 All in favor. Aye. Aye. Excellent. Thank you for your vote of confidence. Thank you. Thank you. This is the chairman of the meeting. Good. Thank you. So item 2.03 is the appropriate question, chair. And so really all entertained nominations for this. I do want to, before we take the nominations note that I've not heard back from Jeff as to whether he is interested in reprising his role as chair. So I sort of see a couple options here. We can take nominations today and fulfill the chair of vice-chair role or we can postpone the filling of the vice-chair role until next meeting. I'm memorable to do either option and want to get my fellow commissioner's thoughts on them. I'm not regular. I have no idea what I'm going to want to continue that. What are your thoughts on whether he, no one's really heard from it. This was his first term as vice-chair. And it's yearly. And this is a yearly. I think that's a good question. No constant donation. I have no problem with it either. Unless you've seen some sort of detrimental effect not having a vice-chair or really the role of the vice-chair as the second vice-chair is not present. So you don't actually need them today. The chair is here. And you are not being at the side plan on being at the end of this meeting as well. Okay. So we will table. I think we went through it. So obviously. Are we? Item 3.1 is public forum. I don't believe in which one for the public. Anyone in the attendees and I don't see. So we will close public forum before we. Oh, except for that. Just sort of curious how common is it to have. I would say it's hitting this. It's either you will have not many, or you'll have several. It depends on sort of. You know, I think you do have a little one. You're on. Before. Oh, you. Park. Park. Park. Park. Park. Park. Park. Park. Park. Park. Park. Park. Park. Park. Park. Park. That's good to see. I agree. All right, so we are on item, pm. Ani comments or discussion. Do you have any comments or discussion on the agenda that you've ever been interested in? No, none for me. Usually I talk about how amazing our claiming numbers that may is no exception. Two numbers aren't quite in just yet, but you're also going to see historic numbers on the two, Frank, as well. Yeah, we're really the second page. Shows it all with the line graph there. We're very close to 2,000 and over month basis. And we're just as close on the year to date as well. So there is an update with that month set up. Exactly. Very good. So the passenger and operational statistics. So under 4.2. Yes, yes. Now at least. OK, perfect. And in plain means they got on it. Yes, OK. Correct. And actually, maybe I'll talk a little bit more about this document. So every month we upload this document, which, of course, is our statistics for the month prior. You can see the totals. The left hand columns of page three, of course, are May over May of the previous year or the month that we're reporting on. In plain passers, it's the number of people getting on or in aircraft decline. It's, of course, the opposite. We also attract the low factors for the month, which is really important to have conversation with our airline partners, but a very important metric as we talk about new service or added service or added to a particular amount. Usually 78 to 79 percent is the national average on low factors. So when you see 87 percent, we're really, really good, meaning the larger planes that we're off from here at Roantan are generally full or approximately 80 percent full. We also track our departure capacity, which is exactly that number of seats that are on the schedule, even the Roantan airport. And really importantly, we track the land, and that's a really important metrics on the financial end because we charge our airline partners per 1,000 pounds of weight, $2.35 per 1,000, $2.35 per 1,000 pounds. So 63 million manpower times $2.35 into the battery. It's based on maximum gross data, yes, very good. The next section is actually taken directly from the FAA. This is our operations. Operations is either in landing or in takeoff. So this is the number of corporate in the FAA system broken down by both air carriers or taxi. Generally, Bay Area has provided that section right there at the bottom. Page two is all of our employment for the last almost 10 years. We're looking at nine years right now, since 2011, month over month basis. And the bottom half of that is a Q&A telling visualized in the line graph broken down by airline on the bottom of page two. Then we get into the details of landed weight on page three a little bit more with a month over month. Analysis of those landed weights, line graph, and then broken down by airlines as well. Shelly also reports for large utilization, which is the final page on the passenger operational statistics. The one for the employee you can see was the 7% for average on the month of April. I'm sure a little bit pretty close in May, which will have those numbers. You can see that's above most of those years now that I see how the line graph. So we've been reporting on this way for quite a while, and we can adjust. We kind of adjust as we go and add to and get as efficient as possible, but that's the challenge. One more good question is the, so it looks to me like we're just getting back to pre-COVID number stuff, even though we have this like 200% increase, which looks wonderful, but really just getting back to pre-COVID. You got it. Yeah, so that on page one, where you see 150 or 191% over 2021 fiscal fiscal year 2021, you're exactly right. That was prime COVID season right there. So we're about almost double what we were doing last year, but we're not going there in 2019. We'll get some packets. Okay. Yes, please. Contrary to any other comments or questions on sense agenda. All right. Very not all those favorites. I think sense agenda is the same. I'm not going to put any votes. This is a sense agenda. Next up are items. Are actually items. I'm going to put a little bit of technology around this. It can be done. Perfect. And we will have these as well for action. Generally, no, I probably had my name told all of the action. I need to get some of that. Okay. This question. So the, this was exciting. Very exciting. We've talked a lot about this over the last couple of months. In the months, this one was approved by the city council last month, because of the timing of this meeting versus the city council meeting. I'm curious to know today. Generally, the memo that's written right there is really spelling out those key terms for the way that these, this is not really exactly going of course, but this is for the new manufacturing location, which is on the south end of over here, for the map in there attached as one of the attachments to build this over 350,000 square foot manufacturing facility. Lots of elements to this piece. Very complex, at least. Lots of project-praising, of course, or facing a project to get this building to rent. We are currently under a license agreement with beta technologies, which is able to make them to start the project mostly with earthwork, a little bit of concrete work until the end of July, which is very timely that this piece was approved in this time capacity. We also have an FDA approval of this 75-plus, essentially six years of this agreement. That's critical, because at 50 years, this is sometimes the maximum amount we set in airport. This was approved because of the substantial benefits associated with the earthwork in the surrounding region to be that 75-year lease. There are, of course, main requirements and many protections for the city going to the airport, both on a required leaseable improvement in the capital reserve account. There's additional expansion options available to beta in that general vicinity, both to expand a commercial building, but also a daycare facility. And then rent and the associated infrastructure and credit immediately, they just want to be building a function of $11.5 million infrastructure that benefits the city of Burlington, the roadway systems, utilities, underground utilities that really benefit that entire area down the valley. So that $11.5 million is now their infrastructure credit based on their credit. Rent is fair market value for brown rent in that area, which is about $0.06 a square foot on an annual basis. And that rent, of course, or that square footage relates to the timeframe of infrastructure or rent and credit. There's also protections, which was very important. It's very important for the mayor's perspective to protect this particular site to be beneficial and to be the electric aircraft manufacturing site. If they do not continue producing electric aircraft, they're okay to disassociate, including the infrastructure credit of $11.5 million close to $1 million, including an automatic increase in 10% of the product costs. So throughout this term, if that use of the facility changes, there are penalties. There's also a fair start requirements for what can actually be at that site, meaning an Amazon warehouse can't be sighted on our location in case it's associated with aeronautical use. And then the final piece of this memo and the approval is the 1929 peace with the Great Burlington Industrial Corporation. Very strange as we went through some of the title searches on marijuana, but there's a vague language saying that there couldn't be potential conflict on that particular site. So there's a lease amendment on that GPS and lease, which confirms that these are not associated with each other, there's no overlap on the two leases. And that's actually very important in science by GESC. And just to waste the precious details, I should add. It was a long bit of a skimming. Everybody was a little late. Yeah, it was a little late. Yeah, it was a little late. It was just a place. But, so I'm curious with the 75 year lease, and then you can expand it to 81, which is sort of a odd number to me, though. And then the requirement that they actually continue to build the length of planes or aircrafts. So I don't know what's gonna happen 75 years from now. I bet they don't either. So is that something that ultimately can be negotiated? It potentially could be something throughout that time. And you're absolutely right. We have no idea what the future of that technology and industry of the airport looks like right now. So it potentially could be, and that's one of the reasons why we want to protect it to at least make forward moving motions to reach some next zero and sustainability goals in particular at the airport, associated with the airport and the next zero goals. It's a protection, and there's penalties if they don't. So if it does change, there can still be an aeronautical use to that building with those penalties associated with it. The 75 year lease, so 75 was based on an organization of their investment into what ultimately will be around $250 million. But we, I mean that 75, the permit with South Burlington allowed a 10 year period of time to completely construct that facility, which is being faced into multiple sessions. We, during negotiations and