 I haven't read this article but I mean let's just let's take a second and appreciate that title women are disproportionately hurting our country yikes now when was this written you ask 2004 1983 I don't know it was written august 30th 2022 let me read you that title one more time women are disproportionately hurting our country venice prager is one of those people he just like wants to be known for saying really stupid things but the reason why he doesn't have as much clout as other right-wing commentators uh despite the prager you stuff because of the funding for that but the reason why as a commentator he's less successful is because he is boring as shit nobody wants to listen to Dennis Prager it's like he's falling asleep like i'm talking about Dennis Prager and poopy is bored he's trying to like you know um dig in his little chair there nobody wants to hear about Dennis Prager you good poopy he's that's his cue he's telling me to stop he doesn't like Dennis Prager but let's dive in a little bit i haven't pre-read this so if it has any yikes takes then you've been warned but let's let's see what he has to say i'm sure he's making a very um persuasive and cogent argument when i was in college i read a book by george gilder one of the wisest thinkers of the last half century titled naked no man's which had a deep impact on me it was about single men and all the pathologies associated with them for example gilder drove home the point that the biggest factor concerning violent crime was that it is overwhelmingly committed by single men while there was no danger i would say no chance that i would commit a violent crime though i was at the time single this fact along with others in the book made me a lifelong advocate of marriage okay what if there's like other factors that lead to violent crime such as socioeconomic conditions poverty other things um no it's just if you're single you're going to be a criminal okay maybe statistically that's what this person argues but aren't you like a little bit more intellectually curious we're like maybe it's not that simple no it's Dennis Prager of course he's not i also came to realize that raising good men was the most important thing society could do if it doesn't the male propensity to physical aggression and predatory sexual behavior will wreak havoc therefore raising boys to control their natures is fundamental to society avoiding chaos so he's starting off trying to pin blame on men but really it's women who are disproportionately ruining the country over the course of a lifetime however i have come to realize that while society was right about males it was wrong about females whether spoken or unspoken most people thought that girls just didn't need to be raised to control their natures nearly as much as boys did okay we're getting into some really like oof territory here and i don't know where the fuck is gonna go but right now if you just stopped right here i can't imagine what he's gonna get into rape apologia essay apologia i have no clue but oof it's true that females are not inclined to violence or predatory sexual behavior as men are but this hardly means that girls and women don't have to learn to control their natures okay how so on the contrary as i have been telling parents for many years now they need to teach their daughters to control their natures just as much as they teach their sons to do so okay when you say control their natures what exactly do you mean maybe hold specify here but that sounds really weird have you ever heard a normal human being say hey are you teaching your daughter to control their natures i'd say what the fuck are you talking about what do you mean control their natures like stop farting too frequently like what does that mean specifically girls have to learn to control their emotions oh okay not guys though not guys i mean he supports the president donald trump who just threw a temper tantrum on truth social the other day where he made like 60 plus posts boosting qanon sharing fake evanka tweets um that's pretty emotional is it not so guys don't have to control their emotions just girls can guys never get overly emotional i'm trying to figure out like what's the point why is this as he claims in the article um hurting the country government couldn't function if women were too emotional like i'm just trying to figure it out like you can be emotional and there could still be good outcomes for example like you can care so much about healthcare that it makes you feel emotional when you think about all of the unnecessarily unnecessary deaths that you fight for that particular policy of single payer so i feel like emotion isn't inherently bad it's just it's part of the human experience so i feel like he's gonna really have to do a lot of argumentation you need statistics you need anecdotes you need um macro data meta analyses but do we think that uh denise prager is going to provide us with that of course not of course not just as the male sexual drive and violent impulses can overwhelm their conscious and their ability to think and act rationally emotions can do the same thing in girls and women overwhelm their conscious and their ability to think and act rationally holy shit this is wow i'll just keep reading however it should be obvious that at least two generations of parents especially among the well educated did not teach many of their daughters to control their emotions and think rationally maybe it's because people who are more well educated don't actually view the opposite sex as inferior or defective inherently because of some dumb stereotype that you believe until this day again as if men aren't fucking emotional like to be violent is that not inherently an emotional you know um thing to do like like what a fucking idiot the result is that women are disproportionately active in doing damage to our society how do you come to this conclusion how do you come to this conclusion holy shit the most obvious example is education american schools teach less and and indoctrinate more than ever before how so what because they're teaching history is that indoctrination just getting facts well facts don't care about your feelings dipshit big city public and most private schools are damaging young americans to an extent and in ways no one imagined just a few years ago young children are prematurely sexualized they are for example exposed to drag queen story hour okay so that's the problem in class and in local libraries from the age of five these feature a man dressed as a woman reading and dancing for them oh no he'd rather than read the bible where it talks about god committing genocide and how that's good because he promises to never do it again remember Noah's Ark that's a really wholesome uh story that's told to children but like you need to first of all prove that there's a correlation between indoctrination and children being overly sex sexualized and women being overly emotional and once you determine that there's a correlation you have to prove that there's a causal link but he's not going to do that he's just saying well like look they're workifying our kids and women are too emotional and that's the reason why you know you can draw a direct line between uh you know drag queen story hour and women being too emotional how is it because women like when they see you know drag queens reading to kids they think wow our society has come so far that it makes me so happy it brings tears to my eyes this would never be permissible 50 years ago like is that why i mean this is