 Zdaj imam tukaj izgledaj na mozimikov. Vse počekam, da počekam poček, da ne vradi v moženju, in v moženju, da je in glasba. Motivacija, da je tukaj izgleda, prikratila, da je zelo menej v Mozambiqueo, pravič, v 2006, vzelo vzelo. In je sem tudi ješeljeno, da je zelo menej, da jaz se je organizacije, da je zelo početnjala, odgovoril početni, tudi. And then also due to the limited capacity of the government, the high cost regularization costs for communities that imply not only money but also time. It's a really high intensive process and a lot of land conflicts. Prostaj nasih nabijemo bojo v tem, da v loju res nabijemo predtagednju, in nasih nekaj neasilim nekaj dahanje, kar si se naprejmo na politiskom se ozrivaniho svetu, tako, da so se pogledanje čo, da je, da povisimo, se zakojimo, da hljeva in ne kako jim sva v Panko, dao mn odmah, da je odvrčen, schojenje Basically飯 v kraju. This entourage is a the limitation of Community Land, the demarcation of rural associations is the promotion of economic development, Promot njih neč nekaj način, časčšičo način imeliram svoju vse odlače, začala jazda nelijno tudi, vneč je včerjati nekaj neč neč neč nekaj način časčšičnih srednevckih in prosit nječ, ki se bila meti v vsočne, nekaj ne možno, ki se je to nebej rained, in ki je Princess, neko leži se početni vsočnik. Čestno je in to ta oblastirana posunstena bila, ki se staročijo in vsi rebler je na vsočna zelo. Mi se nekaj nemožno, da je uhodil je FAJ. transakcija, in skupniti konflikt v redukciju. Počekaj smo začali, da sem musila, da se s konstribucijom od 6 europejskih donarstv, da sem musila referi, vse, Nederland, Izraeli in Danesku. Milenija Čalrenča korporacija vzela v 2009, the nine helped us cover the northern region and then we became encouraged to expand to provinces. The results we present here are modest but this has an explanation on the limited capacity of the government came over the law. In 2007,agi be heating them over the law of the land. They then amended the law to establish limit authority to attribute land. At that time,until 2007,a governor could give you 30 –40č to land and... 50,000 actors. in se je zelo kontrolno. Zelo je izgovoril danes. Zelo je zelo, da je taj njič zelo, vzvečila v vsega vzvega, in začin je vsega vsega vsega, vsega vsega vsega vsega vzvega, v rovnih zeloj, zeloja zeloje. To je pozitiv, ali smo dovolje vzvega in narednje do vsega. Zato vse je nekaj zremljeni, da je kaj je odličen. Proste v komunitji če je zremljen, z kaj je zremljen je zrej. A kako se prijeva sektor na zelo, prijev si je zresel. Zato se, da se vse zrpunje, odličen je, da se vse zrpunje. In to je naredil, da ino sektor naredil, je naredil izvanja, očun, ki je zelo, teželje se prokratil. Zelo se naredil pri tudi 3 rovnih barj, ki se to vzelo. Čudovim je, da smo počali s neko 25 nekaj nekaj nezavljavnih barj, in tudi smo mogli dojati 300 delimitacije. Vse je tudi traget za 2017, je tudi 354 delimitacije. To je pravda. Značili smo tudi programe, kaj je zelo zelo zelo zelo. To je zelo zelo zelo? Vse je zelo zelo zelo. Zdaj smo zelo odličili v Njambani provjenje, in tudi bridzi, ki se v Moputu boljali, smo zelo odličili, zelo odličili, da imamo tukaj provjenje. V svoj povedičnih povedičnih povedičnih povedičnih, nコ zemno izgleda. Je nekaj nekaj bolj. Zelo je delimitacija. Zelo je ino nekaj nekaj. Zelo je tudi nekaj nekaj, da je zelo zelo zelo. Pa, včasno, najbolj tudi da najbolj delimitacija. Dela je delimitacija odpoznačna informacija na komunitivnih, odpečenju vse resursov nekaj, kako se zelo počke, da ne nešli potrebnih, nešli nešli potrebnih. The result of our process of delimitation does build of identity of a community. A community becomes, gets an ID card. A community becomes eligible to exert their rights, z njih zelo izgledaj. Zvuk na različenje, več kot zašliščenje. Našličenje so zašliščenje zašliščenje v predmah i vladi in zamah je 15 % v zelo večetnih v poštih. Med Swedenu je 2,75 % ... of mining, which revenue of communities once delimited, once recognized by the authorities, ... have the right to claim. The government, as I said, our law is beautiful, it's good, it has all the needs to respect people's rights. The basis of the law is already there. You have to share information with the community. You have to establish capacity, internal capacity in the community by building natural resources committees. This is an obligation of the law. You have to respect limits between communities. Part of the conflicts that exist are not necessarily brought by outsiders. It's not necessarily that. Sometimes it's within communities that the problem arises. But also inter communities, between neighboring communities, they can be really... You can find terrible conflicts and the law already considers the importance of this exercise. And then you have the formalization of the rights. We come in bringing social preparation to the process. And social preparation is an exercise of formalizing the structures within the community. But it's also an exercise of creating within the communities the capacity to sort the problems out by itself. So it's a bit that the law do not take in account that we bring in. There is an exercise of opening a bank account that I can explain later. From the delimitation process you have recognition from the provincial authorities that give you a certificate. You have a zoning, a land zoning that we expect to contribute to the district level. So this would be a micro dimension of the need to map a district. So you get a certificate and a map that