 This is also addressing a question I didn't ask. I didn't ask why people believe them, but you talk about perceived authority. I don't recognize this authority, and I don't see that you've demonstrated any authority. But you're asking about the leadership. You said that there's people that ascend to our leaders. I'm saying that the authority that comes to them is what makes them a leader. It's like, it's very, well nowadays is just because there's more physical power. Back then, the leader kind of became a leader because people trusted him. People gave him the leadership. That has nothing to do. Is it possible that there were people who trusted false leaders that aren't speaking the truth? Yes, that is possible. So then whether or not they're a leader and whether or not people believe them is irrelevant to whether or not it's true. So let's try and stick with things that demonstrate truth, not things that are irrelevant to truth.