this is such a fallacious argument this is quintessential conjecture that only an imbecile would be able to fabricate and who is facilitating all of this in virtually every case a woman 92 percent of kindergarten teachers are women 75 percent of all teachers are women and 85 percent of librarians are women okay so that's where he's he's bringing in some hard data so because he's established that um teachers are are indoctrinating children and since most teachers are women well there's the problem makes sense right checkmate atheists or checkmate liberals i instinctively say checkmate atheists because that was a meme for so long but we've got to change that checkmate libs uh and they are teaching young people to despise their country the creator of the poisonous 1619 project is a woman how dare she how dare she to feel guilty about their white privilege or to think of themselves as victims if they are black even worse they're indoctrinating them in non-binary thinking regarding uh regarding sex and gender these ideas originated in university gender studies uh and women's studies departments nearly all of whose professors are female no stat there though so you're gonna have to provide us with a citation teachers and their unions did great damage to young people during COVID-19 they demanded because of their hypochondria and an apparent inability to apply reason to COVID-19 risk that schools be closed for nearly two years teachers unions in big cities threatened to go on strike if schools open okay first of all you're talking about their fucking supposed hypochondria more than a million americans died you piece of shit more than one million americans died due to the global pandemic and you're just brushing that aside what a piece of shit in general teachers are just radical arms of the democratic party and progressive movements they are overwhelmingly composed of women members and women leaders the head of the national education association is a woman uh as there are heads of los angeles chicago and new york city teachers unions so literally his argument is that like there are women teachers and women are you know in charge of a lot of organizations therefore you know women are indoctrinating children thus women are being trained to be overly emotional the argument just doesn't make sense like he's not making any sense here the points that he's making are easily disprovable because there's nothing to like back up this the uh the claim that he's making here women physicians and healthcare workers are the vanguard of ruining young people's lives at children's hospitals that push giving young people purity blocking hormones and opposite gender hormones performing hysterectomies and mastectomies on healthy girls who say they are boys and chemically or physically castrating healthy boys who say they are girls oh so it's women physicians as well right they're the ones doing all the gender forming care first of all you're just lying they're castrating healthy boys okay has denis prager ever condemned circumcision because if we're talking about like mutilation of genitals of children who are too young to consent um does he know that more than 60 of young cis boys in this country are circumcised when they're infants this is an irreversible procedure is denis prager going to come out and denounce circumcision well no because who gives a shit because that has nothing to do with you know trans people so why you know be consistent when you can just demonize trans people and claim that they're castrating uh young boys no actually you um you cannot get bottom surgery until you're 18 period and he can claim that genitals are being mutilated but that's just not true and gender forming care puberty blockers uh HRT these are medically necessary they save lives so i'm sorry we should have the freedom to allow parents to make a decision in concert with their doctor and child about what's best for them women are at the vanguard of perverting the medical profession so now like he's just straight up making things up right because at first he said oh well most teachers statistically are women but now he's just like oh well women they're the reason why everything is bad in this country they're at the vanguard of perverting the medical profession um last week an organization called physicians for reproductive health published an open letter to the nation's reporters and news editors demanding that they censor anti-abortion activists we're asking for a commitment from the community of media outlets reporting on abortion to keep in mind the true danger that you present when interviewing anti-abortion extremists you are giving the opportunity for dangerous lies to spread first of all that doesn't seem like censorship it just seems like they want these news people to fact check forced birthers which i'd agree with that as regards the demand that news outlets censor pro-life individuals forced birther really you're not pro-life you're forced birther what you support endangers the lives of women and girls um and the open letter was signed by more than 60 medical doctors and other healthcare professionals nearly every signatory was a woman so i wonder if he took the time to count if you know Dennis Prager walks into a store and he sees that like most of the people there are women does he automatically assume that that's going to be a bad experience like this is deeply deeply misogynistic and what this tells me is that he's got some serious personal issues to work out you need to not blame women you need to blame yourself and maybe you're the one who's being a little bit too emotional if you're you're this like you have this visceral reaction to just the existence of women if you're that triggered by women existing you're the one who's overly emotional you're the one with the problem not the women dummy so uh women clergy say even religious people if you're a religious woman you're bad too sorry you thought that you can you know win some points with Dennis Prager for being religious nope you're bad too women clergy have been at the vanguard of pushy christianity and Judaism to the left uh oh can't do that can't you know adopt uh any different values to kind of grow at the time so your religion doesn't become relevant that's bad uh leaving mainstream churches and synagogues increasingly empty of course the increasingly feminized male male clergy go along with their female colleagues so it's not just the women it's the men who are feminized because we all know that Dennis Prager is peak masculinity folks when I look at him I think goddamn that's an alpha how does somebody even be that masculine right and women are disproportionately supportive of cancel culture the greatest threat to free speech in American history again where's the citation for this are you citing polls he's pulling all of this out of his asshole it should go without saying but it's undoubtedly necessary to note that there are many women doing great even heroic things for our society and that many men are working to wreck it oh so how charitable of him to add that qualifier at the end but for those who associate women with instinctively protecting children or with being supportive of a traditionally religious life this era in american history has provided something of a shock perhaps that's because mentally you've never left the 1800s and like if you're questioning whether or not this is misogynistic because he criticized men at the beginning substitute women with any other group of people just try it it's very bad is it not