 Welcome into the week 14 fan dual waiver wire Q&A. I am your host today, J. Elgrafalo joined by my good friend, JJ Zacharyson. How you doing today, JJ? I'm good, man. I'm good. I'm excited for the fantasy playoffs to almost be here. You know, we got one more week in most leagues here in week 14. Yeah, I'm excited. I'm excited to get bi weeks officially out of the way here pretty soon. It's really frustrating that bi weeks are still going on. But yeah, we got like hypochalypse too this week. Yeah, and having a lot of Justin Fields and Christian Watson on my teams don't love it this week without them being active. But yeah, man, things are good. Things are good. Yeah, I love the fantasy football playoffs because it feels like the strategy just gets a little bit tighter, you know? Like a little bit more focused. It's kind of a little different from the regular season. We are here answering any of your week 14 waiver wire questions. We prioritize the waiver wire questions, but probably answer other questions too. We're not opposed to it. Sure. There's some big news, JJ today. I know a lot of people are patiently waiting for news on Lamar Jackson. Adam Schefter reported that Lamar Jackson has a sprained PCL. So he's probably less likely to play this week. How are you feeling about Lamar Jackson, Tyler Huntley, and the situation there in Baltimore? I feel like there's a perception out there that Tyler Huntley was like a better fantasy asset than he actually was last year, or like that he's a better player than he actually is. And like no shade, like he's a back of quarterback. He's mobile and that's fun. And he's still someone who hasn't gotten a lot of reps or anything like that. So obviously he can improve. But last season he had five games where he threw the ball 30 plus times. In those five games, he averaged about 16 fantasy points per game, which is nothing special. But that's also skewed by a 35.9 point performance against Green Bay last year. And so if you remove that, I mean, not to say if you remove that game, but if you look at that 16 points per game average, four of those five games were below 16 points. It's just that one game is really skewing that average and bringing it up. If you look at Number Fires expected points model, this was courtesy of my buddy Jim Sonnis. He found that last year, Tyler Huntley's expected points added per dropback or net expected points per dropback, which is Number Fires expected points model was minus 0.12, which is horrific. I mean, it's a really, really average is like, I would assume average this year is probably closer to like 0.1 or 0.08 or something like that. What does that mean? What does that number mean? So it's basically expected points is basically like, every spot on a football field has some sort of expected point value. So when a team, let's say it's second and five on the 50 or something like that, the expected point on that drive is one and a half or something like that, depending on where they are on the football field. And then when a play happens that either increases the expected points and the driver decreases it. And so whoever's part of that play then gets credited to that difference and that differential. So if players are consistently adding to their drive and doing good things. So this is another thing that you can look at, when there's like a goal line back or a short yardage back where their yards per carry is not gonna be very high because they're only gonna gain one or two yards to convert that first down or convert that touchdown. You can look at expected points because if they convert that first down, if they convert that touchdown, that's a positive expected points play. And so I look at things like success rate which is a more binary way of looking at it where it looks at and says, this guy was a success on this player, he was not. And then you can say, okay, this guy has a success rate of X, this guy has a success rate of Y and you can compare and contrast that way. Instead of just looking at something like yards per carry or yards per attempt. So Tyler Huntley effectively versus what the average play has done over the last like decade or wherever it dates back to was well below average like per drop back. It's a small ish sample size. So like things like fumbles and turnovers can really alter that. Cause if you think of it, like let's say you're at the goal line and you're expected points on that drive might be like five and a half or something like that. If you're at like the one yard line and you throw a pick six, then all of a sudden that's goes from five and a half to minus six the other way. So that's 11 and a half points swing. So obviously that's a very bad thing for your overall total and your overall expected points per drop back. But without being said, Tyler