 As you said, the guideline was based originally on a statutory scheme and on directives, specific directives by Congress at a time in which more serious child pornography offenders were identified based on the volume, based on the number of photographs that they received in the mail. And that made totally total sense before when we didn't have the internet, when we didn't have distribution, but the way that the guideline is now structured based on that set of circumstances is leading to extreme disparities in the system because it's so easy for people to get volumes of this kind of material now by computers. Let me get this straight, lighter sentences for pedophiles is okay because everyone's doing it and they're giving lighter sentences because pedophiles can get more child porn on the internet than they used to be able to get by mail. So more child porn for pedos equals lighter sentences because critical race theory?