A discussion of the rights of sentient entities. Drawing inspiration from quantum complementarity, defends a complementary notion of ontological dualism, countering zombie hypotheses. Sans zombie concerns, ethical discussions should therefore focus on assessing consciousness purely in terms of the physical-functional properties of any putatively conscious entity.
Andrew's research interest relates to both the ontology and ethics of consciousness. Andrew is interested in the ethical significance of consciousness, including the way in which our understanding of consciousness impacts our treatment of other humans, non-human animals, and artifacts. Andrew defends the view that the relationship between physical and conscious properties is one of symmetrical representation, rather than supervenience. Andrew argues that on this basis we can confidently approach ethical questions about consciousness from the perspective of 'common-sense' materialism. SngSum2012 d2s2
Do you shuffle with the Philosophical Zombie Apocalypse?
Has the so called 'living' used zombification to heap undue social pressure on you? and use zombiehood as an excuse to diminish your rights as a sentient entity?
Its time to come out of your coffins and make a stand!