 the tasks of a theory of social conflict. It is an approach based on postulating some social changes and a social conflict, specifically with the help of the dysfunctionality of all the elements of social structure and the constrating character of social unity. If we want to understand the theory of social conflict for our own sake, and see what the task of it is, then we should understand it in such a way that it is such an approach, it is such a view, which has been explained in a very clear way. That the relationship between social change and social conflict is the discussion we get. Now, why is it necessary to understand the discussion of social change and social conflict? Because wherever, in the whole world, in any of the conditions, between social conflict and social change, when there is a phase where there is a dysfunctionality, that people are asking for social change, but due to the presence of social conflict, the system is not capable of working properly, and because of this dysfunctionality, the social conflict rises more and more. There is such a phase between people, where we have seen many times in the world, that because of social conflict, not only the system is affected, but the conditions in the society have been created that the relationships between the two have deteriorated that the conditions have gone towards such a change, which is not suitable. Similarly, we can say that what are the major requirements for the theory building? It should be a scientific theory, as a theory of social integration. As a basis, the social integration, like it is necessary for that philosophy, for the theory of social conflict, for such conditions, for such characteristics, that it must be formulated with reference to a plausible and democratable, demonstrable explanations of empirical phenomena. For the theory of social conflict, we need empirical evidence that whenever there is a social change and there is a social conflict, there will be such a phase where there will be no cooperation between people, there will be no consensus between people. So, will the conditions go towards the same every time? Until there are many empirical evidences, we cannot say that there will always be such an outcome in every situation. Because the elements of the theory should not contradict the conflict model of society. Because there are different categories which we can be applicable, which we can discuss with this specific context, that the integration theory, that is also relevant, and then the conflict theory should enable us to derive social conflicts from structural arrangements and then they can be related to the conflicts systematically generated. Now, look at what we are trying to understand. Instead of very difficult terminology, if we can explain this to ourselves in an easy way, we can explain to ourselves that the people who live in every place, the people who are refugees, the people who are in the society, there are some structural arrangements in that society. Now, at times, there can be conflicts within those structural arrangements. And at times, this conflict systematically rises in both ways. That is, at times there can be conflicts in the system, at times there can be conflicts within the process. So, if there are such conditions between the two, and at times this can also be combined with both, that is, the process and structure that can be created within the conflict moisture. So, if there are such conditions, then that conflict will become more intense. So, there are some important questions and with the help of these questions, we can understand this basic philosophy and its tasks of the theory of social conflict. So, number one question that, how do conflicting groups arise from the structure of the society? Now, there is a structure of any moisture that is basically working within every moisture and structure. There is authority, there is a system that applies authority, there are rules and regulations. Now, how do conflicts arise when there is a structure within a moisture? Then, what forms can the struggles among such groups assume? Now, when there are conflicting groups in the moisture, now, in these conflicting groups, what is the way to establish that they are involved in struggle with each other? So, if in the moisture, different systems are working, the moisture system, the moral system, there is poverty, there is education, there is health and society overall, a whole system is operating. Then, how will clash arise? Basically, we have to understand this. So, how does a conflict among such groups affect a change in the social structures? Now, when conflict arises, then how will it influence these groups? Now, a simple formula for all these questions that we can understand, that there is a conflict in every place which is them and us, you and I, that or we. If we understand this, that everyone among us is trying to establish his or her share. Similarly, the other one is also trying to establish his or her share. His or her share is ours. Wherever there is a conflict, conflict will arise. Now, we have to see whether the system has the ability to settle down that conflict and settle down in time. If the system doesn't settle down in time, then the conflict that can arise, then it will be converted into the system. And it can be converted into the system. It can involve many groups as well. That is, it can be converted into political parties starting from the political parties. It can also be converted into the political parties on an ethnic basis. If the mechanism of protecting those people is not available and the mechanism is there too but if it doesn't settle down in time, then what is the mechanism? The availability of the mechanism is important. And the solution is also important. And the most important thing is who is organizing this whole thing. Who has the power authority who wind up all these things and look after all these things. So proper structure is important and functioning is more important than that.