 I think it's a common misconception that big businesses don't like regulation. But in fact, big businesses do like regulation. They like regulation because you need regulation to act as barriers to entry for other companies, or regulations that help create a standard like the gap accounting standards, or anything that makes it easier for foreign investors to understand the businesses and to invest in our economy. So yes, we do agree that the government intervention is necessary to create these regulations. In fact, big businesses are leading the way pushing for these regulations or for these policies to help create standards that even small businesses would have to follow, and it makes it easier for us just to be efficient in the economy. Another argument for big business is more the increasing lack of government intervention in society. We keep talking about we're going to be cutting the budget, and next year the Republicans are hoping to cut 6 trillion out of the federal budget. So obviously we have to keep rolling back these social programs for our country. And to some extent, people are hoping that these large businesses will step in and fill the void left by the lack of government social programs as they continue to cut the budget. I guess I just wanted to add a more general comment, because it's difficult to argue that this corporate takeover thesis. And I mean, I think about a lot of the examples you're saying, you know, Exxon not paying taxes and things, but I mean, that has to do a lot of things like oil subsidies and all sorts of subsidies that the government offers to Boeing and Lockheed. And I mean, that's a question, yes, that you have to ask the government. And I don't know, I mean, yes, there's lobbying, but I also think a lot of responsibility goes on the government. So you can't necessarily blame the big businesses and for, you know, getting these subsidies, because it also has a purpose to serve, you know, the society here. And also, big businesses, I'm not sure this is really an argument. They don't always make so many profits either. They just have large amounts of capital. A lot do, but not all airlines, for instance. We need them. They don't make a lot of money at all. They're usually, they go through bankruptcy. But the economy needs them and society needs them. So they're necessary. So I just wanted to point out that government intervention there is important. All right, so that's going to be our last question. And I guess I'll ask the judges to take some time to think about, you know, which side you think may have argued stronger case. And like to thank our debaters for researching all semester and presenting these arguments, you guys did a great job. And I think we should all give them a big round of applause. The judges will now move to the chat table. He'll drum or something, yes. Only if you shimmy on the way up. I shimmy unintentionally, actually. Well, as always, I'm always very impressed with the amount of energy and effort both teams have done. I think I've judged these competitions in whole or part five or six times now. And they're always one of the main reasons I love coming back up to you, Mass. Here's how we apply. We felt that the small business team had a good balanced argument and provide a good level of detail. We also appreciated that the multinational pro team did address effectively economies of scale. And that the small cluster approach didn't seem appropriate for certain businesses like telecom and railroads. And we kind of went through some of that. That all said, we all agree that the small business team was more effective in this debate. So congratulations to the small business team. Well, thank you very much to our judges for your questions and your hard work there. And I want to especially congratulate the small business team that won and congratulate all of the debaters for their excellent presentations. So we have some awards to hand out, a certificate for all our debaters. Daniel Brock, Lian King, Angela Lee, Laura Maligno, Thomas Peek, Daniel Schwartz. And last but not least, Luke Sieberg. And we also have for all the debaters and our judges, if we can find them to fit, you guys. This fabulous t-shirt, who was designed by Anastasia, designed this great t-shirt for everybody should look at it. It's kind of a little kind of monopoly board there and says, big business, promoting social welfare, question mark. So we have the right sizes for you all. And I think, where do we have the t-shirts? In the back. So congratulations to everybody. First of all, I want to thank a few people I want to thank. Nicole Dunham, who's done a great job in helping to organize the event. To Kevin Crocker, our undergraduate program director, who did a terrific job helping with the debate. And I want to also thank Jackie Brown-Hazard, who could not be here today because there was a death in her family, but she did a lot of work putting this whole thing together. So let's all thank Jackie as well. So following the debate now, we have our major's, economics major's awards event, end of semester celebration, and barbecue. So please stay for the food and the awards. And enjoy yourselves. Congratulations to everybody.