 Good evening all. You're all very welcome. Thanks very much for joining me and I have a bit of a read through the comments that have been coming in. Lots of discussion about fascism and I do want to talk a little bit about fascism this evening but there's also a lot of other things I need to talk about this evening. I want to talk a little bit about Batley and Spen and what's been going on there. A few bits of news. I've also got another letter or Kim Ledbetter the Labour candidate there has put out another letter which I will show you and it's actually funny. It is actually funny. The woman has no shame clearly. It is quite funny. But what I want to do first is say a few thank yous. I want to, we've had the faff, frankly, that is sorting out the leaflets for Royal Mail which is a faff and I've had no involvement in it so it wasn't my faff but it is a faff and I want to thank Tom, Colin, Josie and Jim for sorting these. And Jim for driving them there this morning. I also want to thank Diane and Nigel who you may be able to see just behind me there's a book, The Splendid and the Vile by Eric Larson which was sent to me by Diane Nigel. It was about life during the Blitz which I will read. I think I've got a list as long as you are of books but I definitely do want to read that and thank you very much for sending it to me. And yesterday, Diane gave me this and I want to say thank you for this. I will find pride of place for this. This is, you can't really see it with the reflections going on here. This is David and Goliath and I think we can guess or immediately understand the symbolism of that one. Thank you, Anne, that's absolutely lovely and I will find a place, a good place for it. Right, let's start with a bit of news and as always let's start with a little bit of news on where we are in our hopes to get back our basic freedoms. Let's have a look at what's going on with coronavirus, first of all. So it is looking good for the 19th of July, says Boris Johnson. He said, Boris Johnson said 19 July is still looking good for the date when all COVID restrictions can be lifted in England. Although he has downplayed any suggestion this date might come earlier. The Prime Minister said cases of the Delta variant forced identified in India were still rising and the priority was to keep other variants out of the UK. This reminds me of something that I saw the other day that I just, you have to laugh, you have to laugh. Labour complaining about lack of border control and the lack of border control had allowed different variants to come into the UK. Shameless, absolutely shameless, it's either laugh or cry sometimes, but you have to laugh at Labour having a go at the Tories for lack of border control. I mean, incredible and there won't be any border control, just variants of various different kinds are, I don't think we've seen the last of the variants. The second piece of news on this, the Scotland's First Minister has defended the decision to impose a ban on non-essential travel with Manchester and Salford because of high COVID rates. Nicola Sturgeon said she had the duty to keep Scotland as safe as possible. Again, you can't make this up, you can't make it up. Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Bornham continued his criticism of the restrictions saying he felt people in his region had been insulted by the move and lack of consultation. So just there is that Nicola Sturgeon has banned travel to and from presumably Greater Manchester because of high COVID rates there because she has a duty to keep Scotland safe. Scotland still has its open borders to the world and there's a lot out there that could threaten its people, but never mind. Third then, Wales football fans have been told not to travel to Amsterdam for the next round of Euro 2020 in the Netherlands. Wales Health Minister Eleonard Morgan said police in Amsterdam had advised they would not be letting Welsh fans into the country. Seems to be a lot of travel bans going on, doesn't there? All three are about travel so far. The shame not so concerned about travel at other times. Scotland midfielder tests positive for COVID-19. Father recovers from COVID-coma to climb Snowden. Those are the top five bits of news on it. Delta variant case is still going up and but we're still looking good to end all restrictions on the 19th of July. I want to talk about fascism and racism. This has come to me and if you haven't read my Sunday column and I realise that for the last two weeks my Sunday column has been published on a Monday. But I thought it was better than not publishing it at all. The last two weekends have obviously been busy. I've been travelling around. I'll tell you more about that fairly soon. It came to my mind that I really want to look at definitions of this. The effect, the impact that being accused of these two words has is immeasurable. Absolutely immeasurable. People are terrified of being called racist, we know this. People are terrified of being called fascists, we know this as well. This morning in my Sunday column I decided to have a look at what it actually means. It will start with fascist. If you look at the Britannica Encyclopedia, one of the things it will tell you is that there is no clear definition. Of fascism. It is something that is debated. There have been various different parties, political movements, political ideologies, particularly in the 20th century in Europe. Which were known as fascists, but which themselves had major differences between them. For example, the Nazis in Germany and Mussolini's people in Italy. Their philosophies with regards to Jews, for example, were