 So we have had, I think here, great perspectives of different business leaders. I'd like to open up for questions. We'll take a few questions. So I think there are some mics coming up. Let me take just a second. We have one question here, one here, one here. I'll collect three questions and we'll go by a batch of three. Yeah, please. Good afternoon. Narendra Taneja from India. Very interesting, good to hear perspective from Germany and Total, which is probably more dynamic in terms of looking at the new world order than probably most of the governments invested in part of the world in particular. You see, my sense is that the world order is already changing. For instance, the Global Gravity Center, be economics or energy, for that matter, other issues as well, has already moved to the region between, let's say, Israel and Japan and Australia, some call it Asia, some call it Indo-Pacific. I'll leave it to your choice. But it has already moved. But how many countries, for instance, in the OECD are actually willing to acknowledge it? They do sometime, but when you look at their policies and their obsessions, nothing is changing. It's 1.30 billion versus 6.7 billion. 1.30 billion is OECD population, and the rest of the world, that is 6.7. You see, the point is that these 1.3 billion, they are used to building global narratives, controlling them, disseminating, and they want the world order the way they want it. But there are 6.7 billion people, and Asia has risen. There are countries like India, there are countries like China, the countries now wait for some time, you know, Indonesia and wait for some more time, Africa. So now the point is that how long, for instance, the OECD countries would go on just having meetings, conferences, and listen to themselves. Some people call it Apochamba. Word is changing. Recognize it as soon as you can. My sense is total has. Why don't you follow total? Thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you. I'll just take two other questions. There was one here in front. One here in the front. Lady in front. Laurent Co-Internets-Germain, international lawyer and writer on geopolitics in Paris. The panel has so far addressed how business can and should adapt to geopolitics, but I'd like to reverse the perspective and have the panelists' views on how business can influence geopolitics to what extent it can, because geopolitics does not stand in a vacuum. And I'm not only talking about influential business leaders who could influence political leaders, but business as a whole and civil society have had a big influence on global challenges in recent years. And so as geopolitics is becoming a global challenge and has a negative impact on the economy and government's care about growth and employment and so on and so forth. So I think we should start thinking in a more organized way on how business can have a voice in the evolution of geopolitics. Great. Thank you very much. I think there was a third question here. Please, the lady in the front row. Thank you. Thank you. I just wanted to have more details about what Madame said about the risk assessment and where you happen to have more risk in countries you don't expect than in Africa. And I think total energy as a global company is a very interesting source, so I would like to know more about that. And the second question linked to that is whether the crisis of war in Ukraine has an impact on the risk assessment in Africa, and we see now that, you know, getting back to Africa to have to get more energy with countries which used to be not so popular. So how does it look? What is the impact on that on Africa? Thank you. Well, thank you very much. I think there's a great set of questions. One about the rise of Asia, one around the possibility of business to influence geopolitics, and I think also the question about the relative risk assessment. So given the last question, maybe, Helene, may I ask you to pick up on this topic and answer, like, shortly we have just a few minutes left on the risk assessment potentially also potentially on the other question. So risk assessment, it's hard for me to summarize the few words, but we have a risk mapping exercise that we do in the company from bottom up. So every affiliate, business unit, silence, one has to do a risk assessment. Then we aggregate those, it's effectively a map, and we look at the occurrence, so the probability of likelihood, the severity, and we look at, you know, how good would it be to mitigate. So three dimensions, and we make all these maps, then we aggregate them, and then we come up with a corporate map, and then at the executive committee level, we also do the map, and there is a methodology here which is the same we do for compliance risk, which is we vote on the risks, and then we end up with a list of risks, and if you look at our Universal Registration document, you'll not get the map, but you will get the risks, okay? And that's dynamic. So the minimum frequency of updating this is three years, and we just finished actually this fall, an update from what we did in 2019. And then when we have all these risks, we look at are there clear owners, are there not owners? So in our company, a big risk would