through some of the time frames, we built all the sections of the permitted area, decided that six years was really the number based on the logistics of getting from K to construction. That six year period of time, if they complete the second phase of this building, they are given a reset of their lease. So if on year six, yeah, so if on year six, 75 years free starts again. If on year one, they put 75 years starts again. So it's between 75 and one. So I was having a little trouble defining where this is geographically. So is this a new road that they're constructing off of route two? It is. So the curb cut doesn't exist there yet? There is a curb cut, but it goes into a dirt road. Okay. So that part's already there. They're just adding onto it to create a new entrance way. So I can add to the new light system and lane. Okay. So is this basically over where the flight school is, federally or it's before the flight school? So there, we own all the city and airport almost all the way up to Williston Road. And there's a building called 3060 Williston Road, which houses a well known site, which is Maramael's. Yeah. So that is more of our tenants in that building. And that's where that initial location is right there. It's just to the right hand side. Okay. Yep. It's not the same road that Maramael's is on right now. It shifts. So got it. Okay. So it's a little bit south. It's a little bit south. And that road that Maramael's on and the building that Maramael's is stays there for now. That is one of their expansion options. So if one of those tenants leaves, they have the option to occupy that building to eventually build it. Okay. That's helpful. Thank you. What is going to happen with the little dirt road? They haven't decided that one, right? In between heritage and their new property. So that all fits 100% paid, improve new entrances to the flight academy, new entrances to additional parking over there. That is part of the $1.5 million infrastructure credit because that would be retained by the city. That's wonderful. Right. And then the other side, all the way around the other side, nothing happens that isn't already happening, right? Where they are building right now or where there's a big ballroom. Yeah. It's where that whole building and everything else is going to be. Correct. That's where that $350,000 is going to be. And then going around the fence to the other side, like where Eric and Tina are, nothing changes over there anywhere. In other words, the valley is, state remains the same. The valley remains the same. There's no impact of anything associated with the valley or those tenants were negotiating in the Mansfield right now. But none of those tenants or geographic areas change. And I think it's 13th. The state is the same. The state is the same. And you got that on the other side. So the infrastructure, so I don't really know infrastructure, I'm assuming it's all in France and with I-5-ROP, I can call it. So is that potentially be available to some of these other tenants or future tenants or future development if you're filling that quarry and can develop that? It is because that whole road between heritage and where the new beta location is, not only is it going to be the cave, but everything on the ground is going to be there. So access and utilities now are available to improve some of these other locations. So it's definitely going to be here for 10 minutes. One of our oldest areas down here, the alert hangers is the, it's not the oldest, it's one of the oldest buildings on our car location. So improving access and utilities is really important. Do you want to explain what that road has to do with it? Yeah, so that the new road will be. What is it? Division? Division? I suggest it. I suggest it. So it's not as common. Can you suggest it? Electric app. Electric app. I think one of the girls can even have a thing or something. So the permitting is all in place then as well. It's so in place right now, see what's going on next week. Thank you. You mentioned that there was the possibility of shared infrastructure. You talked to her when you sort of gave me the tour that data was going to have a geothermal energy for the use of their electric lines, which is not just that important, and creates that level of sustainability. Is there a chance that some of that geothermal could be used for other areas of the airport? I'll let Larry answer that. I just wanted to just point out that they're building there. They are doing the growing now with that, so yes. Right now they're building. However, not really associated with the beta, but to answer your question, we are going to study right now with BHP to look at those types of renewable energy resources. Possibly geothermal, solar, et cetera, et cetera, to add to our existing energy. And a couple other just newbie questions. This sounds like a great contract for the length of the lease or the rent for the infrastructure aspects of it. Does the airport have their own attorneys or was it the attorneys for the city, or kind of look out at it up? So we use, in fact, he just called me right now, we use a consultant firm, a gentleman's name is Trevor Casper. He's helped with so many initiatives and negotiations throughout the city of Florence, and he's not an attorney, but he helps develop that business deal. We also used outside of Turkey, grab a mask and clean in our city attorney's office. So through a lot of aspects, and generally those that's relatively system-proof, all of our uses and contracts and so on. So it's lawyers and pensioners. Any other questions? I was actually just going to ask what exactly, because it sounds like things are already progressing, City Council has already approved this, what do you need us to formally do as far as a motion is concerned? I'm guessing the motions in here aren't going to be relevant to you. Not to you, and honestly, a lot of the times you'll see those memos directed towards the city council or the finance in the city ground. So this ultimately is a ratification of the already approved lease that was approved on Monday. Correct. And I say ultimately because this body is still an advice report, so it is ratifying a decision because of the timing of this, but it's, it's, yeah. Sorry to have it. Sorry, I'm just going to add to that. I was going to go over some of that conversation to the other, just for new commissioners. That is our role, we are an advisory body. So usually we do not, we usually recommend approval of a contract. We can certainly bring up any points of concern that we have. I know that City Council likes to hear the feedback that we have. So even though we're only advisory that you appreciate us going through and reading these contracts, but at the end of the day, it is a ratification. This sort of after the fact is not typical. Most of these contracts we will review and recommend before the council. But it's not specifically, but it's just happy to go into the reversal or so. So today there is no formal recommendation if we get to two. Well, and sometimes we will have a special meeting that it's called in a bit, but I think we'll just turn over in the commission just as part of this as a part of the plan. And there's a, there was a single City Council meeting and the material has to allow us to ask. So the coordination of all those efforts, we did end up shifting many other contracts so that we could, we could get those to you in a different timeframe. And it's actually going to break out, but I would suggest if you can date for the month of August, so that we can get things in front of you before they do a two to five City Council meeting. Sometimes they'll work out, they'll sit down. I also don't like to do this either. I like to bring this up well. And I guess just be clear, I'm not complaining about the process. I was just wondering if we still need to take action on this, you know, sorry about it. Sorry to be improved by council. So I'm happy to do it either way, but I would say it's up to the commission on how you want to pursue it. Well, I guess what I can do is, that is a goal that we recommend approval. So I guess this situation would be to confirm support to there again. All right, so that's why I didn't do a motion to start, so I wasn't quite sure how to do it. I was sort of pan out, but let's make that motion to concur with the City Council's approval of the data technologies groundless through your motion to that effect. So moved. Second. I'm actually wondering if this is pretty long and if anybody had any more questions before we make that question. Okay. So we just need to be aware of who we can speak after something's moved in second. All that is. Yeah, I'll say that. So we have discussions. We have discussions. All right, with the start of it, which is sort of already starting and we have all of that, we'll get a lot of blasting happening. It's really already, you know. Well, those, all of that work was done, not under this, those were done under a license agreement to do that work, which we're doing. All right, all right, all right. But was this the physical place that we're talking about hasn't changed? Correct. Okay. And so I guess one of my questions is, is there in place or is there still seeking a approval of how high it can go with respect to their place? That has been confirmed in the authorized by the FAA at this specific level. So that's part of the lease as well. I think that doesn't matter. We don't need to do that as a part of the lease because that's a federal requirement. And in that lease, there's language for meeting all local, state and federal requirements. The process to receive height requirements is the 70, it's called the 7460, which means really, whether it's when you see your Williston or South Burlington or Richmond, they need to go through that federal process to receive height authorization. This one's a little bit. I understand outside of the FAA you're saying. So let's say they wanted to go through and the FAA was fine. It still could be trumped by South Burlington. Correct. And then there's other zoning. We don't like this as well. Okay. And that permit is also in place as well. So both federal and local separate permit for meeting is confirmed. And the only other thing that was weird is the other businesses like Mirabels and such that are in there are secured in their lease. But they're sort of in a waiting place, right? So if theirs comes up, do they just, what's the process? Do we, or is the airport likely to go, okay, we're not gonna be you because we've got a little bit of gender or do they have them still looking to have an option? So they have a long term lease. I want to say 20 plus year lease on that. So they just last year, like three years ago? Yeah. And I want to say it's longer, but I'm not 100% sure. Beta term for this lease does have the option to occupy any expired entire facilities in that area or help relocate those facilities at the full expense of data. So that's not what we're interested in at all. We'd like really enjoy working with those. And it's very important too, to our revenue