Huntley was not that great through the air. We have to get out of our minds. I think that he's some like stud fantasy asset. And then the other thing to keep in mind, Lamar Jackson has not been a stud fantasy asset himself. I mean, basically since like week four, he hasn't been this like high end QB one that people drafted him to be. And so would we really expect Tyler Huntley to be better slash significantly better than Lamar Jackson? I think logically, you know, of course anything can happen. You know, we should be open about range of outcomes and stuff like that. But I think logically we should say no. They have a 16.75 implied team total this week against Pittsburgh. That game is like a 36 and a half point over under according to Fandle Sportsbook. It's just like, there's a lot of things pointing to Tyler Huntley, like not being a great play. I think that you could go to like Ryan Tannehill over him this week. And I'd feel a little bit more confident. I wish the trail on Berks were playing, but I would feel a little bit more confident with that. Yeah, Baltimore really isn't set Lamar Jackson up to succeed there. So it stands to reason, you know, Huntley is going to walk into that same terrible situation. Speaking of Huntley, Dustin in the chat has a question for us. Purdy, Baker or Huntley, which of these three guys are you picking up? Jimmy Groppolo having the broken foot, seemingly broken foot, and you know, Baker obviously being released from the Panthers here. Which of these three guys are you prioritizing? Yeah, I don't think that we've gotten, I don't think the waivers have, or I don't think he's been claimed yet, Baker, right? So we don't really know what's going on there. I think, you know, Purdy's probably the one if you want like a, if you need someone that like the full season, because I think Lamar might only be out one or two weeks with this injury. And he's going to play, you know, even if he's like 90%, I bet you he would still play. So maybe Purdy's the guy here, because again, I don't feel like that confident in Huntley this week against Pittsburgh. And so, you know, like, I think I'd rather just take a chance on someone like Purdy who could hypothetically be the starter from here on out. You know, it's obviously a very influx situation, like anything can change. I still want the Colts. This is, this is my dream. The Colts get Baker Mayfield off waivers. I don't even know what claim that I think they have in like the 20s or something like that. I don't know. I have no idea. So the Colts get Baker Mayfield. They drop Nick Foles and Nick Foles goes to San Francisco. Anyone's. I mean, it's a Super Bowl. Oh my God. The story is Nick Foles all, all famer then. He does that. I mean, if you like the conversation, right, two-time Super Bowl MVP, that's a great point. So Purdy's the guy that you were prioritizing out of this group here. I guess. Yeah. I mean, if you want to go hunting, I can understand. I don't think you can go Baker just because, you know, we have no idea at this point where he's going to sign. If he's even going to be a starter or get playing time this year. Yeah. And Dustin coming in with some more information. Colts are ninth on the waiver list. And he said they go through around 4 p.m. Yeah. Probably gets more information there. And then my morning coach in here, Andrew Cooper. I guess we are calling him Andrew Cooper Foley. Hooping here, saying expected points every week. I expected Cal fits to score points. And then he did it. There it is. That's how you calculate it. You got some tea going on over there in jail. I got some tea, a little green tea. Yeah. Oh, nice. I got some. Oh, look at us. We have the same mug. Can we go to the same mugs? And even, I mean, look at us. Do you double them as juice cups? I can't drink juice unless it's in this cup. You drink juice out of a mug? Yeah. No, I don't do that. Oh, man. Thought you were weird with me. I don't have my giant water jug around here, though. Got to go back. You do. You got to go hydrate after the show. Yeah. Keith and then you're asking, I need to stream a tight end this week. Everett, Higbee, Ingram, Henry or Phant. Which of these guys are you, do you like this week? I haven't done all my research, obviously, for week 14. I would assume just looking at this list that I would be going with Gerald Everett over these other guys. You know, I don't mind Hunter Henry in this spot against Arizona. So you could always go that direction. But I think Gerald Everett is probably the guy. Did we just lose JL here? Maybe? I don't know. He's here. He's here. Cameron decided to hold me hostage. OK. I would go Gerald Everett, I think, of this group. But again, I haven't done full research. I think Hunter Henry is pretty interesting, though, this week against Arizona. Because