 The most important thing about that work, not only in content was the timing. That work came to us at environmental affairs through the work that UNUI was doing with national treasury. And the scope of the exercise we're doing in the LTS had overlooked the component of costs associated with climate change. And this is specifically the added value that was provided by the work with UNUI in the work of LTSs. What are the anticipated costs of inaction regarding climate change? And that has provided a very good basis, not only for that work on LTS, but for us in South Africa going forward to launch more specific focus that is based on what we have done with UNUI. On the section of adaptation, we relied a lot on the information that we got from the LTS process. We had done the work on LTS over a period of at least two years partnering with different institutions, MIT being one of them in some of the components and with different departments within the country. The work was led by us at environmental affairs. But what that work did, it outlined for us not only academic scenarios of what the climate would be in the near future, but it also gave us policy options of what we could take going forward in response to what is anticipated that was provided by the LTS process. Big time. The lack of clarity on the rainfall side was not surprising to us, but the clarity that we got on the temperature side, on the temperature issues, is a good guide for us. And it gives us more comfort to inform the policy direction that we can take going forward. The nature of the field we are in, which is energy, climate change, development, is such that it needs to be backed by robust evidence. The technical work that is required to inform the decisions that have to be made is crucial in the work we are doing on energy, on social development. Someone has to do that technical work. And it is in conferences like this that there's this interaction between technical experts and policymakers. And they try to find a language that discusses the same issues, try to talk the same language. So there is significance in these workshops in that they inform precisely the decisions that countries, in particular this country, it has to take on core social development issues, that social development decisions, not only issues, but we have as government have to take decisions that have a direct impact on economy and a direct impact on energy, a direct impact on lives of people. We are way past the stage where we have to thumb-suck that kind of decision making. So conferences like this provide us an opportunity where we are provided with scenarios, options to take that talk directly to these decisions that have to be taken by government officials. Providing expect knowledge is the key value, providing latest trends, latest pieces of information is the key value so that they so as to inform the discourse amongst, in particular, policymakers.