 CHAPTER VI. Meanwhile the politicians found an incredible profit in using the law as a club to keep the saloons in line, all except the biggest, the owners of which, or the owners of the breweries back of which, sat in the inner councils of Tammany, or controlled Tammany's allies in the Republican organization. The police used the partial and spasmodic enforcement of the law as a means of collecting blackmail. The result was that the officers of the law, the politicians and the saloon keepers, became inextricably tangled in a network of crime and connivants at crime. The most powerful saloon keepers controlled the politicians and the police, while the latter in turn terrorized and blackmailed all the other saloon keepers. It was not a case of non-enforcement of the law. The law was very actively enforced, but it was enforced with corrupt discrimination. It is difficult for men who have not been brought into contact with that side of political life which deals with the underworld to understand the brazen openness with which this blackmailing of lawbreakers was carried out. A further dark fact was that many of the men responsible for putting the law on the statute books in order to please one element of their constituents, also connived at or even profited by the corrupt and partial non-enforcement of the law in order to please another set of their constituents or to secure profit for themselves. The organ of liquor sellers at that time was the wine and spirit gizette. The editor of this paper believed in selling liquor on Sunday and felt that it was an outrage to forbid it. But he also felt that corruption and blackmail made too big a price to pay for the partial non-enforcement of the law. He made in his paper a statement, the correctness of which was never questioned, which offers a startling commentary on New York politics of that period. In this statement he recited the fact that the system of blackmail had been brought to such a state of perfection and had become so oppressive to the liquor dealers themselves that they communicated at length on the subject with Governor Hill, the state Democratic boss, and then with Mr. Croker, the city Democratic boss. Finally, the manner was formally taken up by a committee of the Central Association of Liquor Dealers in an interview they held with Mr. Martin, my Tammany predecessor as president of the police force. In manner, of course, way the editor's statement continues. An agreement was made between the leaders of Tammany Hall and the liquor dealers, according to which the monthly blackmail paid to the force should be discontinued in return for political support. Not only did the big bosses, state and local, treat this agreement and the corruption to which it was due, as normal and proper, but they never even took the trouble to deny what had been done when it was made public. Tammany and the police, however, did not fully live up to the agreement and much discrimination of a very corrupt kind and of a very exasperating kind to liquor sellers who wished to be honest, continued in connection with the enforcing of the law. In short, the agreement was kept only with those who had pull. These men with pull were benefited when their rivals were bullied in blackmail by the police. The police, meanwhile, who had been bought by appointment or promotion and the politicians back of them, extended the blackmailing to include about everything from the push cart peddler and the big or small merchant who wished to use the sidewalk illegally for his goods up to the keepers of the brothel, the gambling house, and the policy shop. The total blackmail ran into millions of dollars. New York was a wide open town. The big bosses rolled in wealth and the corrupt policeman who ran the force lost all sense of decency and justice. Nevertheless, I wish to insist on the facts that the honest men on the patrol posts, the men with the nightsticks, remained desirous to see honesty, obtain, although they were losing courage and hope. This was the situation that confronted me when I came to Mulberry Street. The saloon was the chief source of mischief. It was with the saloon that I had to deal, and there was only one way to deal with it. That was to enforce the law. The howl that rose was deafening. The professional politicians raved. The yellow press surpassed themselves in clamour and mendacity. A favourite assertion was that I was enforcing a blue law, an obsolete law that had never before been enforced. As a matter of fact, I was only enforcing, honestly, a law that had hitherto been enforced dishonestly. There was very little increase in the number of arrests made for violating the Sunday law. Indeed, there were weeks when the number of arrests went down. The only difference was that there was no protected class. Everybody was arrested alike, and I took a special pains to see that there was no discrimination, and that the big men and the men with political influence were treated like everyone else. The immediate effect was wholly good. I had been told that it was not possible to close the saloons on Sunday and that I could not succeed. However, I did succeed. The warden of Bellevue Hospital reported, two or three weeks after we had begun, that for the first time in its existence there had not been a case due to a drunken brawl in the hospital all Monday. The police courts gave the same testimony, while savings banks recorded increased deposits in pawn shops hard times. The most touching of all things was the fact that we received letters, literally by the hundreds, from mothers in tenement houses who had never been allowed to take their children to the country in the wide open days, and who now found their husbands willing to take them and their families for an outing on Sunday. Jake Rees and I spent one Sunday for morning till night in the tenement districts, seeing for ourselves what had happened. During the two years that we were in office, things never slipped back to anything like they had been before, but we did not succeed in keeping them quite as highly keyed as during these first weeks. As regards the Sunday closing law, this was partly because public sentiment was not really with us. The people who had demanded honesty, but who did not like to pay for it by the loss of illegal pleasure, joined the openly dishonest in attacking us. Moreover, all kinds of ways of evading the law were tried, and some of them were successful. The statute, for instance, permitted any man to take liquor with meals. After two or three months, a magistrate was found who decided judiciously that seventeen beers and one pretzel made a meal, after which decision joy again became unconfined in at least some of the saloons, and the yellow press gleefully announced that my tyranny had been curbed. But my prime object, that of stopping blackmail, was largely attained. All kinds of incidents occurred in connection with this crusade. One of them introduced me to a friend who remains a friend yet. His name was Edward J. Burke. He was one of the men who entered the police force, through our examinations, shortly after I took office. I had summoned twenty or thirty of the successful applicants to let me look over them, and as I walked into the hall, one of them, a well-set-up man, called out sharply to the other's, gangway, making them move to one side. I found he had served in the United States Navy. The incident was sufficient to make me keep him in mind. A month later I was notified by a police reporter, a very good fellow, that Burke was in difficulties, and that he thought I had better look into the matter myself, as Burke was being accused by certain very influential men of grave misconduct in an arrest he had made the night before. Accordingly, I took the matter up personally. I found that on the new patrolman's beat the preceding night, a new beat, there was a big saloon run by a man of great influence in political circles, known as King Callahan. After midnight the saloon was still running in full blast, and Burke, stepping inside, told Callahan to close up. It was, at the time, filled with friends of personal liberty, as Governor Hill used at that time, in moments of pathos, to term everybody who regarded his tyranny any restriction on the sale of liquor. Callahan's saloon had never before in its history been closed, and to have a green cop tell him to close it just seemed so incredible that he regarded it as merely a bad jest. On his next round Burke stepped in and repeated the order. Callahan felt the jest had gone too far, and by way of protest knocked Burke down. This was an error of judgment on his part, for when Burke rose he knocked down Callahan. The two then grappled and fell to the floor, while the friends of personal liberty danced around the fight in endeavor to stamp on everything they thought wasn't Callahan. However, Burke, though pretty roughly handled, got his man and shut the saloon. When he appeared against the lawbreaker in court the next day, he found the courtroom crowded with influential Tammany Hall politicians, backed by one or two Republican leaders of the same type. For Callahan was a baron of the underworld, and both his feudal superiors and his feudal inferiors gathered to the rescue. His backers in court included a congressman and a state senator, and so deep-rooted was the police belief in pull that his own superiors had turned against Burke and were preparing to sacrifice him. Just at this time I acted on the information given me by my newspaper friend by starting in person for the court. The knowledge that I knew what was going on, that I meant what I said, and that I intended to make the affair personal, was all that was necessary. Before I reached the court, all effort to defend Callahan had promptly ceased, and Burke had come forth triumphant. I immediately promoted him to Roundsman. He is a captain now. He has been on the force ever since, save that, when the Spanish war came, he obtained a holiday without pay for six months and re-entered the navy, serving as gun captain in one of the gun-boats, and doing his work as was to be expected in first-rate fashion, especially when under fire. Let me say again that when men tell me that the police are irredreamably bad, I remember scores and hundreds of cases like this of Burke, like the case I have already mentioned of Raphael, like the other cases I have given above. It is useless to tell me that these men are bad. They are naturally first-rate men. There are no better men anywhere than the men of the New York police force, and when they go bad it is because the system is wrong and because they are not given the chance to do the good work they can do and would rather do. I never coddled these men. I punished them severely whenever I thought their conduct required it. All I did was try to be just, to reward them when they did well, in short, to act squarely by them. I believed that as a whole they liked