 I will just introduce Ellen actually, but I will say just a few words about short-term scientific missions in general. With this presentation, we tried to collect all 17 that we have. So, you know, from our Vadimekum, short-term scientific missions are actually institutional visits. The point is to foster collaboration and, of course, they need to be in the scope of the complete cost activity. Of course, as each cost tool, they are also promoting gender balance, enable early career investigators and broadening geographical inclusiveness. I think that we managed this with those 17 that we have. So, a few more are also under preparation and some of them started already. So, you can see that 18 different countries were involved, Switzerland, Macedonia, Portugal, Italy, Denmark, Norway, et cetera. You will see also from the overview that for sure more than 15 conference and journal papers were published based on short missions. And you will see also that they were basis for case studies that were developed for further development of scientific methodologies and some of them are also the input for practical guidelines. We tried to compose this presentation as a kind of compilation of two slides per each mission. You will see who was the scholar, the STSM participant from where he went, what is his home or home institution, who was the host and why he chose this host, what was the general aim of the mission, what were the methods and tools used before for the preparation and during the mission, what were the main results, of course, within the cost action scope. Results contain also the data on scientific publications and what is, I believe, the most important outreach, what can we expect as a future developments and is there a potential to exploit what they've done through their missions. And of course, there is always some figural schematic representation so you can, let's say, get a better perspective. There are also, besides this presentation, we asked them all to make posters. The posters were actually going, the presentation of posters was going in the morning and I suppose everything will be available on the website after the finish of the action. Now, Ellen, will you please go through those 70 units? Okay, so hopefully you can hear me? Great, okay, thanks Anna. So, I'm gonna look through a flavor of the STSMs which we promoted during the course of the action. Right from the outset, we tried to identify and select and promote STSMs which had good impacts in terms of the various work packages and I hope you'll see that in the context of the ones which we present today. They've contributed to a lot of work which has been done, they've also contributed to a number of objectives that have been outlined in terms of the innovation potential. We specifically looked when we were considering STSM proposals at innovation potential, at exploitation potential and that became a determinant in some cases of whether or not the STSMs were approved for funding. So we had 17 in all completed and we have four currently at various stages. So just to give you a flavor of what some of these looked like, these are not necessarily in consecutive order here of how they occurred. These are the slides which were produced by the scholars so we would acknowledge them and thank them for the slides as they stand here. I don't propose to read everything that's on all of these to you. Rather, what I think is important to look at is just to get a flavor for where people came from, where they went to to show the geographic spread of the scholars as they moved around the various locations. To look at what their aims were and then maybe a little bit on the results and some of the outputs. So the first one here was Maria Giovanni Massiota who went from Italy to Portugal. The title of the STSM was the value of SHM for the structural behavior of masonry structures under varying environmental effects. And the aim here was to shed light on how information collected through monitoring systems can be exploited for assessing the structural performance of masonry historical buildings under varying environmental conditions, making more effective asset management decisions. So this was a very interesting STSM which occurred very early in the project. The outreach activities which occurred here were focused on development of SHM based forecasting models for heritage structures in order to predict aging effects. And as with all the other STSMs, the final reports which are very interesting and are very detailed are available on the website for your information. The second one here was Simona who went from Macedonia to Eleni in Switzerland. Unfortunately, that's the information which we have to present to you so you'll have to refer to the document on the website for more information on that. This project looked at a novel by-component SHM strategy for deriving global models of operational wind turbines. So you can see, and I'll sum up at the end, the variety of different structural forms and types which were considered during the course of the project. The third one which we're gonna look at was the application of bridgeway and motion measurements in the assessment of existing structures. And this was where Dominic went to Alesh who's also here today in the audience from Croatia to Slovenia. The aim here was to study and analyze the application of bridgeway and motion measurements as a part of SHM tools in load carrying capacity assessment of existing road bridges. A number of publications, as with a lot of the STSMs, there was a significant number of publications which resulted from the work, which was very encouraging. And the outreach here, outcomes here were based on case study developments. You've seen the case study in this consequence. This was the subject of a number of two STSMs, actually, this particular work. And so it fed from one end to the other into a case study which