 Next question is from JBLSZKW. What do you think of functional patterns and their stance that weightlifting in its traditional form does more harm than good? Is that the one dude that we got into it a little bit a couple years ago? We did. The big unilateral rotational dude that does all the crazy shit. He's in Hawaii. Yeah. Really? Okay, so he's got- He's a really smart guy. He's got really, really good stuff. There's a really, really smart dude, but he falls, you know, prey to that whole, I'm in a camp that you start to see in the space. Just like the conversation we had earlier. Exactly. And first off, I disagree completely with this statement. I think what he provides is very valuable, but I think to say that weight training in its traditional form does more harm than good is totally and completely false. There's a lot of value in all the modalities for training. And a lot of what he says has to do with unilateral training and rotation. And I do think they have a tremendous amount of value. Is there value in training with both feet together, barbell work, traditional type of- Absolutely. The absolute strength you gain from that, you can't compete- You can't deny it. No, you can't deny that. You're gonna gain 50 pounds on a squat, is gonna be equivalent to a 15 pound gain or 20 pound gain on unilateral exercise. Well, in terms of building muscle and actually gaining size, and there is reasons why people wanna do that. You know, to say that it's doing you a disservice by training that way, I have a problem with that. But I do like a lot of what he emphasizes, which is rotational strength and moving the body contralaterally, doing a lot of things that we don't consider in our programming and we don't see it in the gyms very often at all. And so it's like he's kind of highlighting stuff that people are neglecting, but he's building an entire camp that's fervorous just about that one method. Well, we absolutely consider this in our programming. That's why one of the things that we're most proud of is Maps Prime and the Prime Pro program is addressing these type of imbalances that people have. And he talks a lot about posture, which I know that was something that all of us were big on when we first started this was, you know, we have to address what we would always address with clients, which is, oh yeah, I know Miss, you know, Susie, you wanna lose 30 pounds or Tom, you wanna gain 10 pounds of muscle, but along the way, we're also gonna address all these issues that are going on in your body. And so that's where I have a lot of respect where he's coming from. I totally get it because he is obviously somebody who's trained a lot of normal ass people like ourselves. That's the reason why I know that we challenge a lot of these other modalities that is pushing the beast mode all out, the CrossFit type of mentality is that your average person has got so much dysfunction that a lot of their work should be around unilateral and rotation stuff. So I can get behind that, but then the problem I have with it is the same thing at the beginning of this. That divisive stance, I just can't stand behind. Yeah, no, I think it's a great way to get attention. I think it's the name of the game with social media. And here's the deal, there's a reason why, I mean, when we all discussed getting in new media as trainers, the reason why it was hands down podcast, the reason why we decided we're gonna do a podcast that's 100% the route we're gonna go is because these conversations around fitness are nuanced, they're not, they're complex. They're never yes, no answers. No, I can't talk about, you know, how to lose weight effectively in a post or a picture, or if bench press is the best exercise for chest in one blog or post, it's a conversation. A lot of it depends on the individual. There's a lot of value in all these different things. Look, even the most useless machine in the gym, okay? Even the, I don't know, abductor machine in the gym has some value to some people. Have I had clients where that was where I took them because I saw value in them? Maybe the least value, but. Right, you get what I'm saying though. Had some value. The Smith machine is just above that. Yeah, but you get what I'm saying, right? Yeah, yeah, 100%. So traditional resistance training has got lots of value. So there's a lot of stuff that he does. I think he's playing that game where he gets in his camp, puts up his walls, let's make these big statements so I can get more attention type of deal. That's where things happen. Yeah, well I mean he creates a really strong fan base that like, our way is right, yours is wrong. It's his tribalism that just persists in our industry which tries to be crazy. I mean, he walks a walk and talks a talk. If you look at a lot of the transformations that he's made posture wise, that's his main focus. He does great work. If you pay attention to the stuff that he's really highlighting, he addresses posture, right? And here's the thing where, again. An overall movement in general. I can defend his stance, right? You got somebody who's got lordosis or they've got excessive internal rotation of the hip or they're pronating really bad on one side and then you load them with 225 pounds on their back. Yeah, not a good idea. Like you need to address all those issues. Or you do a bunch of isolation exercise on them. Right, exactly. So you can get behind a lot of that stuff and the work he's doing is good work. I just, I think I always get annoyed when people are like, this is the way because it is so individualized, right? Yeah, the hallmark of a good coach or good trainer is when they answer a lot of questions. Depends. By saying it depends.