me. When in 1912 I ran for president on the progressive ticket, I received a number of unsigned letters enclosing sums of money for the campaign. One of those enclosed twenty dollars. The writer, who did not give his name, said that he was a policeman, that I had once had him before me on charges and had fined him twenty dollars, that as a matter of fact he had not committed the offence for which I find him, but that the evidence was such that he did not wonder I had been misled and never blamed me for it, because I had acted squarely and had given honest and decent man a chance in the police department, and that now he enclosed a twenty dollar bill, the amount of the fine inflicted on him so many years before. I have always wished I knew who the man was. The disciplinary courts were very interesting, but it was extraordinary difficult to get the facts in the more complicated cases, as must always be true under similar circumstances, for ordinarily it is necessary to back up the superior officer who makes the charge, and yet it is always possible that this superior officer is consciously or unconsciously biased against his subordinate. In the courts the charges were sometimes brought by police officers and sometimes by private citizens. In the latter case we would get queer insights into twilight phases of New York life. It was necessary to be always on our guard. Often an accusation would be brought against the policeman, because he had been guilty of misconduct. Much more often the accusation merely meant that the officer had incurred animosity by doing his duty. I remember one amusing case where the officer was wholly to blame, but had acted in entire good faith. One of the favorite and most demoralizing forms of gambling in New York was policy playing. The policy slips consisted of papers with three rows of figures written on them. The officer in question was a huge, Pythicoid lout of a creature, with a wooden face and a receding forehead, and his accuser, whom he had arrested the preceding evening, was a little greg of a red-haired man, obviously respectable and almost incoherent with rage. The anger of the little red-headed man was but natural, for he had just come out from a night in the station house. He had been arrested late in the evening on suspicion that he was a policy player, because of the rows of figures on a piece of paper which he had held in his hand, and because at the time of his arrest he had just stepped into the entrance of a hall of a tenement house in order to read by lamplight. The paper was produced in evidence. There were the three rows of figures all right, but as the accused explained, hopping up and down with rage and excitement, they were all of them the numbers of hymns. He was the superintendent of a small Sunday school. He had written down the hymns for several future services, one under the other, and on the way home he was stepping to look at them under a convenient lamp post, and finally by the light of the lamp in the tenement house hallway, and it was this conduct which struck the sagacious man in uniform as suspicious. One of the saddest features of police work is dealing with the social evil with prostitutes and houses of ill fame. Insofar as the law gave me power, I always treated the men taken in any raid on these houses precisely as the women were treated. My experience brought me to the very strong conviction that there ought not to be any toleration by law of the vice. I do not know of any method which will put a complete stop to the evil, but I do know certain things that ought to be done to minimize it. One of these is treating men and women on an exact equality for the same act. Another is the establishment of night courts and of special commissions to deal with this special class of cases. Another is that suggested by the Reverend Charles Steltze of the Labour Temple to publish conspicuously the name of the owner of any property used for immoral purposes after said owner had been notified of the use and has failed to prevent it. Another is to prosecute the keepers and backers of brothels, men and women, as relentlessly and punish them as severely as pickpockets and common thieves. They should never be fined, they should be imprisoned. As for the girls, the very young ones and first defenders should be put in the charge of probation officers or sent to reformatories, and the large percentage of feeble-minded girls and of incorrigible girls and women should be sent to institutions created for them. We would thus remove from this hideous commerce the articles of commerce. Moreover, the Federal Government must, in ever-increasing measures, proceed against the degraded promoters of this commercialism, for their activities are interstate and the nation can often deal with them more effectively than the states. Although, as public sentiment becomes aroused, nation, state, and municipality will all cooperate towards the same end of rooting out the traffic. But the prime need is to raise the level of individual morality, and, moreover, to encourage early marriages, the single standard of sex morality and a strict sense of reciprocal conjugal obligation. The women who preach late marriages are by just so much making it difficult to better the standard of chastity. As regards the white slave-traffic, the men engaged in it and the women, too, are far worse criminals than any ordinary murderers can be. For them there is need of such a law as that recently adopted in England through the efforts of Arthur Lee, MP, a law which includes whipping for the male offenders. There are brutes, so low, so infamous, so degraded and bestial in their cruelty and brutality that the only way to get at them is through their skins. Sentimentality on behalf of such men is really almost as unhealthy and wicked as the criminality of the men themselves. My experience is that there should be no toleration of any tenderloin or red-light district, and that, above all, there should be the most relentless war on commercialized vice. The men who profit and make their living by the depravity and the awful misery of other human beings stand far below any ordinary criminals, and no measures taken against them can be too severe. As for the wretched girls who follow the dreadful trading question, a good deal can be done by a change in economic conditions. This ought to be done. When girls are paid wages inadequate to keep them from starvation, or to permit them to live decently, a certain proportion are forced by their economic misery into lives of vice. The employers and all others responsible for these conditions stand on a moral level not far above the white slavers themselves. But it is a mistake to suppose that either the correction of these economic conditions or the abolition of the white slave trade will wholly correct the evil or will even reach the major part of it. The economic factor is very far from being the chief factor in inducing girls to go into this dreadful life. As with so many other problems, while there must be governmental action, there must also be strengthening of the average individual character in order to achieve the desired end. Even where economic conditions are bad, girls who are both strong and pure will remain unaffected by temptations to which girls of weak character or lack standards readily yield. Any man who knows the wide variation in the proportions of the different races and nationalities engaged in prostitution must come to the conclusion that it is out of the question to treat economic conditions as the sole conditions, or even as the chief conditions that determine this question. There are certain races, the Irish are honorably conspicuous among them, which no matter what the economic pressure furnish relatively few inmates of houses of ill fame. I do not believe that the differences are due to permanent race characteristics. This is shown by the fact that the best settlement houses find that practically all their long-term graduates, so to speak, all the girls that come for a long period under their influence, no matter what their race or national origin, remain pure. In every race there are some naturally vicious individuals and some weak individuals who readily succumb under economic pressure. A girl who is lazy and hates hard work, a girl whose mind is rather feeble and who is of subnormal intelligence, as the phrase now goes, or a girl who craves cheap finery and vapid pleasure is always in danger. A high ideal of personal purity is essential. Where the same pressure, under the same economic condition, has tenfold the effect on one set of people that it has on another, it is evident that the question of moral standards is even more important than the question of economic standards. Very important, though this question is. It is important for us to remember that the girl ought to have the chance, not only for the necessaries of life, but for innocent pleasure, and that even more than the man she must not be broken by overwork, by excessive toil. Moreover, public opinion and the law should combine to hunt down the flagrant man's swine, who himself hunts down poor or silly or unprotected girls. But we must not, in foolish sentimentality, excuse the girl from her duty to keep herself pure. Our duty, to achieve the same moral level for the two sexes, must be performed by raising the level for the man, not by lowering it for the woman, and the fact that society must recognize its duty in no shape or way relieves, not even to the smallest degree, the individual from doing his or her duty. Sentimentality, which grows maudlin on behalf of the willful prostitute, is a curse. To confound her with the entrapto-correst girl, the real white slave, is both foolish and wicked. There are evil women, just as there are evil men, naturally depraved girls, just as there are naturally depraved young men. And the right and wise thing, the just thing, is to them, and the generous thing, to the innocent girls and decent men, is to wage stern war against the evil creatures of both sexes. In company with Jacob Rees, I did much work that was not connected with the actual discipline of the force, or indeed with the actual work of the force. There was one thing which he and I abolished, police lodging-houses, which were simply tramp lodging-houses, and a fruitful encouragement to vagrancy. Those who read Mr. Rees' story of his own life will remember the incidents that gave him, from actual personal experience, his horror of these tramp lodging-houses. As a member of the health-board, I was brought into very close relations with the conditions of life in the tenement-houses. Here again I used to visit the different tenement-house regions, usually in company with Rees, to see for myself what the conditions were. It was largely this personal experience that enabled me, while on the health-board, to struggle not only zealously, but without reasonable efficiency