quite different, at least in the earlier days. There is essentially no clear definition. At least if you look at it in great detail. So I went to, instead of an Encyclopedia, to a dictionary. And this is the definition that I found. A political philosophy, movement or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual. And that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader with severe economic social regimentation and forcible suppression of opposition. Now I started to discuss forcible suppression of opposition. This, I think, is something that even looking around on various different definitions of this, Encyclopedias and dictionaries. This is from the Merriam-Webster dictionary, the one I've just read. This will usually appear. Forcible suppression of opposition. At what point have I or most of the people on my side of this debate? And let's be clear, the reason we're called fascists is because we don't want open border mass immigration and we object to religious barbarism. We're not afraid to point out where and what religions are the danger, the great danger. And we're not afraid to point out that that religion is and has a massive influence in our society as a result of mass immigration. This is two and two equals four territory. But because we pointed out, we're called fascists. At what point, if we take forcible suppression of opposition, at what point have I or anyone on my side? So if we take people like Pamela Geller, Tommy Robinson, Robert Spencer, Gert Wilders, people who speak out with the same views on those two same issues. At what point have we tried to suppress opposition? I have always called for an open debate. And I'm still calling for an open debate. On the other hand, what I and all the other people that I've just mentioned have been subject to is threats of violence, cancel culture, intimidation, and you can see that intimidation all over social media at the moment. The Antifa lot are organizing, if you like, or trying to organize to be in badly next Saturday, the 26th, which is our day of action, and to make sure we don't quote, walk freely. They call us fascists while saying that we can't walk freely. They'll make sure we can't walk freely. We struggle even to get services that other people take for granted. For example, leaflet delivery. And by the way, if anyone in badly would like to earn some money doing some leaflet deliveries, please do get in touch. We can't organize that either. No one will do it for us. We have had approval from the Royal Mail, but we will have to see whether or not that actually ends up with delivered leaflets. We'll work on these, we'll be optimistic and work on the assumption that those leaflets will be delivered. I tried to organize an interview with someone who had been subjected to violence in badly because he was white. He wouldn't speak to me. At the last minute he wouldn't speak to me because he's afraid and I understand, he and his family are afraid and I understand entirely why that is. He's afraid because the police won't protect people on our side of the debate. We know this. His job and perhaps the job of his wife or other family members will be threatened by this. And they'll be threatened and this is how it works. Someone says something, for example on social media or participates in a political event, whatever it may be, that is disliked by the extreme left. So the anti-fa, etc. crowd. They'll find out where that person is employed, hand them on social media and threaten all sorts of boycotts and these companies are weak, weak, weak and they give in immediately. A great example of this is GB News and a few, it had been broadcasting for a couple of days when already the anti-fa types, the left had started their campaign on social media to stop big companies advertising with GB News. This is the intimidation and this amounts to suppression of opposition. So the only people who I can see engaged in the forcible suppression of opposition is the left. And I know that that's a very broad word but you get who I mean. You do, you get who I mean. You're talking about the socialist workers, the Labour Party, the anti-fa types, this and that against racism types. This is who I mean by the left and they are the only ones that I can see, I'm certainly not, engaged in the forcible suppression of opposition. They also, another characteristic listed here, severe economic and social regimentation. Well the social regimentation bleeds into what I've just been describing. No freedom of association if you belong to the wrong groups, you risk losing your job, you risk being subjected to that intimidation. Freedom of association is gone. Freedom of expression, it's about the social and a political right I suppose. That's gone, absolutely. And as far as economics goes, well yes, severe regimentation of economics is a fundamental characteristic of left wing politics. Always will be, always has been socialism, communism, severe regimentation of the economy, headed by a dictatorial leader. At what point have I, Pamela Geller, any of the rest of the people I've mentioned? Oh and that's another thank you I want to give actually, it's to thank Pamela Geller who has given me free access to her website and an audience in the United States to help us fundraise for this, so thank you very much. But at what point have any of us advocated for dictatorial leadership? We're all Democrats, each and every one of us who want freedom of speech, free and open debate. And based upon that free and open debate, the electorate should cast their vote, not based upon lies and smears. This is not dictatorship, democracy and