 70 points for the Miami Dolphins this week. My goodness. Three separate guys had four touchdown days for the Miami Dolphins. They had a couple of dudes went up for 40 total Fandal points. It was absolutely bananas in that game. And obviously if we recap on week three, we gotta start there. We're gonna recap the Dolphins and their massive victory, what to do with Devon A-Chain and Raheem Ostra going forward. Talk about other key takeaways from week three with injuries, role changes and more. And take a look forward to week number four in NFL DFS by looking ahead to salaries on the week four, Fandal Main Slate. Welcome on into the Heat Check Fantasy podcast. That's right here on the Fandal Podcast Network. My name is Jim Sonnis. I am a managing editor of digital media for Fandal Research here to recap week number three in NFL DFS breaking out all the key takeaways and what it means going forward for NFL DFS. We'll start things off by talking about those Dolphins here in just one second. The first day reminder to make sure you're subscribed to the Number Fire Daily Fantasy podcast feed wherever you get your podcasts. We are here twice a week talking to NFL on Mondays and on Thursdays. You can also find the solo shot for one more week with Tom Vecchio here every weekday. And of course the USC via Austin Swame as well. All right here in the same podcast feed the NFL and MLB shows go up on the Fandal YouTube page and on Fandal TV Plus to get Fandal TV Plus go to Fandal.com slash watch or download Fandal TV Plus on Amazon Fire, Apple TV, Roku devices and just log in with your Fandal account. Snap into action this NFL season with Fandal America's number one sports book right now. New customers get $200 in bonus bets guaranteed when you play as a $5 bet. That's $200 in bonus bets win or lose. If you've been thinking about joining Fandal there's no better time to get in on the action. The app is easy to use. There's a wide range of betting options including spreads, player props, totals and more. So visit Fandal.com to kick off the NFL season. Fandal official partner of the NFL must be 21 plus and present in select states. Fandal is offering online sports wagering in Kansas under an agreement with Kansas Star Casino LLC. First online real money wager only $10 first deposit required bonus issued as non-letrable bonus bets that expire seven days after receipt restrictions apply see terms at sportsbook.fandal.com. Gambling problem call 1-800-Gambler or visit Fandal.com slash RG in Colorado, Iowa, Michigan, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Tennessee and Virginia call 1-800-NEXT-STEP or text NEXT-STEP to 53342 in Arizona 1-888-789-7777 or visit ccpeg.org slash Jack Neticut 1-800-9 with it in Indiana 1-800-522-4700 or visit ksgamblerhealth.com in Kansas 1-877-770 or stop in Louisiana visit mdgamblinghealth.org in Maryland 1-800-gambler.net in West Virginia call 1-800-522-4700 in Wyoming hope is here visit gamblinghelplinema.org or call 800-327-5050 for 24 seven support in Massachusetts and in New York 1-877-8 hope and why or text hope and why let's start things off here by talking about those unstoppable Miami Dolphins what they did in that game on Sunday 70 burger against the Denver Broncos. I can't talk about anything else as a headliner here for week number three. The two key guys obviously were the running backs here Devon Hain 233 yards and scrimmage in this game where he most earned 142. So 142 is a great number but still almost 100 less than what Hain had Hain had eight at 15 chances inside the red zone most are it had four most are did lead in snaps and he was obviously very good but I don't know how you put Hain back in the bottle. Now Jeff Wilson is eligible to return to week five so we release one more week of these two and what makes it even more fun is that they are the headliner for week number four as well they're facing the Buffalo Bills right now the total is 53 and a half to an half point spread it is the marquee game on the Sunday main slate. So I'd love to have more time to sort out who will be the lead back here between Hain and Mosturt. I've got no idea. Now the other key thing in play here is that I think that we'll probably be able to see Joe and Waddle back out there did practice on Friday so he'll probably be able to clear protocol by Sunday which means we'll have Mosturt, Hain, Waddle, Hill all in the lineup or the Dolphins in week four. So taking a look here at the salaries over on Fandall.com for week number four it's a pretty tough one to figure out because it's hard to like two backs in the same team but the problem is this team is unreal right now it is different facing the bills on the road their implied total is 25 and a half. So I think if I'm assigning salaries to these two guys Mosturt was 66 this week and we talked about him being a very good value play on the heat check so thought he