 Okay, yep. I wanna go back to a UVA survey you looked at where they talked to people who voted for Biden, talked to people who voted for Trump. And your conclusion, which I agree with is that people are largely the same. I mean, you know, they may be arguing about little things, but largely they are the same. Uneconomic issues, right? That's right. I'm shocked, first of all, that the people who did the study conclude exactly the opposite thing. That there's this huge divide between them. And they, while they mentioned very lightly, oh, you know, people agree on censorship and authoritarian governments, but we're not gonna worry about that. There's this huge divide because Trump people don't like Biden and Biden people don't like Trump. It's the fact that they hate each other that is the cause of the divide. Yes. Yes. And that's what we have to find this compromise, where, you know, okay. They stop hating each other. Yeah, yeah, you know, censorship's okay, but we've gotta stop hating each other, you know? I mean, I'm just, I'm shocked. And all I can think of is, I mean, they're looking the same day that you are, right? The same study, they wrote it. You can't argue with people about statistics, stuff like this. I mean, it's gotta go to a deeper level somewhere, right? I mean, it's like, where are your priorities? If getting along is more important than censorship, yeah, we're in a world of hurt. Well, yes. And getting along, of course, is the way to deal with this, you know, or having censorship is the way in which we deal with getting along. You know, one way to get along is to have authoritarianism and everybody just follow the leader and then everybody gets along and whoever doesn't is shot. And then you, even then, then you secure that everybody gets along. Cause if you don't, there were serious consequences of not getting along. And that's what scares me. It scares me that if you could find a voice who could unite the left and right under the ban of the things they agree about, which is a big banner. Scary, scary. That's why I always thought it's religion and environmentalism. Those are the two things that I think could unite left and right. And if you could somehow deal with the race stuff, although I don't think that's essential, if you could get environmentalism, particularly if there's some kind of crisis or perceived crisis like energy or whatever, and then you bring in religion and nationalism, then you could really unite some in the left and some on the right. And that's where it gets really scary. And then censorship, they've both have given up on it already. And that's the thing is that they agree on censorship, then you're not allowed to express ideas that are unpopular. So, you know, because you're creating discord and you're creating, you're creating, and look, and deeper, the deeper issue here is the complete irrational, we live in a culture that's deeply irrational. And that is, as a consequence, what we're seeing is the rise of tribalism. And so the tribe of the left and the tribe of the right, you know, like most tribes in history are pretty similar. They don't really disagree on that much, but they hate each other because they're different tribes. And there are few issues they disagree on, I don't know, they disagree in transgenders. But, you know, and they're willing, I guess, to go to war over how many bathrooms we should have or something like that, I don't know, or how many times transgender should appear in the New York Times. But that's the level of it because on governing the economy, on free speech and things, they don't, they don't disagree. It's who the victim is, who's the bigger victim? Is it the Christians are the victims? Or is it transgender and LGBTQ plus, plus, plus, or whatever it is these days, are the bigger victims? That's the debate. You know, and as I've said many times at the extremes, at the far left, far right, it's about are you a racist who's pro, you know, black or are you racist who's pro-white? But they agree on the racism too at the very edges of this thing. So it's, I don't know, it's very difficult to be optimistic. On the other hand, as I said before, you know, as an economist, pessimism, it's very rare that pessimism pays off. As an investor, you know, the good outweighs the bad overwhelmingly over history, over the history at least of the last 200 years. And I don't know that we shifted to a new historical paradigm. So in spite of everything, innovation, progress, technology, somehow, you know, keeps us afloat. The dagnies, the read-ins, even the John Galtz of the world have not gone astray. They're still pulling, they're still holding the world up. The thing that totally shocks me though is that something like 20% of the people are in favor of censorship because if that goes through, it's game over, right? That's why having a constitution really matters because so far the courts have been better than the rest of the institutions at protecting us against real censorship. Thank you for listening or watching the Iran Book Show. If you'd like to support the show, we make it as easy as possible for you to trade with me. You get value from listening, you get value from watching, show your appreciation. You can do that by going to iranbrookshow.com slash support by going to Patreon, subscribe star locals and just making a appropriate contribution on any one of those channels. Also, if you'd like to see the Iran Book Show grow, please consider sharing our content and of course, subscribe, press that little bell button right down there on YouTube so that you get an announcement when we go live and for those of you who are already subscribers and those of you who are already supporters of the show, thank you. I very much appreciate it.