 This is covering the spread part of the Fandall podcast network. I Hope you all had fantastic weekends on this Memorial Day and a lot of sports going on We had games seven last night between the heat and the Celtics the heat coming out on top We're gonna talk about that series between them and the Nuggets coming up later on this week But for day we're talk some golf the Memorial Tournament is coming up this week. It is an elevated field once again We're gonna talk to Branden Goodula to break down that event talk about his favorite pets at Fandall Sportsbook And I'll go through some NLB. That's for today as well. Welcome on into covering the spread That's right here on the Fandall podcast network and number fire calm My name is Jim Saunders. I am a senior writer and analyst for number fire Joined here as mentioned by Branden Goodula check him out on Twitter at Goodula 13 You can find his work over at number fire calm where he is a senior managing editor Brandon Happy Tuesday to you. I didn't love that for once. How you doing today? You did a great job, Jim good work. I was petrified this morning. I would forget that it was Tuesday because Had a very weird work schedule yesterday given that it was Memorial Day I tried to plan my schedule around plop myself in front of the TV during the two NASCAR races Which meant that I didn't start work until 11 and then worked until 1230 is like a little bit of an odd schedule for sure. So it does not feel like a Tuesday to me So there are two races on Monday Yeah, there's a lot of rain this weekend, which meant that I got two races on Sunday and two races on Monday And personally I am in favor of that going forward I just prefer that the NASCAR ones not be Monday because it messes up my schedule as far as Logging data and getting models ready for the next week. Yeah, that makes sense. I had a had some more day plans and They they were in the evening, but of course Monday night Game 7 had to catch up on that and of course can't go to bed without knowing what happened on Monday night raw So there's a late night for me as well So did you DVR raw and watch the heat Celtics game live or what was the configuration for you? They were both DVR'd because we were out pretty late. So it was a late night But so you DVR'd both at day So you DVR'd both and watch them back to back. Yes What time do you go to bed? As your life manager, I feel like I need to too too late. Let's say, okay So we're both we're both operating a hundred percent right now is what you're saying. I mean My my analysis is all done. So I don't worry about that It's more the delivery and if you ask me to you know, say something else I might be a little little slow on the intake Well, you know, I like you love I know you love surprise questions off the cuff You've not prepped for any initial thoughts for you on nuggets heat. They don't do betting and insights Just kind of general, you know based on your feel for those two teams not betting just Brandon What are your thoughts in that series first look? Yes, I'm just I'm the kind of person who if you ask me that I'd rather have like three minutes to think and then have Like a good answer Yeah It's it's gonna be It's gonna be tough I think for the heat to hang offensively because the Celtics They had some horrendous three-point shooting in the series Jason Tatum rolling his ankle early In game seven clearly not a hundred percent Jalen Brown just I don't know Shrunk in the moment or something and it was weird because he was he was good in the finals last year Yeah, whenever they needed him I don't know if they're if the heat are gonna get that many opportunities where the opposing offense kind of lets them stay in the game Unless you know, they Get another Incredible showing from Caleb Barton. So I don't know how you don't go into this thinking that the heat are the clear underdogs Which you know, it's not a surprise, but right hasn't really stopped them before so I think it's gonna be fun It's one of those it's it's sometimes it's sometimes tough with underdogs where you feel You want the underdogs to win, but you also want the best games possible So in the back of my mind, I was like, I think I kind of want the Celtics to win for a better the a higher probability of a competitive series, but I Think it's time that we all just quit doubting the heat anyway, so The market is because their money line to win the series is plus 330 So I'm sure that they will not use that for motivation at all as they have definitely not had a chip on their shoulders entire time We'll talk more about the series as mentioned later on this week to get the insights on the NBA finals and the Stanley Cup finals and more Make sure you're subscribed to covering the spread wherever you get your podcast We'll be breaking down all that later on this week plus more as always So go subscribe your plot podcast