 What's up, guys? It's the night before Passover, and I've got everything I need to find that last bit of hummets. I've got the feather, I've got a candle, I've got a spoon to brush the last bit of hummets into. I've got the bracha, right? So, right after we do Mareev, we search all the apartments of the house for the leaven bread, and make sure not even the smallest piece of leaven hummets remains in the house. Traditionally, this search is conducted by the light of a candle, and the hummets, the grains, swept up with a feather onto a wooden spoon, which is then burned the following morning. The hummets, not the spoon. Okay, a blessing should not be recited in vain, so a few pieces of bread are left around. The commandment is to remove the leaven, and that way, it can be fulfilled. Okay, so a friend, Jewish friend says at 40, it's time you come up with the Alt-Right Haggadah. So, with the Alt-Right Haggadah, we ask, why is this outgroup different from all other outgroups? Just kidding, they're all the same. All right, so why on this night do we measure verbal and spatial IQ, but on all other nights, it's just spatial. All right, so on the Seder plate of the Alt-Right, the part of the Seder, we've got a branch of eucalyptus. Why do we have a branch of eucalyptus? Because eucalyptus are an invasive species, and they can run wild in certain environments, giving rise to the eucalyptus question, and they can destroy the native vegetation and outcompete the natives for access to water. So, these invasive species can just run wild. Now, invasive species have a time and a place, right, but you may want to like have certain preserves free from invasive species. This is the eucalyptus question, and then you do Lashana Harbour Bar Charlottesville. Then, before we break the middle, Martza, we will read a passage from Duvid's multiple-truth hypothesis, and then we will all get together and we'll talk about what's worse for your health, to drink four full cups of mega-high-sugar grape juice, or four cups of dry red wine, 11% alcohol. So, is it better to get diabetes or cirrhosis? And what's up with Trump's own social network truth? Why is truth in the oven? What happened to that? And, friends, they're really enjoying the panic over Elon Musk buying Twitter. It reminds me of 2016. You think Elon Musk is doing this for his own profit? He's trying to save the country, guys. So, Ann Korter has already given the nod to DeSantis. So, Maddie Iglesias tweets, what is the free speech on Twitter dispute actually about in concrete terms? Trump's deactivation in the New York Post story about Hunter's laptop? Ann Korter tweets, no, it's about Gavin McGinnis, Babylon B, Libs of Tectoc, Laura Lermer, Alex Jones, Milo Yiannopoulos, Katie Hopkins, Chuck Johnson, Jesse Kelly, and so on and so on. So, Maddie Iglesias says, Twitter might just be better as a totally non-moderated, non-algorithmic, one-to-many broadcasting platform where you follow who you want to see and only their tweets. Maddie Iglesias says, in response to Ann Korter, my guess is silencing right-wing creeps while letting tankies, who are tankies, run wild, is net good for Republicans, less moderation, less algorithmic amplification and return to something closer to the traditional reverse chronological timeline would be good. So, you're probably thinking, what's on Richard Spencer's page? Michael tweets, Big Tech has had no interest in censoring their terms of service weren't enforced until 2017. The GOP led bipartisan Congress ordered Big Tech to censor Russian disinformation so they hired personnel to enforce that demand and they used that crew to start enforcing other violations. And Richard responds to Queen Ann, I'm pretty pathetic when this is the nonsense you're fighting for, Gavin McGinnis, Babylon B, Libs of TikTok, Chuck Johnson, did you forget that Big Delaske is banned too? And Colin Liddell tweets, people getting jacked by a must-taking of a Twitter-pushing-free speech, but most of the censorship has been driven by the US government pressure to counter Russian disinformation. So Musk's free speech agenda sets up a clash with the US government. And Antonio Garcia Martinez tweets, if Alon takes over, there will be a slew of left-wing gabs and parlours as the super woke threatened to leave Twitter. They'll all fail, just like the right-wing versions did and it'll be glorious to watch that just build your own people sulk and wail. Edward Dutton says, if I were a Saudi prince, I'd want to keep the western world woke and impotent as well. And Richard Spencer is still not getting on truth, right? His profile has been successfully created. Thank you for joining. Due to massive demand, we have placed you on our waitlist. We love you and you're not just a number to us, but your waitlist number is below number 494,227. So Richard says, I'm not a Elon Musk fanboy, but his purchasing of Twitter would be a good thing. I hope it happens. It's sad in a way that digital public space square needs to be rescued by a libertarian billionaire, but so be it. Shows the utter failure of Trump who was elected through social media to solve this problem through clear and reasonable legislation. Yes, we get it. Twitter is a private company. It's ridiculous to think that it doesn't have a public function. The regulating and protecting speech on digital platforms isn't far more important than protecting speech in public parks or sidewalks. Trump ultimately had no real agenda or vision, thus leaves no legacy. He addressed the digital platform question by threatening the end of section 230, the opposite of what should be done in building his own grift boondoggle truth. Criticisms are Musk, but he clearly wants to accomplish something in this sphere, and that's a good thing. That's a pretty good analysis there. Bye bye.