be, for instance, a major industrial accident, you know, an oil spill or whatever. So are there people whose daily lives to handle that risk? Yes, they are within my organization also, but so we consider that the risk is being taken care of so finally. And then we find risks that maybe are more subtle, fall in between other risks, in between the cracks if you want, and then we have a global risk committee that actually assigns a risk to someone or a team and we deal with it. And then we do a lot of crisis preparation and so on so forth, but so I think we have a framework because of the industry we're in, because of its intrinsic characteristics that we have been fine-tuning for years actually. Okay. Great. And maybe just building on this, because the connected question was also about, let's say, the rise of Africa, Middle East, Asia. So maybe a quick comment from you, Mr. Masroy, and then from Sam about, do you see that the political development over the last few years, accelerated by the war in Ukraine, has kind of changed the weight of these regions? Yes, I think the world is in a race. Each country in the globe is trying really their best to create a good environment for an investment, to create a strong economy, and we've seen it all over the world. I mean, we are seeing now super power like China and India is taking the lead in the world economy. They are becoming number one, number two, number three, replacing Europe and North America. If now, at least in the future, unless Europe and America do something about it. And then Middle East here as well, despite the challenges we've seen, we are trying our best. We faced a lot of challenges. My friend at the back here asked a question whether the business can influence the geopolitical. I think, you know, I can give you an example. We've been attacked and UAE by our neighbors, Iran, but not directly. They created what they call war by proxy. They go to Yemen, control the country, and from there they are attacking here by drones. They are also doing the same thing in the Middle East, in Lebanon. They are existing in Syria and Lebanon, threatening the neighboring countries. In addition to this, they also went to Europe, in Ukraine. I'm sure you heard the news. Their drones are supplied to the Russian with their crew, where they are attacking a European country in the daylight. So business cannot really influence. What we are trying to do here in UAE as an example, we are trying to provide our citizens and our residents the best life, best opportunities. We are accommodating 80% of the population as expatriate, and we are trying to provide for them the best living conditions, the best security, and I'm sure if you go through into our cities, you will find them secured, clean, and people are living in a very good condition. This is our aim and we are hoping to be one of the most successful countries, if not in the world, but at least in our region, for the sake of our residents and our people. We have the pleasure to enjoy it while we are here as well. Thank you. That's a great point. Maybe Sam, because we are running out of time, but I'd like to have your perspective on these regional shifts and the role Africa would be playing in the light of the geopolitical fragmentation, multi-alignment that also Maurice mentioned before. What would be your concluding remark here? Madame asked a very pertinent question, especially about the vulnerabilities that the war in Ukraine, for example, has exposed in the systems around the world, especially in developing countries. I just gave the example of Sri Lanka, for example, or the examples of what we have in Africa. It's very important that we start to understand the impact that global activities have on a local perspective, because the crisis in Ukraine has triggered demonstrations in Sri Lanka as a result of food and fuel crisis that turned into a political problem. I think African governments have started to learn from that really, really quickly. I think it was the President Senegalese, if I remember well, that went off immediately to Russia to try and negotiate the blockage of wheat exports. That, in one hand, shows that there are real vulnerabilities that could turn from economic problems to political or security or instability problems. On the other hand, it starts to give a credence to the question from back there around the important role that businesses could play in influencing geopolitics. I think this is where these kinds of roles that we're talking about, like a chief trade officer becomes very important. When you find corporate society and corporate organizations from an organized perspective, being able to present a front to political leadership, that starts to influence policy and that starts to make governments pay real attention. I think those are two very important questions that we should not ignore at all. Thank you, Sam. Merci beaucoup à ce panel, tout à fait extraordinaire, qui nous a donné la possibilité d'avoir une perspective business sur le monde, en complément des perspectives politiques, institutionnelles et religieuses et donc au plaisir de continuer cette discussion en offline. Merci d'avoir été aujourd'hui avec moi et à bientôt. Merci.