was undervalued there and it's hard to bump his salary down with what he did in that game. So looking forward to next week I would say appropriate salary for Mosturt is probably 73 or so and he is 79 which makes sense. He went off for 40 points this week so kind of hard to put him a lot lower than that. I would say Hain, he was still running behind Mosturt again fewer snaps but really good red zone usage. Hain 18 carries and four targets in this game. I would say appropriate salary for Hain is probably 7,000 despite fact Mosturt is 79. Hain's salary is 64. Okay, so that's pretty fun. I know we saw a lot of Mosturt in this game but Hain was pretty involved as well even early on. I was talking to Brandon Gadoula on Slack about this. We were talking about Hain getting involved early on. Mosturt was too. So when you add back in Waddle and add another competitor for touches in this offense I think 64 makes sense. I would still say that Hain is probably under salaried at that number. If you're making me choose between Hain and Mosturt at their respective salaries I'm going Hain. I think 64 is a little bit generous on Fanduil's behalf for Hain for week number four. Now this could go bad because Dolphin's running backs historically have not gotten a ton of work and especially if they have Waddle back next week it makes sense to go a bit more past every once again but I'll have to dig more into what the first half snaps looked like for these two guys. I know Hain was involved pretty early. So it's not like he was like totally just garbage time but I want to look a bit more and to see what they used to just like and I think it's arrows up. So Devon Hain $6,400 probably going to be a guy we're talking about when we get to our Thursday preview podcast for week number four. Let's dig in now to the key injuries from week number three in the NFL. Derek Carr ruled out for the same due to a shoulder injury. James Winston came in and averaged negative 0.08 passing that expected points per drop back in relief of Derek Carr and he did that despite having no picks and no fumbles just one sack on I believe 16 or 17 drop back. So Winston did not play well but he did funnel targets to the primary pass catchers maybe very good pass catchers. Winston, lot of looks, Michael Thomas, lot to Chris Olave. Now there are two things to consider here. One is volume and one is efficiency. The efficiency part I think will decrease with Derek Carr missing time and with Winston filling in for him just because Winston was a backup for reason and lost his starting job to an adult last year those are important factors to consider. Winston did funnel targets to those guys but so did Derek Carr before his injury. Chris Olave's target for the first two weeks was 32%. So that's not a difference. Derek Carr was chucking a deep two. So I would say actually, and there's also the potential that with Alvin Kimberick coming back next week we're probably gonna see a more one centric approach than what we had when their leadback was Tony Jones. So I think this is pretty much a net downgrade for this New Orleans team. It is a James Winston revenge game next week because they're taking on Tampa Bay. So that's obviously worth a lot but I think it's a downgrade for the Saints. That's kind of a bummer because all these wide receivers are very, very fun but I would probably need pretty generous salaries too. Be super, super intrigued by them. It's actually the lowest total right now for week four is the Saints and Bucks game. That's a 40 and a half right now. I just wanna check quickly on Michael Thomas because the salary was low this week. He's 59, so that's not bad honestly. I could see being intrigued by that. Yardage has not been there despite the work he's got. Not a lot of doubt the work for Thomas so far. 59 is not bad for him. Olave 79, that's appropriate I would say for Olave. So more intrigued by Thomas but I do view it as being a downgrade for the Saints in week number four if we assume Derek Carr can't go. Mike Williams left Sunday's game with a knee injury and did not return. He'd been playing awesome before that not just this week but the entire year. It did pave the way for a massive game for Keenan Allen. 