dictatorship are the opposites of each other by very definition. What I and the people I mention advocate for is democracy, not dictatorship. On the other hand, if you look at the extreme left in practice and what its influence has been throughout history around the world, communism for example, and the communist heroes of the world, dictators, dictators, if not in name, then in nature. To exalt nation and often race above the individual is another part of this definition. We're now granted for most definitions of fascism there is a nationalistic element in it. That it isn't the case with the left, it's the only characteristic however that's missing. But to place race above individual, who is it that manifests that particular idea in modern British society? So is it me or is it the left? The left are absolutely obsessed, obsessed with race, obsessed with it. And you can see this manifest in various different ways. The individual is subjugated in favour of race based political philosophies. So where does this show up? Well an example I used in my column today was the rape gangs. I do talk about the rape gangs a lot, for reasons that are probably obvious but they're the most grotesque example. I can think of, of placing race based politics and a destination that left wingers seek to reach using race based politics. Let me explain what I mean by that. The rape of girls was covered up, continues to be covered up. Because the gangs doing it are Muslims. If they're not covered up, if that reality comes to the surface then this threatens the political philosophy of the left. It threatens their multicultural open border utopia. It threatens their worldview. To them, the individuals being assaulted, being raped, having their lives destroyed are minor. Those people are expendable in the cause of the greater political philosophy. This has always been the case with left wing thinking. It's the group over the individual. You can see it in various examples, Communist China, Soviet Union, etc. The philosophy is what matters. The individual human beings are completely expendable in the name of following that, pursuing that philosophy. That's delusional utopia that so many on the left seek to reach. And in reaching it, individual human beings are absolutely expendable. Tenor planning. This is this definition at least of fascism. And genuinely, genuinely the only people I can think of who fit that definition, at least most of it, is the left wing today. This, I don't think, is a coincidence. I think they are and do project their own ideas onto others. And this, again, is a deception as old as deception. Accuses others of what you are guilty and it takes the focus off yourself. Again, as I wrote in my column, I don't know whether Winston Churchill actually said the fascists of the future will call themselves anti-fascists. Whether he said it or not, that is exactly what's happening. Racism is similar. I had a rummage around for various different definitions of racism. Not easy to find. Again, it's a bit like fascism. It's a debate. It's a debatable word. But again, from the Mariam Webster dictionary, definition of racism, a belief that race is a fundamental determinant of human traits and capacities. And that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race. When have I ever done that? When have I ever said I believe that race is a fundamental determinant of human traits and capacities. And that racial difference has produced an inherent superiority of particular race. I never have. Not even hinted towards it. What I have said, because it's true, is that different peoples from different parts of the world have developed very different cultures. Those cultures are a fundamental, they don't exclusively make up the character of an individual, but they fundamentally influence the character of an individual. We are all different. Different parts of the world are history, religion, have created completely different sets of values in different parts of the world. Now, what we're doing, and have been doing for the last few decades, is just bringing down all those borders and throwing all these people in together. No, actually, we've been throwing all the people from outside of the West into the West in the completely either misguided or rotten belief that this will all go A-OK. And we're not different. We have hashtag more in common. No, we don't. And it's not working. It's not working. It don't work. You get what work. It can't work. You can't throw people with millennia of difference behind them in together and expect those differences to make and have no impact. And what's happening with this rush to move people from outside the West with completely different values, different history, different everything to European culture. It has all come in quick, very quickly, and it has harmed seriously and severely harmed the people who are already here. That's what I've said. And I said it because it's true, and other people say it because it's true. There is, however, now, presumably, if racism is a belief that produces or a belief that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race, then conversely, presumably, inferiority of a particular race is also racism. Note that this doesn't say anything about privilege or power, which is the left's new definition of racism, which they've done only so that the definition can't apply in the way that I'm about to describe it. If it's a belief in the inherent superiority of a particular race, it must also be the belief in the inherent inferiority of a particular race. Who is it that is described, the only racial group on this planet today