stream to have non-aerotical revenues coming into the airport. However, our primary mission is aeronautical services as well. So that's why both FAA and we considered and approved and authorized essentially through this lease to have beta receive that option by those facilities. We also asked them to potentially reload the entire building. And that would have to be worked out with additional other requirements. But right now that's only an expansion option. They do not have control over that particular site at this point in time. So what could be kind of down the line is, one, if they at least expire, then they could say, they have the option. Correct. And they pay us for that. And they pay you for that option. Or it could happen that before that 20 years is up, they could offer to move everybody. And that could be a separate line. But they don't have the ability to move anybody before that expired last year. I think we're in. Yep. It is. It is. It is, right? It's going to be there. I don't even think we're supposed to get right today. For them, especially. I did have one question on the GBI sequence. And sort of concerning other things, at least in person, is there any other recommendations on anything else at the airport? That's the result. That we were prepared for. You know, this lease was brought out through a special meeting. So we were unaware of this. We weren't, and do actually have a very great partnership with GDIC, especially with the foreign trade zone. That's a different one at this point. Yes, I did that. And this lease talks about the foreign trade zone, which is an important part of the airport as well. Through that foreign trade zone, we can move that zone around through different certification processes with GDIC. We essentially were unaware of this lease except for the title search. And you can see, like you said, it truly is later. And honestly, it's tough to talk about how this went about in 1970, not in 1970. This sounds like an option, right? This sounds like a right-of-first refusal on air without a complaint, which at the time, I don't know what the rules are, but we couldn't do that today. We can't say we can preserve that if you're going to build on it in a certain date within this 50-year time period. So there's a lot of additional research on how to exactly what this is, what it turns out to be at least needed to. And I understand, I'm just taking a few notes. There's, again, there's seven years left. There are a proper part to the extent that this either needs to be negotiated or shamed than what it says, but that is, or just something that we'll just admit. Yeah, sorry. Yeah, at this point, the city attorney's office is pretty comfortable with kind of separated. These things need to go first. And at this point, there's some kind of an expiry. Oh, there's an expiry. So that's it. Yeah, that's perfect. Come on, come on. A little piece of tape. All right. Hearing no further questions, on those conveyer, let me say hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. By the way, there is item number two. Item number two, I'm going to take a motion that would be directed at the board. That's going to weigh in a little bit. Come on, second. Discussion. I apologize, but the third bullet, first angel, the number you receive, that was just asked to make you know it should have been out from the motions of our correct application and the transition that you receive. So we will fix that before we go to the board by the city council. So basically, this project consists of using that photo right there at the bottom to see my next bullet. That's the redevelopment issue. I see going to pass it, but that's a gentleman over a pair of five inches. Also, the X lights are in the grass. We will, on the east side, we will be putting a 20-foot shoulder for ease, for safety, and for ease of maintenance. The grant has been applied for. We're waiting for the offer to come. And then, beside that grant, it's selling contracts. We had two contractors that did it, SC Ireland and Pike Industries. SC Ireland was sitting in the way less than Pike. And we worked with Fireline Johnson on the design to the contact with that place for the assistance and construction oversight. Any questions? That was the 300. Yeah, 300. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, Fireline Johnson was going to produce something. Yeah. Yeah. And also, the design wasn't there, too, because that was the design. So we're kind of moving the tax away this way to give us more room to be in our place. No. No, this is just the technical office deteriorated. Oh, it's just the pavement condition is reduced. So we're going to improve that pavement condition and add a shoulder. It helps with snow removal and safety, and also new garden like horizons. Yeah, definitely. We did look at that a little bit to try to move that back. We actually, the word I use is right size, the classification of the 119. So that for various reasons, one of the reasons was to move. Now we're getting real technical there, but we moved our safety area closer in, and then we try to re-approach that to the elbow. We didn't want to turn it off. Couldn't do that. So we're going to do the opposite. We actually got to relocate our terminal. Seems hard. I'm going to get it. We were looking at it. We were looking at it. And I have a question about that. Basically, it's set up right outside of content and construction, and construction or it's like in the design and programming. That's already getting released. Any further questions or comments? We're ready for the question. All those in favor, please put the five or say aye. Aye. Aye. Opposed? Five, one, two carries. Next is item 5.03. I'll entertain a motion to have the authorized to grant organizations and contracts for the home improvement projects for the final project. Yeah. We have a second. I'll second that. All right. OK. A little over a year ago, we came before the Airport Commission, and we applied for a grant to do a pilot program to kick off the residential sound installation program at the airport. That was reviewed and accepted and approved by City Council so we can receive a pre-construction grant to do a movement for 10 homes in that grant. OK. So we've gone through the process of acoustical testing, design, bidding, and all we're asking here is to sign the contract with the lowest bidder to do those home improvements for eight homes that we already have a grant for the money to do so. But we need to sign that contract with that contractor to move that project forward. I guess I can't say also we will be coming forward in our next meeting with the next group of homes that we've already bid and we have applied for a grant for and also the next 54 homes will be designed. So it's all coming together from the pilot. The pilot did allow one good thing about the pilot. We did the acoustical testing. So anything that is sent via online, we don't have to redo anything. We don't have to continue doing acoustical testing. We can put it there. They're all approved. So that's kind of a challenge. Yeah, I mean, this is kind of historical. Because, like Larry said, over a year over the trial work, it's this D1st contract that we are approving for these eight houses. Like Larry said, like the map in the future is indicating there are, I don't know how many blue houses there are out there, but around nine or so more houses plus the 15 houses that are being designed as well. So this is the start of the movement to actual construction. We're working now diligently one-on-one with homeowners and not getting anything ready. And it's not easy. Everything's very unique. The cost of this project is going up more than we expected. I think two times more than we expected for that one was two hundred. And we will be to those next homes that we want to share with them now. Those next homes that we've already been, we'll start at the same time, please, because we anticipated that by the time we get this contract signed. And we'll be back before you pass the question. Sign that contract in the end, let's do it there. Did we bury our reports? Hopefully, we'll get more of a local based on these projects. But as we go back, all right. Since the cost of this doesn't include it, I'm just curious about the interface with efficiency per month. The month gases seems in terms of doing those kinds of updates along with all of this. He was going to mention, where are we with that? You're correct. Yeah, the costs are included in this. But the collaboration and the connection between homeowners, not just on the trip where it's all things that work within their eligibility criteria so that they have a 10% share of those parameters, but also beyond that. So make sure that the homeowners are aware that even though the FAA won't pay for every sustainable or new product online, there's options to take advantage while we're under construction. So it's significant kind of collaboration. I'll take both of our consultants, Larry and Tini, who would provide gas and some of his other issues in terms of the amount of gases we're going to take away. Yeah, which I think is really critical. And are we anticipating that each of them going forward, at least in the near future? Is it going to be at $1,000? Right now, it's $1,000. We thought it was going to be $15,000. Yeah, well, that's what we're going to receive. And no, I know. Yeah, so we've had to make some adjustments. The engineering was less. We've made adjustments to make it work. So it's not only, I mean, obviously, it's hard to tell what the cost of the construction is going to be, but as we work out away from there, we're theoretically going to have a lot of projects that we're also going to do, as well as do a third of the way, that are based on a number of factors. You can achieve that 45. Let's jump to it. Thank you. Larry, what are you? How about both of them? Have you had a fairly good success with most of the owners agreeing to this, or is there sort of a group of a few just refused to participate in? For example, the initial pilot was 10, right? We moved forward with that 10 and did all that effort for 10 in the back time of the 10. So we went forward with nine. OK, so the pilot had nine. And we're in eight here because of the cost that the water will get pulled over to the next grand. They'll do this. This morning was wonderful, Larry. Do you think that they pulled their place because the cost increased? And even just that 10% of that cost made it out of them? This grant was 100%. And we are, like they said, we were working with other. Dermont gas is making up to the 10% although we've had additional needs with them. But we're going to be working through this process to move forward. And the whole water will never actually go to the temperature of these costs? I think some of the challenges with unique circumstances of homeowners who are not wanting to participate or whatever that needs to be, is it's going to be for each homeowner. It's all over the place. Some don't want to participate or whatever. There's some reason. Some will find a disability or permitting or co-requirement issues that are above the shower on home. Yeah, it could even increase their taxes because it helps for some sort of those changes. We didn't give that just a general idea. I'm just sort of curious. How is this done? Is it just insulation or windows mostly? Windows, insulation, doors, ventilation. In a lot of cases here, we had to double up on the board of the walls. So now it's just not moving. Solution, insulation, insulation. In the case, there's a special type of window versus window. Shultz would have spillover types of terms. It's like in the house, too. Oh, yeah, they're going to be that if it's in the living room. Which is why the sole traction should not be asked because instead of paying for 100% of the people who are with one of their programs. And I'm actually very attracted to those issues. And one of the great questions since this is a contract, again, the airports, legal team, or the city, the attorney is responsible for taking a look at the contract. If you read in the motion, they have to put it before the design. And when we do these memos, we go together with the contracts to them. And they're all in the standard contract anyway. So if you look at the same thing, I'm not going to fix it, but the difference is further than the ones that we're doing. And that's from a very standard low-cost contract, to a multi-dialect contract. Our city turns out it's small in every group. And so that's outside of them. You're very thorough. I don't know. I don't know. I guess we can comment about that. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Just to hear it, I'm saying, how are they chosen? I'm sure we've come up with that before. How are that holds chosen? Like, who goes first? Basically, it comes to the cost of the company goes to the customer. But the noise level. The area that they're in. The level of the area that they're in. The contract. The noise contract would stay. And then you approach them or they apply to you? We approach that. And correct me if I'm wrong, but if the homeowner chooses to not participate, they basically have to sign off saying the company's harmless. Wasn't that included in earlier versions? No. So there are different methods. There's different programs that homeowner gets used to. Right now, we are in the Salmon Solution Program. There are what's called purchase assurance programs or sales assistance programs that the FAA has also authorized us to move forward with. Those change dramatically the cost of this program. For example, sales assistance program or purchase assurance program needs the Air Force or federal funds would buy that house, relocate the resident, and try to resell that house. Obviously, the initial cost on that grant is $750,000. It could be $200,000 plus $200,000 to $300,000 for purchase. So that cost was up. So if a homeowner chooses not to participate in the program, that's simply it. If they are within the hand-out contours, this map for future maps, they can still be eligible for this. That's the best. I don't care. It would be perfect. I'm thinking of something else. Because I feel like earlier on, there was a new grant. If you receive the funds, then what I can do with the name. So these homeowners did have to sign a contract with us pretty much Eastman. And then the Air Force. The Air Force. The Advocates. That's it. The Advocates. The Advocates. So that's included. Oh, no. Oh, it isn't. So originally, when we were going through this conversation, we were considering with FAA making that a requirement, but FAA authorized it not to take that money. So these homeowners do not decide that. They do have to decide kind of a contract and say, if we purchase these unique materials and halfway through or when the materials come, we can't just sell these. I don't know. These are four of your hours. Then they're so pretty. That's why I'm trying to figure it out. You know, I'm trying to figure it out. I'm trying to figure it out. I'm trying to figure it out. You know, I'm trying to figure it out. You know, I'm trying to figure it out. I think I was thinking of the application. The requirement, because it was at one point. Yeah. And it was at one point, and there is one of those programs that does require application. But I can't remember. I think when you purchase. I think it is. Yes, I think it is. Which is what we have to purchase. Yeah, we purchase, we add, navigate, and we resell it. Yes, yeah. That's it. All right. Any further discussion? Hearing all those, if you have any questions, can I say hi? Hi. I'm going to go through Gary's. We're on two items six. Okay. So this time I just say, right. The update. I do a very thorough job to ask for some improvements. I added a little bit. It's satisfaction if you want more improvements. Glad to do it. There's a lot going on as you can see. And then I think that's all. If you have any questions, let me know anytime. I really don't have much more than that. Other than the end, I put other projects for working on to move forward, like the new maintenance garage. There was one other one, but also I should have added. We are in the events of working with the FAA, which includes the full mill and overlay of our main runway, which will be probably the largest. Projects we do here. And that has to be programmed. We're going through costs right now. So there's a lot of work to be done. And then I think that's another thing. I think we need to get to the point where we can see when there a funding for the next couple of years. Can afford that. And we need to get going. Like, like Larry said, funding was probably the biggest part of that. We're planning for. Operation. Is a lot of shoulder to. This is a main. And a lot of this is going to be done at night. Or. It has to be done at night so that we don't impact the daily flow. It's going to be a tough thing to do because it's a fantastic thing. Yeah, very complex. That's why Alpha might be up there. And you can't get to the money. You can't get to the money. I think the most fucking land. That's the best picture I've ever seen. The last picture I provided was the new TSA equipment going in the in the tip project. So, all the way, I mean, everything else is intact away. Kilo, as you can see, it's not late today. You have the, you have the, you know, you see the sun base. It was. It was pain today. So, as far as being, you know, we gotta do all the work. Any questions? And just for reference for the pictures, the text that's in red. It's the latest information. It's not, oh my God, it's a problem. And we, and so, so thank you for, you know, adding their purpose this month. I'm going to work a little bit better. There's nothing in here on the. Intersection. We're not moving on that anything on that right now, right? Not under current construction. What Robert is referring to it is during a rule, I'm going to say the action team meetings, which is hosted by the air traffic control. We identify certain hotspots or challenging geographic positions or crosses or crossing a runway. We currently have three hotspots on our airfield. And I don't want to say that that's a bad, sometimes the geometry of tax ways and my ways causes some of these. And adding a hotspot to a public map or a public account for or for pilots is really important, really critical because it spells out. Hey, attention when you're in that hotspot in that area, focus is a little bit differently to look and focus with the air traffic control down there. We have responded to those three hotspots by just completing a project last year, which was our hotspot. It was a remediation project. And he was part of it. That's why number three and we were watching closely some of these hotspots. What can we do, can we add additional. If they were part of science, we had like change geometry and then program. No, the garlots. In painted lights. Well, they are good. They're like, they're yellow lights that would be wise. It was a large aircraft as you come to a whole short line. It just enhances that alertness for the pilots. I'm going to the end of Q. And that's going to come back to you with the one thing we did talk about was this under construction but associated with the project is another $5 million general transportation grant that goes at the end of tax away golf right next to where they did this development. And that are two large one of those large aircraft goes beyond to the end. That would be wonderful. Thank you, Larry. Next item seven package. I'll go through this. Typically, I include like if we're in July, I'm including a financial, the revenues, the expenses, they're not true, they're going to be from the prior month and the reason that that happens. And a lot of our large revenues, a lot of our things, they're not getting reported to us. I was at the car rental agency, we're not getting some of that data, they don't send it to us, you know, there's times of it so I'm still waiting for all of that data. So I typically to give you a, I would be estimating the last so give you a better picture I do two months. Closer. Yeah, so that's what you'll see here. There's always a cash statement, and that is always as the month is just ended once in the bank is very, at the end of the month. And then I included what's called an AIP receivable report, and I just simply enlisted a lot of our federal grants, and it shows you how much you spent in the time period like the wire is weird, and then how much we're so these are sort of that I'll go through each thing, being that we have some new members, very new members and newer members. I expected to be on the house. I have something here of all of our grants, one of the most thing that really was able to help the important function is very complex that we received three stimulus, federal stimulus grants, because of the situation. And we received a lot of grants, and we have not the biggest news and why are we putting all three of those bills because we haven't spent all that time. And so I'm just letting you know how much we spent out of each grant so far how much is remaining in each grant, and I added a new one that the request, you know this is where this interaction is great. But the, the, the, how long those grants, we have to spend them. They're all four year grants. So that four year timeframe is in there so it gives you a good sense of even if I still have money relating to the cares, which is $1.4 million are available about $1.1 million still available. I have until 2024. I don't know that we'll be spending all of this money. But we, we have been because the, and we talked to we were talking about it that the appointments are going up quite quicker than we had anticipated what we were budgeting a year ago. So part of our strategy for financial wealth is help here is to spend money, as we need to spend money and not go gangbusters just because we have these friends because it's been a bit of a productive right. And one that's been unusual. So, those are in there. The airport also the last bullet point I have there is, we have was called great anticipation notes, and