and success to improve conditions. We did our share in making forward strides in the matter of housing the working people of the city with some regard to decency and comfort. The midnight trips that Rees and I took enabled me to see what the police department was doing, and also gave me personal insight into some of the problems of city life. It is one thing to listen in perfunctory fashion to tales of overcrowded tenements, and it is quite another, actually, to see what overcrowding means, some hot summer night, by even a single inspection during the owls of darkness. There was a very hot spell one mid-summer while I was police commissioner, and most of each night I spent walking through the tenement-house districts and visiting police stations to see what was being done. It was a tragic week. We did everything possible to alleviate the suffering. Much of it was heartbreaking, especially the gasping misery of the little children and of the worn-out mothers. Every resource of the health department, of the police department, and even of the fire department, which flooded the hot streets, was taxed in the effort to render service. The heat killed such multitudes of horses that the means at our disposal for moving the poor dead beasts proved to be quite inadequate, although every nerve was strained to the limit. In consequence we received scores of complaints from persons before whose doors dead horses had remained, festering in the heat, for two or three days. One irascible man sent us furious denunciations until we were at last able to send a big dray to drag away the horse that lay dead before his shock-door. The huge dray already contained eleven other dead horses, and when it reached this particular door it broke down, and it was hours before it could be moved. The unfortunate man, who had thus been cursed with a granted wish, closed his doors in despair and wrote us a final pathetic letter in which he requested us to remove either the horses or his shock, he didn't care which. I have spoken before of my experience with the Tenement House Cigar Factory Law, which the highest court of New York State declared unconstitutional. My experience in the police department taught me that not a few of the worst tenement houses were owned by wealthy individuals, who hired the best and most expensive lawyers to persuade the courts that it was unconstitutional to insist on the betterment of conditions. These businessmen and lawyers were very adroit in using a word with a fine and noble association to cloak their opposition to vitally necessary movements for industrial fair play and decency. They made it evident that they valued the constitution not as a help to righteousness, but as a means for thwarting movements against unrighteousness. After my experience with them I became more set than ever in my distrust of these men, whether businessmen or lawyers, judges, legislators, or executive officers who seek to make of the constitution a fetish for the prevention of the work of social reform, for the prevention of work of the interest of those men, women, and children on whose behalf we should be at liberty to employ freely every governmental agency. Occasionally during the two years we had to put a stop to riotous violence, and now and then on these occasions some of the labor union leaders protested against the actions of the police. By this time I was becoming a strong believer in unions, a strong believer in the rights of labor. For that very reason I was all the more bound to see that lawlessness and disorder were put down, and that no rioter was permitted to masquerade under the guise of being a friend of labor or a sympathizer with labor. I was scrupulous to see that the labor men had fair play. For instance, they were allowed to pick it just so far as under the law picketing could be permitted, so that the strikers had ample opportunity peacefully to persuade other labor men not to take their places. But I made it clearly and definitely understood that under no circumstances would I permit violence or fail to insist upon the keeping of order. If there were wrongs I would join with a full heart in striving to have them corrected. But where there was violence all other questions had to drop until order was restored. This is a democracy, and the people have the power, if they choose to exercise it, to make conditions as they ought to be made. And to do this strictly within the law, and therefore the first duty of the true Democrat, of the man really loyal to the principles of popular government, is to see that law is enforced in order upheld. It was a peculiar gratification to me that so many of the labor leaders with whom I was thrown into contact grew cordially to accept this view. When I left the department several called on me to say how sorry they were that I was not to continue in office. One, the Secretary of the Journeyman Bakers and Confectioners International Union, Henry Wiseman, wrote me expressing his regret that I was going, and his appreciation as a citizen of what I had done as police commissioner. He added, I am particularly grateful for your liberal attitude toward organized labor, your cordial championship of those speaking in behalf of the toilers, and your evident desire to do the right thing as you saw it at whatever cost. Some of the letters I received on leaving the department were from unexpected sources. Mr. E. L. Godkin, an editor who, in international matters, was not a patriotic man, wrote protesting against my taking the assistant secretarieship of the Navy, and adding, I have a concern, as the Quakers say, to put on record my earnest belief that in New York you are doing the greatest work of which any American today is capable, and exhibiting to the young men of the country the spectacle of a very important office administered by a man of high character in the most efficient way amid a thousand difficulties. As a lesson in politics, I cannot think of anything more instructive. About that same time I had a letter from Mr. afterwards Ambassador James Bryce, also expressing regret that I was leaving the police department, but naturally, with much more appreciation of the work that was to be done in the Navy department. This letter I quote, with his permission, because it conveys a lesson to those who are inclined always to think that the conditions of the present time are very bad. It was written July 7, 1897. Mr. Bryce spoke of the possibility of coming to America in a month or so, and continued, I hope I may have a chance of seeing you if I do get over, and of drawing some comfort from you as regards your political phenomena, which so far as I can gather from those of your countrymen I have lately seen, furnished some good opportunities for a persistent optimist like myself to show that he is not to be lightly discouraged. Don't suppose that things are especially nice, as a lady would say in Europe, either. They are not. Mr. Bryce was a very friendly and extraordinarily competent observer of things American, and there was this distinct note of discouragement about our future in the intimate letter he was thus sending. Yet this was at the very time when the United States was entering on a dozen years, during which our people accomplished more good, and came nearer realizing the possibilities of a great, free, and conscientious democracy, than during any other dozen years in our history save only the years of Lincoln's presidency and the period during which the nation was founded. CHAPTER VII. I suppose the United States will always be unready for war, and in consequence will always be exposed to great expense and to the possibility of the gravest calamity when the nation goes to war. This is no new thing. Americans learn only from catastrophes and not from experience. There would have been no war in 1812 if, in the previous decade, America, instead of announcing that peace was her passion, instead of acting on the theory that unpreparedness averts war, had been willing to go to the expense of providing a fleet of a score of ships of the line. However, in that case, doubtless the very men who in the actual event deplored the loss of life and waste of capital, which their own supineness had brought about, would have loudly invaded against the excessive and improper cost of armaments. So it all came about the same thing in the end. There is no more thoroughgoing international Mrs. Gummidge, and no more utterly useless, and often utterly mischievous citizen, than the peace at any price, universal arbitration type of being, who is always complaining either about war or else about the cost of the armaments which act as the insurance against war. There is every reason why we should try to limit the cost of armaments, as these tend to grow excessive, but there is also every reason to remember that in the present stage of civilization a proper armament is the surest guarantee of peace, and is the only guarantee that war, if it does come, will not mean irreparable and overwhelming disaster. In the spring of 1897 President McKinley appointed me Assistant Secretary of the Navy. I owed the appointment chiefly to the efforts of Senator H. C. Lodge of Massachusetts, who doubtless was actuated mainly by his long and close friendship for me, but also I liked to believe by his keen interest in the Navy. The first book I had ever published fifteen years previously was the History of the Naval War of 1812, and I have always taken the interest in the Navy, which every good American ought to take. At the time I wrote the book, in the early eighties, the Navy had reached its nadir, and we were then utterly incompetent to fight Spain or any other power that had a Navy at all. Shortly afterwards we began timidly and hesitatingly to build up a fleet. It is amusing to recall the roundabout steps we took to accomplish our purpose. In the reaction after the colossal struggle of the Civil War, our strongest and most capable men had thrown their whole energy into business, into money making, into the development, and above all the exploitation and exhaustion at the most rapid rate possible of our natural resources, mines, forests, soil, and rivers. These men were not weak men, but they permitted themselves to grow short-sighted and selfish, and while many of them down at the bottom possessed the fundamental virtues, including the fighting virtues, others were purely of the glorified huckster or glorified pawnbroker type, which, when developed to the exclusion of everything else, makes about as poor a national type as the world has seen. This unadulterated huckster or pawnbroker type is rarely keenly sympathetic in matters of social and industrial justice, and is usually physically timid and likes to cover an unworthy fear of the most just war under high-sounding names. It was reinforced by the large molly-cattle-vote, the people who are soft physically and morally, or who have a twist in them which