that is described as being subhuman? Who is it? It's white people. Be less white. The problem of whiteness and on and on and on it goes. So if there is an inherent, if there is a belief in an inherent inferiority subhuman, the problem of whiteness, be less white, that's inferiority. And white people are the only people on this planet publicly subjected to that today. Therefore, white people, by this definition, are the only people subjected publicly to a sanctioned, sanitized, and entirely condoned racism. It's a racism that is perpetrated by the left, adopted by the mainstream because it's so terrified, for two reasons. One, because the left is so mainstream now, has pushed itself into the mainstream. And two, because the mainstream is so terrified of the left. So they meet most of the characteristics of fascism, although those characteristics are debatable. Some of the accepted characteristics, the left, is the greatest fit for them. And in racism, in their absolute open hatred of white people, by this definition, also the left is the only one engaged in actual racism. Unlike those, it accuses of being both racist and fascist. Now this is very important and it's very serious. And it's serious because so few people understand this reality. It is understanding that reality is the only way we're going to be able to push back against it. Serious harm is caused to people out of fear of being called racists and fascists. And until we discuss often and openly what those two things mean and who the real racists and fascists in this society are, only when we truly understand that can we start to push it back and bring about a bit of change. Talk about that wherever and whenever you can. Okay, I want to show you one or two things. Let me start with, now you won't be able to see this very well, but I'll show you anyway. Let's have a look. This is the latest, so let's talk about battalion span for a couple of minutes. This is the latest to go out from the Labour candidate in the area, Kim Ledbetter. And because it's small, unlikely to blame to me, I'm not going to read it all, but I do want to just show you. Just check out the bottom, it's on my right, the bottom right hand corner of this. I'll show it to you again. What does it say in big, big bold letters down in the bottom right hand corner? It says, battalion span first. With that in mind, let's have a look at what it says. Again, I won't read it all to you. As battalion spans Labour MP, I will be a strong voice for Palestinian human rights and statehood. I saw someone on Facebook yesterday saying, is Palestine in badly? No, I don't think it is, but Kim Ledbetter seems to think it is. I condemn, she goes on, I condemn the attempts to force evictions at Sheikh Jarrah, the violence perpetrated by Israeli security forces at the al-Aqsa site and the rocket attacks and airstrikes that have resulted in the deaths of innocent people including children, unequivocally and without hesitation. She doesn't say who does the rocket attacks and airstrikes, with the airstrikes that was here. Who does the rocket attacks? She doesn't mention that. The use of rubber bullets and stun grenades at the holy site of al-Aqsa was outrageous, unacceptable at any time, but a particular source of pain to Muslims in our local community and across the world at the end of the holy month of Ramadan. I'm issue wearing a burqa now. This is unbelievable. As Batleon spends MP, I will use my voice in parliament to speak out against the injustices of the Israeli occupation, including illegal settlements expansion, the military court system and the demolition of Palestinian homes. The international community continues to condemn such violations including the forcible transfer of Palestinian populations and illegal settlement expansions in the West Bank. Violence is not the answer. I don't know where that comes from. I will use my voice to amplify calls for coordinated international action against illegal settlement expansion and for recognition of the state of Palestine. I will work with Palestinians and Israelis who continue to work against the odds for a peaceful two-state solution. I can only be the strong voice we need with your support on the 1st of July. It turns out I was going to read it all sorry. And then she's got Batleon spent first at the end. This is actually unbelievable. The leaflet was bad enough. The leaflet I described to you last week about Palestinians and then about Kashmir and then about Islamophobia. This is a letter to voters and the only thing she's talking about is Palestinians. It's absolutely, I'm embarrassed. I'm embarrassed for her. Embarrassed. But it's quite clear what she's trying to do and I think the presence of George Galloway has made her up the ante on this. What it also shows me and should show all of us is that when you have a demographic, a specific demographic which makes itself known, shall we say, in the way that the Muslim demographic and Batleon spend us, the politicians will fall over themselves to bow down to them, absolutely fall over themselves. But this is Labour. And Labour is desperately, desperately trying to cling on to the Muslim vote now because I think we're getting to the point where it's the only vote they have left which won't be long. They won't have it for long. They were too short-sighted, stupid, treacherous and downright evil to stand up for the people of this country that they've lost a great deal of them and now they're desperate to hang on to this one. Other thing I want to show you is this. Okay, so Al Mubarak Radio, here's your first clue. Here's your first clue. Al Mubarak Radio held