platform of choice and also check us out over on the Fandle YouTube page To get all the insights there as well Let's kick things off now Brandon though by talking about this week's PGA tour event It is that Muirfield Village is the memorial tournament and we know what to expect at this course They had to redesign a couple years ago, but a lot of data here from this course So what should we know about Muirfield before we fill out our bet slips for the memorial? Yeah long par 72 over 7,500 yards and Despite that length The fairways are they're not they're not narrow per se, but missing them is problematic so you don't want to miss the fairways here and So that kind of makes driving a really strange combination for for the week because yes the distance helps But you can't just be spraying it I Data golf has a pretty pretty lowered importance on driving distance and a much higher relative importance on driving accuracy For this week as a result now what we do with that information That's always a question that we have Anyone who's ever listened to us on the heat check or you know me at a course where like driving accuracy matters It's gonna sound familiar, but what that tends to do is bring more golfers into play Because more accurate hitters Kind of close that gap, especially in the case whenever distance itself is not enough For the longer hitters to keep that separation that being said you don't just have driving accuracy Ranking in your spreadsheet or something like that and give it a ton of weight because there's a lot more to golf than just hitting the fairway You know a lot of these golfers could hit the fairway if they clubbed down and had no you know no need to hit it far as well We're not you know They're not gonna be hitting irons off the tee just to hit the fairway doesn't work that way So I think whenever driving accuracy comes into play it can get really convoluted for it for you know For people trying to break things down So what I like to do in these instances is look at stroking it off the tee and have like a slight emphasis on driving accuracy So like five to ten percent at most not something absurd with the driving accuracy numbers Which is and driving accuracy itself is not a great stat to begin with but not only do we have like Troublesome fairways to miss we have small greens the greens on average here 5000 square feet PGA tour average is around 6000 square feet So that's gonna put an emphasis on stroking it around the green where they're gonna miss greens They're gonna have to get up and down stroking it around the green is important so You know iron play always super vital at any course, especially at a course with those small greens and you know Whenever you're gonna be hitting stuff out of the rough. So It's important to be really good with all three of your T degree in areas just to different degrees for this week Stroke getting around the green is a key stat for me So that kind of means that if a factor in putting it's all around golf, but I mean this course plays tough winning scores on average over the past five years have been like 11.8 under par and We've had like a lot of Multi-shot winners. So like the sort of hypothetical, you know First place you need is gonna be even lower than that. So it's gonna be somewhat similar to the scoring conditions we had last week and so That then does re-raise the the stakes For the better golfers because when things play tough for better golfers Tend to separate with a designated field. I mean, we have a lot of great golfers. So Basically, you know, there's not a key stat that I think is the key stat this week It's more having a good all-around game and a good enough all-around game to beat a Lot of great golfers in the field. So I want I want driving a little bit of driving accuracy Irons and wedges for the week. Okay Now you mentioned how the fact that it's a non-distance course does put more golfers in play But as you said, it's a tougher course too, which kind of has a push and pull here where you think it would gravitate towards the top guys Let's take a look at the odds board here over at Fandall Sportsbook Scotty Schaeffler is the favorite at six to one John Rom 7 to one now Roy McElroy kind of came back a bit at the PGA championship and showed some life once again But he's down at 14 to one To you Given the macro is behind Xander Shafley and Patrick Cantlay did Roy do enough to you to like Spark some interest in buying low on him, especially now with his eyes lengthening out to 14 to one Or is it still really Schaeffler and Ramas being like a two-horse race at the top here? Yeah With Rory he's not really in that tier for me just yet My model looks at long-term form so over the past year and gives more weight to recent rounds So obviously he's not gonna look quite as good as Scotty Schaeffler and John Rom in particular, but I have him also behind