 So we're going to go live live. So whenever you're ready zone administrative. Okay. Thank you. Good morning everybody. My name is Susie Murray and I am the zoning administrator for the city of Santa Rosa. And I think effective today. That's official. I am the zoning administrator for the city of Santa Rosa and I'm very happy to announce that you can call me zoning administrator Murray or you can call me Susie and I really prefer Susie. I have some some notes that I have to read before we really officially call this meeting to order. And I want to say that if members of the public, they can participate in the meeting by attending in person from the conference room, or by logging on to zoom the zoom webinar by going to hopefully they're already there. H T T P S colon slash slash SR city dash org dot zoom dot us slash j slash 82874727915 or by dialing the good old fashioned way at 8778535257 and entering webinar ID. 82874727915 public comment will be accepted, whether you're here live, or if you're dialing or zooming in. The meeting is also live streamed at youtube.com slash city of Santa Rosa. You can also log on to our legislature system by going to this is another long one H T T P S colon slash slash Santa Rosa dash. I'm sorry. I'm going to start that one over again. H T T P S colon slash slash Santa dash Rosa dot L E G I S T a r dot com slash calendar. Click on the in progress link to watch. We're also being televised at Comcast channel 28. Okay, with that, I'm going to go ahead and call the meeting to order. Right at the beginning of the meeting, we do have an opportunity for public comment. Seeing only applicants and staff members in the room here. I will say if you would like to make a public comment if you're joining us by zoom. If you can raise your hand and I'm going to hand it off to Kyle to let us know how to do that. If you wish to make a public comment via zoom please raise your hand the raise your hand icon is located at the bottom of the zoom screen. If you wish to make a comment in person, please raise your hand in person. If you are dialing in via telephone, please dial star nine to raise your hand and star six and view what's called upon. It appears there's no hands raised at this time. So the administrator. Thank you very much. Now I'm going to read you my statement of purpose. The zoning administrator is appointed by the planning and economics development department director. And has the responsibility and authority to conduct public hearings and to take action on applications for administrative permits and approvals issued by the department holding public hearings and public meetings. It includes entitlements or land use permits and reduced review authority permits. Today, we have none of those. A determination or decision made by the zoning administrator may be appealed to the design review board, cultural heritage board planning commission or city council, whichever board is applicable. And decisions made today must be appealed by all that thought by Monday, March 13. It's extended by a day because the 10th day falls on a weekend. We have some next item 3.2 is our zoning administrator reports, and I do have one and I'm actually going to slip my hat and zoning administrator off and my senior planner hat back on and say that there was an item that was noticed. I'm the planner. It's for Stonebridge attached housing. We received a request for public hearing and we will reschedule that meeting to a date uncertain at this point. We don't know the date. And it will be renoticed that item will be heard before the are by the design review board and the meeting will be at 430 in the afternoon rather than 1030 in the morning. And again, you will receive another notice if you are here for that item. You'll receive that it will be a public hearing. Okay, and I do want to I want to take a moment. I don't know. No, let's go ahead and we'll go on. The next item is consent items, which we have none. And then we'll move on to our scheduled items. And the first one is a public meeting. It's for the property located at 512 Orcher Street here in Santa Rosa and it's for a detached garage. The project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act. This is a landmark alteration and Jan and Frisco is the project planner. You're on. Can I show my screen recording Secretary Carl? Yes. Good morning, everyone is on Administrative Murray and everyone else who's in attendance on Project Planning Jan and Briscoe and I'm here to present to you about 512 Orcher Street in a new detached garage. This 512 Orcher Street is located in the Cherry Preservation District, which is why this requires a minor landmark alteration permit. The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing garage due to deterioration and a plan to rebuild a detached garage while installing a new concrete driveway to the new garage. Here on the slide show is shown the existing garage that is to be demolished. And this is and is to the rear of the property. Here one can see that this is a rendering of the new garage that's being proposed. And on the right side of the slide is the color of the siding that they'll be using and below that is the is the siding is the hardy panel vertical siding that they'll be using the color is going to is not going to really mimic the house but it's going to harmonize harmonize the house. And the siding it has a different orientation, however, it's not the intent of the call to totally mimic the primary dwelling. Here's an overview view of the property. And again, this is in a cherry district and it's pretty typical in the Cherry Preservation District that there's a long, there's a long property with. The general plan is low density residential and the zoning destination is R-1-6-H single family residential and a historic combined district. Both of these destinations are for single family dwellings. And here's the site plan. You can one can see that the existing garage is more so to the south of the property and a new garage will move for the north to the property property to align with the new new driveway that we'd be building that's going along with this permit. And it's moved to the north side of the property to help with the setback requirements, the five foot rear setback. And as zoning administrator alluded to earlier, this project has been reviewed and compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and qualifies for a class three categorical extension on this section 15303 in that the garage is an accessory structure to the existing residents. Thus, it is recommended by planning an economic development department that the zoning administrator by resolution approve a modern landmark alteration permit for the property located at 512 Washington Street. Here's my information if you have any questions. And that's the end of that's the end of my presentations for this project. Thank you very much for a thorough presentation. And I think let's see if there are any public comments. If you wish to make a public comment via zoom please raise your hand, raise your hand icon is located at the bottom of the zoom screen. If