 not listening to you. I have no interest in talking to you at all. You have aligns yourself with terrorists, that's the end of the story. I have aligned myself with terrorists. You have as well. I was speaking to you about humanitarian hate to Palestinians, to innocent women, children. Do you know that the average age of the person killed by the Israeli government is five years old? And when I tell you that, does that target your heartstrings at all? No, I'm looking for a taxi. Would you please get out of my way? It's a really unprofessional and cruel and totally baseless thing to say. This is an elected official, and she called me a terrorist, because I asked her about humanitarian aid. I asked her about war crimes. Because you've aligned yourself with Hamas. I've aligned myself with Hamas. See, this is their argument. They say that if you support Palestinian lives, you're aligned with Hamas, and they use that to basically dehumanize Palestinians as well. Absolutely. Baseless rhetoric. So that they can continue to support Israel with impunity. They can continue to support the murder and the starvation of people with impunity. And there's nothing to say besides just throwing names. Really actually quite dangerous names. Absolutely. At constituents. That's right. We're voters. Yeah, we're Americans. I don't represent people in Wyoming. I don't represent people in Wyoming. I don't represent people in Wyoming. I don't represent people in Wyoming. Well, you support genocide. She just said that. So she just said if you're in Wyoming, listen to Wyoming constituents. If you don't support her views, she doesn't support you. She's not representing you. Why? Why? Man, you just said we have to align yourself with people who support Palestinians. So what about your Wyoming profile? That's what I said. I said Hamas. And what about me? Who's someone who's spoken for Palestinians and you keep saying that I support Hamas? You don't know me and I've never mentioned Hamas? We're not discussing Hamas. We're not discussing innocent civilian lives being lost to Israel's slaughter, being lost to genocide, which you clearly care nothing about. Well, we know what your legacy will be. Do you have a response? Is there something that they would do that would you with them say, I no longer support them? Is there a conflict in Syria? Is that concerning to you? A wider war in which the US would be drawn into? Or maybe you would be concerned with the hostages in which Israel just struck the high political figure of Hamas's grandchildren on the same, on Eid, no less, on the same day that they were supposed to have an exchange. Is that something that concerns you? Are you worried about the families in Israel who are begging and condemning the Palestinian refugees? Who do you represent? Is it the people financing your campaign? Do you answer? You're not. Clearly, you're not. She calls people terrorists. You are representative of the United States. What is your red line? What is your red line for the people in Gaza? What is your red line for families? Whose lives are you concerned with? Have you listened to maybe the doctors? Doctors against genocide or the people returning from Gaza who have described amputations with no anesthesia of shrapnel shredding children's faces of babies who weigh less after they're born because they're starving to death, mothers with C-sections who don't have anesthesia who then die later from complications, or maybe the women who have been stolen by the IDF outside of a hospital and then raped and then forced to wash their husbands with oxygen. And Israel has murdered most of its own hostages at this point, so for you all to keep talking about the hostages and becoming a moot point at this junction in the genocide, which is clearly a supporter of a genocide, your legacy is supporting a genocide. Good job, Congresswoman. Good job.