20 targets, three of those were deep. He caught 18 of those 20 targets for 215 yards plus a passing touchdown to Mike Williams. It was Josh Palmer who filled in for Mike Williams. He ran 33 routes compared to 13 for Quinton Johnston. Palmer also did have three deep targets. Austin Eckler sounds like he may be back next week but I think Palmer will be relevant here and I don't think that Johnston as of right now is a massive, massive threat to volume for these guys. And Allen has the potential to get massive target volume. So if we're thinking about salaries heading into week number four this is also a very good game on next week's slate. Totals 50 and a half for the Chargers and the Raiders. As I pull up the screen here on Fandall YouTube and Fandall TV Plus you can see Keenan Allen checks in at $9,500. I probably would not put him above Justin Jefferson generally but maybe the game environment does tip you that way. But it's a high salary for Allen. You're not gonna catch him and sleep in there. As far as Josh Palmer goes probably can expect six to eight targets somewhere in that neighborhood. Decent efficiency, some downfield work from a very good quarterback. They're playing indoors next week. I would say Josh Palmer would deserve a salary of around $6,300 for next week. His salary at 61, so that's not bad. Pretty appropriate I would say there. So Josh Palmer I think will be the primary benefactor of the very unfortunate Mike Williams injury. And Palmer going to be a guy we can use to get lower salary exposure to that game. Eckler's salary 96 still, assuming he is active for that game as well. Slight downgrade for Justin Herbert too with Mike Williams. Allen's been awesome this year so that does mitigate a bit of it. Herbert's with 86 that makes sense fully on board with that. But it is a downgrade to lose a very good wide receiver. Mike Williams hopefully is set back healthy very soon. Gus Edwards left Sunday's game to be checked for a concussion and did not return for the Ravens. Melvin Gord was the primary back after that with Justice Hill sideline this game. Kenny and Drake got involved early but not a lot from him late. Gordon finished with a 40% snap rate. He had 10 carries and two targets that was aided by there being overtime in that game but he did get more work than Kenny and Drake. Even if we do lose Gus Edwards for a week I still don't think I want any part of this backfield until someone separates. Maybe if there's no Hill and no Edwards maybe that could push me towards using Melvin Gordon but it would be purely a salary based thing where I'd be like, I suppose I have to use this guy not like I really want to use in this backfield it's not one that's been fruitful for fantasy. So still really don't want to go at the Ravens backfield if I can avoid it. Finally, Jonathan Mingo left early with a concussion on Sunday, Andy Dalton through 58 times. So Adam Thielen and DJ Chark got a lot of work. It was 14 targets for Thielen, 11 for Chark. Chark had five downfield targets and Thielen had three. Thielen added one inside the red zone as well which he converted for a touchdown. We had to keep in mind how much volume there was in this game, 58 pass attempts for Dalton. So Thielen's target share was 24% and Charks was 19%. Adam Thielen revenge game next week because the Panthers are taking on the Minnesota Vikings. So, you know, again, revenge games are the only thing that actually matters. I'm gonna guess that the volume does come down for this Panthers offense at some point. Looking forward to next week, I wanna check out some salaries here on the Panthers because that game could be okay. Total 44 and a half Vikings, 3.5 favorites. Thielen's salary is probably gonna be too high. Actually, 68 is not terrible for him. I actually don't hate that. I don't love it, but I don't hate it. Charks salary for next week is 6,000. That's probably a little bit loftier than he'd want it to be. And then Miles Sanders' salary is 66 and a dollars. Looking at Sanders, I believe he got a lot of targets again this week. Yeah, nine carries and nine targets for 62 yards. So, the efficiency has not been there for Miles Sanders, but he's getting work in the passing game. I think eventually we'll see a decent game from Sanders. That could be this week. So, I'm thinking between Thielen, Chark and Sanders. We might have some guys who are like, okay, values next week if Mingo can't go. It's not a team I really wanna be super enthused about, but I'm okay, I'm receptive to them at least. Looking at that, somewhat okay game against the Vikings. Let's move now into the key roll updates from week number three and let's talk about the Texans' rookies because they had a huge game and a big upset over the Jacksonville Jaguar. CJ Stroud turned 30 pass attempts into 280 yards and two touchdowns. 