Arizona has been horrible against the tight end position. I think they are second and adjusted. Fantasy points allowed to the position. And Hunter Henry seemed decent at 13, 14% target shares last couple of weeks. So I could see him having a decent day. But I think Gerald Everett is probably the player. This guy, do you expect Mike Williams to play this week? I mean, I thought that he might even be back last week. But it sounds like they just don't seem super optimistic. So I would say maybe 50-50 right now. I think they're going to try to practice at least. Dustin with another really good question here. Who's the Seattle running back to owns? Kenneth Walker dealt with an injury this past week. And then it kind of came out that it might be a strain instead of a sprain. Are you prioritizing any of the Seattle running backs? And if so, which one? It's too hard. It's way too hard right now. Because there's Jay Dallas, Travis Homer. There's literal injuries to every single guy until you get to Tony Jones. So you have Kenneth Walker who's banged up. I'm not feeling very good about Kenneth Walker playing this weekend based on what some of the Twitter docs are saying. And then you get to Travis Homer, who was out last week. He's banged up. You go to DJ Dallas who, yes, he saw the most snaps last week, but he also was hurt in that game. He kind of played through it. But there's an injury there where he might not even go. So I don't think that you can really confidently go after any of these guys out the waiver wire. I guess if you're going to go after one, you'd go after Tony Jones because he's the only healthy one of the group. But I have a hard time believing they would just let Tony Jones kind of run the show in that backfield if all these guys were out. So unfortunately, we don't have any more information right now. Hopefully we do before waivers run tonight if you're in a league that runs from Tuesday to Wednesday. Yeah, I'm with you. I'm just staying away from it for now until we get some more information. Roboto in here asking, should we handcuff P-Ryne to Mixon for the rest of the year? So are you keeping, are you stashing some Ajay P-Ryne if you have Mixon? Yeah, I mean, I think you should stash him even if you don't have Mixon. This is one of those things where this time of year especially, I'm not very big on drafting handcuffs, not best ball stuff aside. This is more just managed fantasy football. I'm not big on drafting handcuffs because there's a lot of reasons why they're generally overvalued. They don't really hit value and come to fruition until later in the season when people have already dropped them. We don't know who the high-end handcuffs often are. I mean, some Ajay P-Ryne is a perfect example of this where no one was drafting some Ajay P-Ryne when now we're seeing that he's just as valuable as Alexander Madison. And Alexander Madison was that like 10th, 11th round pick. So it's just, you know, it's not someone that these handcuffs aren't players that I draft typically. But in season I hold them all the time, especially if you have an empty bench spot. I mean, it's a perfect kind of, you know, Jalen Warren, Madison, like I mentioned, and P-Ryne is now up there as the higher-end handcuffs in fantasy football. He has now, you know, over the last two weeks, he has two top 10 performances. Joe Mixon across the entire season has two top 10 performances. I mean, P-Ryne has been very, very good in relief, 21% target share per game, 93% running back rush share per game. I mean, he is the dude in that backfield whenever Joe Mixon's been out over the last couple of weeks. And that's something that you absolutely need on your bench, not just as insurance for Joe Mixon, but if Mixon gets hurt and you have him on your bench, even if you don't have Mixon, all of a sudden you have another, I mean, I would say RB1 on your team. I mean, that's what we've seen from a usage perspective over the last couple of weeks. So do not drop some Ajay P-Ryne. You know, this time of year two, you have to think about this. Like we're gonna see guys emerge. Yeah, yeah, yeah. But earlier in the season, like week two, week three, even into like week seven, you're adding these dart throws. Like we added, you know, Christian Watson a week early, hopefully, and you were able to see that come to fruition and whatnot, but you're not necessarily looking for those guys the same degree as you are now. Now you're looking for stability and you're looking for that massive upside from a running back if a running back injury occurs, especially if that running back injury occurs to one of your opponents, and then you're the one who has that handcuff, you get a big, big boost from a game theory perspective. So this is the time of year to roster a lot of these handcuff running