makes them acidly cantankerous and unpleasant as long as they can be so with safety to their bodies. In addition, there are the good people with no imagination and no foresight who think war will not come, but that if it does come armies and navies can be improvised. A very large element, typified by Senator Ainu personally, in answer to a question as to what we would do if America were suddenly assailed by a first-class military power, that we would build a battleship in every creek. Then among the wise and high-minded people who, in self-respecting and genuine fashions, drive earnestly for peace, there are the foolish fanatics always to be found in such a movement and always discrediting it, the men who form the lunatic fringe in all reform movements. All these elements taken together made a body of public opinion so important during the decades immediately succeeding the Civil War as to put a stop to any serious effort to keep the nation in a condition of reasonable military preparedness. The representatives of this opinion then voted just as they do now when they vote against battleships or against fortifying the Panama Canal. It would have been bad enough if we had been content to be weak and in our view of weakness not to bluster, but we were not content with such a policy. We wished to enjoy the incompatible luxuries of an unbridled tongue in an unready hand. There was a very large element which was ignorant of our military weakness, or naturally enough unable to understand it, and another large element which liked to please its own vanity by listening to offensive talk about foreign nations. Accordingly, too many of our politicians, especially in Congress, found that the cheap and easy thing to do was to please the foolish peace people by keeping us weak and to please the foolish violent people by passing denunciatory resolutions about international matters, resolutions which would have been improper even if we had been strong. Their idea was to please both the mollycoddle vote and the vote of the international tale twisters by upholding, with pretended ardor and mean intelligence, a national policy of peace with insult. I abhor unjust war. I abhor injustice and bullying by the strong at the expense of the weak, whether among nations or individuals. I abhor violence and bloodshed. I believe that war should never be resorted to when, or so long as, it is honorably possible to avoid it. I respect all men and women who, from high motives and with sanity and self-respect, do all they can to avert war. I advocate preparation for war in order to avert war, and I should never advocate war unless it were the only alternative to dishonor. I describe the folly of which so many of our people were formerly guilty in order that we may, in our own day, be on our guard against similar folly. We did not, at the time of which I ride, take our foreign duties seriously, and as we combined bluster in speech with refusal to make any preparation whatsoever for action, we were not taken seriously in return. Gradually a slight change for the better occurred, the writings of Captain Mayhan playing no small part therein. We built some modern cruisers to start with, the people who felt that battleships were wicked, compromising with their misguided consciousness by saying that the cruisers could be used to protect our commerce, which they could not be unless they had battleships to back them. Then we attempted to build some more powerful fighting vessels, and as there was a section of the public which regarded battleships as possessing a name immorally suggestive of violence, we compromised by calling the new ships armored cruisers, and making them combined with exquisite nicety all the defects and none of the virtues of both types. But there still remained a public opinion, as old as the time of Jefferson, which thought that in the event of war all our problem ought to be one of coast defense, that we should do nothing except repel attack, an attitude about as sensible as that of a prize fighter who expects to win merely by parrying instead of hitting. To meet the susceptibilities of this large class of well-meaning people, we provided for the battleships under the name of coast defense battleships, meaning thereby that we did not make them quite as seaworthy as they ought to have been, or with quite as much coal capacity as they ought to have had. Then we decided to build real battleships, but there still remained a lingering remnant of public opinion that clung to the coast defense theory, and we met this in beautiful fashion by providing for seagoing coast defense battleships, the fact that the name was a contradiction in terms being a very small consequence, compared to the fact that we did thereby get real battleships. Our men had to be trained to handle the ships singly and in fleet formation, and they had to be trained to use the new weapons of precision with which the ships were armed. Not a few of the older officers kept in the service under our foolish rule of pure seniority promotion were not competent for the task, but a proportion of the older officers were excellent, and this was true of almost all the younger officers. They were naturally first class men trained in the admirable naval school at Annapolis. They were overjoyed that at last they were given proper instruments to work with, and they speedily grew to handle these ships individually in the best fashion. They were fast learning to handle them in squadron and fleet formation, but when the war with Spain broke out they had as yet hardly grasped the principles of modern scientific naval gunnery. Soon after I began work as Assistant Secretary of the Navy I became convinced that the war would come. The revolt in Cuba had dragged its weary length until conditions in the island had become so dreadful as to be a standing disgrace to us for permitting them to exist. There is much that I sincerely admire about the Spanish character, and there are few men for whom I have felt greater respect than for a certain gentleman of Spain whom I have known. But Spain attempted to govern her colonies on archaic principles which rendered her control of them incompatible with the advance of humanity and intolerable to the conscience of mankind. In 1898 the so-called War in Cuba had dragged along for years with unspeakable horror, degradation, and misery. It was not war at all, but murderous oppression. Cuba was devastated. During those years, while we continued at peace, several hundred times as many lives were lost, lives of men, women, and children as were lost during the three months of war which put an end to this slaughter and opened a career of peaceful progress to the Cubans. Yet there were misguided professional philanthropists who cared so much more for names than for facts that they preferred a peace of continuous murder to a war which stopped the murder and brought real peace. Spain's humiliation was certain, anyhow. Indeed, it was more certain without war than with it, for she could not permanently keep the island, and she minded yielding the Cubans more than yielding to us. Our own direct interests were great, because of the Cuban tobacco and sugar, and especially because of Cuba's relation to the projected Ismian canal. But even greater were our interests from the standpoint of humanity. Cuba was at our very doors. It was a dreadful thing for us to sit supinely and watch her death agony. It was our duty, even more from the standpoint of national honor than from the standpoint of national interest, to stop the devastation and destruction. Because of these considerations I favored war, and today, when in retrospect it is easier to see things clearly, there are few humane and honorable men who do not believe that the war was both just and necessary. The big financiers and the men, generally, who were susceptible to touch on the money nerve and who cared nothing for national honor if it conflicted even temporarily with business prosperity, were against the war. The more fatuous type of philanthropists agreed with them. The newspapers, controlled by or run in the interests of these two classes, deprecated war, and did everything in their power to prevent any preparation for war. As a whole the people in Congress were at that time, and are now, a short-sighted set as regards international matters. There were a few men, Senators Cushman K. Davis, for instance, and John Morgan, who did look ahead, and Senator H. C. Lodge, who throughout his quarter of a century of service in the Senate and House, has ever stood foremost among those who uphold with farsighted fearlessness and strict justice to others our national honor and interest. But most of the congressmen were content to follow the worst of all possible courses, that is, to pass resolutions which made war more likely, and yet to decline to take measures which would enable us to meet the war if it did come. However, in the Navy Department we were able to do a good deal, thanks to the energy and ability of some of the bureau chiefs, and to the general good tone of the service. I soon found my natural friends and allies and such men as Evans, Taylor, Samson, Wainwright, Bronson, Schroeder, Bradford, Cowells, Cameron, Winslow, O'Neill, and others like them. I used all the power there was in my office to aid these men in getting the material ready. I also tried to gather from every source information as to who the best men were to occupy the fighting positions. Sound naval opinion was overwhelmingly in favor of Dewey to command one squadron. I was already watching him, for I had been struck by an incident in his past career. It was at a time when there was a threat of trouble with Chile. Dewey was off the Argentine and was told to get ready to move to the other coast of South America. If the move became necessary he would have to have coal, and yet if he did not make the move the coal would not be needed. In such a case a man afraid of responsibility always acts rigidly by the regulations and communicates with the department at home to get authority for everything he does, and therefore he usually accomplishes nothing, whatever, but is able to satisfy all individuals with red-tape minds by triumphantly pointing out his compliance with the regulations. In a crisis the man worth his salt is the man who meets the needs of the situation in whatever way is necessary. Dewey purchased the coal and was ready to move it once if need arose. The affair blew over. The need to move did not occur, and for some time there seemed to be a chance that Dewey would get into trouble over having purchased the coal, for our people are like almost all others in requiring responsible officers under such conditions to decide at their own personal peril, no matter which course they follow. However, the people higher up ultimately stood by Dewey. The incident made me feel that here was a man who could be relied upon to