 Thank you very much. First of all, I would like to thank the organizers that I can present it here. Yes. So this is my presentation title, and I would like to talk a little bit about Alshonik. Professor Eserbanti had a really interesting presentation yesterday about Alshonik, but the time period was the originality. I would like to talk about the late Nalitik period. So this is Alshonik, the site located in South, Hungary, more precisely, South-Eastern part of Transnidia. We can see the outline map about the time distribution. The originality, such as a culture settlement located here, the Transnidian albic located in the middle part of the site. And 90% of the settlement belong to the late Nalitik Lengar culture. This is the relative chronology in Hungary. The Transnidia, this time period is Lengar 1 and 2. In absolute data, the settlement lifespan from 4,700 to 4,600 call BC. We have got 217 absolute data from the TUTL project. It was a large-scale excavation, and it happened 2006 to 2009. We see a lot of excavated area. All in all, the excavated site was 23 hectares. But about the geomagnetic perspective, we know that the whole size of the site approximately 80 hectares. I think 23 hectares is good. I would like to speak about more the north part of the site. This is the 10-B, or I from the Kanizhagmullur, because this site is absolutely unique. Because before, we don't know so much houses and burials in this period. All in all, we have got 120 buildings and 2,240 burials. About the settlement, what I mentioned, the north part of the settlement is absolutely... So the buildings located in this region, in general, the buildings are a gold-ground timber-trimmed buildings, and just the post-horses show the building's plan. So we haven't got burnt houses or flat, sorry, walking surface. And the most important archaeological feature from the Cheapstone materials are the pits, which located really close to another wall of the house. These pits are really huge and really deep. And most of the material is coming from the pits. The burials, all in all, we have got 92 grade groups. Most of the burials located in grade groups. In general, the oval-shaped burial is the most typical, and it was the first time where we documented the rectangular-shaped burials before post-horses. It was a hypothesis that these rectangular-shaped burials are the richest grave and maybe the leaders of the community. It's true on one side, because a lot of prestige goods coming from the rectangular-shaped burials. But if we're just focusing on the Cheapstone materials, it's not true exactly. The quantity of the stone assemblage, most of the stone tools come from the second-hand part of the alchemy, the 10B is absolutely a high number of the whole material. Our main question is what was the toolmaking procedure of the Cheapstone tools at alchemy? And what were the value and the symbolic value of the local raw material for this late Neolithic community? Because the local raw material is really important, not just the settlement, just the burials too. And what I mentioned that the rectangular-shaped burials has got prestige items. Of course, a lot of people would like to see that, oh yes, a big cultural connection shows the non-local raw materials and so on. But the local raw material is really important in the burials too. And what did show the new burial practice? What did symbolize the location, the local raw material, and typological features of the stone tools? And at the higher level, how can we understand the transformation of the society? Because this period is, in this period, the essential, more maturely practice, it's changed the totally different. In these diagrams, we see the raw material distribution on the settlement. The blue shows the local raw material, namely matcha radial rite. And the red is the vacuum radial rite. It's located in Transnubian mountains. And matcha is the local supply zone. And the bakon, Transnubian mountain, is a regional supply zone, approximately 100 kilometers. We have got some distant or non-local raw materials. It's mostly the northern flint varieties, cracko-jurassic flint, bollinium flint, chocolate flint, and carpetia radial rites. We have got some pieces from platensilex. And if we see the spatial distribution, which is another part of the site, this shows the big landia culture pits. And we see that in every pits contain stone pools. And it shows the distribution of matcha and bakon radial rite. We have got only eight pits, which contain just the bakon radial rite. So we can suggest that the whole part of the site happened to making activity. If we see the raw material distribution in the materials, the big circle shows the whole assemblage. And the smaller circle shows just the reticent tools and raw material distribution. It's really similar, like a settlement. But we can see some differences, not big differences, just only one part, one sub-site. The bakon radial rite dominate, but maybe the big difference that, of course, the number of the non-local raw materials is higher. But we can see the same non-local raw materials. And if we are just focusing on the burials, the main question is that we can find any special position in the burials. So we separated the grave zone and just the burial zone. And in the grave zone, from