 It says, I'm trying to create a bookings calendar that is then displayed on SharePoint as a web part. I have a shared page that I want to use as a boardroom scheduler that invited multiple attendees. I'm getting stuck at how to use the web part to choose multiple people for a service offering. Is that possible? I know that in the service setup, I can add staff, but on the web part, it only allows me to select one staff member from the dropdown. I'm not sure if this is important, but located in Australia. So the person's located in Australia. I know some of the offerings are different here. Well, there's definitely things that are different there. I don't think that's one of those. When you set up the service, one of the settings is can you allow that person to pick who they want to select for that service. So there's a setting in that service and the booking calendar. I've heard a lot of multiple people's selection though. That's part of the problem. The one part only allows me to select one staff member. Yeah, because it's kind of, when people try to explain bookings, it's kind of like having the hair salon or the beauty salon, whatever. You set up your service of who does nails, who does hair, who does beards, who does man's hair, women's hair, whatever, right? And then, you know, a lot of those beauticians that they can offer multiple services. So no, no, no, the only person that touches my hair is Kathy. You know, that kind of person, you know, you can pick who you want or anybody that's open. So I don't know how to create, you know, multiple people. Anybody, that's not my question. I guess that's my question. I'm trying to figure out when I read this, I'm trying to figure out why they're using bookings for this use case to begin with, because it says that they're trying to use it as a boardroom scheduler for multiple attendees. And so, I mean, my answer would be as if you're doing boardroom scheduling, I would be using exchange. I would use outlook and resources and set up the rooms or the locations or the people, because then you can do exactly what you're trying to do. Yeah, exactly. They're using the wrong tool for the job. I think a lot of people are like, oh, I want to use bookings for this. Unless you're scheduling outside of your organization, you know, because everybody internal can see those boardroom resources and schedule, use the schedule resources and make them whatever you want them to be. They can be, I mean, we used to do, you know, projectors or notebooks or laptops. Like you can make a resource anything. So then to be able to display that within SharePoint. So that takes, if they want to use bookings, everything has a web address. So you have to enable the HTML capability to put an iframe. Bookings won't work for this. So if they use the exchange and use it, because you can look at the calendar for that resource. Yep. And do that. You know, you can display that resource calendar within SharePoint. Correct. Yeah. Yeah, because everything has a URL and you can just add that to a page or a link to it. If you don't want to display it on the page, you can create a link to it. Or if you want to get really fancy, you can use a graph call with SPFX and build a custom. You could actually build a custom. They either in PowerApp or using SPFX. You could build a custom window to basically be able to pull that information through and be able to see it in really snazzy way. Yeah. Because you can do that. Yeah. He doesn't say anything about snazzy. I don't, I'm rereading. No, it doesn't look like. I didn't see snazzy either. Everyone loves snazzy. No, of course. And I went to the PowerApp too. And you could even display that in Teams, should you choose? Yes, you can. Using the PowerApp, is that like the, yeah, that's a great example, because then you could have it in multiple locations. Is PowerApps, is the next question, part B to this, is PowerApps the bedazzling of the Microsoft 365 collaboration? I mean, it can be. The visual I just got of the bedazzled screen. I don't know. I don't know. I've seen some pretty fancy stuff come out of SPFX that I don't know that PowerApps can hand. I don't know that PowerApps can compete with that. I mean, I think it can, but I think you could do more fancy thing with SPFX right now. I think PowerApps is a close second. And I think the Teams toolkit stuff is coming in pretty hot and fast behind it too. Question sharing from a mobility perspective. Still SPFX, or would the app start to nudge that out? I think when you start talking about responsive design, then you start, I would say PowerApps or the Teams toolkit stuff would probably win over SPFX. Not to say that it's bad, but like if you try to do a real fancy SPFX custom web par, you might have to work a little harder to get a really good responsive design, whereas PowerApps out of the box is going to have a better responsive design built in. Another reason why to know your requirements, if the majority of people, I would say in my company, people are not doing a lot of activities in SharePoint on their mobile device. It's going to be on the desktop. So that would be something where, how are people going to be accessing and using this? And also consider that in your decision of which tool to build it on. But I want to build it in SharePoint and make them use it, Christian. Of course. Especially if it's concave outwards, because that's going to make them love it, right? With high depth graphics, it takes a long time to render. And it has to be a question. And look what we've done. We've taken them around the world of apps. Every time. They said it's all about use case and Sherry. You said it using the right tool for the right job. Do we all agree that bookings is a wrong tool? Yeah. If they're doing it, if they're all their audience always like, who needs to do what when, right? If it's, if it's all internal people, then why aren't you using the scheduling assistant that's built right into Outlook and Exchange? It makes more sense. But then again, maybe bookings is the right solution in Australia. But it's, but it's shiny. It's pretty. Yeah. I think Pete, it's the exact same thing. I don't think there are differences. That's why people tend to want to go off and do frequency coordination databases. That's, that's areas where you've got a whole bunch of different kind of radios, whether it being news types or ambulance and police types and so on and so forth. And because they all have to have some place to talk and other places to listen. You pick this big database, right? And you do it and something like Excel or SQL or something. That's a database. And, and unfortunately leave a little leave a little bit too much leeway with the people that are going to line up using it. So they do things like they change field names or field types. Right. Right. Yeah. Right. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And that's what that has wound up in is that is now all in Excel. Okay. Yeah. I can do that. But cell is not a database manager. It just isn't. Yeah. Access. Access. All the way. Paul. I would say that your share point is not a database. Yeah, it is. Well, it is. Yeah. It's not a good one. Right. Well, that's right. No one said we're good. We have no information. So I'm hoping it's. It gets it gets pulled back out of Excel into some sort of a real relational database. Once people learn how to use data verse, like just like just push data verse. It's so great. Yeah. Yeah. So Mr. Buckley, I have to say it's I realize it's been a while since I've been on your very illustrious show here. here. But it's, you must have changed something because now we have the actual presenters, the experts raising their hands. Do you have a question? I saw Joey raise her hand. I don't think I've ever seen that on the show in the last couple of years that we've been doing that. But she raised her hand. I thought that was awesome. But it's, it's, it's weird. It's just weird. I'm not used to it. So I'm still adjusting. I just don't do the horse. Just don't do that horse acting up. You know, I don't overwrite somebody. So it's like, look at me. There almost needs to be a setting in teams. So you have to raise the hand, but there needs to be like a turbo button. If I keep clicking it where it has another go, they got the hand that comes up the screen. What are the things that go up the screen? You know, we are higher and higher and higher. Well, no, you have the, you have the hearts and the emojis that go up the screen, the reactions. So we need a raised hand reaction that just keeps going. It just keeps growing bigger the longer it's raised.