prepare in advance, and to act promptly, fearlessly, and on his own responsibility when the emergency arose. Accordingly I did my best to get him put in command of the Asiatic fleet, the fleet where it was most essential to have a man who would act without referring things back to the home authorities. An officer senior to him, of the respectable commonplace type, was being pushed by certain politicians who knew I had influence with the Navy Department and with the President. I would have preferred to see Dewey get the appointment without appealing to any politician at all. But while this was my preference, the essential thing was to get him the appointment. For a naval officer to bring pressure to get himself a soft and easy place is unpardonable, but a large leniency should be observed toward the man who uses influence only to get himself a place in the picture near the flashing of the guns. There was a senator, Proctor of Vermont, who I knew was close to McKinley, and who was very ardent for the war and desirous to have it fought in the most efficient fashion. I suggested to Dewey that he should enlist the services of Senator Proctor, which was accordingly done. In a fortunate hour for the Navy, Dewey was given command of the Asiatic Squadron. When the main was blown up in Havana Harbor, war became inevitable. A number of the peace at any price men, of course, promptly assumed the position that she had blown herself up. But investigation showed that the explosion was from outside. And in any event it would have been impossible to prevent war. The enlisted men of the Navy, who often grew bored to the point of desertion and peace, became keyed up to a high pitch of efficiency, and crowds of fine young fellows from the interior as well as from the sea coast throng to enlist. The Navy officers showed alert ability and unwearyed industry in getting things ready. There was one deficiency, however, which there was no time to remedy, and of the very existence of which, strange to say, most of our best men were ignorant. Our Navy had no idea how low our standard of marksmanship was. We had not realized that the modern battleship had become such a complicated piece of mechanism that the old methods of training in marksmanship were as obsolete as the old muzzle-loading broadside guns themselves. Almost the only man in the Navy who fully realized this was our naval attaché at Paris, Lieutenant Sims. He wrote letter after letter pointing out how frightfully backward we were in marksmanship. I was much impressed by his letters, but Wainwright was about the only other man who was. And as Sims proved to be mistaken in his belief that the French had taught the Spaniards how to shoot, and as the Spaniards proved to be much worse even than we were, in the service generally Sims was treated as an alarmist. But although I at first partly acquiesced in this view, I grew uneasy when I studied the small proportion of hits to shots made by our vessels in battle. When I was president I took up the matter, and speedily became convinced that we needed to revolutionize our whole training in marksmanship. Sims was given the lead in organizing and introducing the new system, and to him more than to any other one man was due the astonishing progress made by our fleet in this respect. A progress which made the fleet, gun for gun, at least three times as effective in point of fighting efficiency in 1908, as it was in 1902. The shots that hit are the shots that count. Like the people the government was for a long time unwilling to prepare for war, because so many honest but misguided men believed that the preparation itself tended to bring on the war. I did not in the least share this feeling, and whenever I was left as acting secretary I did everything in my power to put us in readiness. I knew that in the event of war Dewey could be slipped like a wolfhound from a leash. I was sure that if he were given half a chance he would strike instantly and with telling effect. And I made up my mind that all I could do to give him that half chance should be done. I was in the closest touch with Senator Lodge throughout this period, and either consulted him about or notified him of all the moves I was taking. By the end of February I felt it was vital to send Dewey, as well as each of our other commanders who were not in home waters, instructions that would enable him to be in readiness for immediate action. On the afternoon of Saturday, February 25th, when I was acting secretary, Lodge called on me just as I was preparing the order, which, as it was addressed to a man of the right stamp, was of much importance to the subsequent operations. Admiral Dewey speaks of the incident as follows in his autobiography. The first real step, as regards active naval preparations, was taken on February 25th, when telegraphic instructions were sent to the Asiatic, European, and South Atlantic squadrons to rendezvous at certain convenient points where, should war break out, they would be most available. The message to the Asiatic squadrons bore the signature of that assistant secretary who had seized the opportunity, while acting secretary, to hasten preparations for a conflict which was inevitable. As Mr. Roosevelt reasoned, precautions for readiness would cost little in time of peace, and yet would be invaluable in case of war. His cablegram was, as follows, Washington, February 25th, 98, Dewey, Hong Kong. Order the squadron, except the monocacy, to Hong Kong. Keep full of coal. In the event of declaration of war, Spain, your duty will be to see that the Spanish squadron does not leave the Asiatic coast, and then offensive operations in Philippine islands. Keep Olympia until further orders, Roosevelt. The reference to keeping the Olympia until further orders was due to the fact that I had been notified she would soon be recalled to the United States. All that was needed with Dewey was to give him the chance to get ready, and then to strike, without being hampered by orders from those not on the ground. Success in war depends very largely upon choosing a man fit to exercise such powers, and then giving him the powers. It would be instructive to remember, if only we were willing to do so, the fairly comic panic which swept in waves over our sea coast, first when it became evident that war was about to be declared, and then when it was declared. The public waked up to the sufficiently obvious fact that the government was in its usual state, perennial unreadiness for war. Thereupon the people of the Seaboard District passed at one bound from unreasoning confidence that war never could come, to unreasoning fear as to what might happen now that it had come. That acute philosopher, Mr. Dewey, proclaimed that in the Spanish war we were in a dream, but that the Spaniards were in a trance. This just about summed up the facts. Our people had, for decades, scoffed at the thought of making ready for possible war. Now, when it was too late, they not only backed every measure, wise and unwise, that offered a chance of supplying a need that ought to have been met before, but they also fell into a condition of panic apprehension as to what the foe might do. For years we had been saying, just as any number of our people now say, that no nation would venture to attack us. Then when we did go to war with an exceedingly feeble nation, we for the time being rushed to the other extreme of feeling, and attributed to this feeble nation plans of offensive warfare which it never dreamed of making, and which if made would have been wholly unable to execute. Some of my readers doubtless remember the sinister intentions and unlimited potentialities for destruction, with which the fertile imagination of the yellow press endowed the armored cruiser Vizcaya when she appeared in American waters just before the war was declared. The state of nervousness along much of the sea coast was funny in view of the lack of foundation for it, but it offered food for serious thought as to what would happen if we ever became engaged with a serious foe. The governor of one state actually announced that he would not permit the National Guard of that state to leave its borders, the idea being to retain it against a possible Spanish invasion. So many of the businessmen of the city of Boston took their securities inland to Worcester that the safe deposit companies of Worcester proved unable to take care of them. In my own neighborhood on Long Island clauses were gravely put into leases to the effect that if the property were destroyed by the Spaniards the lease should lapse. As Assistant Secretary of the Navy I had every conceivable impossible request made to me. Members of Congress who had actively opposed building any Navy came clamorously around to ask each for a ship for some special purpose of protection connected with his district. It seems incredible but it is true that not only these congressmen but the chambers of commerce and boards of trade of different coast cities all lost their heads for the time being and raised a deafening clamor and brought every species of pressure to bear on the administration to get it to adopt the one most fatal course. That is to distribute the Navy ship by ship at all kinds of points and in all kinds of ports with the idea protecting everything everywhere and thereby rendering it absolutely certain that even the Spanish fleet poor as it was would be able to pick up our own Navy ship by ship in detail. One congressman besought me for a ship to protect Jekyll Island off the coast of Georgia an island which derived its sole consequence because it contained the winter homes of certain millionaires. A lady whose husband occupied a very influential position and who was normally a most admirable and sensible woman came to insist that a ship should be anchored off a huge seaside hotel because she had a house in the neighborhood. There were many such instances. One stood out above the others. A certain seaboard state contained in its congressional delegation one of the most influential men in the Senate and one of the most influential men in the lower house. These two men had been worse than lukewarm about building up the Navy and had scoffed at the idea of there ever being any danger from any foreign power. With the advent of war the feelings of their constituents and therefore their own feelings suffered an immediate change and they demanded that a ship be anchored in the harbor of their city as a protection. Getting no comfort from me they went higher up and became a kind of permanent committee in attendance upon the President. They were very influential men in the houses with whom it was important for the administration to keep on good terms and moreover they possessed a pertinence as great as the widow who won her case from the unjust judge. Finally the President gave in and notified me to see that a ship was sent to the city in question. I was bound that as