backs, even like lower tiered ones, because I guarantee, you know, like, if you have Jarvis Landry on your roster right now and you're in a fairly like normal league, there's not a lot of reason to be holding Jarvis Landry. Like he's not gonna win you your league, you know, whereas some of these backup running backs have a chance to. Yeah, Jarvis Landry's not gonna all of a sudden turn into Christian Watson. Yeah, like it's just not gonna happen. You just get rid of those like low ceiling guys and set, like you can stash multiple defenses this time of year. You can stash three tight ends if you want to, just to see if like, like add Daniel Bellinger this week and see if he continues to see this target share that he saw last week and then all of a sudden you have another usable tight end. I mean, it's that kind of stuff you should be doing more so than getting the veterans that you already know what you're gonna get out of them like a Jarvis Landry, even like a Tyler Boyd. It's like we saw Tyler Boyd without Jamar Chase earlier this year. And yeah, he might have a big week down the stretch, but Boyd was not good without Jamar Chase. It's not like he's even a handcuffed wide receiver at this point. Right. So players like that, they don't really need to be on your roster. You can usually drop them for some of these backup running backs. Yeah, I'm fully with you on that one. Brady in here asking, he's looking ahead to week 16 as he has a buy. So he's wondering, is the no-brainer to pick up the Tennessee defense who's playing against Houston? Is that correct? Do you agree with that, JJ? Yeah, I mean, Tennessee against Houston's great. Yeah. And then the second air question here is, can you pick up Geno Smith who plays Kansas City or Aaron Rodgers who plays Miami? Which of those two guys would you pick up? I'd probably be playing Geno against Kansas City. That's his only good playoff matchup for the record. The other two are pretty rough. I think they get San Francisco in the Jets. So those are like two really, really, I mean, like bottom three matchups for quarterbacks. And Geno earlier this season scored six fantasy points against San Francisco. So that's a very, very risky play. But against Kansas City, that's the one game where he could hypothetically blow up. Tennessee against Houston, absolutely. Houston over the last three weeks has given up the number one fantasy defense in every single week. They have been, actually get this, I have this on my 10 trends episode tomorrow, but Houston over the last three weeks has given up 67 points to opposing defenses and standard fantasy points and standard scoring. And the Steelers this year, there's been eight teams that haven't even scored 67 points this year. The Steelers being one of them, they've scored 64. So the three defense in the last three weeks against the Texans have scored more fantasy points than the Steelers. Steelers all season. Oh my God, that's wild. That's a wild stat. It's crazy. I bet the Broncos are in that list. They scored like three points all season. Yeah. And by the way, just speaking of Geno Smith playing Kansas City, it reminded me, go see if Kansas City is on your wave wire. If you're playing with defenses, they have a fantastic defensive schedule going forward Denver, Houston, Seattle and then Denver again and we 17. That's beautiful. Badz official asking Gus, Gus Edwards or Rashad White for San Francisco or is there a waiver option that you like better that's out there, JJ? And mostly probably not. I think Rashad White, you still have to go against San Francisco. You can't really trust Gus Edwards in a game with a really low over under bad team total and Gus didn't even lead that backfield in Snapshare this past week. It was Kenyon Drake. So I'm not very high on Gus Edwards. Obviously, anything can go, anything can change. But Rashad White, his usage wasn't that great last night. Leonard Fournette was playing more Snaps in him, saw better usage than him. Obviously, Rashad White got the game winning touchdown and San Francisco is a really tough matchup. So overall, I don't like either of these guys this week to be clear, but I think I would still prefer Rashad White. Yeah, that ball to more Ravens backfield is really not valuable unless there's like one person getting the majority of the workload and our ball came out earlier this week and mentioned how Dobbins might be back this week. Yeah, Dobbins has got people's radars, yeah. Yeah, so he's popping up. He will likely be back, but I agree with you. Gus Edwards is just not enough standalone value there. Yeah. Jack DeBarry asking, streaming defenses, 49ers or cheese? Mr. Liv in the stream, which of those two defenses you like? I mean, I'd rather not have to drop. I mean, I'd rather just roster. I would try to roster both because