fittingly here Patrick Cantlay in Xander Shafley. So I think that 14 to one is Reasonable for Rory in terms of You know, they're not gonna make Rory 25 to 1 right even though maybe that's where my model says he should be I'm just saying like I don't think that we're we're ever gonna see massive amounts of value on on Rory But you know for me, it's Schaeffler and wrong They both have at least 11% Odds to win Roy's under 4% for me and then that tier 2 of of really good friends Patrick Cantlay and Xander Schaeffler. So I think the odds order is right, but boy, it's it's really tight this week 6 to 1 and 7 to 1 And then also 10 to 1 and 12 to 1 it's not leaving a whole lot and you know the thing is those guys aren't Substantially according to my model like overvalued by any means sure So they suck up win equity, but don't give you betting value. Yeah, that's the war there You know, and if we're not being using that word ironically, it's it's really the worst because It's not enough to get there with these guys But it doesn't really leave a whole lot else Down the rest of the odds board. So for me this week, unfortunately, it's it's shaping up to be a little bit more of a That's gonna be more like finishing positions some matchups Any special things that we can get our hands on because I'm not seeing a whole lot in the outright market anything in the outright market for you or nothing at all so With Patrick Cantlay at 10 to 1 It's justifiable. I'll say it's close enough. Can't lay has Like with an asterisk here Was it to win over the past four years One of those where John Rom withdrew due to the COVID test Like a four-shot lead after seven or after whatever I can't do math, but whatever three times 18 is 54 54 sick, you know the first time I benefited from that personally. So it's it's fine by me but yeah Just something to keep and keep an eye on with that that win I mean, you know that you should ever make your decisions based on who's won here in the past. I look at You just sort by wins Well, I'm very harshal at 12 to 1 for this week Yeah, back the back-to-back narrative tends to work out a lot, but I mean if you're if Inseriousness like if you're Factory and course history a lot it's John Rom in Cantlay very specifically those two guys to kind of stand out But you know can't lay at 10 to 1 I Wouldn't really argue. I haven't been 11 to 1 so again It's just a lot of those like one or two points away and it's not enough for me to want to You know, just because I don't always trust the model Sometimes it comes back to bite me, but I think it's close enough where you could justify it other than that with Cantlay like Sung Jae M is Currently 35 to 1 He's accurate off the tee his form overall has been Fine not not a standout. So I see the case for Sung Jae sure, but boy it's a really tight field or a really tight board at the top of the field and I see some like sprinkles of value on guys and I am I might get Wyndham Clarked where I say It's just a sprinkle and then I don't actually get the full full credit for it on the show But it's not the kind like that you look at the designated event winners and Clark is Clark and Kurt Kiteyama Are basically the two outliers. So you don't want to be throwing a lot of units. Yeah on any of these Any of these longer shots, but you know instead of betting a ton of guys at the top of the board You can do partial units on some of these longer shots, which I'm all right with in that event The names I'd be looking at a Russell Henley at 55 to 1 Tom Kim at 60 Keegan Bradley Keegan Bradley at 90 And even Matt Kutcher at 100 to 1 If I just took a unit and kind of put a quarter unit on those four guys I don't at least feel like I was getting some expected value But with you know, it's tough whenever there's not a whole lot at the top of the board and it's it I mean, it's a it's a list of it's like murderers row up there at the at the top of the board So it's always tough going against them and it sounds like based on your sentiment that that am at 35 is not someone You would bet personally. It's more so you say he's justifiable I'm gonna bet him out of fear of missing out Okay, cuz I have met 37 sure, okay, and at least at that rate. I'm like, you know But it's different whenever it's I have someone at 7 in their 6 that feels different. So yeah, yeah, that's a huge difference. Yeah So that makes a lot of sense. Okay. So the ones you like the most sounds like our Russell Hemley 55 to 1 Tom Kim 61 Keegan Bradley at 90 and Matt Kutcher at a hundo What about the non-outrights? What are you seeing there this week? Yeah, so this is where I'm really gonna jump in Again, Patrick can't lay first-round leader 22 to 1 slight value there in my first-round leader model Also, get you some coverage if he gets out to a good start You know, I don't I don't like this is not always the case But I don't mind