 But if your interpretation is incorrect, you're committing intellectual suicide because you are showing that science contradicts a false interpretation. Well, so what? I agree with you. The question is, what is an accurate interpretation of Genesis and does science contradict that accurate interpretation of Genesis? And my point is rather simple. There is absolutely no science in Genesis to contradict. There's no biology, no zoology, no astronomy, no science anywhere in the Genesis account. That is why for anybody to say, oh, I can't believe Genesis because a contradict science is intellectually dishonest because there's no science in Genesis for modern science or ancient science to contradict. It's that simple. Okay. So in Genesis, when it lists the order of events that God created, supposedly, is that order accurate to the order that things were actually created?