145 of those yards were to tank Dell. Dell emerged last week, Nila Brown went on the IR. Dell became a starter and immediately played well and this week he went nuts. Seven targets, which was the most on the team. Dell had three deep targets and Stroud has been fantastic on deep throws this year. Nico Collins, a bit more quiet, but still has a 20% target share. I think that both Collins and Dell are going to be great options and Stroud can be viable for DFS in the right spots as well. The problem we have here is the next week they're facing Pittsburgh and Pittsburgh's rush defense is diminished right now but their pass defense is still very, very good. So a much tougher spot for Houston than what they've had so far. Let's play name that salary though for let's do all three. Let's do Nico, Tank and Stroud. Let's start with Stroud. I would say his salary in that matches prior on 7,000. I think it'd be appropriate. He's 67, so that's low. Does he have the upside in that spot to be worth it in DFS? I would lean towards no, but at least like he's somewhat palatable there. Tank Dell, two good games of volume, but also another target guy in the mix, tough matchup at home, which is good. A lot of deep work for Tank Dell. I would say Tank Dell's salary, let's go with 62 for him, 62 on the bun. Okay, that works. So Dell is in play next week. Nico, given that another target earner has emerged, given the Robert Woods is still in the mix, didn't have his best game on Sunday. He played, he had some fun plays, from a target share perspective. I'm gonna say Nico, 64. Nico Collins, 64 on the button. Okay, so the Texans very appropriately salaried four week number four, taking on the Steelers, tough matchup, but would not be surprised that they're at least somewhat in play for the next week because Stroud is playing well and because the salaries are still reasonable. Zack Moss maintained his every down roll for the Colts. He played 76% of the snaps, he had 30 carries and three targets, which is banana numbers. He had five out of eight red zone chances, including a really fun wheel route for a touchdown and Moss was effective. So I see no reason to scale him back, especially with Jonathan Taylor, potentially back in week number five. So good usage, good efficiency, offense has been fine so far and Gardner-Minshew was okay enough where he did for Richardson can't go yet. They should still be okay. The Colts facing the Rams, one of that point dogs at home, I would say an appropriate salary for Zack Moss, given his workload is like probably $7,500. I don't think he'll be there, but I think that's what I'd say as far as a good salary for him, 73. So closer than I thought he'd be, but well deserved. And I think that he's still pretty desirable at $7,300. So Zack Moss, another guy, I'm feeling pretty good about next week, honestly between A-chain, Moss, Miles Sanders, might be another week where we are okay with some more mid-range running backs. If you want to get to Keenan Allen, gets Tyreek Hill, stuff like that. I think we might be able to get there for week number four, at least based on the early look. In the first game with no Nick Shubb, Jerome Ford was the Browns lead back, but Kareem Hunt was in the mix as well. Ford played 55% of the snaps. Some of that was late where he missed work because Pierre Strong came in to close things out as the Browns were ahead by quite a bit late in that game. Ford ran 23 routes compared to five for Kareem Hunt, and Ford scored twice against a very tough defense. So he will lose some work to those guys, but he's clearly the top guy on this team. Next week, the Browns are facing the Ravens. We did see the Ravens, you know, get beaten up a little bit by Zack Moss in the running game this past week. And they've got a lot of injuries on defense. Maybe those guys are back next week, but they're not at full health. So I would say a salary for Jerome Ford, given that he's gonna lose some work to Kareem Hunt, and it's a tougher matchup. I would say probably around $66 or so, and he is at 64 for next week. So again, mid-range running back is not too bad. And I feel a lot better about salaries early on, looking at the week four main slip than I did heading into week number three. So things might be a bit easier on us heading into week number four. With David Montgomery out, Jameer Gibbs' role did expand. He had 17 carries, two targets, 59% snap rate. The main spots where Gibbs lost work were two minute and obvious passing situations because Craig Reynolds came in to be the pass blocker for this team. Gibbs did have four out of eight red zone chances for the team though. They play Thursday taking on the Green Bay Packers. And I'm pretty optimistic about Gibbs' role. I wish he had got more work in the passing game, but you can definitely run the Packers at times. So I would say Gibbs in that game, if there's no Montgomery again, feel pretty good about his role, annoying that there hasn't been a lot of touchdowns yet. But again, four out of eight red zone chances for him in that game, I think that is encouraging at least for me. Other rookie, Sam LaPorta, had the big game between the two. He had 11 targets and that ranked second on the team behind Amon Ross St. Brown. One of those is a broken play. The touchdown was a broken play and broken plays are not something you project going forward because it's a fluke. So I don't think that that's something that we're gonna care about too much going forward. But 11 targets for a tight end is tough to turn down. So there on the Thursday slate this week taking on the Packers, I'd obviously like him for