the description, we know that just coming from the filling. So we don't know exact place. But we separated the four post holes. And in the body region, we separated the skull, the upper body, lower body region, the left and the right side, and the leg region. And we use the same system in the oval-shaped burials, too. This is the location of the grave, in the graves. And you can see the raw materials in oval-shaped burials. Most of the tools coming from the filling, the grave filling, the skull and leg region. Of course, the skull and the leg, these regions contain the most variety of raw materials. Everywhere, the matcha-cradle rite is the most frequented raw materials. This is the same. So it's like the positions and the technological categories. The skull region is the most of the technological categories. And the blade is absolutely the dominant categories. In rectangular-shaped burials, we see the same system, so the position and the raw materials. The skull, as every non-local raw materials appear in the skull region. And the leg region also contains a lot of stone tools. But I think the most interesting that in rectangular-shaped burials, in the skull region, just we can find the blades, mostly big blades. I don't use the long blades because everybody is thinking about that real long blades. It's the Volhynian flint, the pressure blades. So I just used the big blades. So this is our big blade. And the leg region is really interesting. And it's a pattern that we can find a lot of trapezes. I would like to continue the logical way just with the blades and trapezes. These blades, a lot of blades made from matcha-cradle rite. And it is the question that, what is the volume or symbolic volume? What is the meaning that they use the local raw material that created the really big blades? And they use the special position in the burials. It's from the geological background. It was the other presentation topic. But I think it's really important from this question. It's a core from the settlement assemblage. And we see that this core has got heavily worn cortex. And it shows the water activity. So we can suppose that the river valley and the river bed was the secondary out of the sources. And they used to collect really good capybara materials in these places. We did a gearcheological field survey in the matcha. And we didn't find any big sized, really good, radial rite pebbles. So we didn't find the big blade's original core in the river bed. But we found a lot of outcrops. And these outcrops contain a really thick radial rite intercalation. And it's absolutely useful to create a really big blade course and create a big blade. So we suggest that the late Nalitik toolmaking specialist absolutely know what is the best raw material source. And they used about what was the original task, the original aim, because the big blades and trapezius absolutely typical in burials. And we didn't see any use of the case. We didn't see any use of the trace, the stontos which come in from the burials. And to turn back the trapezius, these are trapezius sets, trapezius collections from free graves. And it's really interesting because before Ashwaniq said, we know only seven pieces of trapezius, the land yell, little materials. But Ashwaniq has got 20, sorry, 214 pieces of trapezius. So it's really big high. And we managed to define that they are located in a lag region or near the pelvic bone in one set. And from the settlement assemblage, we detect sickle gloss. So we suggest that maybe these trapezius, they are not used like a raw head, like a sickle, part of the sickle. And maybe it's just the idea that how can we understand the local raw material importance and the trapezius appearance in this period. And what I mentioned, the mortuary practice is absolutely changing in this period. So there is a liminar phase between the social death and the biological death. And the technological background to create these trapezius that they broken the blades and after created the ratush end. And maybe the sickle and this transformation was one part of this liminar phase and the mortuary practices. And the final, what is the future questions? Of course, I just show some of the main elements of the whole question. So if we see the other grave goods, the copper items, the polished stone tools, and other vessel types, I think it's really important in the next years to understand the social inequality. And it's necessary to research the other materials. The big blades, like a chronological marker. I write a question mark because Alexander Wielski wrote about that the Bolhini and big blade, and it's a fragmentation. It's really important. And the macro realization technology from the early copper age viewpoints. So maybe this shows maybe a precursor of early copper age. And what is symbolized? What is the meaning, the metaphor in this late Neolithic community vocabulary? And of course, from the society's transformation viewpoint, it's only one element. And we would like to understand in a bigger level what was the volume and the meaning of the raw material, and what was the meaning from the landscape and the transformation in the burial activity. And of course, what was the part of the whole communicative memory, this late Neolithic community's memory. Thank you very much. APPLAUSE