we take out a $10 million, this past time we took out a $10 million great anticipation note. What it is, it's a line of credit that can be used only for money set with the way the grants were. We have these grants, the current voices we pay the voices and then it's a reimbursement. To the FAA. So I pay it out first and I gotta get the money back. They're really good at it. There are some items like that last final 10%. I can't draw that down until the grant. So, there are times like that I have borrowed $2.5 million under the grant anticipation note so it's like a line of credit that we can use only on our FAA grants. And I know that that is specific to AIP 18, which is a very large grant. And that is because we are close and I'm going to kind of take a little bit longer. So I didn't want to hold the cash here. So that's what we have borrowed. I always let the commission know where we are with our ranks is fictional. We didn't borrow for much of the year actually. And full of coin is our year date revenues through through may were about $20 million just under $20 million compared to the year before that was almost twice as much, which is just to show you how much it has. And the fiscal year of the date revenues are 92%, they're 92% compare everything to pre COVID to give you a sense was 90% pre COVID may 2019. And we are making significant headway, we're not quite back to where we were in the revenues, but we're getting off the course, which is like all that stimulus money or more. Let's see. We, there's a new schedule that is included here this month. I'm not sure if it was for the new condition, but I really want to finish that out and thank you to him because our chair, he had requested and then put this together. This is the dirt, but I'm going to say this right trailing. Yes 12 month trailing revenues. So it's sort of the accumulation it's going to show you for each of our large revenues are landing car concessions PFC parking and our CFC revenues. So we have a larger facility charge, whatever ticket that somebody who's flying a relative eyes, we got a pay a $4 fee for life, and then we get, we get the most of that so that comes to us as a PFC, CFC, just trying to explain the link up is a car facility car facility charge, and because right now we are for one year we're charging $6 a day when somebody rents a car. Typically the past story, they was $4 today, but we did a bit like a COVID COVID surplus charge to make sure that we're covering all the expenses. So this just shows you kind of where we were back in the 19 and if you do a really good visual where we are, we have the number so you can see directly just to give some information because it's hard to compare here after here, but we've had such wild space. So I want to thank you tamper. I think this is I really like this I think it's a great representation to show how we're coming. There's also illustrated to me. Obviously, I guess I didn't recognize the depth at which it really sank. Telling that story of how we truly federal price to continue our operation. Like we always say we have one aircraft or back to work today, we still have the same federal requirements and expenses. So huge support. Well, I like, you know, Well, it shows me in some areas, we've already been involved with that. Right. So I think it's really helpful because this is such the bulk of our revenues anyway. The airline revenues that we get the landing things were obviously affected but the, the rents that people pay was the same whether or not we had passengers. Anyway, our expenses for the year were 13.3 million dollars. This is our budget that that we have for fiscal year 22. Our budget was was set quite a bit higher than what we had during the bulk of COVID. And we intentionally we had some repairs and maintenance we had some construction costs. We had some other things that were coming through our operational budget. A lot of that is hidden toward the end of the year, which we do we just sort of play about that in that way. But we are seeing higher than year before because during COVID we really pull back as much as we could. So we can't, we can't not do safety things we can't not found the runway, we can't, you know, turn all the lights off here. We need just as many staff because it's about safety. So as far as our operations staff or maintenance staff, it doesn't really reduce the number of stuff that we need. All those, all those expenses really were the same but we've been doing more repair maintenance or things that we've been planning on. We're able to accomplish this year. Our cash or the change that we had this month is in our primary checking accounts. So one of the big significant things that happened is realize my PSA is a passenger facility charge. And back before COVID we take about $2.6 million a year to give you some perspective on how much revenues are raised with the PSA cover. They're very likely we are only able to spend those dollars. Once we put together an application, we have to apply, we have to apply so that we can continue to collect that passenger facility. It's not an automatic. We have collected that we applied to use it to apply a stamp. So, the very specific process we share that information with the airlines, we follow federal guidelines because we don't spend much. And we submitted a package to the airline that signed off on and to the FDA, which they approved. And once they did that, the bulk of the money that we drew down was for older projects that we had a match up. So, you're able to draw that money and pay ourselves money that they have on the match. We also have some snow equipment that new equipment that we're releasing, and we're able to draw down and continue to be able to draw that money. So we were able to draw down a significant amount of money, or the PSA application that got approved. So it came out of the PSA account and it went into our checking account. So, overall cash. Those couple of sentences don't do it justice and how much more respect. Well, it's very much a team effort to to go through that process. Mother. To start. Yes. We've heard pretty much as soon as we get this one approved we start thinking about the next one. What things would be appropriate to go out of there and we start, you know, start a folder and we'll start building and we'll start thinking about putting together the next application, which is exciting because once the grants go back to the 90% 10% split. This allows us to fill that 10% of construction projects. We're just thinking about new projects down with that pipeline, new, new things that we might not get a funding for. Pretty pretty second time for them. Yeah, and, and just even like, you know, last year, our, our total project expenses for over $23 million and that's living for a full year. I know it is. I'm sorry, that is through June. So for a full year, we're still collect this is a preliminary one for June, because I still have invoices coming in for work that has done through to that will be adding to this so we spent the work. But we do spend, there's a lot of projects. We were very fortunate during COVID for two years, all the grants that we got. All the grants we got were 100% federal dollars, and that was tremendous for all airports, typically they're 90%. There is a 6% state match and a 4% local share. Unfortunately for us to see taxes, I have a million dollars, which does not mean it doesn't cover that. That's a lot of information. Benefit of, I guess, all of the commissioners, but I'm happy. Questions. We do. Yeah, and actually, under our out going that covers like all the people that work. You're talking about the parking fees. We actually, so we budgeted. 3.6. Yeah, and yes, we made about $5 million through May. That's a big issue. So that's a big issue. So I didn't have the losses from that. Yes. Okay, but then. Amazingly, that would actually cover our HR. Our parking garage revenue is our simple larger source of revenue. So when, what was that 10 years ago? We don't need it. Yeah, let's let's compare this a little bit. One of our largest single sources of revenue, but also a very large expense for us as well. Right. But expenses were still paying off from when we made it bigger or expenses. Security. In fact, we just over this today, which exceeded $2 million. Replacing lights and. And then we'll have, we have, you know, we have a tremendous amount. We're always. And the thing I don't see it on here, which is curious, I don't really get how it works, but. This is the military. The army guard in the international guard. Do they just pay with police or how do they contribute to your heart? Thank you. They're not here as far as I can tell. So we have a long term lease. We also have a joint agreement with the Air National Guard because they use our facilities. Two separate agreements, the lease agreement itself talks about the geographic location and the ability for that to buy that space at no cost. The airport joint use agreement talks about what does it cost the airport to run those joint use facilities and what is the ratio of military aircraft that uses those joint use facilities, and we take that expense and essentially charge it for at least the methodology is charged to the National Guard. They do the same thing. What do they provide to the airport, which is significant and exclusive. Which is just on a capital cost of infrastructure and equipment exceeds $20 to $30 million on an annual basis right now I think it's over $2 million. So they have a watch, so money never changes hands? Money never changes hands. In fact, the cost of the ratio of our expenditures on our joint use facilities is far less than the cost of what cost of that. And they're just not responding to aircraft incidents, medical emergencies in the terminal. They also are mutual aid response to joint use facilities as well. And that's all right, right after the fire situation. So is that a, then sort of a revenue for us if what they're providing is, you know, $22 million worth of fire rescue? Yeah, yeah, I want to call it a revenue but it's certainly a massive cost savings, because, because that you're at that number that $20 million would be an additional project that we would sum out after the fire. $2 million would be added to our operating budget year and salaries. I think that's closer to work because it was the personnel was to the equipment. Right. Do they help with the lab or is that, or can we do that for them? Yeah. So, so 99% of the zero field is by army and staff and our equipment. In fact, we help in very specific areas of their taxiways. They do have equipment because they are responsible for the rest of their taxiways and their ramp. You don't get that type of relationship with me. Whether it's a large FBO or a large entity that has the capability of having the staff, the skill in the equipment to house the additional scope of equipment. For example, if one of our equipment is down for an answer out of service, we now have that resource to help us. This doesn't happen happen very often, but that's a huge benefit. Nice. And then the other