a hostings in Batleon spend on Saturday night and only George Galloway turned up. I would bet a few quid on this that he was the only one told about it. I would bet a few quid on that. This was a little bit of a stage show. Now I wouldn't be invited to this anyway, besides the point. What I genuinely would bet a few quid that this was a set up is that the George Galloway folk probably only told him about it and therefore he's the only one to turn up. So then he gets to go. They got to go on social media and say, look, George Galloway was the only one that showed up. Needless to say, I wasn't invited to this. I didn't know about this. I'm still not aware of any hostings that are going to take place. No idea at all. And pretty sure that even if they do take place, I won't be invited to it. Little notice again. This is from Kirkley's Auntie Fascist. And actually this that made me think I want to talk a bit about fascism and its definitions. This is a post from Kirkley's Auntie Fascist. And I've seen also that so-called Auntie Fascist groups have been trying to organise on Twitter. The police have been in touch with me. I would like to know whether or not the police get in touch with these groups because they are the real threat. I've got no, we have no intention whatsoever of trying to cause any trouble. In fact, we're doing all we can to try to prevent any trouble. And it was the same yesterday. We did some leafletting there yesterday. And I made a short video when I got back just saying that it's like a covert operation and it is. And to explain to people why that is. If any trouble which you break out, if there was any violence in badly in Spain, we would be blamed for it. Regardless of the particulars, regardless of what actually takes place, if there's any trouble there, we will be blamed for it. We face potentially even being banned as a party. Any excuse, any excuse to stop us. So believe me, A, I don't want it because I don't want it. I'm not that way inclined. I don't like trouble. I like civilised behaviour and discussion. But B, anything that goes wrong will be laid at our door and we risk anything up to being prescribed as a party. It's not about being afraid. It's about accepting the reality and working within it. And that reality is that unless we want violence and it's laid at our door, we have to act in ways that are meant to essentially covert operation. And I was so struck by it yesterday. I was walking around and I thought, look at us. Just look at us. All we want to do is deliver a few leaflets. And this is how it has to be and that is how it has to be if we want to operate at all. It's hard really to get across sometimes that we're already there. This suppressed, oppressed, subjugated to Islam society that many people, myself included, have warned of for some time. It's not around the corner. It's already here. It's already here. In reminder of the left wing and the alliance of Islam and the left does remind me of Iran and the end of the Shah and the rise of the Mullahs in Iran. It was facilitated by the communists who brought the Mullahs to power and then the Mullahs killed the communists. And I think there's some parallels to be made with the relationship between the Labour Party and the Muslim community today, which has just been demonstrated so nauseatingly by Kim Bledbetter. But it won't last. When the power is strong enough, the Islam party will come and Labour will be its enemy. Last thing I want to show you, and I wouldn't normally do this, but I just can't help myself. Last thing I want to show you before I get onto some questions. And again, I wouldn't usually do this, but I have to, I'm afraid. Here's something that went out on Twitter. I don't know when actually, but have a look. The only party, the only party that has said anything about the Batli teacher, it's a name of course we don't know, it's probably just as well for his sake. Unbelievable. So yesterday as I was walking around to live for leaflets in Batli, I came across this. It's a bit tatty, but I picked it up and took it with me anyway. This is the leaflet of the Social Democratic Party, the only party, according to Particle Flynn, speaking out. Look, there's a reason I want to say this. Basically, I went onto the website and I had it read through not every single word of the manifesto, but quite a lot of it. And the only thing I can find is this bit. It says, defend free speech in schools and public debate. That's apparently it. Look, that's very nondescript, isn't it? Very uncontroversial. It's not good enough. And it's not the only party standing up for this teacher. And frankly, with the greatest respect to the teacher himself as an individual, it's not actually just about this teacher. Defend free speech in school is all very well, but defend it from what? Are there no specifics here? Why was a teacher beheaded in France and by whom? Why is this teacher still in hiding and he is still in hiding and probably will be in some kind of disguise for the rest of his life? Because of whom? Anyone? Anyone specific or is this just a general threat? Anything? No? No. Why is that non-specific threat such a big threat in the UK? Because of immigration. Because of mass immigration. We didn't suddenly become, okay, I'm not going to do the, let's be clear. The threat is Islam. This teacher is threatened because of Islam. Because of Islam. The teacher was beheaded in France because of Islam. Pamela Geller was shot at because of Islam. People must spend their lives in hiding or under security because of Islam. So I'm afraid defend free speech is not quite enough. You're going to