again Partial unit on guys you like or are close to and just go in first-round leader because those odds are a lot different And then you kind of get that like peace of mind and generally things correlate quite well with those odds But can't land my first-round leader model does look Does look solid Xander Shafley top 10 plus 160 He's in great form. He's been top 10 or sorry top 20 in four straight years here You asked me if like Rory McElroy was on on par with John Rom and Scotty Schaeffler and He's not and Xander isn't either, but he's pretty close. He's really really good right now His irons are great. That's kind of one of the knocks is someone who's loved Xander over the years He wasn't as good of an iron player as some of the best guys The iron stats for him right now are pretty phenomenal. So Top 10 for him. I like that Tom Kim top 20 plus 220 Really accurate off the tee irons are still there puttings a bit up and down the putting stats from five to ten feet Not particularly great or bad. So I'm alright with that. I think this is a gen You know generally an overall good course fit for someone who will gain some leverage based on being accurate and then kind of a stab here, but it's more to do with the the Rest of the the players in this in this prop group top South African Garakiego plus 300. Hmm. He's really going up against Christian Bezadenhote Who is deservedly the favorite of plus 135 in that market? MJ Duffy is he can kind of pop here and there but This almost feels like a glorified head to head and so there my model shown a slight value on Garakiego And three to one there you can get that the prop market over if annual sportsbook top South African He go a plus 300 there all the ones Brandon mentioned again Can't lay first-round leader 22 to 1 and Xander top 10 plus 160 and Tom Kim top 20 Plus 220 did want to go briefly back to the Rob discussion about Robin Weirfield Looking back at the COVID year where he tested positive mid-events If you look at the first three rounds there data golf's true strokes gained if you want to guess His true strokes gained per round the first three rounds before he had to withdraw because of a positive COVID test What number are you putting on John Rob per round above the field? After accounting for course their difficulty and stuff so Outlier like an elite number, you know for is like elite like that's like not John wrong at the Genesis was 4.67. That's a bananas event He was probably like a four and a half seven point four three no really Absolutely unreal on the hinge. It was a three-round sample. So it's like, you know a small But like that's what he was that far out. He was eight. He was 18 under. Yeah and It's sick Can't they want it in a playoff at 13 under yeah, yeah, I had no right winning that that ticket, but yeah I mean We all get lucky sometimes we remember the bad beats. We don't remember the bad wins But you know sometimes they do happen. So by the way excited for this week's event We're talking more about that on the DFS side of things later on today We talked about that over on the number fire daily fantasy podcast So you've been for today here on the podcast Brandon want to thank you for coming on as always Good luck to you with the memorial. Have fun with the NBA finals. We'll talk to you once again next week Sounds good looking forward to it. All right. Check out Brandon on Twitter at Cadula 13 find his work in simulations for golf over at Number fire dot com we're gonna dive in to tonight's baseball slate here in just one second But first make a fast break to fan duel during the NBA playoffs because right now new customers get a no-sweat first bet up to $1,000. That's but $1,000 back in bonus bets if your first bet doesn't win There's no better place to bet all the playoff action than America's number one sports book fan duel Official sports betting partner of the NBA must be 21 plus and president select states first online real money wager Only $10 deposit required Refund issued is not on the trouble bonus bets that expire in 14 days We're strict to supply seafold terms at fan duel dot com slash sports book Fan duel is offering online sports wagering in Kansas under an agreement with Kansas Star Casino LLC gambling problem call 1-800 gambler or was a fan duel dot com slash RG in Arizona 1-800 next step or text next step to 533 42 in Connecticut 1-888-789-7777 or was a cc PG dot org slash chat in Indiana 1809 with it in Wyoming in Kansas 1805 to 240 700 in Kansas KS gambling help dot com Louisiana's 18077 770 stop in Massachusetts gambling helpline MA dot org or call 800 3 2 7 50 50 for 24 7 support in Maryland MD gambling help Org in New York 1 8 7 78 hoping wire text open Y and West Virginia go to 1 800 gambler dot net I'll take a look now at tonight's MLB slate where I've got two money lines and two strikeout props Where I'm showing value right now over