a single game there. But I think the bigger thing is that LaPorta has established himself as being a viable tight end for DFS in the future. And I think we need to be receptive to him. This week, I think that we were on LaPorta because of the salary, because of the game and environments. But I think that for him looking forward, he probably should be one of those like mid 6,000 range tight ends with the potential for that to go up just because he's been so good. James and Williams still a couple of weeks away. So looking forward, LaPorta is a 6,000 range tight end. And as a rookie, that's very, very fun. And this offense is very, very fun. Alexander Madison bounced back even with a near fumble this week. It was overturned on replay. 80% snap rate for Madison. He had 20 carries and seven targets. Three of those targets were inside the red zone. Cam Acres should be active next week. I'd expect Madison to get scaled back as a result of that. But I do still think he will be the lead guy for this team. Given that Acres will be there, I think I probably don't wanna go at Madison next week. His salary is 72. Just taking a look there. You're adding Acres in the mix. Madison's had a couple of bad games. There are 6,000 range wide receivers. I like quite a bit. So I'm probably not gonna be on Madison next week, but I think with games like that, the odds he does stave off Acres as far as threatening for that job, those odds do increase, which is encouraging for sure. We finally saw Elijah Mitchell in the mix for the 49ers, but Christian McCaffrey's role was still fine. Last year in Mitchell played, McCaffrey's overall workload decreased and he lost red zone work, which is a big key. But McCaffrey had eight out of 18 red zone chances for the 49ers on Thursday. 18 carries and five targets overall. So it is a slight downgrade, but I'm still fully into McCaffrey, even as I scale him back a bit on, I don't think he's on the main slate next week because that game is on Sunday night. Actually, it's not on Sunday night. Oh yeah, because there's only one Monday night game next week. So that game actually is on Sunday night or is on the main slate facing Arizona, that it might be more of a Mitchell script just because they could blow them out. But McCaffrey's salary is $9,700. It's appropriate, might not be able to get there, but just because we'll want a lot of the value running backs, but it's not bad. Zach Charbonnet's role expanded a bit in week three, but Kenneth Walker still turned 18 carries and three targets into 156 yards. I would say that this backfield is pretty much status quo, at least on Walker's side. He's flawed because he'll lose work and he's kind of boomer busty, but he's viable at least. I just need the salary lower than what it was in week number three. He was $7,600. I thought that was too high. They're facing the Giants on Monday this week. I think you need to keep in mind the fact that he is boomer busty, might not get a ton of passing game work, could lose work to Charbonnet. Still didn't a lot of work in the red zone, which is great, but flawed, but okay, profile for Kenneth Walker the third and for me really status quo for them heading into week four. The Cardinals offense might be good enough for us to consider James Conner. Conner, his adjust opportunities marks in three games, which is again carries plus two X targets. Those are 24, 25 and 18. Those are not bad numbers are not great, but he hit 100 plus yards from scrimmage in two of those three and he had 70 in the other one as well. The red zone role for Conner is very good. I don't want to consider Conner and I will not next week against the 49ers, but if he stays in the 6,000 range and they're in an okay matchup, there are probably gonna be worse options. I'm not gonna look at a salary next week because I don't wanna be tempted in that matchup, but going forward, they're playing well enough or at least can to be on our radar is what I would say. That Brita played a bunch of snaps in place of Saquon Barkley, but didn't really matter much. Four carries and three targets. Gary Brightwell started the second half, but still didn't get a ton of work for this team. Brita is not a needle mover and Brightwell could eat it into his work as well. I did a very low salary to be intrigued by Brita. I think he was 11,000 on the single game slate on Thursday. They play on Monday night. I would need Brita probably around, I guess 11,000 is probably fair honestly for a starting back in a team that's at home, slight underdog. I would say he's okay, but not really someone I wanna seek out there. Ezekiel Elliott's got a decent amount of work in a positive script for the Patriots. First positive script we've had for the Patriots so far this year. Ramon O. Stevenson still played 65% of the snaps, but Zeke had 16 carries and a target. He also had 87 yards compared to Stevenson 62. Stevenson's