line that this curious is FAA Aircraft Security, no dollars. So that's an old, you know what, we used to have, as we're used to show our security payments. It's an old account that we can use and it's not, and I shouldn't have taken that off, but because the past years I would have had it for comparison. So it just doesn't exist. No, it's not a thing. No, we have aircraft security all over a different line. It's on the last line actually. So that's what we pay to the city of Burlington for their police services. You'll notice if you, you'll notice just walk through there or you'll see uniformed officers, or you know, police officers. Or if you're flying through TSA, you'll notice that they're hanging around observing and you know, available. So who is in charge of the perimeter then is that like half the guard on their side and your products on our side. Yeah, it was inclusive of the police department as well. Right. You got it. Yeah. Yeah. And it really is mostly teams team in their operations department that does multiple types of perimeter and airfield inspections security wise can wildly wise. So that public protection is what it's initially called protecting the public. Yes. And then the last grand anticipation note that we owe is that one of the ones that we took in sort of the waiting place like you were talking about, we owe it because we're going to grant them and then we gave it back. I drew down from the key bank, key government bank on to cover the expenses that we paid a little bit grand that we are now waiting for a way to come back to the SBA. So it's like a line of credit and just to be a holding place. So that's what that is, but we don't have to worry that any of the grandmony that we hit has to be returned because we don't have a place to put it. No, no, no. So the FAA work going to close. And I mean all the stimulus stuff. Yeah, no. Great questions. I like it. Any questions? First of all, thank you for that presentation and the work that you've established is accomplished over the last couple of years. You hear a lot of situations on how people's jobs and change, but I can only imagine that, you know, boom, you're really glad that you get these grants, but then all of a sudden, you know, that creates an entire new highway for you to travel down. And if taking a look at Tim's visuals there, if you're able to project into the future a little bit and think about how as data work expands, the revenue enhancers that are going to be needed in order to keep that line at a level, at a level of position, obviously as you grow, your expenses increase. And if you and your staff talked about that at all, is it something that you're concerned to or are you feel confident that if you build it, they will come to serve the curious from your expertise. Good question. None of us can entirely predict the future. I think with the COVID, the approach that we as a team, you know, have taken, has been to be specifically responsible. So, while I could see things improving all spring, it wasn't about being overly zealous and even building our budget for this year. And we have to know there are some uncertainties that that can affect who flies and who's choosing to fly. We started to rock the vibe and rock out in April of 2020. So, I think we take a conservative approach, we, we try to budget maybe a little bit less than what we hope we will bring and we hope it's going to be more. It's a little harder to be honest with you. It's been harder to predict than it ever has. I've been in this role about seven and a half years. And, you know, that's a point I felt like I could, I can have a pretty good sense of where we were going. So, made my job very interesting but more challenging. And I think we're doing hopeful for the future. The, and I know you've mentioned this. The number of seats that the airlines are operating over four months are the highest that they've ever offered 12 years. So, it gives you a sense that airlines are very confident in this market that Burlington is going to continue to be a very, that people want to fly to and people want to fly out of. We're very hopeful that we're going to see some great members and that's going to allow us, we have so many projects here we are. It's a matter of scheduling projects that we can find finance and get done. We have, we just opened up this today and we'll be in that number. There's always something and how you have to justify the highest needs, always need equipment. So it's about what kind of, we can be kind of frugal here for smaller airport and make a lot of money, but we have to balance will be spent as well. And I'll add to that a little bit to make sure that we're appropriately managing the risk of fluctuating. So, as airlines bring in larger planes and bring in more revenue essentially directly directly toward the sessions are part of the rush. That's fantastic. With airlines, again, whether if we service one planner or a lot of clients, landing or using a terminal facility, still have essentially those same expenses. So that risk share with the airlines as well. That's not always that too is a risk I should say of itself, because that means the cost to an airline goes up, and the risk of an airline saying, is it worth making a burden. So, so we constantly have to balance that part out, but I think the substantial part of managing the fluctuation of growth and decline is the better. Those are even though our parking garage is our largest single revenue source, or my partners are our primary mission. And that's how we receive the sessions. That's how we see part of the graduate news. That's how we have the radiation produces significant amount of their funding. That's how some of the others will pass occur right here at the center we're not mentioned beyond. So I had the energy that that risk through appropriate contracts is really working for our future. Usually building it will come from most of our stocks infrastructure gets in place as being improved for safety purposes. If you look at the terminal. If I became you look at the afternoon there was a big square bench square inch of carbon people are jam in there because the space is in there for the size aircraft. So we're not really expanding. We're replacing those concourses with an area for people to see. We're replacing or like the runway what we did, we're right sizing this terminal for our traffic today, and we're creating a flexibility for whatever income. Whether it's smaller aircraft, if they should go back down to the smaller aircraft, whether it's electric aircraft, whether it's larger aircraft, we're right sizing our terminal for that flexibility. And we also from the master master plan, thinking further, we actually have projections as to if you know independently to sort of projections, that's what future traffic. So, so, right, I threw by the end of the day. So it's not to be right. So, you know, a lot of these products are like, you know, in anticipation. So it's not like we're sitting around. We can't build the projects without the master plan and the appropriate forecasting process. The fact that this is a military commercial airport provides more confidence or more interest by airlines to make this a place they want to fly in and out. Or is it just, that's what it is, and that's what it is. It doesn't have any effect. Yeah, from, I would say from an operational safety perspective, yes. I think that piece of the conversation does come up quite often. What are your capabilities from one standpoint, but also capabilities of a reference and a firefighter. It's a requirement of the airlines, but it's also internally. There's policies within those airlines. David, I just went through a process where a charter flight came in. And it was, they were asking. No, they didn't know where they wanted to send it. No, they didn't know where they wanted to send it. And then this happened to be for deployment. But that airline, that specific airline, did certain requirements met to land at this airport, which we were able to do because the airport is really above and beyond. So that they have, you know, the revenue is a product, as you say, is the conversation with the marketer and the profit and what sustainable routes can they offer today? Yeah, I just was curious if that was a comment or a question. Some in fact, it's not. And I'm going to mention one more thing on this. I showed the budget report, which are the revenue expenses, and I thought it, you know, I showed sort of the net we have. And it's easy to look at that. What I don't show here is that we have debt coverage. We have debt that we pay, we have debt reserves that we're continuously finding that we have leases that we're paying. And if we have capital improvements, the capital expenditures themselves are not going to show here because they're not operating. So this is for my operating revenues and the operating expenses. It shows probably the things that's going to care about most, but just, I'm just going to highlight that it's not like we're walking away, you don't have to spend that money on anything else. Careful not to give that impression. And for reference, the budget for a point three is zero. It's a net. Yes. Our revenues or expenses are for the money coming in, the money's going out, it's not a place to go. Which is exactly where we are at the 100% of the self-sustainable. We're reducing the revenue to over 200 months. And we are considered an enterprise fund, but the city of Ehrlichton, which means that we don't get any subsidies, any tax revenue, we don't get any revenues from the city of Ehrlichton. We're a self-liquid business. We're a enterprise fund. And they don't take money from us unless we take for services. The FAA requires that and has to be for, you know, services that we're actually receiving. So you send her. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah, you can't just get money one way. But we also, we don't get money. So where does the new beta lease money and what sort of bucket does it go into? It will be ground rent and ground. It'll be ground lease. Yeah, yeah, because I will be building. Because they don't. Right. Right. So you're just releasing under. So I wasn't sure if you were going to report that because of the rent session. So you're going to basically report the revenue and the expense. I mean, we'll have to see how I will. I'll have to take Gatsby 87 and inspiration with all of this. So to be determined. