 Cooking rice in a high water-to-rice ratio reduces toxic arsenic content, meaning if you boil rice-like pasta and then drain off the water at the end, you can drop arsenic levels in half. 50% to 60% of the arsenic gets poured down the drain, whereas the typical way we make rice, boiling the water off in a rice cooker or pot, doesn't help. Or may even make things worse if the water you're using to cook the rice has arsenic in it, too. A problem that exists for about 3 million Americans is about 8% of public water supplies exceed the current legal arsenic limits. But cooking rice in excess water and then discarding efficiently reduces the amount of toxic arsenic in the cooked rice. Yeah, but how much nutrition are you pouring down the drain when you do that? We didn't know until now. Unpolished brown rice naturally contains nutrients that are lost when the bran layer and germ are removed to make white rice, to compensate since the 1940s white rice has had vitamins and minerals sprayed on it to, quote-unquote, enrich it. That's why cooking instructions for white rice specifically say don't rinse it and cook it in a minimal amount of water. In other words, the opposite of what you do to get rid of some of the arsenic. But brown rice has the nutrients inside, not just sprayed on. For example, rinsing white rice, like putting it in a colander under running water, removes much of the enriched vitamins sprayed on to the white rice surface during manufacture, removing most of the B vitamins, but has almost no effect on vitamins in whole grain brown rice because it's got the nutrition inside. Same thing with iron. Rinsing white rice reduces iron levels by like 3 fourths, but the iron in brown rice is actually in it, and so rinsing only reduces the iron concentration in brown rice by like 10%. But rinsing didn't seem to affect the arsenic levels, so why bother? Now if you really wash the rice, like agitate the uncooked rice in water for three minutes and then rinse and repeat, you may be able to remove about 10% of the arsenic, and so this research team recommends washing as well as boiling in excess water. But I don't know if the 10% is worth the extra wash time. But the boiling like pasta and then draining the excess water really does cut way down on the arsenic, and while that also takes a whack on the nutrition in white rice, the nutrient loss in brown rice is significantly less, because it's not so much enriched as it is rich in nutrition in the first place. Cooking brown rice in large amounts of excess water reduces the toxic arsenic by almost 60% and only reduces the iron content by 5%, but does reduce the vitamin content of brown rice by about half. Here it is graphically. A quick rinse of brown rice before you cook it doesn't lower arsenic levels, but boiling it instead of cooking to dry and draining off the excess water drops arsenic levels 40%. That was using like six parts water to one part rice. What if you use even more water, boiling at 10 to 1 water to rice? A 60% drop in arsenic levels. With white rice, you can rinse off a little arsenic, but after cooking you end up with similar final drops in arsenic content, but the iron gets wiped out in white rice by rinsing and cooking, whereas the iron in brown rice stays strong. Similar decrements in the B vitamins with cooking for brown and un-rinsed white, but once you rinse white rice, they're mostly gone before they even make it into the pot. What about percolating rice? We know regular rice cooking doesn't help, but boiling like pasta and draining does, steaming doesn't do much. But what about percolating rice is a radical rethink to optimize arsenic removal. So they tried like some mad scientist labs set up, but also just a regular off-the-shelf coffee percolator. But instead of putting coffee, they put rice. Percolating 20 minutes for white, 30 for brown, and got about a 60% drop in arsenic levels using a 12 to 1 water to rice ratio. Here's where the arsenic levels started and ended up. The squares are the brown rice, circles are the white, so raw brown may start out double that of raw white, but after cooking with enough excess water and draining, they end up much closer. Though 60% percolating at a 12 to 1 ratio was about what we got boiling at just 10 to 1, so I see no reason to buy a percolator. But even with that 60%, what does that mean? By boiling and draining a daily serving of rice, we could cut excess cancer risk more than half from like 165 times the acceptable cancer risk. It's only like 66 times the acceptable risk.