 We find that Sheikh Hatusi says to following in his Talkhiyyat al-Shafi One of their offenses which were held in contempt Was their beating Fatima alaihi s-salam It is narrated that she was whipped and it is well known and without any contention among the Shi'a's is that Amr Hit her on the stomach. So she miscarried Muhassan Such a narrative is quite famous among them Add to this their attempt to burn her house when some people Sought shelter in it's refusing to swear the oath of allegiance to him Nobody in our eyes this narrative at all because we have proven how such a narrative is transmitted by way of the Awam by the Sonnis via al-Balawari and others and The narratives transmitted by the Shi'a's are numerous that is to say it's musta-feef and There are no contradictions in Nobody has the right to say that if this were true It would not be a serious charge because an Imam has the right to threaten those who refuse to swear fealty to him Unlike other Muslims. This is not true Because there is no excuse whatsoever For anyone to burn the house of Fatima alaihi s-salam and of the commander of a faithful alaihi s-salam and of Hassan alaihi s-salam And of al-Hussain alaihi s-salam. How can a heinous action such as this actually be justified?