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. You can always come up with one of those fancy charts. Yes. Speed right at the minimum. Any further questions? Next up is 8.1. So our background noise monitoring system went online. So we're going to start with June 21. And that my mom bears are in South Burlington. And on BTB sound. Updated monthly. All of the noise events that are currently for each month, which means that they're about a certain decimal point. So any time it reads a certain certain level that that it will counts and it's recorded as a noise effect. So you have everything posted. He might want to take a look. See all the data that we have there. From those three voice monitors. And then the graphs that we have posted there are the comments that people provide to us on that same. Online web portal through Vector. That's the software program that we use. So we have them. Separated by comments by aircraft. So that was a duplicate there. And then these are all the people list. So it's up to the commenters provide to provide which aircraft it's by. It's not something that sorted. As well as the commenters, which means that that was one individual or to say what address. So that's how that is organized by a number of comments by a single address that's reported. I think that support so far June 1 to was it July 15, 345 full comments from justice system. Not anywhere else just this is 48% came from a single commenter. 40% of those 318% single commenter. And then there's many, many, many, many comments. So almost 75%, three or three comments came from. And a comment, a commenter is somebody that puts something in. Correct. So the stock of their assets. Yeah. So three people. Three out. Yeah. And then there's the noise. This is the noise comment data. That was the thing drawn. And how do people participate. So if you go online to the website that we have listed, you click. You can find your existing data on the public content. So yeah. No, it's monitoring system. Yeah. Yeah. There's a place you can click on to provide. But this isn't something like really cool that we have out there that's registered. It is. So it's not, we have noise monitors that are placed. It's a location in South Rhine. And we'll listen and what you see that are. That do continuously, continuously that recording the data. So every time. So it is. It is. It's almost. It's. It's. Well, that's. Which is a requirement. We're not allowed to show the FAA. We're not allowed to show live data. So this is as a five 30. PM. So 10 minutes ago. This is live information. I created our data. At these three sets. Are the. Live. Almost live. Always desk. Levels. Okay. So, but what we're seeing on a chart is not one of those decibels. No, this is easier. It's a common for people that make. So we're going to add two songs. So that the live data. Report each month. Yeah. And then we're going to have. Noist data is right there. So every single live event. It's just like an Excel spreadsheet that we get right from Vector. And it lists every single noise. I think it's over 60. Yeah. And so, and the ones that. Are of concern. Is they have targeted 75. 75. But. It's loud. So. So we're missing out. Yeah. So. So. So. The. You have noise monitors and you have people talking. So we're right. So the people talking is from the noise. No, it's not. What's something there. It came from one person. Yes. Three. Nothing else to do. Right. Small selection. People are commenting. But. That's. But. Our noise sensors. That are slightly delayed. It's a federal. This is security in a federal. So the FAA will not find. The FAA funded these three systems. And so what are we using this piece of. Great question. This is, this is a public outreach. People like to know. Yeah. People like to know. We've had. No idea. Go on and they can see. What it was. I think it was two years. You're not an airline or something. Yeah. Or you can see the background. Yeah. When there's nothing going on. And this came from a public comment. Public process. And we applied for a grant. For this to install these three monitors. So. That's exactly right. It's a public accessibility public access. Website to view. Desperate. That's not to be confused though. With that layer that I just added right there, which is the 65. D&L line. Which is an average of the entire. So that's, that's not the same as those. Moist monitors. In fact, these noise monitors sending information that we. Publish. Online. It cannot be used to. Create. Our next voice contour line. Which is the line that we need for eligibility of. The sound. Earlier. So two very separate. But I'm guessing that the. They do. So. First. So usually. I mean, they could show up as numbers, but they're not going to say. No. No. So usually. They're not going to say who they are. You all understand this. You can't even see them. Yeah. You'll understand this. So usually they have their. Part two or four pairs. Yep. And the first aircraft squats of their unique. Yeah. Transponder. Yeah. That code. It does get picked up and does display that first aircraft. It's like number two, three and four would be displayed. But of course the, the noise is still picking up. That information. And you'll see a track. You'll see that. The stuff does come into play. The technology that's available. Usually you'll see the F 35 part. When it first comes on with the, with the transponder code. Then all of a sudden it's over here. Over here. Over here. And that, that really is. Sure. But if they just don't relate to it. Right. Don't ask me how. Well, they're not federally funded. So. Who's feeding on the information? It's amazing. Okay. So. All right. So. But apparently since we only have 300 comments out of our. Several thousand community members. Not that many people are. Really monitoring. Well, comments that one wants to make. When you know it's a F 35. You can go directly to. The. The tank. And they collect that data separately. So. Those. So they probably have those people know. Where they're not trying to get gone. They don't care. Yeah. Gotcha. They want the ear guard to know. That it was. Got you. Very separate. That makes more sense. So. This is mostly, I think. Commercial airline. Do we have. Mostly military, but there's two ways. Military. Right. And we only pick up. Yes. It's only. Yeah. One is. Truly amazing about this program. Is. We can start looking up patterns of. Track data. Yeah. And if somebody does make a complaint, let's say about it. That complaint on the time that it was submitted using this button up here on the left. Is automatically associated with one of these radar track data. On the back. And we can actually see exactly where the house is. And the closest proximity of that aircraft. High speed location distance. And, and confirm. Why was that aircraft over that particular house? Or was there a new situation that. Or do we need to look at a different. Or do we need to call a draft control to. Yeah. Generally those are one off. Very. Situations that. An explanation to it. It's very helpful to explain that to. The general public as well. Do we have. I didn't begin with the size of the runway. But. And. I didn't begin with the size of the runway. But. And. We do not have the first procedure here as well. We can get them if we keep going in this direction. That's one of the, one of the things that. It's just. Again, we condense or consolidate. A caution about doing that because I hear a lot of. Stories from other airports is when you spread your noise departure procedure. So this is why over the flight path. And try to consolidate it over a single path. Now the same. People are getting. Highly dense. Well, you can. You can do that, but you can also require a reduced. When the operation is safe. So you can just reduce it. How are you using it? Without having to. Change the direction. You can do that or require that as an airport, but there's a possibility. There's a possibility. Anyway, that's interesting. Okay. Thank you so much. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Great. Anything else? I was wondering. Next to move on to eight. Yeah. Yeah, so. Actually. Right. Yeah. The map is being revised. Yeah, I'm trying to bring that up because we just added that new map today. It might be under construction. So here's the latest map. And what we did was we just make sure that the airport was high that it's similar to what he was saying before it's hard to see if you're kind of just looking at this and you're not aware maybe of where the airport is, or the parcels that the airport homes, and then you just see the orange, blue and green, dark green areas ago. Wait a second, why is the airport starting way up here. So this made it a little bit helpful to see that we're starting with some of these random parcels in there, because there are no residential houses in the purple area that's all this purple area is already owned by the airport. So you can see Larry Kurt guide me here a little bit that one, the orange numbers of what are those blue is what they just approved on the contract today. The orange is phase one. That's designed that we will be seeking what we've applied for a grant to all, which also includes the money to design the green. So we need to improve the six orange and then do the testing and figure out what we need to do for the three. Well, we don't need to do testing we got to prove a blanket approval for that you know like we need no testing we just need to work with those homeowners for design and bidding. Okay, but the design means they have to do the testing in their house. No. So, so we did a sample size of testing. And the FAA approved that everybody greater than the 70 dnl line is approved for the noise insulation program without additional testing. Everybody. And except we will design and then this includes bidding and then we'll apply for a grant. Once we get those kids guys next year to construct or to do those. Yeah, this, this is also the line that just skirts the south side of when he's when you ski. So we're, we're just about there to now start splitting up these between Houston and South Burlington according to our implementation. And then when we get the new noise plan, the lines will potentially will change. So will that be the determinant lines for the next. And when we should also still be the approval is approved for no, who's the protest because that line at approval is already just for the 70 dnl even officials. Oh, and we have a way for that grant. The noise exposure. Yeah. Yes. Further comments or questions. So for new measures generally what we like to do is try to have people submit any topics that they have in advance of the meeting so that if the public is, you know, they may want to see what we're talking about. So I encourage you to sit ahead of time. That being said, we don't want to prevent any commissioner from speaking of something comes up so briefly when I open up the floor to see if any commissioner has any comments or if you want to discuss tonight. I have a question about the search. Okay, you're on the search committee so as it sort of stopped for a bit so I've been in communication with Tom. So we've got we've had one, we've had one formal evening. And there were some questions that were brought up in. Things about the conversation or the role questions about the job description for the role. So some of those have undergone tweaks. I think that position has been posted. And there are, there's been a substantial increase in group of applicants. And so the committee is now. We have our recommendation from the mayor's office as to which candidates before which candidates to not move forward with. So the process is the mayor goes through and does the first. Yes, and