both of those defenses are probably gonna be top five options rest of season. I have not done my rankings yet. I'm assuming I'm probably gonna have the 49ers over the Chiefs still, even though the matchup is absolutely there for the Chiefs. But they're both like top 49ers. They're both like top three options this week. Right. Yeah, I'm with you. I'm with you. Let's see, Rashad, Rashad asking, does Zonovan Knight got juice or sauce? That's a good question. So yeah, so the thing with Bam, yeah, he looks good. Like, he's definitely like the better player between him and James Robinson at this point. The problem is, what's that? Is it legit? The problem is that Michael Carter was out this past week. And I don't think that when Michael Carter's healthy, we're gonna necessarily see what we saw this past week. Now, with that being said, Bam can still see like half the team's workload similar to what he kind of saw this past week. Ty Johnson was playing the pass catching snaps a lot. But I think that Bam Knight can still be usable as like a flex. But don't forget that last week, Michael Carter was out. So I think Bam should be rostered everywhere. Yeah, he was someone last week who we had talked about, Simon and I at least. And so I think that he makes sense as someone to roster and they have a good playoff schedule as well. Not the best matchup this week per se. Not someone that you can probably like feel very, very confident about. But even when Michael Carter returns, I think that night's gonna have a role. Yeah, I'm with you. What we saw is a little too fantastic. I'm not sure Michael Carter comes back and takes over this whole thing, but I think it might be, we might see more of a split. Just how good it's out of a nice look. Yeah, like Michael Carter is not a bell cow back. I mean, you look at every move that the team has made and it's showing you that they don't think Michael Carter is a bell cow back. Not in college, he shared a backfield with Javante Williams, gets to the NFL, and then what do they do after his rookie season? They go and they draft Breeze Hall. Breeze Hall gets hurt. They trade for James Robinson. I mean, they start using BAM night in that game even when Michael Carter was active. I mean, they clearly don't think Michael Carter is a bell cow back. With that being said, he's a good pass catcher who's gonna cap that upside for night. And he's also just gonna see some early down work. Like I think Michael Carter is a good player. He's just not a workhorse. Yeah, I fully agree with you on that. Jeremy, and you're asking or it said Edward Poros says two to four weeks for Lamar, given the injury and lack of production, are you dropping Lamar Jackson? I would have to dig into that in a little bit more detail. I mean, if you have like legitimate options on the waiver wire, like I'm in a league where the best option on the waiver wire is Tannahill or something like that, then I'm probably not dropping Lamar. But if the best option on the waiver wire is, yeah, I mean, Goff is obviously a little bit better. I think Goff is probably a decent enough baseline. If you feel good enough about like finding guys like a Trevor Lawrence, a Jared Goff that you can play. I mean, Lawrence is a terrible schedule, but that you can play and stream. I don't think this is like so insane. Would I be dropping him? Probably not because I think there'd be a lot of guilt that I would feel and I would just feel horrible if my opponent then picked up Lamar Jackson and they beat me with them. You know, that's one of those things where like psychologically, I don't think I could. That would be it. That would be it for you, JJ, last straw. Tommy asking, you guys think DJ Moore is where they spot if available. My receivers are currently Jefferson, Waddle, McClaren, Berks. Yeah, DJ Moore has a really, really good schedule the rest of season. I believe I can pull it up because I have the schedule like grades that I have for these guys. So Carolina wide receivers rest of season in terms of adjusted fantasy points allowed. They have the fourth best schedule and then they have the fifth best schedule for the playoffs. So it's a good spot for me. Three plus matchups for DJ Moore and the fantasy playoffs. They have a tough one this week from an adjusted fantasy points allowed perspective against Seattle. But Carolina schedule, I can pull it up too. Carolina schedule is good enough for DJ Moore to be, they get Pittsburgh, Detroit and Tampa Bay in the fantasy playoffs. That's pretty solid. Yeah, so you can realistically get wide receiver three production out of them. I would, you know, I have DJ Moore ahead of train lawn Berks, for example, right now, rest of season. That's partially because I don't think Berks is gonna play this weekend. But, you know, I think he should be rostered