speaking in vague generalities. He's using anecdotes, not really citing anything in particular. A lot of these times when somebody is actually fired or there's any repercussions even socially for misgendering someone, it's not because you accidentally misgender him. It's usually due to a consistent pattern of harassment. And this is what the Canadian bill that Jordan Peterson was fear-mongering about. He made it seem as if, if you misgender a transgender person, you're going to be locked in prison. Zero people have gone to jail as a result of that law that he said would lead to people being jailed. And this is Mike Huckabee doing the same thing but in the American sphere. You're not going to get jailed or fired from your job for misgendering people. If you harass someone, if you misgender them intentionally and treat them like shit, I mean, yeah, you could be fired, but you would do that if you treat anyone like shit. There's zero sources for anything that he says, zero. And if you own a business that involves artistic expression, be it cooking, calligraphy, cake decorating or making t-shirts, and you declined expressing support for a gender transition party, you can be sued, charged with discrimination by the government. Okay, how many trans people have gender transition parties? I don't know any trans person or the trans people that I know don't know that they do transition parties. He's just trying to find some way to create some hypothetical to where if you discriminate against trans people, you're going to be penalized for it. He's got nothing or Dickie McGee's acts as one of my favorite philosophers would say. And just right output out of business, the rights of a male pretending to be a woman would be protected, but your rights seeking to actually live as a Christian will be eliminated. They'll be eliminated. Guys, if the Equality Act is passed, your rights to be a Christian in America will be eliminated completely. It's not that this bill doesn't actually have anything to do with you. And the only way this bill pertains to you is if you plan on going out of your way as a business owner to discriminate against LGBTQIA plus people. But, you know, your rights as a Christian, totally gone. Really? This fucking goofball right here, he's just lying through his teeth. And listen, again, I want to emphasize the reason why conservatives have to lie about things that they talk about. They have to create strawmands of arguments that leftists use is because if they actually engaged in good faith with our arguments and the reality and facts and data and evidence, they'd lose every single time. So they have to lie. You really should contact your congressman, Senator. Stop stepping on the rights of some to give special rights to- Oh, he said it, he said it! ...unwillingness to follow the science of basic biology. They're so predictable, special rights. You know, the only shock is that it took him this long. We are four minutes in to a five minute video. I'm shocked it took him this long to say special rights. So KineMid says that he was saving it for optimal impact. Exactly, exactly. Here's some science. There are two genders, male and female. You notice how whatever they talk about the different genders, they always conflate gender with sex when these are two different things. Sex is what you're born with, what's between your legs. And contrary to popular belief, intersex is a thing where people have ambiguous genitalia. Second of all, gender isn't what you're born with. Gender is an expression. Gender is what society dictates it is. I mean, is there some biological link to the idea that girls are supposed to wear pink and boys are supposed to wear blue and that girls should be the only ones to wear dresses? Is there a biological link to that? Is there any science behind the fact that men are supposed to not wear dresses? Now we can have surgery and hormone therapies and change our physical features. And at that point live as a different gender. That's possible. But we can't just make a declaration that we are something that we are not. And then force the rest of the country to accept that as normal. And let me just be gentle in saying an act of Congress can change the law but not even an act of Congress can rewrite the scripture. It's a good thing that the scripture doesn't actually dictate American policy and we have the separation of church and state enshrined in the constitution that I'm assuming he purports this support. And I love how it's like, hey, guess what? You can write laws. However, you're not gonna change God's law. Mic drop. Got him.