at fan duel sports book. Let's begin things off with the money line That is for the Orioles and the Guardians. I like the Orioles money line here at minus 142 my model is the Orioles went off 62 percent implied odds here 59 percent and I I'm guessing there are a couple reasons why that is the case The first one is the offense is here because the Guardians offense last year Got by as being like the scrappy team not a lot of power But because they never struck out they wound up having pretty good numbers Despite that that is not carried over into this year. They're wrc plus against righties in the current active roster 79 Power is still crazy low at 116 for the ISO there So they've not been a good offense Second, I'm kind of skeptical Cal Quantrill their starter will be as able to outperform his peripherals as he was last year He did that by having a very good hard hit rate. So you look at stuff like skill interactive era I think it undercounts the value of a low hard hit rate personally and it can It can I think that be that haven't be its biggest weak spot So Quantrill last year out performed a skill interactive era Because he did such a good job of suppressing hard contact This year he has not been doing that and as a result his expected era, which I think does a better job Looking backward at quantifying stuff like hard hit rates. It doesn't it's not as good a forecast I don't think a skill interactive era, but does a better job looking backward and His expected era is 5.54. So almost a full run higher than his actual era at 4.75 So Quantrill this year hasn't been the same picture as he was last year Is now facing an Orioles offense that I respect quite a bit and they could do pretty well here So i'm not super high like Kyle Gibson the Orioles starter, but given the offensive differences here and given the fact that I do think that um Quantrill Probably not going to live up to what he did last year. I think there is enough to justify Buying into the Orioles here at minus 142. So the Orioles money line to me a good bet at minus 142 Over at vandal sportsbook I have a money line in the strikeout prop into the same game right now That is for the cubs and the rays and the money line is going to be on the cubs at pulse 168 The strikeout prop is going to be kyle hindricks over three and a half at minus 126 I don't want to pair those together personally. We can look at what that looks like if you want to in just one second But first let's talk about the cubs money line here It's not fun to bet against shame the clan hand and the rays that has not gone well for People who have done so so far this year. So I go in knowing that's the case But clearly the market knows that because the cubs money line their win odds here under 38 percent despite the fact they are at home here That's pretty low. Kyle Hendricks making his second start here for the cubs this year He's had ups and downs or had ups and downs in his debut, but increased strikeout right there His velocity is better than it was last year and we saw that increased strikeout rate in his rehab stints as well I think that's kind of interesting, but it is potentially not sticky That cubs offense. I think is stickier. They've been very good against lefties so far this year And you look at the composition of that lineup. There are a lot of good righties in that line So I think like Logically it makes sense. They'd be good against lefties It's a small sample don't want to buy in fully to what they've done so far this year But I think they had the components to be very good against lefties. So mclanahan Is a very good pitcher his era is sub 2 this year and he's deserved that he has earned that good strikeout numbers Pretty good bad at ball data as well. But pretty tough test here for today Now it's plus 168 for a reason. So the odds this bet caches are pretty low The implied odds there are 37.3 So you have to keep that in mind as always when it's lower probability bets Keep in mind the odds that that bet hits are lower So account for that within how much money you put into this bet But i'm higher on the cubs in the market I think it's a worthwhile investment personally and do want to take the money line at plus 168 Now I think one way you can do that Is to scale the money line bet with the hendrix strikeout prop over three and a half where If one of them hits you profit, they're pretty easy ways to do that Uh, so let's take a look here at the hendrix strikeout prop over three and a half of currently minus 126 right now Fandals sportsbook talked before about the increase velo talked about the increase strikeout rate His swinging strike rate in that game was 9.3 percent now I was actually on hendrix under in that first arcs. I didn't think its pitch count would be very high You look back to the rehab stints and they kept his pitch count pretty low But in that game 86 pitches