long as a ship had to be sent it should not be a ship worth anything. Accordingly a civil war monitor with one smooth-bore gun managed by a crew of about twenty-one naval militia was sent to the city in question under convoy of a tug. It was a hazardous trip for the unfortunate naval militiamen but it was safely accomplished and joy and peace descended upon the Senator and the Congressman and upon the President whom they had jointly harassed. Incidentally the fact that the protecting war vessel to any antagonists of much more modern construction than the galleys of Alcibiades seemed to disturb nobody. This was one side of the picture. The other side was that the crisis at once brought to the front any amount of latent fighting strength. There were plenty of congressmen who showed cool-headed wisdom and resolution. The plain people, the men and women back of the persons who lost their heads set seriously to work to see that we did whatever was necessary and made the job a thorough one. The young men swarmed to enlist. In time of peace it had been difficult to fill the scanty regular army and navy and there were innumerable assertions. Now the ships and regiments were over enlisted and so many deserters returned in order to fight that it became difficult to decide what to do with them. England and to a lesser degree Japan were friendly. The great powers of continental Europe were all unfriendly. They jeered at our ships and men and with fatuous partisanship insisted that the Spaniards would prove too much for our mercenaries because we were a commercial people of low ideals who could not fight. While the men whom we attempted to hire for that purpose were certain to run on the day of battle. Autobiography of Theodore Roosevelt, Chapter Seven. The War of America, The Unready Part Two. Among my friends was the then army surgeon Leonard Wood. He was a surgeon. Not having an income, he had earned his own living. He had gone through the Harvard Medical School and had then joined the army in the south-west as a contract doctor. He had every physical, moral, and mental quality which fitted him for a soldier's life and for the exercise of hand. In the inconceivable bearing and harassing campaigns against the Apaches, he had served normally as a surgeon, fully in command of troops in more than one expedition. He was as anxious as I was that if there were war, we should both have our part in it. I had always felt that if there were a serious war, I wished to be in a position to explain to my children why I did take part in it and not why I did not take part in it. Moreover, I had very deeply felt that it was our duty to free Cuba and I had quickly expressed this feeling and when a man takes such a position, he ought to be willing to make his words good by his deeds unless there is some very strong reason to the contrary. He should pay with his body. As soon as war was upon us, Wood and I began to try for a chance to go to the front. Congress had authorized the raising of three national volunteer cavalry regiments wholly apart from the state contingents. Secretary Algier of the War Department was fond of me personally and Wood was his family doctor. Algier had been a gallant soldier in the Civil War and was almost the only member of the administration who felt all along that we would have to go toward Spain over Cuba. He liked my attitude in the matter and because of his remembrance of his own experiences, he sympathized with my desire to go to the front. Accordingly, he offered me the command of one of the regiments. I told him that after six weeks' service in the field, I feel competent to handle the regiment but that I would not know how to equip it or how to get it into the first action. But that Wood was entirely competent at once to take command and that if he would make Wood Colonel, I would accept the Lieutenant Curlancy. General Algier thought this an act of foolish self-accusation on my part. Instead of it being what it was, the wisest act I could have formed. He told me to accept the coloncy and that he would make Wood Lieutenant Colonel and that Wood would do the work anyway. But I answered that I did not wish to rise on any man's shoulders, that I hoped to be given every chance that my deeds and abilities warranted, but that I did not wish what I did not earn, and that above all I did not wish to hold any position where anyone else did work. He laughed at me a little and said I was foolish. But I do not think he really minded and he promised to do as I wish. True to his word, he secured the appointment of Wood as Colonel and of myself as Lieutenant Colonel of the first United States Volunteer Cavalry. This was soon nicknamed both by the public and by the rest of the army, the rough ride. Doubtless because the both of the men were from the southwestern ranch country and were skilled in the wild horsemanship of the Great Pains. But instantly began the work of raising the regiment. His first assembled several old non-commissioned officers of experience, them in office and gave them blanks for requisitions for the full equipment of a cavalry regiment. He selected San Antonio as the gathering place as it was in a good horse country where the gulf from some port on which we could have to embark and near an old arsenal and an old army post on which we got a good deal of stuff. Some of it practically condemned but we found serviceable at an at a pinch and much better than nothing. He organized a horse board in Texas and began purchasing all horses that were not too big and were sound. A day or two after he was commissioned he wrote out in the office of the Secretary of War under his authority telegrams to the governors of Arizona, New Mexico, Oklahoma and Indiana Territory and substance as follow. The president desires to raise volunteers in your territory to form part of a regiment of mounted riflemen to be commanded by Leonard Wood. Colonel Theodore Roosevelt, Lieutenant Colonel. He desires that the men selected should be young, sound, good shots and good riders and that you expedite by all means in your power the enrollment of these men. Signed by Aura A. Alger, Secretary of War. As soon as he had attended to a few more odds and ends he left Washington and the day after his arrival in San Antonio the troops began to arrive. For several weeks before I joined a regiment to which Wood went ahead of me I continued as Assistant Secretary of the Navy trying to get some coherence plan between the War Department and the Navy Department and also being used by Wood to finish getting the equipment for the regiment. As regards finding out what the plans of the War Department were the tasks they had no plans. Even during the final months before the outbreak of hostilities very little was done in the way of efficient preparation. On one occasion when everyone knew that the declaration of war was sure to come in a few days I went on the military business to the office of one of the highest line generals of the army. A man who at that moment ought to have been working 18 hours out of the 24 on the viral problems ahead of him. What he was actually doing was trying on a new type of smart looking uniform on certain enlisted men. And he called me in to ask my advice as to the position of the pockets of the blouse with a view to making it look attractive. An aide of this general funny enough a good fighting man in actual service when I consulted him as to what my uniform for the camping should be laid special stress upon my purchasing a pair of black top boots for four dress. Explained that they were very effective on Hotel Pizazz and in Paulers. I did not intend to be in any hotel if it could possibly avoid it. And as things turned out I had no four dress uniform nothing but my service uniform during my brief experience in the army. I suppose that will always does bring out what is highest and lowest in human nature. The contractors who furnish poor materials to the army or the navy in time of war stand on a level of infamy only one degree above that of the participants in the white slave trapped themselves. But there is conduct far short of this which yet seems inscrutable to any man who has in him any spirit of disinterested patriotism combined with any power of imagination. Respectable men who I suppose like the imagination thoroughly to realize what they were doing tried to make money out of the nation's necessities in war at the very time that other men are making every sacrifice financial and personal for the cause. In the closing weeks of my service as Assistant Secretary of the Navy we were collecting ships for exhilarated persons. Some men at cost to their own persons helped us freely and with efficiency. Others treated the affair as an ordinary business transaction and yet others endeavored at some given crisis when our need was great to sell us inferior vessels at exorbitant prices and used every pressure through senators and congressmen to accomplish their ends in one or two cases they did accomplish them too until we got a really first class board established to superintendent such purchases. A more curious experience was in connection with the point chosen for the starting of the expedition against Cuba. I had not supposed that any human being could consider this matter safe from the standpoint of military need but one morning a very wealthy and influential man a respectable and upright man according to his own lights called on me to protest against our choice of temp and to in a plea for a certain other put on the ground that his railroad was entitled to its share of the profit for hauling the army and equipment. I have to note that at this time this very man had kingsfolk in the army served gallantly and the circumstances of coming to me was such as to show that he was not acting sick and had no idea that there was anything out of the way in his puzzle. I think the facts were merely that he had been trained to regard businesses as the sole object in life and that he lacked the imagination to enable him to understand the real nature of the request that he was made and moreover he had good reason to believe that one of his business competitors had been unduly. The water body was in far worse shape than the Navy Department. The young officers turned out from West Point are precisely as good as the young officers turned out from Anapas and this always has been true but at that time something has been done to remedy the worst condition since and ever since the close of the civil war the conditions were such that after a few years the army officer stagnated so far as his profession was concerned. When the Spanish war broke out the Navy really was largely on a war footing as any Navy which is even respectable cared for in time of peace must be. The admirals captains and lieutenants were continually practicing their profession in almost precisely the way that it has to be practiced in time of war except