was particularly pleasing. The third value of information, or sorry, the fourth value of information in system resilience modeling was where Simona went from the Technical University of Denmark to Mark Stewart, who was one of our external advisors in Australia. And the application here was in both. It covered a couple of work packages here. So from number one to number four, looking at the application of value of information to system resilience modeling and to demonstrate how the value of information can be applied in a broader sense to different monitoring strategies. So already I hope you're getting a flavor for the very extensive range of work that was done in the STSMs, different structural forms, different considerations, different impacts to the various work packages which we had. Here, the outreach was where the value of information analysis was used as a decision support tool in evaluating monitoring policies over different indicators and scenarios. Again, these slides will all be made available to you subsequently so you can produce these at your leisure. Then we had, this was one of my STSM was looking at meta models in structural health monitoring. And this was where Peter L. Hage, who was actually based at the University of Nantes at the time, came to us in Trinity to look at investigating the use of degradation meta models based on the formulation of correlated state dependence stochastic processes in a structural health monitoring context. And an interesting point here about Peter is that Peter's email address is now in Montmich Donald and Peter, I was with Peter in a meeting last week in London. And Peter is now based in the asset management group in Montmich Donald and is actively encouraging the use of value of information with their clients towards the management of the infrastructure which they have. So that's a great result in the context Helder, you suggested about the PhD students going out into industry and some of the comments we had about education. Peter's actually living the dream now in Montmich Donald in applying the work which he did. And so we looked at looking degradation models in a structural health monitoring context. We looked at reconstructing data sets where data was missing and so on. And I'm glad to say that the meeting I had in London with Peter last week was exactly about this working with Highways England to see how they could reconstruct data sets. So, sorry, enough about me. Strategies in structural thermal monitoring condition assessment with thermal monitoring of earth dams and levees. So this was where Kristoff went to Istea in France looking at the preparation of optimal strategies of structural health, thermal monitoring and condition assessment with thermal monitoring of earth dams and levees. So we've had bridges, we've had wind turbines, we've had earth dams, we've had meta models, we've had so on at this stage. The next one, structural health monitoring for large structural systems. This was one of two STSMs by Professor Lyra where in this one went to the Danish Technical University to look at the potential for application of enhanced Monte Carlo simulation methods for large structural systems within the area of structural health monitoring resulted in a number of publications and some significant outreach activities. Models for structural health monitoring of concrete structures under fatigue loads considering material and structural uncertainties was where Lewis Cicero-Mora went from Spain to Sebastian in Denmark looking at risk modeling of fatigue damage of concrete to develop a probabilistic modeling with a preposterior and prior decision models. And a number of scientific papers are under production in that case. And number nine, development of a digital image correlation technique as an indicator of structural integrity. Again, Lewis Cicero-Mora went this time to LNEC in Portugal and here they looked at extending the model towards a more global application, this digital image correlation technique. Proofload testing decision framework where Henning Busk went from the Technical University of Denmark to Dmitri in Edinburgh looking at the development of a decision support framework of proofload testing and here potential follow-up when research considering hybrid simulation. So another important aspect of the STSMs is that it encourages further collaboration or future collaboration between the scholars and their host institutes. An STSM by our glorious leader, Sebastian, to Mark Stewart in Australia, looking at assessment of risk mitigation strategies for attacks on bridges. This is a really interesting one because this was looking at a different hazard scenario, so looking at terrorist attacks with improvised explosive devices for an iconic bridge structure. So again, you can see the kind of range and the broad scope of the application of the methodologies here. The outreach activities here were identification of efficient strategies for a safer-built environment with less resources. Structural health monitoring of tendon supported large-span roof in the multi-rena in Poland. Again, this contributed, as you've seen, to some case study work. Thomas Hozaki went to Mirza of Secura at the Czech University in Prague looking at reliability and risk analysis involving FE modeling and in-situ data considering a real multi-rena case study and the outreach activities here were managing procedure for the multi-rena and calculation scheme for similar case studies. Dominic's second STSM, then implementation of a value of information analysis with probabilistic assessment methods of existing bridges from the University of Zygreb to the Technical University of Denmark and you've seen some presentation on this work already today. Looking at implementing the value of information analysis to quantify costs and benefits of the application of bridge-may and weigh-in motion measurements in the