you were in person, please raise your hand in person. If you are dialing it via telephone, please dial star nine to raise your hand and star six to new ones called upon. So Mr. Murray it appears there's no hands raised at this time. Thank you. So, first I want to say that I did do a site visit, you have a beautiful home. And, and I think this is makes absolute sense I can see that the new garage won't be readily visible from the public right away. I would like to compliment Janden for doing an outstanding job on the findings. I can make every single one of them. I do have a couple of conditions that I would like to add. I am also the staff liaison to the cultural heritage board some kind of a nerd when it comes to materials, older materials and I think that that older garage has some older materials on it. And I would ask that any existing materials that could be salvaged if it's that old hardwood, even though it may be a little frayed at the ends, if you can get that to a salvage yard, there are other people who may want to use it if you're not going to use it rather than just putting it into the Absolutely. Yeah, that was already our intent. Good, good. Well, if you mind if I add a condition for that, just so I can. No problem. Thank you. So, Janden if you can ask that any existing materials that can be salvaged be salvaged. And the other one is a very standard condition that I like to see and that is that the bill to plan submitted for building permits will match those that were approved today. Absolutely. And you'll see that on your approved resolution. And with that, I am going to approve this project. And I also want to make a public apology to the applicants for waiting. I was assigned to this project originally. It was before I was the zoning administrator and I didn't realize I had it in its set for several months. So, thank you. I'm grateful for your patience. That was my bad. Thank you. And congratulations. Okay, moving on to item two. This is another public meeting. And this is for a home occupation and in home psychotherapy private practice. This project is also exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act requires a conditional use permit and the project site is located at 516 Moyna Vista Drive. The file number is CUP 22022 and Janden. Alright, this is the second item on the agenda today. And this is for a home occupation located at 516 Moyna Vista. And this home occupation is an in-home psychotherapy practice. The applicant, a licensed therapist, is proposing to provide individual therapy, so a few private practice clients per week. The applicant expects 1 in 3 clients per day, 5 p.m. through 8 p.m. on a weekdays, Monday through Friday. And on a weekend, she expects 1 in 3 clients per day, 1 p.m. through 4 p.m. Here, one can see that the zoning is R-1-6 and the general plan is low density residential. And both of these allow for single family residential dwellings. The applicant found a compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and qualifies for a Class 1 exemption on the section 15301 in that a home business presents negligible or no change in residential uses or environmental consequences. And here's the site plan for this. I'm directed to park in the applicant's driveway, so they're not impeding on the regular traffic. And once they park in a driveway, they're instructed to walk through the back gate around to the back yard, to the office in the back. And I did receive public comment from this, and I will read it verbatim. Also, we are property owners of a home on El Dorado Court and have serious concerns of the proposed use for the home located at 516 Buena Vista Drive. It was standard reason that if one business is allowed into a neighborhood that others will follow. To our knowledge, the LaMita Heights area is strictly dedicated to single family homes and you feel very strongly that it should remain that way. We strongly oppose the idea of allowing any commercial endeavors using the homes in our neighborhood. Thank you for listening. And I also also want to want to say that the clients appointment appointments will be staggered in a way to avoid multiple clients at the residence at one time. And the patients going to the back helps helps keep the occupations is street and may maintaining the original neighborhood character. I was recommended by the planning and economic development department that the zoning administrative by resolution approve a minor conditional use permit for the property located at 516 point of Vista Drive. Here's my information if you have any questions. Thank you. And I will ask to are there any public comments Kyle. If you want to make a public comment via zoom please raise your hand raise your hand icon is located at the bottom of the zoom screen. If you're hearing person please raise your hand in person. If you are dialing in via telephone please dial star nine to raise your hand and star six to me once called upon. So Mr. Murray appears there's no hands raised this time. Great. Thank you very much. So I want to address the public comments that were received. I've been working here since where'd I go. There. Hi. I've been working here since 2006 as a planner. And we have had several home occupations throughout the city. There are there are some certain standards that are required for home occupations including offsite parking. And I have to stop looking at the screen. I'm not in a position to get seasick here. Anyways I got sidetracked there. The public comment the concern that keeping commercial uses out of a residential neighborhood. I want to try to put your mind at ease. If you're listening, we do hear your comments and understand your concerns but I don't think that there are any neighborhoods that are overrun by commercial uses because of home occupations. because of home occupations. There are some very, in my opinion, stripped standards with regard to parking, even though it's public street, clients will be required to park on the property in the driveway with a designated parking space. I have one question about the conditions and I'm wondering if they say, if we've conditioned it that customers will be or clients will be staggered. If not, I'd like to add that condition so that we can ensure that there won't be a traffic jam. But I'm not, I understand your concerns, but I don't think they're warranted. And I think if you look at our home occupation history and you were to drive through those neighborhoods, your minds would be put at ease. I very much appreciate you submitting public comments and I hope you continue to stay involved. I am going to approve this project as conditioned with the additional condition and I will say that any decision made today by the zoning administrator is appealable within 10 calendar days and you may, yeah, that expires on Monday, March 13th because the day falls on a Sunday. Yes, I am repeating myself from earlier. So I think that concludes today's meeting. Thank you very much. You did an outstanding job on our blazing the trails in person zoning administrator meeting and I will adjourn the meeting. Thank you.