shows your boundaries. And then you get the recognition of the authorities within the community by the administrator. Then you get these rights published in the national state gazette. And from there you are able to open a bank account. So a community has an ID card and can open a bank account and can start claiming their rights. One of the most important documents that we produce is what we call community agenda. It's what we can simplify saying that it's the profile of the community that can be easily transformed on a business plan if needed. It comes with the history of the community, all the potential and a roadmap of a potential path that the community can take if they decide to do something by themselves. We don't work alone. We need to partner with the key players in the system. Specially we keep close attention to the government plans and try to produce to build synergies between the government programs and communities. But we are stretching ourselves and trying to focus on special slots of the system where we can produce more benefit. Together with other organizations we created a consortium that tries to use the legislation of 2008 to expand the benefits that the communities have. Namely, as I said, the communities are represented by natural resources committees. But the other laws that I mentioned, the mining, the tourism, et cetera, are also channels through which they can benefit. So we expect from this consortium to expand the roles of benefits that the community, formal benefits that the communities have. We have entered in a partnership with the Gorongoz National Park to focus and stretch ourselves to work on the buffer zones of the national parks, but also to contribute to harmony between communities and the authorities of the parks, try to focus our attention in conservation areas. We are here trying to expand also and build better relationships with the academy. All these institutions here are part of the governance system of our organization and make us our decision making processes sounder. It's not changing. Oh, I've been betrayed by this. Let me say some statements from practice, yes, from our experience. Oops, do I go back? Okay, sorry. From our experience, we expect to convince whoever, it's time to listen to us, that the limitation first is an important step, particularly for those investors with mega projects. There are lots of testimonies of business that fail because you get to a place, eventually misled by whoever facilitates your access to land, and you don't communicate with the communities, you don't respect the rights that are already there. And those situations are often result in poor implementation of your business. Social preparation is key to ensure that people, that communities know themselves, know their rights, that they know that they have rights, have limitations, and they are the authors, I'm getting a bit, English is now becoming difficult, that they are authors of their own development. The development plans are an important instrument for a forward-looking instrument that can, as I said, be transformed easily on a business plan if some organization wants to help to establish a value chain for the communities. We adopted intervention in clusters, especially to be able to improve our capacity and increase the number of communities. Today, what we call one project, one intervention, can easily contain five to seven communities. It reduces costs and make it more feasible. There is an attempt to do an inclusive approach to gender and diversity. We don't know much about it. We are trying to find better ways to improve and maximize the impact which regards gender and diversity, trying to learn and trying to build challenging indicators and get out only of the number of women in decision-making posts, and consider more the diversity within a community. There are more needs that are diverse, there are sections of the community that are not heard if you are not sensitive to it. We do inclusive, as I said, I showed you a big bunch of organizations. They are all part of our decision-making process, so we keep all of those sensitivities involved in the monitoring of the program, bringing up the weaknesses as each of the organizations or each of the institutions in their own specificity expects. We do a lot of keeping systematic cost-benefit analysis, and outcome mapping is one of the most important aspects that we have introduced in our attitude, which is while we go forward, we keep attention in going backwards and try to see what are the effects of our work, what has been happening after we have passed. So, right now, I think we are in 2010 looking for the results of 2010, and there are beautiful examples of interesting results. In terms of challenging opportunities, the big challenge is institutional capacity of stakeholders, ours, the private sector, service providers, the government, donors. All stakeholders do need some sort of literacy on the topic. All stakeholders need to be kept in the same level in order to produce results. But one of the big issues is institutional coordination, organizations creating separate paths, not talking to each other and not producing impact. What we have been able to do through synergies is in fact bringing different programs together and producing, I can give you some examples, but I think my time is over. So, we would expect that with better coordination, better productivity, less-land conflicts development, of course, mature response to problems would result. I guess that's all for now.