assessment of existing road bridges and significant, obviously, you've seen this presented today the kind of outreach activities which have resulted from this work. 14, getting there. Implementation of the value of information analysis with probabilistic assessment methods of existing timber hall. Mislav Stepanak went to Daniel Honfi, who I nearly didn't recognize when I saw him earlier on today. Looking here at how a preposterior decision analysis can help to quantify the value of information obtained by the condition assessment of timber structures and the outreach activities, and this is a really interesting one seeing where the results of this STSM could have implication in the assessment of timber structures. Number 15, so Helder had a number of STSMs, so this is the first of Helder's STSMs, development of a novel proactive SHM tool devoted to bridge maintenance based on damage identification by FE analysis and probabilistic methods looking at the Lezyria Bridge, and this was a link between a very valuable and very beneficial link between Helder and TNO, Vim, who's here in the audience today, looking at applying the value of information to pre-stress concrete bridges supported by the test bed with extensive field data available. So this was a huge benefit of Helder's STSMs that we had a significant amount of data already available, which we could use in the context of this bridge. And very interesting to see how the results of the STM can be actually used in a real-life structure applying on the Lezyria Bridge. Number 16, the value of information in seismic emergency management of bridges, Pierre Francesco Giordano, going to Simona at Alburg University, looking at visual inspections in the context of emergency management of a motorway bridge under seismic hazard. And again, the outreach activities here look at the global characterization, dynamic characterization of the structure. And 17, one of the ones which is currently underway by Jorge, who's visiting Daniel in Munich, is looking at sequential decision framework for design decisions, including life cycle considerations. So this is developing the mathematical framework, looking at the operational maintenance decisions and reflecting these in design. So I hope that you've got a good feel for the kind of range of activities which were conducted in the various STSMs over the lifespan of the project. I think we were very successful in the number of STSMs which we promoted. I think we were successful in terms of the interactions between research institutes, as Helder showed in one of his slides, between research institutes and universities and between industry and universities. I think if you consider under five headings here, the types of structures which we considered. So we've looked at masonry structures, we've looked at bridges, we've looked at wind turbines, we've looked at dams, we've looked at large span roofs, we've looked at timber halls. The kinds of loads that we've considered, so environmental effects, chloride attacks, so degradation mechanisms, traffic loading, fatigue loading, terrorist attack, and seismic hazard. If you consider the different inspection and monitoring methods which have been considered by the scholars, looking at visual inspection based condition assessments, looking at digital image correlation techniques, looking at proof load testing, looking at bridgewim, looking at thermal monitoring. The types of tools and methods that have been developed, so system resistance modeling, structural behavioral modeling, structural health monitoring strategies, degradation meta models. I'm getting tired reading it, so you must be getting tired hearing it at this stage, how extensive we've been in the work that we've done. Risk mitigation measures, considering material structural and load uncertainties. And finally, quantifying costs and benefits and decision making within asset management frameworks from the perspective of emergency management and life cycle management of structures in general. I'd like to congratulate all the STSM scholars on the work which they did, which I think you'll agree is really extensive in the context of the action. I think it's been very successful. The amount of STSMs we've had, I think the work that they've done has been really successful. The outreach activities have been great. The rate of publication has been phenomenal. And the potential for future collaboration and for these scholars to really push the boat out in this space in their professional careers, I think, is also evident, and I hope that's evident to you too. So with that, I'll conclude. Thank you very much, Elin. Any questions to Elin? Yes, Hedda? Well, it's not a question, but it's a, well, it's a question, but it's a mainly a challenge. The innovation committee is still working, yes, it didn't finish yet, yeah. So, what do you think about, for example, from what you receive, because I had a short-sighted fiction, so we submitted the report. So, what do you think about in producing a small publication and all these short-scientific missions, or thinking about it, as you presented in these last slides, it's very nice when you see by categories of, what do you think about it? We could produce these compiling briefly, and it could be a starting point for what I suggested in the book onto U-1402. Just a remark. Are you trying to draw me into writing a chapter in your book? Is that the real question? Yeah, I think it's a fantastic idea. I mean, I think it's apparent to everyone how extensive the work that's been performed is. It's been hugely successful in that regard. And the range of applications, of possible applications, the demonstration of the possible applications, the myriad of possibilities that that creates in your mind for future work. I think that it's a fantastic idea. I'll talk to Anna about this and we'll get back to you. I know, of course, of course, of course.