passing game role makes him the better option between the two, but Zeke's getting enough work to be a nuisance. And this offense, I know they won, but put up 15 points. We've not seen a lot of explosion from them outside of Farrell Brown so far this year. Stevenson's total yards marks so far, 89, 60, 62. He has five out of 15 red zone chances. So 33%, he's okay. I don't know. I just don't really wanna use any guys in this team. They are six now point dogs to Dallas next week. So just I'd rather not go there if I can avoid it. Kind of a bad team for daily fantasy. We talked about James Cook's red zone role last week on the preview show and Cook did give three red zone chances this week. All three are carries and he also played five out of seven snaps inside the red zone for the builds. Got a carry inside the five yard line. So I would say that's a slight bump up for James Cook given that he is been effective but still is going to have some issues with touchdowns because of Josh Allen, because of Latavius Murray. Those are downgrades for him for sure. So I pull over here on the computer to look at the yardage numbers, yardage for Cook 63, 159 and 112. Putting him in a matchup with the Dolphins next week where it is the highest total on the slate in a game we're going to wanna stack. We know we like A-Chain. Maybe if we get James Cook at a salary around A-Chain we can view Cook as being a pivot given that the red zone work was better this week and the yardage has been very good. He could bust off a long touchdown, stuff like that. So I'm gonna say with James Cook I think an appropriate salary for a guy who is getting passing game work, decent carry totals and being efficient in a very good matchup. I would say that's worth around $6,800. And James Cook's salary is 68 on the button. So maybe he's a pivot off of A-Chain. He's right between most of them A-Chain. I think that that's somewhat interesting. So James Cook, a guy I could be interested in for next week in DFS. Let's keep up the salaries here right now and go to our salary score for week number four. What we do here is we pull up salaries on the week four fan to a main slate. I will scroll through each position and shout out guys. I think might be intriguing for next week based on their salaries, based on matchups and things like that. Starting off the quarterback in that Bill's Dolphins game, Josh Allen $9,000 to a Tunga Vailoa is 8,000. That's really low for a guy with his upside in this spot against the Bill's. He's had 28 fan to a points twice so far this year. Now because Tunga Vailoa does not run, you are dependent on him getting like 350 yards and four touchdowns, but he's had 466, 249, 309, three, one and four touchdowns, so you can get there. So Tunga Vailoa 8,000 was the first guy to get up to me when looking at salaries for week number four and a quarterback at least. I think between him and A-Chain, we're gonna be able to stack this game and not blow our entire salary. So I think that is something that does definitely interest me. Scrolling down for salaries, Joe Burrow if you play Sunday two, facing off against Tennessee. Tennessee is very much a past funnel team where they encourage you to throw the ball against them because they're so good at stopping the run. I'm not sure Burrow's health. I don't think he'll play tonight. Maybe he will, I don't know. But 72 might be low enough to consider. Now it's a very tough spot as far as like, they'll probably get pressure on him because their offensive line is struggled. The Titans defensive line is very good, but that's at least interesting for Burrow at 72 just because that number is so low. Scrolling down lower on this list, not seeing a whole lot stand out. Again, Stroud, actually Matthew Stafford at $66,000. Let's see what he's done so far this year. Plain tonight obviously, Stafford 334 and 307 yardage totals. That's pretty good. Facing off against the Colts, so playing indoors, that's pretty fun. Stafford at 66 might really be in play. I am very intrigued by that, honestly. So I think focal point will be Tonga by Loa. Obviously Josh Allen is in an amazing spot and will want to be there. But if you want to spend down a quarterback, Matthew Stafford immediately got my attention at that number. I'm curious, we'll see the Rams, other skill guys come in here given they're playing before the slate is up before Monday night. So going over to running back here, McCaffrey's 97, then there is nobody else above 84. 