no, there's a recommendation that happens. And then we come back so we can look at somebody. I don't have hot and said. Presumably cost down to work a little bit. Yes. So we are you did that now. I mean in terms of the time for. I'm curious. It's a great question. So where that came out is that I don't know the exact date, but it's fairly recent. I think she's came out of the mayor's office and so. Well, you know, I don't know the exact dates, but like it was last week. Yeah, yeah. And so now the committee is charged to go through. Review. And come to what, free fund this or. I don't know where we're still interviewing. Oh, okay. So that's the timeline. So, is this going to take those six months? I don't know. Yeah, it's not to my mind, not a good situation. I guess I can't speak to the committee. I think we are behind where we want to be simply because it's a decision to change the checklist and to look at what the role is the salary for those is competitive. I think it works, but it also has to balance against other different cities. So there were some initial last piece that I think were good to bring up or not anticipated. So that's the delay in the process. I think the next couple weeks is too long. Okay, well, that's good. Okay, thank you. I have one, a little. Yeah. The other commissioners. Thank you. I will try to be brief. Before I talk to one. The first one is our new maintenance facility. We've been talking about this on and off and where we're going to locate it. We, we, the team here and Shelby took a, an entire capital planning retreat recently talked about many, many of the projects that we talked about tonight, but many more, many future ones. And the maintenance facility is a very high priority for me. So we're now kicking off and have determined the consultant to help us create the eligibility criteria for our next. We're going to be working on the maintenance facility as well as making sure that we're headed into the design criteria for this facility. And then the site of this. Similar topics on top of construction. This lady mentioned super exciting. We are still preparing to open by the first week of October. The new equipment is a place lots of really great things are in progress with that project. And as that project wraps up, we're constantly putting up our next project in the terminal, which are some of these pictures that you see behind us. We are in line right now to continue to design an additional $35 million terminal project on the north side of our terminal, which is the right side of that picture right there. And we're going to be working on that project through the competitive congressional attorney for spending bill. It does. So I really excited the FAA. We didn't see some of that that work. There's a lot of work still to be done. And ability criteria. Certainly now it's very specific to a terminal building. And a lot of information coming to this. For the hotel, we are just finishing up some final administrative pieces on the hotel project, including some marketing elements, working with Shelby and the grant transportation team, parking requirements for the hotel where. Sign in, et cetera, et cetera. The location. We are expected to see shows in the ground this fall to start that project. The permits are in place. The contract is in place. The ground basis is already in place. And now we are ready to start the construction. You will see coming to the project in August. In amendment to the ground lease, there's been a change in partnership between. The operating manager and the construction management company, which together created this with the management group. So you'll see a small room and then coming forward just to change that. Other than that, everything else stays the same. Very exciting. It's still a fairly lit by area. It's actually an increased number of rooms. It's not 18 rooms. 1717 rooms. Which is very, very exciting. And also I had some complexities through our system. Shelby. Talks to me daily about it, which is parking. Garage at those periods of time to get full meaning our staff parks outside of the, of the building. The hotel. Overflow. That also has to shift into a different location. So we're working together a kind of master. So we tell is, what side of our terminal. We're just on the other side. You have the same height as the first garage. In our, what is today? Overflow or oversized. Yeah. So that moves. Yeah. It's just a surface. Yeah, it's just a surface parking lot. Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah, yeah. So the answer will stay the same. Correct. It's going right inside. So it's a pretty small footprint. Yeah, it's, it's right. It appears for sure. It's, it's, I mean, I don't know how many rooms on the bottom floor with that photo. But with the five, six, four, five floors. It's 118 rooms. And then the final piece is just a quick update on staff reports. We've had a couple of really amazing, really amazing. We hosted an all employee barbecue. The entire airport. Grim master Dave was on a toast. I was on a hamburger. And the entire team helped out with. Literally everything we had a swag. And this wasn't just internal stuff. This was a airline's air guard. We tried to invite everybody that was possibly good. We got a couple hundred people. We also hosted it for staff only and their families. Like monsters game and that commissioner George came with us as well. And then we had a couple of employees. We had a couple of new ambassadors that just joined our team. Shelby has been working extremely hard at higher. Essentially entry level position, which has been very hard and other than the job market. But she is now welcoming a couple of new employees to our basket team. And then we had a couple of new staff members. And then two last things on employees. We have a couple of new ambassadors that just joined our team. Shelby has been working extremely hard at higher. Employees to our basket team, which is really our front team. Those are the folks that are out on the curve that everybody. Everybody sees. And then finally, August 1st, I have to say, we are seeing a retirement with one of the longest serving employees at the airport. And then we started to do some research on that, but I'm just going to say that. He's a great guy. He's a great guy, especially the city. So we did some research on that, but Greg hill is there with us or 44 years. We started when he was 20 years old. Maybe last. Is retiring on this, on this version, which is a really great. So I have. 44 years. I can't see that tremendous growth. You know, I can't see the GV. I see. I have a picture of them. When I did down a year or a couple of years after we started, he usually doesn't watch these things. But we'll be celebrating his retirement. What is his? Great question. So he is one of our airfield workers. So he runs the plows. He runs the lawnmower equipment. He goes every square inch of that. Yeah. Great. So follow up items. So analyze this section just as a quick intro. These are items that either have come up in previous commission meetings that need follow up, or we'll also add in this meeting and take away that are supposed to be done for future commissioners. So. Okay. So the city attorney's office can do this in September. So they'll be here on site to kind of do. I think it would be good to do on an annual basis. That's what we do with our committees. And it's a great online. Training. That's what we do with our committees. And it's a great online. Training. That's the. You know, we have seen some paths. As developed on right to know. And it's a really easy way to just be. Of all those things. So. Yeah. I think that's great. Yeah. Another thing that I'm going to add to it too. If you don't mind. Eric, you mentioned a couple of changes to. Commissioning policy. I think that should be on the annual. Reorganization meeting as well. So voting and then. I think that should be on the annual. Reorganization meeting as well. So. And then. I think it's up to you. But that would suggest. Yeah. I don't know. July. That's kind of. Turnover. And the commission. So I can see like sort of. March, April. Yeah. Like after everyone's got it over the belt for a little bit. Like actually responding. Yeah. Work. So, but yeah, I thought that was a great point. That should be. Because I don't. I think it was updated in August. Before that was. Four years or something. A long period of time. So. That is something we should be looking at. So that was a great observation. Sure. Or would you like us to bring that back to the next one? Or do you want to wait a couple of weeks to make something? Well, I guess I'll defer you there. Cause I know you can like produce. He's not. Well, like that. But it doesn't really change how the body. Yeah. I guess operates. I would be happy to take a look and just compare with other. Procedure. I've worked on her. Example for the boards and commissions that I staff at the city. Just. Issues like that. Or I'm talking about just general membership. Who is appointed. How they get appointed. That nature. Okay. But yeah. Yeah. Great. Comments. Yeah. So the way that that has worked on been worked on in the past. Yeah. And then so that all gets. Amalgamated into a proposed revision. And then the commission will go on that. So it's 11. So that's a staff of 11 one. Are there any other items that we discussed today? That's okay. I think it would be good just to have an update on the process. For. Right. Okay. So I'm. Yes. Okay. So maybe names, but just say, you know, okay. We can 10 interviews or whatever it is. I just think. As a commission. I'm interested. And I think we should be. As to where the panel stands. Okay. Because people keep asking. I don't know what to say. Well, I did say something, but. Not for right now. I think just. I think we might need to be sensitive to how that's presented. Oh, absolutely. Potential candidates already in the room. When that's presented. Just so that there's not any. Well, maybe. Can we have an executive session with that? The more appropriate. Good. You could decide. Think about it. I just think some way to. Keep a surprise in your progress. That's. That would be helpful. Question for the orientation. September 2. Executive sessions. Okay. What is your main content. That's meant to be known. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Personnel issues. Any other. All of us. All right. So. Before you make a motion to the chair. Suggestion for a. The next meeting. Yes. What is your. So we have. A few of us. Leaving on a couple of conferences that are. As well as. As well as. Well, as many. As well as. I'm proposing a very early August meeting followed by this September, this is the 30th of September. Hopefully on the August 3rd or the 3rd. Two weeks. Another meeting starts at seven, but we need it four. That works for me. I'll make it August 30th. I'm not 100% sure about that, but I think I can. I don't know. It's September 21st. I'm going to not be here. I'll be out. Seeing a daughter, but I can call in. You still have that. So I believe that. Okay. Thank you.