actually shooting at a foe. Most of the men on board ship went through in time of peace practically all that they would have to go through in time of war. The heads of bureaus in the Navy Department were for the most part men who had seen sea service who expected to return to sea service and who were preparing for needs which they themselves knew by experience. Moreover the civilian head of the Navy had to provide for keeping the ships in a state of reasonable efficiency and Congress could not hopelessly misbehave itself about the way the Navy without the fact at once becoming evident. All this was changed so far as the army was concerned. Not only was it possible to decrease the efficiency of the army without being called to account for it but the only way in which the Secretary of War could gain credit for himself or the administration was by economy and the easiest way to economize was in connection with something that would not be felt unless war should arise. The people took no interest whatever in the army. Democrats clamored against it and inadequate thought it was in size insisted that it should be still further reduced. Popular orators always appealed to the volunteers. The regulars had no votes and there was no point in politicians thinking of them. The chief activity shown by congressmen about the army was in getting special army posts built in places where there was no need for them. Even the work of the army and its campaigns against the Indians was of such a character that it was generally performed by small bodies of 50 or 100 men. Until a man ceased being a lieutenant he has usually had plenty of professional work to attend to and was employed in the field and in short had the same kind of practice that his brother and the Navy had and he did his work as well but once past this stage he had almost no opportunity to perform any work corresponding to his rank and but little opportunity to do any military work whatsoever. The very best men, men like Lawton, Young, Chaffee, Hawkins and Sumner to mention only men under or beside whom I served remained good soldiers, soldiers of the best stamp in spite of this heartening conditions but it was not to be expected that the average man could continue to grow when every influence was against him. Accordingly when the Spanish wars suddenly burst upon us a number of inert elderly captains and field officers were much against their own wishes suddenly pitchforked into the command of regiments brigades and even divisions and army corps. Often these men failed painfully. This was not their fault it was the fault of the nation that is the fault of all of us of you my reader and of myself and of those like us because we had permitted conditions to be such as to render these men unfit for command. Take a stout captain of an out of the way two company posts where nothing in the world ever occurred even resembling military action and where the only military problem that really convulsed the post to its foundations was the quarrel between the captain and the quartermaster as to how high a mules tail ought to be shaved. I am speaking of an actual incident what could be expected of such a man even though 35 years before he had been a gallant second lieutenant in the civil war if after his intervening do nothing period he was suddenly put in command of raw troops in a mid-summer campaign in the tropics. The bureau chiefs were for the most part elderly incompetence whose idea was to do their routine duties in such way as to escape the censor of routine bureaucratic superiors and to avoid a congressional investigation they had not the slightest conception of preparing the army for war it was impossible that they could have any such conception the people and the congress did not wish the army prepared for war and those editors and philanthropists and peace advocates who felt vaguely that if the army were incompetent their principles were safe always invade against any proposal to make it efficient on the ground that this showed a natural blood thirstliness in the proposal when such weather conditions it was absolutely impossible that either the war department or the army could do well in the event of war secretary alger happened to be secretary when war broke out and all the responsibility for the shortcomings of the department were visited upon his devoted head he was made the scapegoat for our national shortcomings the fault was not his the fault and responsibility lay with us the people who for 33 years had permitted our representatives in congress and in national executive office to bear themselves so that it was absolutely impossible to avoid the great bulk of all of the trouble that occur and of all of the shortcomings of which our people complained during the spanish war the chief immediate cause was the conditions of red tape iracacy which existed in the war department at washington which had prevented any good organization or the preparation of any good plan of operation for using our men and supplies the recurrence of these conditions even though in somewhat less aggravated form in any future emergency is as certain as sunrise unless we bring about the principle of a four years detail in the staff corps a principle which congress has now for years stubbornly refused to grant there are nations who only need to have peaceful ideals inculcated and to whom militarism is a curse and a misfortune there are other nations like our own so happily situated that the thought of war is never present in their minds they are wholly free from any tendency and properly to exalt or to practice militarism these nascent should never forget that there must be military ideals no less than peaceful ideals the exaltation of nagi's career set forth so strikingly and stanley washburns little volume on the great japanese warrior contains much that is especially needed for us of america prone as we are to regard the exchegencies of a purely commercial and industrial civilization as excusing us from the need of admiring and practicing the heroic and warlike virtues our people are not military we need normally only a small standing army but there should be behind it a reserve of instructed men big enough to fill it up to full war strength which is over twice the peace strength moreover the young men of the country should realize that it is the duty of every one of them to prepare himself so that in time of need he may speedily become an efficient soldier a duty now generally forgotten but which should be recognized as one of the vitally essential parts of every man's training in endeavoring to get the rough riders equipped i met with some experiences which were both odd and instructive there were not enough arms and other necessities to go around and there was keenly rivalry among the intelligent and zealous commanders of the volunteer organizations as to who should get first choice wood's experience was what enabled us to equip ourselves in short order there was another calvary organization whose commander was at the war department about this time and we had been eyeing him with much alertness as a rival one day i asked him of what his plans were about arian and drilling his troops who were precisely the type of our own men he answered what he expected to give each of the boys two revolvers and a larit and then just turn them loose i reported the conversation to wood with the remark that we might feel ourselves safe on rivalry in that quarter and safe we were and trying to get the equipment i met with checks and rebuffs and in return was the cause of worrying concerns of various bureau chiefs who were unquestionably estimate estimate men in their private and domestic relations and who no doubtless had been good officers 30 years before but who were as unfit for modern war as if they were so many smooth boars one fine old fella did his best to persuade us to take black powder rifles explaining with paternal indulgence that no one yet really knew just what smokeless powder might do and that there was a good deal to be said in favor of having smoke to conceal us from the enemy i saw this please in theory actually worked out in practice later on for the national guard regiments with us at san diego had black powder muskets and the regular artillery black powder guns and they really might almost as well have replaced these weapons by crossbows and magnolias we succeeded thanks to wood and getting the same calvary carbines that were used by the regulars we were determined to do this not only because the weapons were good but because this would in all probability mean that we were degraded with the regular cavalry which it was certain would be sent immediately to the front for the fighting there was one worthy bureau chief who was continually refusing applications of mine as a regular in each case i would appeal to secretary auger who helped me in every way and get in order from him counters the irregularity for instance i found out that as we were near the july date then the january date for the entrance of issuance of clothing and as it had long been customer to issue the winter clothing in july so as to give ample leisure for getting it to all of the various posts it was therefore solemnly proposed to issue the same winter clothing to us who were about to start for a summer campaign in the tropics this would seem incredible to those who have never dealt with an inert or fisherdom a red tape bureaucracy but such is the fact i rectified this and got in order for khaki clothing we were then told we would have to advertise 30 days for horses this meant that we would have missed the san diego expedition so i made another successful appeal to the secretary other difficulties came up about wagons and various articles and in each case the same result followed on the last occasion when i came up in triumph with the needed order the worried office head who bore me no animosity but who did feel that fate had been very unkind threw himself back in his cheer and exclaimed with a sigh oh dear i had this office running in such good shape and then along came the war and upset everything his feeling was that war was an illegitimate interruption to the work of the war department there were of course department heads and bureau chiefs and assistants who in spite of the worthlessness of the system and of the paralyzing conditions that have prevailed remained first-class men an example of this these was commissionary general weston his energy activity administrative efficiency and common sense was supplemented by an eager desire to help everybody do the best that could be done but in washington and again down at san diego we owed him very much when i was president it was my good fortune to repay him in part our debt which means the debt of the people of the country by making him a major general the regiment assembled in san diego and when i reached there the regiment assembled at san diego