84 is Pollard, I guess we do have Austin Eckler at 90 something, but he's not in the active player pool. Let's pull up here and do all players. There we go. Okay, so Eckler is $96 and then jumps down to Pollard 84. Pollard's role has been very good. Obviously the Patriots defense is not one we want to go at super often, but like his role has been good. So I could see that being a spot where we buy into Pollard. Maybe he should find a way to get up to McCaffrey at 97, but like Pollard, I think he's under salary to bid 84 given the work he's gotten, given his red zone role, no touchdowns each of the past two games, but definitely has that within his range of outcomes. So Pollard, I think is a guy who might talk about later on. Do you want to see what the workload distribution is for the Eagles? Deandre switched to 78. Let me check on Kenny Gainwell quick. 6,000, I don't want to see if Gainwell regains a lead-ish type role for the Eagles because that could be interesting at $6,000. Didn't play last week when Switch went bananas. So interest there. Kyren Williams is 76. Mason, they've always had the first two weeks. Like that's fair and probably a number we'll want to get to. Not a lot of yardage from Williams, but amazing workload, very good red zone workload too. So 76 for Kyren Williams, not too bad. And again, mid-ranger running back pretty good. Zack Moss, 73, Kyren Williams, 76. That's going to be of interest to me for next week, I believe. Again, James Cook here at 68. Mention Miles Sanders, 66, some interest there. James, or Jerome Ford at 64. Some interest there. H&M 64, quite a bit of interest, just given I don't think you can put him back in the bottle, given what he did. Gainwell, 6,000 dependent on what we see on Monday night with his workload between him and DeAndre Swift. Scrolling down further, we could do get Givante Williams at 58. He led the Broncos in snaps this past week, but only played 25. And I'm monitoring the snap number for him because we said he's on a snap count. And I'd expect that to increase at some point. Yardage total so far for Williams, 57, 58, and 65. It's not great yet as red zone share has been pretty bad to only four red zone chances so far across math. 29 red zone chances. So pretty rough workload there. It's the Bears, so maybe Givante winds up being in play, but I think the guys in the 6,000 range, a lot more appealing than him, at least as of right now. Don't see anything else in the low 5,000 range that wants to draw us in. So let's switch over to wide receiver now. Pretty loaded slate, Tyree Kill, Keenan Allen, Justin Jefferson, Stefan Diggs, and then the Bengals guys if we get Joe Burrow, but also Givante Adams at $8,100. Givante 20 targets in week number three. He has a 39% target share. And I think Kobe Myers and his two games is around 30% too. Let me pull that up quick here. So Givante at 81 is too low salaried. I think he's gonna be a priority on the slate taking on the chargers. You would hope the chargers would have a scheme to try to slow him down, but they didn't with Tyree Kill in week one. So that wasn't the case then. Kobe Myers 31% target share in the two games he has played. Givante 41% in those two games. Josh Jacobs at 11%. So the Raiders pretty fun. Jimmy Garoppolo might be checked for a concussion and that would hurt this offense for sure, but we saw how no Connell played decently well during the preseason. It would definitely be a downgrade because Garoppolo is a guy who can boost up some guys, make them viable for DFS. And so hopefully he's able to go, but Givante 81 does stand out to me as being a guy who sour stands out. We'll talk about Myers once we get there, which I'm not sure when we'll get there, honestly. Scrolling down further. Pukinakua $7,500 that's appropriate. Jalen Waddle 74. I'd assume he gets cleared again this week. 74 is not bad. So like a Tua Waddle A-chain stack could be kind of fun. If you can't quite get to Tyree Kill and Rahim Mostert, that's not bad. I think when we have palatable salaries for guys in very fun games. And that's what we get here with these guys. George Pickens 71, probably a little bit high. Yeah, 127 and 75 yards in two games with no Deontay Johnson. Michael Pittman 72. He's had I think double digit targets in all three games so far. Target share for Pittman is 31%. Couple of deep targets, one where he just beasted out on Sunday too. So Pittman 72 is not bad. Not sure about the upside, but that's a game we want to stack. So Zach Moss, Michael Pittman, both guys we could include in game stacks there. Scrolling down further here. Jacoby Myers is 69. I don't mind that. Mention Adam Thiele before it's 68. I prefer Myers if we get Garoppolo. Might prefer Myers regardless to be determined there, but that's not bad. Gabe the Babe Davis $6,500. Only one catch I believe on Sunday. He was a touchdown, 35-yard touchdown. His role has been underwhelming so far. I was hoping he bounced back and playing in the narrative. Okay, ankle injury last year was never fully healthy, but so far in three games, 14% target share for Gabe Davis. He does have a 39% deep target share. So basically everything he's got has been deep, which means he can at big games. So probably gonna be a guy we include for game stacks, but 65, probably too high for