 This study conducted a scoping review to identify knowledge gaps, set research agendas, and identify implications for decision-making. The results showed that the number of scoping reviews conducted per year has steadily increased since 2012, with most of them being conducted in North America or Europe and reported a public source of funding. However, the study found that only 13 percent of the scoping reviews followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology guidance for scoping reviews, which included using a protocol, two reviewers for selecting citations for inclusion, full text screening, data charting, and a predefined charting form. The results of the scoping review were used to identify evidence gaps, provide recommendations for future research, or identify strengths and limitations in most cases. There are no guidelines for reporting scoping reviews or studies that assess the quality of scoping review reporting. Further research on scoping review methodology is warranted, particularly a guideline to standardize reporting. This article was authored by Andreas C. Trikko, Erin Lilly, Wasif Azharin, and others. We are article.tv, links in the description below.