 Next, my lecture. If you open the first page of our agency and put the click service, you can find that this service includes five key programs, Rays for Hope, Zodiac, Anotec, IMPRA, and Peaceful Use Initiative. IMPRA was established after Russian initiative during United Nations Millennium Summit in September 2000. And truly speaking, initially, we would consider it a separate project under the umbrella of energy. And it's a very simple abbreviation, International Project on Innovative Nuclear Reactors and Fuel Cycles. But taking into account the specific of the agency, it is not a market platform for promotion of some innovations. It's only place for discussion. Of course, it was slowly modified to some program that considered some systematic issues and so on, so on, so on. But till now, it is a key forward-looking agency activity assessing nuclear power system integrated with the name One House approach in the agency, taking into account efforts of safety department, security group, safeguards approaches for future technology and economic and so on, so on, so on, so on, plus legal. And in comparison of main part of activities, this activity works as a member's project. Member states work on this project, and the number of members slowly growth. Sorry, yes, now we have 43 members. Maybe some members now is not so active, but members that joined last year's now works very actively. And the biggest part of the budget of this project in the IIS are named extra budgetary. It's mainly a payment by Russian US key founders of this project taken into account that US joined not from first stage, only in 2005. And in a different period, Japan, Poland, Canada, India, Pakistan also made some contribution for some specific study for cost-free experts and so on, so on, so on. And what simple explanation of objective of IMPRA. IMPRA is connected to sustainable development ideas. And if you consider sustainable development, of course you need to consider sustainable energy supply. And if you take into account, of course, sustainable energy supply, you should consider national, regional, long-term system. And you can use energy system planning and IEA instruments also in this system could be very useful. If you have a relatively clear picture of your future, your energy basket, you can consider role of nuclear power or nuclear energy. It is correct not only for newcomers and this for some countries which have nuclear power plants, it's also very important. And of course, next stage it's planning for sustainable nuclear energy. We have a number of instruments in the agency, but IMPRA focused on ensuring nuclear energy is available to contribute in sustainable manner the growing energy needs in the current century and beyond. So we work a service in two lines. First it's consideration and advanced and innovative nuclear energy systems, scenario modeling, analysis, sustainability assessment using IMPRA methodology and dialogue, cooperation, collaboration project when we try to involve or our member states try to involve another member states to work together. And for example, our dialogue forum has a very important basis. It's dialogue between technology holders and technology users. It's some specific type of conferences and as usual after, for example, our dialogue forums, we have new studies. Then member states decided to promote some new activity. So we work in area of innovations. We consider a role of innovative technologies, not particular technological arrangement, design and so on, but role of this technology in nuclear sustainability. IMPRA methodology consider six areas for assessment of sustainability of nuclear system, big system, small system, technological system, national system, different analysis. And we have a number of instruments for analysis of further strategies. So it's different approaches for service for member states. We have some type of task structure. Our activity is split on four structure, global scenarios, innovations, taking into account different transportation reactor, SMRs, fusion, sustainable assessment and strategies. And here we work for IMPRA and its direct support to member states to assess technologies and dialogue and outreach. For example, we had in this year some break due to postponement, but in next year and now we send to member states the announcement, we will have dialogue forum in US in March next year. And plus we close to completion of preparation of methodology for master program related IMPRA methodology and energy planning for sustainable development of national nuclear powers. IMPRA task, global task, and it's development of scenarios. And both mentioned in last lecture project were part of this task. Development of some special analysis tools provide global vision and forge innovative new partnerships. So it is not innovative technology, innovative partnership in area of nuclear power. And now we have here a new package, also a service, analysis support for enhanced nuclear energy sustainability. Next innovations, here is only current project. We had a lot of project in this area. For example, now we complete case study related deployment of SMRs factory field. Then host state have no any headache related management with spent or fresh fuel. And review of innovative reactors from point of view of sever accident, prevention of