for hendrix So i'm okay projecting him around 90 fourth night another step forward here as he gets one step deeper one start deeper into his return And again the strikeouts were there in the rehab stint too So it's a very good offense, but they're not a low strikeout offense They are better than average in that department the rays are but Not like a crazy outlier in terms of the strikeout rate So how i'd play this personally is i'd scale these two bets where If you win one of them you can get a profit for the night. I'm giving the comes the money line is plus 168 That's pretty easy to do Again, hendrix over three and a half minus 126 if you wanted to pair them together via the same game parley or fandals sportsbook the over with um the money line at plus 168 That gets you plus 301 odds. I don't think that's good enough to tempt me given the money line is plus 168 So I need a bit a bit steeper than that personally to go at this one That's why I want to go with separate selections With the hendrix strikeout over and the money line at plus 168 Scaling them where if one of them does hit I profit for the bet overall Let's finish up here with one more strikeout prop four tonight That is in the reds and redsox game seen some movement on this game right now So we'll see where the strikeout prop is right now Ben lively over three and a half is still minus 102. It was plus 106 this morning So there's bets moving towards the over even at minus 102 I still think that's good enough to take because lively is getting a lot of leash right now It's now minus 104 as we are talking here right now, but uh still think there is some value there Once it gets to minus 115. I think it's minus 106 now. It's moving in real time once it gets to minus 115 I'm probably out of lively So if you're if you check this after I'm done recording, you see it's minus 115 I probably would stop if it's longer than minus 115 I'm okay with lively right now the reason I had interest here and lively to begin with was because I don't think this number reflects how much leash he got in his last start He went 103 pitches last time out and he got eight strikeouts there It was a second consecutive start with eight strikeouts He was not doing this in the miners. So I don't expect lively to do that again But I'm also not projecting him to do that again I've gotten projected for more than four strikeouts for today Closer to five action than four, which is why I'm okay getting to minus 115 and over three and a half I have a hard time projecting fewer strikeouts for a guy who Is getting that much leash can go over a hundred pitches It is on the road against the red sox and they are a low strikeout offense But I do still think there is value here So lively over three and a half strikeouts as long as it is minus 115 or longer I'm okay with it minus 106 right now as we record here I think that's okay, but getting closer to where I would jump ship. So better recommendations for today in baseball Ben lively over three and a half strikeouts minus 106 Kyle Hendricks over three and a half strikeouts minus 126 The Cubs money line of plus 168 and the Orioles money line at minus 142 all available Over at Fandall sportsbook now before you close up shop for today Do you got to go back to last week and recap the better recommendations here from the show? An overall pretty solid week for our guests here on the show first one Brandy can do let's start things off here with PGA for the Charles Schwab challenge Emiliano Grillo won that event and Grillo has been our favorite of ours over on the DFS side of things for a while So fun to see him win no outrides are brand on Grillo outrides there We're Denny McCarthy 55 to one Brendan Todd 90 to one and then Andrew put him at 100 to one First round leader bets of Brandon were Russell Hamley 45 to one and JJ spawn 80 to one Harry Hall shot a 62 in the first round. So He was three shots clear for everybody else. So no wins there But we'll see if we can bounce back at the memorial good week by Austin Cass our epl guy For the final weekend of epl check out awesome on twitter at Austin Cass and find his work over at number fire Austin was heavy on arsenal this past week and he liked over two and a half goals of plus 128 He liked their first half money line at minus 130 and both those hit because arsenal Was up 3-0 in the first half and they won 5-0. So very easily hitting both votes pretty much right away He also liked Bakae Osaka to score our assist and he notched that goal Got that that bet via a goal in the 20 seventh minutes So all three arsenal bets did wind up winning good call by Austin there Arsenal very good to him Over the weekend One of the other bets was full ham to win or draw a plus 155 against Manchester United They lost two to one They did score in the 79th minute to get it close to the draw there But couldn't quite get the equalizer