 Welcome back to Investor Intel at PDAC 2018. I'm pleased to be joined by Mark Chalmers. Mark is the CEO of Energy Fuels. Mark, Uranium and Vanadium have both been in the news a lot lately. First of all, can you comment on what's going on in the market and particularly what's going on politically in the U.S.? Well look, Uranium itself has historically been a political kind of element. I mean, we as a company with U.R. Energy, we filed a Section 232 trade petition to limit imports of Uranium into the United States. Now, Section 232 is quite in the media a lot right now with the steel and aluminum, so I think people didn't know what Section 232 even meant up until a few days ago when the Trump administration, after a review by the Department of Commerce, is looking at imposing tariffs on imports from various forms from different countries. So we as a company, we actually started this process about a year ago and we felt that the low-level production in the United States, the United States is the largest consumer of Uranium in the world, but we're only actually producing less than 5% of our requirements. So the Section 232 is a trade act that is driven for any type of commodity like Uranium or Vanadium or in the cases of steel or aluminum that may have national security implications. And so that is what we've put in with U.R. Energy. Well, I think that would be a pretty compelling case that Uranium is an important strategic element. On that basis, you guys are already a producer. Obviously, a U.S. producer would be extremely benefited by any kind of ruling under 232. Yeah, we would be benefited naturally, but the thing is that we want to be reasonable with this Section 232. We want to survive as an industry. The nuclear industry in the United States has been challenged with natural gas and the increase in renewables lately. So we don't want to be greedy here, but we do think that a front end of the nuclear fuel cycle is required in the United States. So it's really, again, when we talk about national security issues, it's not just Department of Defense, it's really more focused on the nuclear power generation industry for the electricity. Because 20% of our electricity comes from nuclear. Well, sometimes people don't regard Uranium production as being something that's particularly green. But from my understanding of your business, you guys provide some very green services not only in how you process your own materials, but also in cleaning up other projects or other mining operations. Is that correct? Yeah, we have our white mason mill in Utah. It's the only remaining conventional mill in the United States that's operable. And we have two sources of revenue with that facility. We have what we call alternate feed, which is basically taking out of spec material or low level material that we can actually run through the mill and recover the Uranium and repackage, we're basically recycling products that had Uranium in it. In a lot of cases, returning that to wherever we got it from, like it could be a major other mining company that had a stream that was unusable otherwise. And that's what we call alternate feed. But in addition to that, we are also as a company looking at doing cleanups of former Uranium mines, most of which were mined in the 50s and 60s during the Cold War, largely subsidized by the United States government. And the EPA has collected around two billion dollars of cleanup funds in trust on the Navajo Nation alone. So we're looking at using our facility which is just a short distance from the Navajo Nation and providing a service where we can take low level radioactive material left from that period of time, the 50s and 60s, recover the Uranium from that material and dispose of it safely in our facility. Well, there's a lot to the story. What should investors be looking for right now as a reason to own energy fuels? Well, I mean, we're primarily a Uranium-focused production company. That's number one, the Section 232 and what that could do to our company in terms of stimulating and providing an inflection point. If that review, that petition, which we think will happen will go forward. And also the Vanadium space because we have historically produced quite a lot of Vanadium from the assets that we have. Over the course of the last 38 years, we've produced over 45 million pounds of Vanadium at current prices that's in excess of $500 million of Vanadium. So there's some real interest in Vanadium for steel hardening which has been the normal use, but also Vanadium flow batteries for renewable energy storage systems. Well, Mark, thank you so much for joining us today and we'll look forward to seeing you again soon. Thank you very much.