sever accident, and they can sequence. It's also very specific. It's not technical part of related innovative reactors, but effect of innovative reactors in case of sever accident. A waste arising from innovative reactors and fuel cycle, we're off. Back end activity from point of view of international cooperation. And with study related legal institutional issues of our nuclear reactors. Sustainability assessment. It's also some examples. Just last year, we published sustainability assessment of system with big fast reactors, then 12 habits. We are working in area of assessment of system with some SMRs and some other activity. Taking into account some, sorry, some states, NISA, but I will explain a little bit later. We have dialogue forums. For example, next dialogue forum will be in US. And in the autumn of the next year also related SMRs will be organized in Russia. We have in pro school during last two years. We had four virtual in pro schools and one school here two months ago. And higher education programs. So what is in pro methodology? Of course, it was very unique international activity in the beginning of 2000s. I also was one of participant and also was a member of this big group of 300 national and international experts who bring some information or analyzed the result of this activity. The first publication was, it is really tools for assessing the sustainability of nuclear energy systems, different systems, I will demonstrate here. And now we come close to completion, revising of this methodology. This methodology rising from a united nation sustainable concept of sustainable development. Not sustainable development goals. It is some steps back to the end of 90s. But the sustainable development goals, sustainable development conception includes sustainable energy supply. And four key line of united nation sustainable development of energy, economic environment, society, political, and institutional, were converted in six areas of in pro methodology. Also economics, environmental, waste, management, safety, infrastructure. Infrastructure is white meaning for milestone approach and proliferation resistance. So in pro approach is a holistic and global view on nuclear energy system together with pursuit innovations in nuclear energy. But nuclear energy system assessment is not analysis. It has a special time frame, some decades or maybe one century, but taken to account long term assessment. As usual, we try to focus on 100 years. So and first tools, comprehensive tools of info, had named NISA, nuclear energy system assessment. Just a moment, I will show initially the principle of methodologies. Hierarchical system that for every areas has one so named basic principles. Basic principles split to user requirement for designers, separators, industry, states, and so on to meet goal defined in basic principles. And each user requirement split on criteria. So it's real assessor tools to check metrics for nuclear energy systems. It works as hierarchical system for assessment, one basic principles from two to seven requirement and each requirement have from one to six criteria. And some basic principles is very simple for economics. Nuclear energy system is economically attractive and competitive without energy sources. Simple, but taken to account hierarchical consideration, you will have a lot of nuances. Environmental impact from two point of view, first of all, stressors. No adverse impact on environmental and human health. And second, depletion of resources, sufficient resources for nuclear energy system to run for a century. Waste management, also simple. Protect current and future generation, no pass and you bargain on. Similar in proliferation. An attractive means for nuclear weapons or explosive device. Safety, also very simple. Safe than previous generation. But of course, if you consider every volume of our methodology, you will take into account a lot of details and infrastructure to national international measures to ensure nuclear energy system is sustainable. So it's, from one hand, it's simple, but from other hand, it is necessary to prepare a lot of initial data and some member states, some technology holders. Took only assessment in some areas. For example, economic plus waste, waste plus safety and so on, so on, so on. There are methodics for assessment, also very simple. Yes, no. Yes, it's taken into account criteria. Yes, it's sustainable. No, you shouldn't identify gaps or improvement areas or modify design or define areas for research and development. And next reassessment and confirmation of sustainability. It's very good system for searching of some gaps in legal aspects, in safety things, and in initial data. And for different stakeholders, this assessment can bring a lot of very useful information. For example, for designers, maybe one of key point, identification of areas for research and development. But from other hand, this approach can give chance to guide development, identify different options for national industry, also comparing options, and also identifying areas for research and development. But from industrial point of view, it's different level. It's different resources, different level, and different view for future. For government, it's also very important for governments. Due to, it's possible to identify gaps in legal systems