non-game stack lineups for Gabe the Babe. Scrolling down further, 22 at well, 63. Another way we could potentially get some exposure to that game without breaking the bank. Love that and could be a decent staffer in stack. Again, I prefer Nakua, but Palmer 61 again. Pretty good value there is a Flower 61. Another big game for him as far as targets go. Michael Thomas 59, mentioned that one before. I think that's a bit too low, whether it's James or Carr. I think that's a pretty good number for him. Jehan Dotson-Sauer got shot down to 55, justified, given he didn't play very well in that game, but it's getting down to the point where I might wanna continue going there, even though it has burned me a couple of times so far. Marvin Mims 54, if they were to decide to actually use him. Let me check out the route tools Marvin Mims has passed. We can kind of see if he got a route increase in that game. Obviously the score matters there where they got blown the F out and like that's gonna change some usage a bit. But looking at routes for the Dolphins in this game, or for the Broncos in this game, Marvin Mims ran 11 routes, sick. Adam Traven ran 35, what honor? Smajipi Run and Givante Williams ran as many routes as Marvin Mims. This is the dumbest he moved all the time. Okay, so Marvin Mims, sorry. We'll get to you eventually, but not quite yet. And I think that's probably gonna be it for wide receiver. I don't really wanna go Quinton Johnson at 52, just because that's been a, I think it'll be more Josh Palmer and we got Keenan Allen and likely Austin Neckler sucking up some targets there too. So guys, this stood out most of me at receiver, Michael Thomas at 59 is not too bad. I do like Tank Dela 62, Josh Palmer 61, but then some of the high end guys, like Devante Adams going to be, I think, in Jalen Waddle at 74, probably gonna be some standouts for this week at wide receiver. Tight end, no Kelsey on the main slate. Next week they're playing Monday night against the Jets. Woof, that game is gonna be brutal. There is no, I thought the game is mad or no La Porta. It's a bummer, no cow pits. So not missing out on too much of tight end this next week, Mark Andrews 67, kind of like that. Let me see the target share or target numbers for Andrews so far. Obviously the Ravens offense has been weird, but Lamar has played well, didn't play as well yesterday, but eight and five targets so far for Mark Andrews. And they're two games with Andrews and Zay Flowers. Flowers, 24% target share Andrews is at 21%. Nelson Aguilore is at 16%. And of course, Rashad Bateman now doing with a hamstring injury so he may miss, Odell didn't play. Andrews 67, I think we'll wanna keep an eye on that one. Dallas Goddard 59, it's not bad. Pretty rough start to the year, but they seem to wanna get him targets last week at the open of that Vikings game. Didn't really pay off for them, but seven targets there. So Goddard 59, if you wanna get some exposure to the Eagles that could be pretty enticing as well. As far as lower salary tight ends, I'm not seeing a whole lot as of yet. K-Dotten 48, taking on the Saints, very good defense. So probably don't wanna do that. At least right now, it kinda looks like tight end might be more of a mid-range week than it was the past couple of weeks. So looking at Andrews 67, Goddard 59, I think those guys, maybe Pat Friarme with that 55, those guys might wanna be in the primary focal points for next week, tight end is awful though. So it's real grim if you get nauseous, do not pull up tight end for week number four. That's gonna wrap things up here for this week three, recap podcast. As mentioned, we are back with you once again, Thursday to give a full dive into week number four's Fandall main slate. If you wanna check that out, you can check us out on the Fandall YouTube page, live at 10 a.m. Eastern on Thursday with myself and Brandon Gidula that will go up on the number fire daily fantasy podcast feed after that and up on Fandall TV plus. Just log in to your Fandall account on Fandall.com slash watch to check out us. You can watch up and Adams live with that all in the same place along with covering the spread as well. If you want some thoughts on Monday night football with that doubleheader, Ryan Williams and I broke down that from a betting perspective over on the covering the spread podcast feed also on the Fandall YouTube page also on Fandall TV plus. If you've got any questions for me, I am on Twitter at Jim Sonnis, J-I-M-S-A-N-N-E-S. You can also follow Fandall research at Fandall research. Wanna thank you all for tuning in for today. Good luck to you with your Monday night lineups. We'll talk to you once again on Thursday to preview week four, hopefully week number three was a blast and a profit for you. We'll talk to you all again soon. This has been the heat check fantasy podcast right here on the Fandall podcast network.