have to say, you're going to have to grow a spine and point out the specifics. Because unless you deal with the specifics, you can't fix the problem. You don't identify the problem. How are you going to fix it? The problem is the teachings of Islam. Why is it here? Because of mass immigration. What is still happening? The mass immigration. Who is coming in every day with open border illegal immigration? Muslims. What does this mean for the future? It means that all the problems we have now, this teacher going into hiding because of Islam, will get bigger and bigger and bigger. And generations to come will continue to have to deal with it. Now, I shouldn't need pointing out, but I will point it out anyway, that I'm fully aware that not every individual is a problem. But the reality is we can't tell who is and who isn't. So we are going to take that risk. We are going to put our own society at an absolute peril in order to help the ones who aren't a threat. Well, I'm sorry. No, no. We have a problem here. It's not a non-specific generalized problem. It's a very specific problem. We, not the SDP, are the only ones who are actually going to talk about it. And the only ones, the only party in this thing that is going to talk about this and talk about it, we will. And we won't tiptoe around it either because the public out there have had enough of tiptoeing and they've had enough of pretending that this is a general problem and oh, it's got nothing to do with this and nothing to do with this. No, no, it's not good enough. You need to start telling a few difficult truths about this and a fundamental truth about this. The most difficult one of all, because he's also got stop mass immigration on here. I agree with that. But the most fundamental, one of the most fundamental issues about this and the problems about the immigration that is coming here is that this religion already has this much dark influence over our society. It's coming every single day to make that influence greater and greater and greater and greater. For this generation, for the next one and for generations to come. That's the harsh reality and genuinely, genuinely, we're the only ones, we're the only party in this who will say so. Okay, let me answer some questions then. Okay, where am I? Where am I? Where am I? Okay, Richard, what do you think of GB News? I've not watched much of it, Richard. I must watch a bit more of it actually, but what I did see, the little bit I did see of it, and I actually mentioned this last week and I haven't watched it since last week, was a Labour politician on there talking about how this country has a long tradition of helping refugees and I'll just briefly repeat what I said last week was yes, 27,000 Ugandan nations came here on the run from Idi Amin. Once again, these people were identifiable, we knew who they were, we knew what they were running from, we knew they had a legitimate reason to fear for their lives and we brought 27,000 here. The Nazis, 80,000 or so Jews came here to escape the Nazis. Again, we knew who they were, where they were coming from, why they were running, they had a legitimate reason to fear for their lives. That's different. That's entirely different to what is happening today. We don't know where people are coming from, there's no identifiable threat to them. They throw their passports if they have any in the sea on many occasions and they arrive here looking really rather buoyant and healthy and well dressed and well fed and not in any way like people who are on the run for their lives to compare them to Jews fleeing the Nazis or Ugandan Asian fleeing Idi Amin is insulting, genuinely insulting. So that was pretty much all I've seen of GB News. Okay, I'll tell you what, I will watch it, I'll make it my mission to watch. I'll sit down and watch at least a half an hour between now and next week and I'll see what I think of it. But that's what I've, the only bit I've seen so far and I was a little bit, oh come on, BBC. And what was significant is that this all went on challenge. There was nobody there to say, but hold up, Jews fleeing Hitler was hardly the same as what we're seeing today. I mean, why are you trying to confuse the two? We know why they're trying to confuse the two. Okay, Amarie, with the accusations of being a racist, being bandied around willy-nilly. Thank you, Stu, for so long. Do you think the phrase has lost most of its potency? Of course, absolutely, absolutely. Nobody knows what it is, but I, actually part of the problem and something that I do see happening and I think a lot of us will agree with this, is that far from fighting racism as in racial division, racial separation or the hostility between different racial groups, these accusations of racism which are thrown around willy-nilly are actually creating tension, creation separation, creating division, creating hostility between racial groups. It's backfiring spectacularly. If they had just left us alone and left people alone and stopped with this obsession with race, I think I've mentioned this before, but I will again. When I was a kid, so a lot of you will be of my generation and will remember this as well, Floella Benjamin, do you remember Floella Benjamin? She was the host of Place Girl, which I'm sure most of us watched, certainly around my age, watched when we were kids. And this was the early 80s and there was no this, there was no black lives matter, there was no obsession with race, there was no, we just weren't swamped with racist, racist, racist, racist every five minutes. And Floella Benjamin was black and everyone, all the kids loved her and nobody sort of