So they did lose there couldn't quite get that one a plus 155 And the final one was dimari gray to score or assist at minus 110 They did score but gray was not involved in it. So overall still a great day for Austin via the arsenal bets Hopefully, uh, those were enough for you to profit and again check out awesome on twitter at austin cast Our guest to preview the indy 500 and the coke 600 was dr. Nick giffin check him out on twitter at roto doc Fight his work at the action network and on the stacking denny's and running hot podcast in the indy 500 Tough one here for nick because cal kirkwood was running well and running sixth I believe at the time But got caught up in a wreck not of his own doing and flipped and he was his tire who almost went in the stands Outrides for nick were alex polo six to one sentino ferrucci if you give him a 20 to one and then ryan hunter ray as a fun one 65 to one Winner there was joseph new garden finally getting that first win for him getting win for team penske at indy He talked about hunter ray top chevy at 30 to one But uh new garden was a chevy there. So couldn't get that one Nick though had a great read on the cup series race He liked ross chest 8 11 1 as did I which would have been my better recommendation for the show If we had done those to last week didn't work ross Had some issues or was gaining track position then got caught in a thing on pit road and kind of ruined his race, but Nick said to find markets to bet bubble wallace who finished fourth I had a wallace over chase elliott head to head So there were good bubble markets out there top five bet cashed the elliott head to head cashed I think there was a group at the cash too So if you were looking for bubble markets giving you finished fourth probably did pretty well there But the big thing by nick was He said he liked the penske cars on joey legato and ryan blaney because of the weather we'd see this weekend He'd said it helped the forwards quite a bit and blaney went out and won in I would say pretty dominant fashion Blaney was 22 to 1 f anduel. He was as long as 30 to 1 other places and his car was sick so Good process by nick great bet by nick great win by nick with ryan blaney Check him out on twitter at roto doc check out his podcast stacking denny's and the running hot podcast and find his work at the action network Good process good results. You always love when that occurs I had just won bet for f1 at monaco for the monaco grand prix I had shown value max for stappen to win at minus 120 But I was worried about qualifying because I thought if first stappen couldn't get the poll It'd be tough for him to get the win. So to account for that I took uh first happen to win both the poll and the race which was plus 220 in that instance The two bets were highly correlated because of how tough it is to pass monaco. Whereas I think they're being treated as effectively as like a traditional parlay not straight up because it was a kind of or a bit But I think the correlation should have been much tighter between those two markets First happen won the poll saturday had a final uh, his third sector time was fantastic to get the poll away From fernando alonso and even with rain on sunday for stappen won That cashed. I don't know if my handicap on first happen was right given how close Fernando Alonso was given. I benefited from Sergio Perez wrecking and qualifying two I probably got a bit lucky in the handicap But I think that the process of finding that market specifically was correct So I feel great about that part of it. I'm glad it worked out as well as it did I think that's always something we should be mindful of is finding the proper market for Betting our assumptions and I think that one worked out really well. So nick hitting the ryan blaney outright I got for stappen plus 220 to win the poll on the race austin cast via the Arsenal stuff good week overall in the show hoping to run it back once again this week with another good week of recommendations That's all we got here for covering the spread of four today We're going to preview the nba finals coming up later on this week though So make sure you're subscribed to the covering the spread podcast feed wherever you get your podcast and while you're there I like what you hear leave us a five star rating as well or on youtube Give us a thumbs up over on the fandom youtube page. Thank you once again to brandon gandula for swinging by breaking down the thoughts on the Memorial tournament checkout brand on twitter at gandula 13. I am on twitter at jim saunas j i m s a n n e s You can also follow the fan dual podcast network at fan dual podcast want to thank you all for tuning in for today Good luck to you with your bets across baseball for tonight. We'll talk to you once again later on this week This has been covering the spread right here on the fan dual podcast network