in pretty much every 12 team. Yeah, he's just, he's one of those talents where it feels bad seeing him on the waiver wire. Like he should be on a team. Just those QB concerns are a little, you know, are present. Brad and you're asking, stick with streaming Tana Hill this week versus the Jags then versus the LA Chargers next week or pick up Huntley off the waiver wire. We talked about this a bit. I think you're on the Tana Hill side, correct, JJ? I'm on Tana Hill this week over Huntley. Yeah, I mean, better team total, better matchup. I wish, you know, Traylon Berks were playing and we, you know, we don't know for sure. I don't think he's been ruled out, but if Traylon Berks were playing, I would, I would feel a lot better about Tana Hill. Right now I'm like, yeah, I mean, he's probably gonna be like QB 16 ish ranked or something like that. You know, nothing like super special. I just am worried about Huntley. Huntley probably has maybe a little bit better of a ceiling because of his rushing, but I think the floor is just, is just sick. Like it's just, it could be bad. I mean, last year, like I said, four of his five games with 30 plus attempts, he was under 16 fantasy points. He had a game of six fantasy points, game of 10, game of 11. I mean, it just wasn't that strong. So, you know, I'd probably go with Tana Hill. I would hope that I'm not like sticking with him week in and week out and play a week by week. You know, you can then see if Huntley was good or not. Like if you're really relying on streaming right now, I would be rostering multiple quarterbacks. I would not just be rostering one because then someone might be able to get that other quarter. Like what if Huntley does go off this weekend and then you could rely on him next weekend? I would rather him just be on my roster if I'm really relying on streaming. Right, because it's gonna be that much harder to get him next week if he does pop off. That's a, that is a great, great point. And Garrett in here with a follow up question that's kind of related to this. He said, hey JJ, read your 15 transactions, which by the way is a good reminder. If you aren't already, be sure you go check out late round.com. It's where you find all JJ's work, fantastic resource. Like 15 transactions, which I also read this morning. Said, just lost Lamar. You like Tana Hill over Huntley and golf. That's a question. I read it like a statement though. Do you like Tana Hill over Huntley and golf? I have them, I'm gonna have them ranked golf Tana Hill Huntley. I think golf is in a, I mean, golf is in a potential shootout this weekend. So against Minnesota. So I'm definitely gonna go golf there. And then I'd go Tana Hill, probably a couple of tiers below that. And then Huntley, maybe one tier below Tana Hill, maybe even in the same tier, but I would definitely, definitely feel most confident with golf there. Yeah, I feel like I said this this morning on our morning show, if you want to cool like 12 to 16 points, Ryan Tana Hill is your guy. Yeah. That's right where he lives. Let's see, we got a Grimfan in here. What's up Grimfan? I said, Bucks or Titans for Survivor League, JJ. He said, Jail knows my unbelievable story on my run this year. Yes, Grimfan comes in every week and he's let us know he's still in this Survivor League. It is truly incredible. Simon somehow gives him the wrong pick every single week. So JJ, don't let him down. Which of these two guys? I'm openly not a good like game pick person. Like, fantasy football is my bread and butter. I feel very confident in my fantasy football ability and my analysis for fantasy football. I do not when it comes to game picks and betting even to like just game betting. I would probably say that I would probably go with Tennessee of those two playing at home. Tampa Bay coming off, you know, they have a shorter week. The San Francisco defense is no joke. I'm gonna go Tennessee coming off that loss against Philadelphia. Tennessee going against coming off that loss in Philadelphia. Maybe they got a chip on their shoulder. Yeah. I want to look at, I like looking at 538's projections to see what, you know, old Nate Silver is thinking. I would assume it's fairly even between the two. I mean, they're both three and a half point favorites. Yeah, 78% they're given to the Titans. Sorry, the Bucks are three and a half point dogs and the Titans are favorites. Okay. So yeah, and then 49% for the Buccaneers. So 538 thinks Titans is a safer play here. Yeah, that's good. We're going Titans. Going Titans. So let's this one. Sideclaw in here, streaming golf this week with Fields on Vive, Taylor, Stevenson, Pierce, Swift, Walker and Connor on my team. Can I drop Jeff Wilson if I'm not going to play him the rest of the year? No, I mean, these are the situations where you have to make