and system connected to nuclear power. And for newcomers, of course, in that case, we need to organize limited scope of assessment using great approaches for some system. But here, it's also very important we can receive as effect increasing governance for long-term issues. You do have assessment for all aspects. And assisting with planning and decision making is also very important. You too, it is necessary to have so-called qualified decisions in the area of nuclear power. Some results. First decade, colleagues had a lot of studies. For example, initial studies published in 2009. But it's truly speaking this first six years. It was six national NISA, Argentina, Brazil, India, Korea, considered as technology developer and Armenian-Ukrainian technology users. Later, some states fulfilled more detailed studies, converted to big volumes. For example, assessment in Belarus, assessment in Armenia. We have good result in Ukraine. And yesterday, I see in Roman's poster, one picture, namely, that was generated during some studies, whereas Ukrainian colleagues are working very actively. And for example, Indonesia, start publishing in papers, not in agency, also result of these studies. So the role of this methodology in some other instruments, it's on a milestone as approach. First of all, as I mentioned, initial energy system planning and continuous study of energy system as a whole and role of nuclear power. Inter methodology, it's more strategic systems, instrument for preparation of national strategy. And so named milestones approach, consideration of infrastructure on every steps of preparation and start of operation of first nuclear power plant. It's more, if compared, this is strategy. This is tactic, if you know some system. Not all member states, before construction of first nuclear power plant, used all three approaches. Currently, taking into account new cameras, only Belarus walks in all these three areas. But Belarus take from point of view of social, if you remember, from point of view of territory, contaminated territory, Belarus has biggest area after Chernobyl and to prepare decision about construction of first nuclear power plant was really very, very, very hard work. For example, United Arab Emirates walks only in area of energy planning and milestone approach. Some states, till now, walks in in-prem methodology due to they understand that it is not yet ready technology acceptable for their countries. It's also very important effect to avoid big mistakes in this area. So, and, of course, we have some steps for preparation of data, where is some service from agency, could be help for implementation of NISA. And NISA, of course, has some instruments that now available by electronic systems, for example, economic support tools. And some what's about SNS is next stage, it's analysis support for enhanced nuclear energy sustainability. Taken to account development of INPRA, I mentioned in previous lecture project gains, project synergy. Additionally, we had efforts to establish some system for analysis of key indicators for innovative nuclear energy systems. Plus, it was project kind. And it's application, it's completed, but not yet published, project SNESA. ROAD maps, it's some special tools for ROAD mapping of transition to global sustainable nuclear energy. And taken to account all these instruments. Finally, we announced three years ago that we have new service for member states, analysis support for enhanced nuclear energy sustainability. It's instrument for preparation and analysis of probable scenarios. Well, comparison with NISA. NISA, it's assessment in six areas. Yes, it's assessment. Adhere analysis, here is scenario modeling, message NS, comparative evaluation of different scenarios in nuclear energy system, ROAD mapping, economical analysis. So truly speaking, INPRA and agency now has a lot of tools for analysis of strategy. Of course, it is not easy to organize analysis. For example, we can take information, treat it and to provide for member states. It's so difficult and one of reason why we start work in a real capacity building in member states plus university courses, master courses, it is necessary for member states, it's necessary to have some expert who can operate by these instruments. So we have a number of publications and instruments and in tool kits for these systems. And I will split some slides with big text due to us and us, it's really a system for support for decision makers, finally. So from my point of view, it's much better if every member states that have potential idea to start nuclear program or have nuclear program should have two or three experts in some academy or in ministry of energy who can work in area of these instruments. So in that case, the member states will have ability in scenario modeling in comparative evaluation of energy system, road mapping for national nuclear energy and it's economic elevation of alternative nuclear energy systems. We had idea but unfortunately not easy realized in frame of the agency to support regional studies. Unfortunately, agency has very specific system with works with member states, not with regions. Well, it's some political group, it's political group, it is not technical activity. But for example, this January, we announced, DDG, my colleague, DDG Chudakov announced for Commonwealth