 Welcome to the Knuckleheads of Liberty. The Trump's Mar-a-Largo estate was raided by the FBI, and it sounds like they haven't given a lot of specifics, but it sounds like it's all about just boxes of documents that he might have taken with him that the archives wants. Let me see if we can get a visual up for the story. So you can see here in the image we've got, it looks like some FBI agents, and they're armed outside of Trump's home there, and they were apparently picking up some boxes of documents. And so let me see here if we can show some images here. So this is from the New York Post. It shows some, what I believe, I guess there are some FBI agents carrying out some boxes. So let's see, it says White House staff removed from the White House in 2020. So yeah, I'm not quite sure what that's about. But anyways, and these are possibly the documents, I guess, that are being held for tomorrow. What's that a baseball bat? Yeah, well that's the crazy thing, right? As your president, you have this issue where you're actually getting, you know, potential gifts or other things that technically, I'm not sure if you get to keep them and all kinds of other things like that, you know, because you're representing the people of California, I mean, not California, but of the United States. So, you know, Yeah, you're allowed to keep some of the gifts. There are certain, the federal government and all state government too. They have rules about that. They do, but I don't know if there are any rules valid here. I don't know if that's a claim, but anyway, go ahead. Yeah. So anyways, and so it's all pretty sketchy at this point. But at the moment, all that we really know as the public is that this is about boxes of documents that, I guess, the National Archives wants and, you know, because apparently, you know, it's they have a right to keep those documents, I guess, from each president. And so, but it's just very strange because, you know, we had Bill and Hillary Clinton, when they left the White House, they even tried to take the China with them and they did have to give it back, but it didn't require an FBI raid. So, I'm not quite sure. And there's been other instances as well of other staff and also possibly other presidents who may have had some materials and you just simply, you know, you have a conversation, I guess, with attorneys and the stuff eventually gets turned over. So this is all very strange. What do you guys think about this? This seems like, are we at the point of no return with this? This is pretty crazy. This is our walk into the land of Banana Republic, okay? Because I want you to look at something. Hillary Clinton had a very big problem with classified information just a little while ago, a few years ago. Where was the FBI raid? Did you see it? I might have missed it in the news, but I don't think I did. Hunter Biden right now, as we speak, is under investigation. For God knows how many plans, for God knows how many possible crimes, including a gun issue where he purchased a firearm and he lied in the form, as far as we know. Where's the FBI raid? Sandy Berger, who used to work for Bill Clinton, stole information from the National Archive. He destroyed some of it. Some of the classified information he destroyed. Where was the FBI raid? Don't you see what's happening here? These are political prosecutions. That's what's going on. These people intend to destroy Donald Trump. I'm not here to defend Donald Trump, but I'm here to defend an American citizen who's supposed to have rights just like everybody else. And they intend to destroy this man because they are afraid of him running in 2024. Maybe he's not playing the games that he's supposed to play as he should, but they intend to destroy him. These are nothing but political persecution. We are now in a banana republic. And this man who's heading the attorney general, the federal attorney general, Mary Garland, is a lunatic. That's what he is. So maybe they'll come after me pretty soon for saying that, but this man is a lunatic. How could you raid the home of an ex-president? Okay, you don't agree with him on everything, okay? He has some policies that are kind of crazy. I would agree. But he's an ex-president, regardless. He's an ex-president. And you make an unannounced raid into his home. There's something wrong here. Seriously wrong. Well, if it's the new standard, then I'm all for it. But we all know it's not a new standard. If they're going to treat all politicians like this, I'm great. Knock them out. Let's go on fishing expeditions and all these people's houses. Let's go do it. I have no problems with that. But we know it's not the standard. We know they've invented a standard just for Trump. And it's likely just because he's an outsider. It has nothing to do with Trump himself. Do you want to send a message to any political outsider that you either play the game or when you make your life hell? They're preventing people like Trump, but someone who's more sane from actually coming in and doing it again. What billionaire or rich person or any normal human being is going to want to run for president now? Why would they want to do it? If you're going to get sent through a political ringer, who's going to do it? And this maybe votes poorly rather for third parties as well because here's a guy who's supposedly a billionaire, Donald Trump. And he also has the backing for the most part, I guess, for more or less of the Republican Party behind him. And if this can happen to him, imagine a libertarian candidate. If they were to be the subject of this, what appears to be potentially a weaponized government coming to step on you if you're outside the bounds. And of course, as a libertarian, we're much more likely to be outside the bounds of what they consider normal. You know, they're normal to the path right off the cliff, you know, that they're taking us over with debt and war and everything else. But, you know, just imagine though, I mean, I suppose- Yeah, well, because you're a real threat to the bureaucracy, right? That's the real, that's really what's up doing this. The bureaucracy is playing its games. But the larger ACA is though, if they will go after an ex-president, who will they go after next? Who will they? These people seem like they have unlimited power and we're not supposed to have that in this country, okay? Well, they've already shown they'll go after parents, right? Parents are, you know, we're getting anger at your school board. You're now a domestic terrorist, right? That's what we're going to go. And again, it was Mary Garlin who wrote that memo who said they should treat us as parents as domestic terrorists, okay, to investigate us as such. Just because you wanted to stand up to your child at a school board meeting, they think you have become somehow a threat to the functioning of our democracy. These people are out of control. And if we don't do something about, we as voters in this land don't do something about this, we're going to lose our country and we're going to lose it fast because if they can go after an ex-president like this, who knows where they will stop next? Who will they go after next? They will choose some Trump supporter and say he's a threat to us and go after him, make his life hell. Who is next? I don't know. Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness always.