 Let me turn now to Marie-Kévinier Mie for the first Prime Minister of Finland, as I already said. And what we are expecting from you, you have the last word, that's all, Marie. So please, we will benefit from your understanding of the very complex and multi-layered and multi-dimensional issue that we are dealing with. Please. Thank you very much, and thank you, first of all, for the invitation. So happy to be here. Again, thank you, Thierry and the organizers for letting us discuss this interesting theme here today. And a lot has been already said, and it's always difficult to be the last speaker and find new angles to the discussion. But a question I would like to actually answer is that what did COVID-19 change something? I mean, did it kind of mutate globalize into a certain direction? And actually, it kind of did good for globalization, and at least it brought some new elements. And I think that the positive aspect really is that it underlined the essence of international cooperation and multilateralism. It brought very high on the agenda the need for global action like cooperation in vaccine production and delivery and also joint measures preventing the virus to spread. And it showed how dependent we are from each other. And also in that sense kind of made us all see how important it's also in the future to make sure that we can assure the global value change to function. But also it made visible that it's utmost important to have a very good international cooperation. But also it showed us some flaws when it comes to taking care of the pandemic and organizing everything. But positive also is that it actually didn't trigger an increased willingness to implement unnecessary trade and trade related protectionist measures in the area of goods. And Minister Bach already actually referred to this fact. And when you look at, for example, the report prepared to the G20 countries by WTO, UNCTED and OECD, you can see there that since the outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic, 140 trade and trade related measures in the area for goods have been implemented by G20 economies. And 72% of them were trade facilitating nature and 28% only could be considered trade restrictive. But then when you look at the rollback of those measures, the trade facilitating measures has been, the rollback of them, has been shifted on the rollback of trade restrictive measures. So really you have to be careful in order to watch what's happening. And another good example of that positive progress is the tax agreement in June where 130 tourist addictions are updated to international tax agreement concerning multinational enterprises. So very good steps forward have been made. But many of you already pointed out that it is challenging to govern the international order and really make sure that the rules-based international order is able to kind of manage the biggest challenges we are facing. And I think that COVID really made visible to megatrends where these international rules-based order is needed, namely digitalization and climate change. So it's the most important in these areas to achieve better multilateral governance frameworks and international rules. For example, when it comes to digitalization, we really have to be able to facilitate the digital transformation of our economies and really create effective value-based digital regulatory frameworks and state-of-the-art global standards. And Bertrand already mentioned when it comes to climate change, the need for a comprehensive global carbon pricing system that is one of the really concrete tools which we should reach in order to tackle the climate change by the rules decided together at the global level. But it is still kind of a bit disappointing and that despite the fact that we all have seen during this pandemic how important it is to have deep global cooperation, and how useful globalization is that we still have protectionism and populism which threaten to unravel kind of the decades of international cooperation and openness. And I think that we really have to put people in the center and this is very much a political question as was mentioned by Masoud earlier in his intervention. So we have to look at the national level and the national policies and there is no silver bullet and I think that we have been discussing kind of the ways how to make everyone see the benefits of globalization and what kind of policies should be implemented in order to make globalization work for all. But I think that we have all the elements on board already. We need more information and also we have to tackle the misinformation. And it's kind of alarming that in many countries you don't have specific policies introduced or frameworks to guide kind of the response to miss and disinformation. So spreading information and also tackling the misinformation are those tools which should be used in order to kind of make everyone see the benefits of globalization. But then as I already said kind of the third point when it comes to the recipe how to make it politically accepted to really move forward in the global governance and also making sure that the globalization really works also in the future. Is that we have not been able in many countries to make sure that the benefits of globalization are not shared equally and everyone has the opportunity to participate in the society. And this is something which we really have to pay attention make sure that everyone has the access to education and also you need active labor market policies social protection and so on. I think there's already those issues mentioned many times when when it comes to kind of the recipe how to make people understand the benefits of globalization and also how to make the globalization work better for all. Thank you. Thank you very, very much indeed Marie for the stress you're putting on fair share of the bounties of globalization as one of the major problem we have to cope with. I'm struck by the fact that when I hear all all members of this panel. One of the element which they underlined was the acceleration of underlying trends the the formidable amplification and acceleration through all possible dimensions and it seems to me that the the speed limit. In some respect has been over past and our own people are saying it goes too fast please cool down try to have a slower speed and we cannot the problem is that we cannot.