of Independent States suggestions to try to apply this system for example, for Central Asia. Here where is Kazakhstan Uzbekistan that would like to start nuclear program, Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan has some specific energetic system. Maybe it is interesting to consider other all system but unfortunately we should receive request from all these members. Some examples, the final. For example, I mentioned today, their colleagues, experts in INPRA, regularly considered some main multi-component nuclear power systems. Multi-component, it's thermal spectrum reactors, fast reactor, so maybe some other innovative systems and fuel cycle. In first decade, it was NISA for close fuel cycle, I mentioned before, a role of thorium. It was also considered not only as scenario study, this is NISA also. And next decade, it was more strong strategic studies and preparation of tools, also mentioned before. And now we have another stage, we start applying of SNS for full scale nuclear power strategy taken to account a multi-component system. It's first step, consideration, the role of nuclear power systems, it's assessment of nuclear energy system based on close nuclear fuel cycle, fast reactors. You see it was a very strong group of countries, Canada, China, France, India, Japan, Korea, Russian Federation, Ukraine in this system and it was really very interesting study that gave impulse to continue some other project. For example, Gains and some particular projects. Synergy also brought a lot of interesting point from institutional area related multi-component system of nuclear power. And now we have a new study, two weeks ago we had first technical meeting after two preparatory meeting. Step forward, it's very good title, step forward. It's applying of SNS package and national tools. Some countries has some national tools, for example, US, Russia and colleagues from Pakistan also would like to use the national tools for evaluating of nuclear energy system and scenarios that involve step by step small number of innovative nuclear energy installations, fast reactors or maybe advanced type reactors, type of molten soil, accelerate driving system, thermal spectrum reactor with modified cores and fusion hybrid systems. And we have just started this study. Next line for example, let me write here, some minutes. SMR and transportable nuclear power plants. Truly speaking, we spoke a lot of about future using of this system, but INPRA also was one of the first group in the agency that underlined the role of small and medium size reactor in the future. And our colleagues were first group who considered some problems related to transportable nuclear power plants. We had one study published before. Next study of some particular cases. And now we have NISA and ASENES for some SMRs. It's also illustration. It's one of first published studies related legal in institutional issues and nuclear power plants. I will touch on Friday a little bit this study, but I would like to underline that really colleagues who worked in this for this collaborative study found that we have really a number of gaps for realization of transportable nuclear power plants. If one country is sent to another country, this system, first of all, it's very complicated life cycle. From other hand, a lot of questions related, related this technology implementation. And as a result of, one of result of this study, we start another study, case study for deployment of factory fuels, small modular reactors. And now we have mentioned study of deployment on factory fuels. We have NISA for free SMRs, also I mentioned. We had some years ago, just before COVID dialogue forum related opportunities and challenges of small modular reactors. And we start SNS study, sustainable deployment scenarios for small modular reactors. This study agnised as a complex of case studies. We have totally 10 case studies, Armenia, Belarus, China, Mexico, Romania, two studies from Russia, Thailand, and US not participate, participate only as observer here. Okay, so it would be some, truly speaking, exercises in this area, but we can extract some conclusions from these studies for further implementation of these approaches for strategic consideration for state, for member states. And just some months ago, we also started a new project for consideration of legal and institutional issues for fusion facilities. It's also a lot of flux. From technical point of view, a lot of people have dreams to have fusion tomorrow, but from many points of view, it's not easy. And simple conclusion, in-pro methodology and in-pro tools are very instruments for strategic planning and off-nuclear power system. And systematic, we have systematic promotion of nuclear innovation and understanding of their role in sustainable development. Thank you. Thank you very much, Aleksandr. Thank you very much, Dr. Bichkov. Now we have time for a couple of the questions here, or from our online audience. Okay, please. Thank you, Aleksandr. Thank you, Dr. Bichkov, for these very interesting presentations. I have one question about the... You speak about the NESA, NESA, Nuclear Energy System Assessment, and the SNS, at the end. So you need to use a lot of data, in fact, to progress. I think difficulty is maybe to collect enough data to check the, I would say, accuracy or coherency