san antonio when i reached there the men rifle and horses which were the essentials were coming in fast and the saddles blankets and the like were also accumulating thanks to woods exertion when we reached tamper we were rather better equipped than most of the regular regiments we adhere strictly to field equipment allowing no luxuries or anything else unnecessary and so we were able to move off the field when ordered with our own transportation leaving nothing behind i suppose every man tends to brag about his regiment but it does seem to me that there never was a regiment better worth bragging about than ours wood was an exceptional commander of great power with a remarkable gift for organization the rank and file was as fine natural fighting men as ever carried a rifle or rode a horse in any country or any age we had a number of first-class young fellas from the east most of them from colleges like harvard yale and princeton but the great majority of the men were southwesterners from the then territories of oklahoma indian territory arizona and new mexico they were accustomed to the use of firearms accustomed to taking care of themselves in the opera they were intelligent and self-reliant they possessed hardy hood and endurance and physical prowess and above all they had a fighting edge the cool and resolute fighting temper they went into the war with full knowledge having deliberately counted the cost in the great majority of cases each man was chiefly anxious to find out what he should do to make the regiment a success they brought first and last about 800 copies of the calvary drill regulations and studied them industriously such men were practically soldiers to start with in all the essentials it is small wonder that with them as material to work upon the regiment was raised armed equipped drilled sent on trains to tamper embarked disembarked and put through two victorias offensive not defensive fights in which a third of the officers and one fifth of the men were killed or wounded all within 60 days it is a good racket and it speaks well for the men of the regiment and it speaks well for wood to counterbalance the newspapers which ignorantly and indiscriminately praised all the volunteers there were others who blame was of the same intelligent quality the new york evening post on june 18th gave expressions to the following gloomy foreboding competent observers have remarked that nothing more extraordinary has been done than descending to cuba of the first united states volunteer cavalry known as the rough riders organized but four weeks barely given their full complement of officers and only a week of regular drill these men have been sent to the front before they've have learned the first elements of soldiering and discipline or have even become acquainted with their officers in addition to all this like the regular cavalry they have been sent with only their carbines and revolvers to meet an enemy armed with long range rifles there have been few cases of such military cruelty in our military annals a week or so after this not holy happy profit was promulgated the cruelty was consummated first at la casimas and then in the san Juan fighting wood was so busy getting the regiment ready that when i reached san Antonio he turned most of the drilling of it over to me this was a piece of great fortune great good fortune for me and i drilled the men industriously mounted and unmounted i had plenty to learn and the men and the officers even more but we went at our work with the heartiest goodwill we speedily made it evident that there was no room and no mercy for any man who shrunk any duty and we accomplished good results the fact is that the essentials of drill and work for a cavalry or any infantry regiment are easy to learn which of course is not true for the artillery or the engineers or for the navy the reason why it takes so long to turn the average civilized men into good infantry men or cavalry men is because it takes a long while to teach the average untrained man how to shoot to ride to march to take care of himself in the open to be alert resourceful cool daring resolute to obey quickly as well as to be willing and to fit himself to act on his own responsibility if he already possesses the qualities there is very little difficulty in making him a soldier all the drill that is necessary to enable him to march and to fight is of a simple character great ground and back square maneuvers are of no earthy consequence in real war when men can readily change from line to column and column to line can form front in any direction and assemble and scatter and can do these things with speed and precision they have a fairly good grasp of the essentials when our regiment reached Tampa it could already be handled credibly at fast gates and in both mass and extended formations mounted and dismounted i had served three years in the New York National Guard finally becoming a captain this experience was invaluable to me it enabled me at once to train the men in the simple drill without which they would have been a mob for although the drill requirements are simple they are also absolutely indispensable but if i had believed that my experience in the National Guard had taught me all that there was to teach about a soldier's career it would have been better for me not to have been in it at all there were in a regiment a number of men who had served in the National Guard and a number of others who had served in the regular army some of these latter had served in the field in the west under campaign conditions and were accustomed to long marches privation risk and unexpected emergencies these men were of the utmost benefit to the regiment they already knew their profession and could teach and help the others but if the man had merely served in a National Guard regiment or in the regular army at some post in a civilized country where he learned nothing except what could be picked up in the parade ground in the barracks and in practice marches of a few miles along good roads then it depended purely upon his own good sense whether he had been helped or hurt by the experience if he realized that he had learned only five percent of his profession that there remained 95 percent to accomplish before he would be a good soldier why he had profited immensely to start with five percent handicap was a very great advantage and if the man was really a good man he could not be overtaken but if the man thought that he had learned all about the profession of a soldier because he had been in the National Guard or in the regular army under the conditions i have described then he was actually of less use than if he had never had any military experience at all such a man was apt to think that nicety of alignment precision and willing and correctness in the manual arms were the ends of training and the guarantees of good soldiership and that from guard mountains to century duty everything in war was to be done in accordance with what he had learned in peace as a matter of fact most of what he had learned was never used at all and some of it had to be unlearned the only thing for instant that a century never to do in an actual campaign is to walk up and down a line where he would be conspicuous his business is to lie down somewhere off a rich crest where he can see anyone approaching but where a man approaching cannot see him as for the ceremonies doing a really hard part of a campaign only the barest essentials are necessary or are kept almost all of the junior regular officers and many of the senior regular officers were fine men but through no fault of their own have been forced to lead lies that fairly paralyzed their efficiency when the strain of modern war came on them the routine elderly regular officer who knew nothing whatever a modern war was in most respects nearly as worthless as a rock recruit the positions and commands prescribed and the textbooks were made into fetishes by some of these men and treated as if they were the ends instead of the not always important means by which the ends were to be achieved in the cuban fighting for instance it would have been falling for me to have taken my place in a rear of the regiment the canonical textbook position my business was to be where I could keep most command over the regiment and in a rough and tumble scrambling fight in thick jungle this had to depend upon the course of events and usually meant that I had to be at the front I saw in that fighting more than one elderly regiment commander who unwittingly rendered the only service he could render to his regiment by taking up his proper position several hundred yards in the rear when the fighting began for then the regiment disappeared in the jungle and for its good fortune the commanding officer never saw it again until long after the fight was over after one cuban fight a lieutenant colonel of the regulars in command of a regiment who had met with just such an experience and had rejoined us at the front several hours after the clothes of the fighting asked me what my men were doing when the fight began I answered that they were following entrance and column of twos and that the instant the shooting began I deployed them as skirmishes on both sides of the trail he answered triumphally you can't deploy men as skirmishes from column formation to which I responded well I did and what is more if any captain had made any difficulty about it I would have sent him to the rear my critic was quite correct from the parade ground standpoint the prescribed orders at that time were to deploy the column first into a line of squads at correct intervals and then to give an order which if my memory serves correctly ran as skirmishes by the right and left flanks at six yards take intervals march the order I really gave ran more like this scattered out to the right there quick cue scattered to the left look alive look alive and they looked alive and they scattered and each took advantage of cover and forward went the line now I do not wish what I have said to be misunderstood if ever we have a great war the bulk of our soldiers will not be men who have had any opportunity to train soul and mind and body so as to meet the iron needs of an actual campaign long continue and faithful drill alone put these men in shape to begin to do their duty and failure to recognize this on a part of the average man will mean laziness and folly and not the possession of efficiency moreover if men have been trained to believe for instant that they can arbitrate questions of vital interest and national honor if they have been brought up with flabbiness of more fiber as well as flabbiness of physique then there will need then there will be need of long and laborious and faithful work to give the needed tone to mind and body but if the men have in them the right stuff it is not so very difficult end of chapter seven part two recording by daisy 55