sure that your opponents can't use them. And Jeff Wilson, yes, it was a horrible, horrible week from every angle imaginable for Jeff Wilson last week. They didn't run the ball at all. And he all, I mean, they had a crazy pass right over expected. And he also played behind Raheem Mostert in that game, which is the first time that we've seen that since he was traded to Miami. But it's a one game samples, a one game thing. I would try to hold on to him because running backs who see volume are just hard to get. You hypothetically could be helping another team by dropping him. I know it doesn't seem like it right now, but it still could happen. Yeah, you got to be able to look at that other end of the spectrum too, right? It's not just your team. You're playing against your league mates here. So looking at it from their perspective is super helpful. That's great advice here. Grim fan asking, considering dropping Brian Robinson, should I grab Foreman or Acres? So are you picking up Foreman or Acres over Robinson here? I mean, I would probably go Foreman if you're going to drop Robinson. I try to keep Robinson though and Foreman and just kind of ignore Acres. Acres, this past week saw like a 73% snap share in that backfield that was up tremendously. I mean, basically him and Kyron Williams flipped flop their snap shares from week 13 to 14, or sorry, 12 to 13. But that had to do with game script. The LA was in that game. They didn't have any plays run while trailing by 10 plus points. The week before that, they had 30 plays run while trailing by 10 plus points. When that happens, you're going to throw your pass catching back behind or in the backfield and that would be Kyron Williams. So I think we're going to see this like Yo-Yo back and forth annoying backfield and it's a bad offense. I mean, it's just, I can see Acres being fine this week because they get Vegas and it's not a bad matchup. But I still think Foreman's in a great matchup too against Seattle. I'd probably go Foreman over Acres, but I would try to hold B-Rub. B-Rub's seeing great usage right now. We can't ignore that use. He's getting some more work through the air, which is very, very important form. So I would, I mean, I would, I would try to be holding both Foreman and B-Rub. Yeah, I like that. Here's my narrative on Cam Acres, JJ. So my narrative is that they're, with the end of the season and the Rams being out of contention here, they're just going to feed Cam Acres to try and raise his trade value because he's already got another year in his contract and they weren't able to trade him before the deadline. Yeah, they could, they could. They just, you know, the way they've been deploying these guys has just been very, very, I mean, even last week, I think Kyron Williams still ran more routes than Cam Acres did. So it's, you know, the way they've been deploying them, that's a clear like, clear one-two punch, but you know, they play specific roles. Right. I can see it though with Acres. We'll see. It's a narrative. So you gotta take it with a grain of salt. Let's, we got two more questions here. We'll wrap it fire before wrapping up. Cyclops asking, rather drop Pickins or to Sean Watson and then for Gough. So which of the two guys would you rather drop? I'd probably keep both of them. Yeah, and just leave Gough. But if you, if you had to drop one, I'd probably drop Watson, but I'd probably try to keep both of them. Yeah, I'd rather have Watson over Gough for us to season. And then our last question here, Jack, the Barry asking, do I drop Cortland Sutton? I'm over him. Yeah, I mean, if you want to, it's fine. I mean, it's fine if you think that no one can, I mean, it could honestly be, you know, move where like a sabotage move where, you know, someone else picks them up and then uses them and then he doesn't do anything because their matchups aren't like horrible down the stretch. It's just, you know, he's just been very, very bad. There's a lot of volatility. I can understand dropping him if you need to. At least this last week, I haven't seen any news since Sunday, but he's been dealing with a hamstring. Yeah, which is definitely worrisome. All right, that is going to do it for our waiver wire Q and A week 14. If we were helpful, do me a favor. Go ahead and hit that like button if you're on YouTube, subscribe to FanDuel on YouTube, as well as follow them on Twitch. They have fantastic content coming out every day, helping you with your fantasy, your DFS, all everything. They got content for everything. JJ, you ready to get out of here? Yeah, man. All right, we'll see you next week. Oh, and also if you haven't already, make sure you go follow JJ at late round QV right there under his beautiful face. We'll be back next week with a week 15 waiver wire Q and A. We will see you then. Bye-bye.