of the data, because there are different sources and so on. How do you process? Do you have some methodology to improve the reliability because the accuracy of the conclusions, of course, is linked to the data you use for that? How do you process? First of all, this is Nuclear Energy System Assessment. Assessment, it's assessment. It is not calculation. It is not special calculation with detailed verification. It's system for consideration of tendency, consideration of role of some energy in the system from point of view of some basic principles and some other things. So sometimes it is not necessary to have data as, for example, for calculation of fuel cycle. Of course, for next step for analysis, if you would like to have a more strong strategy, of course, it's necessary to have initial data, results of some calculation of your neutronic balance and some other things. Take into account the results of reprocessing, tails and some other other things. But it is a little bit different thing. We are working in area of consideration of scenarios. We are working in area of consideration of probable routes. And it's also a very important point. The INPRA can find a number of gaps in different areas. So here, for example, I mentioned NISA for Belarus. Yes, it was really detailed studies for whole cross-catholic systems and some other other things, but reactor systems also was very close, but location of this nuclear power plant was another than Australia. From point of view of detailed political situation, it was not so important, but from point of view of long-term strategy and using of nuclear power in the state that have no natural resources. It was very good demonstrative case study, but it was assessment. It was not real planning, but it was additional cornerstone for establishing of national strategy in Belarus. They had analysis of energy mix. They found no resources. They continue in pro-study. They found that really they can have stable system and decreasing source also very important, some cross-border transmission of electricity. And it's also a very important point for sustainability. And finally, they agreed that to the earth it should be enough for first stage. Plus later they work in some name infrastructure and milestones with agency, with regular visits. You can check of flow and some other things. So it's element of development of national program. It is not direct calculation. Thank you very much. Please, but... Thank you, Dr. Urbagov. Okay. That's true. I cannot make sure that's true. If I understand correctly, I think that Impro is a management guide for decision-making. For developing any technology for any areas. This is... Not only I have one picture related... Oh, it was related to NISA, but designers... For example, now we have a group of NISA related role of some technology in energy systems. We have a group of studies related to fast reactors. Russia is published, China is ready to publish, and we're expecting Indian study. Next, we now have group of NISA for SMR, Argentina, Korea, Russia, and we're expecting one French model. Unfortunately, U.S. started whole tech, but they have no budget. So it's also useful for designer or for manufacturer, maybe totally for... For any decision-making, for example... Here you are right. In some cases... For decision-making, or maybe for an additional validation of your decision. It's also... Or maybe sometimes it could be used for searching of some gaps or insufficient data. For example, result of BN 1200's NISA mainly focused on... It's one of conclusion that designer has no enough data for full-scale vision of role of this system and future nuclear energy. So really, designer really cannot have all necessary data. But we are printing this, publishing this, thoughts not very often, but it's important. Okay, thank you. You told about that some application in some countries, like Armenia and Belarus. So, but about the technology, you generally, for example, for one technology that some countries are calibrated for a sustainable assessment of this technology. So it's related to the... When we want to know about the sustainability, it's very related. First of all, you need to select technology, but if taken into account countries, state NISA, it's... These studies consider different systems. For example, Armenia was one of full-scale... Oh, it's completed study related small country with small sources and with isolated grid. It's also very important, due to... Here, if you have only one nuclear power plant, you have a lot of system for cross cutting and this study demonstrated that without international cooperation and area of spend fuel management, this program will have a lot of problems. But if Armenia or similar states will continue international cooperation, we'll include international flows and fuel cycle. In that case, their program will be sustainable. So it's... I know, thank you. So I will have two more lectures about fuel cycle, taking into account also some... Okay, then we will have to... Okay, now we have 15 minutes in delay. I guess we should go for the coffee break. Or we skip coffee break. Let me know. Skipping coffee break or go to... No, understand, understand. Okay, okay. Alexander decided by his eye to me. So we... Please, but please don't be late. At 11 here, please come back to the office.