realised or cared that she was black, she was just Floella. And then it came the race industry and now we're far more likely to see Floella Benjamin as being black than we did in the early 80s when she was just Floella Benjamin. That's what they've done. By throwing around racist at every opportunity, they've actually created racial division, racial hostility, they're driving home, this person has a different race to you, when actually back in the 80s perhaps, I mean I'm not suggesting that 80s was utopia, but just with the example I've just given, we wouldn't have really cared about that. So we've gone to this point where if you are colour blind, if you don't see someone's colour, you're now a racist because you're supposed to, something about lived experience, you're supposed to be all about their race. So if you don't recognise, if you don't even notice their race then you're a racist, if you do recognise their race you're a racist as well. So everyone's racist. Everyone is white, I mean. And if you're not a racist then you have, if you don't actually say anything that could be deemed racist, all bases are covered here by the way, then you have subconscious bias. You're a racist even though you're not a racist. It's a Titania McGraw tweet, it's brilliant. Not being racist is racist, being racist is racist. Openly racist, racist, not openly racist, you're a racist. Make racist comments, you're a racist, don't make racist comments, you're a racist. Everyone's racist. And it has caused real, real harm between racial groups, it really has. And it just seems to be getting worse now. With the rise of things like groups like Black Lives Matter and the extreme left making things all about this cultural Marxism that they've introduced into society. Making everything about race has created racism and will create more racism. I think people who would not have considered race are now talking about it. I'm not talking about it in pleasant terms. One thing that has come up for me is several people that I've spoken to. Just people generally who I've talked to about these things is the media's desperation by which I mean the entertainment media or the advertising media. Every advert on television as we know is either built to bursting with Black people and there's nothing wrong with Black people in ads. But everyone knows it's not an accurate reflection of British society. And everyone also knows that this is an attempt to ram down our throats. Race, race, race, race, race, race, all the time. And it's backfiring spectacularly. It's creating racism. It's turning people who would never have thought about this. Who would never have been hostile towards this. Now they are thinking about it and now they're hostile towards it. They can see there's a manipulative game going on here. And they don't like it and it's creating hostility. So not only has it, in many ways it's lost, its potency was the word you used. Perhaps I'd argue rather than say it's lost its potency, it's changed it. It's certainly lost its original meaning, debatable though that is. What it has done, it's still a powerful word. But its power now is in creating division, separateness, hostility and racism. Is that irony? Okay, right, where are we? Can you try and get an interview on GB News? I'll call in some names like Nigel Farage or Ann Whittacum. The prediction of George Galloway is looking like it will be a big threat. I think we have put out a communication with GB News. I don't want to be pessimistic but I think the chances of me being on GB News are somewhere between slim and non. And that's okay. I mean it would be great but I long ago accepted this silencing by the media. I don't think this is going to be any different. This is from Charles. I'm not sure Charles what you mean about calling in Nigel Farage or Ann Whittacum. If what you're suggesting is that they might pull a few strings for me. First of all I don't know Ann Whittacum. And secondly Nigel Farage and I are not friends. I can assure you of that. Okay is for Britain going to push the political representatives for police protection? I'm not sure what exactly Anna that you're referring to there. Can you clarify that for me? And if I don't get to it tonight, let me know exactly what you're referring to. And I'll have a look at it maybe for next week. Out of into summary how did you go from Labour to seeing them as what they currently are? Was there one epiphany or particular experience that woke you up so to speak? A list of things really. Knowing finally really really realising and I've written about this in some detail in my first book Beyond Terror. Realising that they weren't what they said they are. Now two things happened. I changed and Labour changed. Both changed. I didn't change nearly as much as Labour did. I just kind of grew up. Very very hard left around the time that I left it. You could see coming what was coming. And in the way that they dominate society generally the extreme left now dominates the Labour Party and has done for quite some time. And they do the same things. Intimidation, bullying, censorship. You can see that coming but it was on the issue largely surrounding the issue of Islam and the things that come out from it. Things like FGM or the Sharia and the appalling treatment of women and girls. The rape gangs, the halal, the horror violence. I mean there's so many absolute horrors that stem out from this. And Labour wasn't willing to deal with any of them because of its source. It wanted the votes of this source. It wanted the black votes. And it didn't give a damn. And actually it brings me back to the sacrifice of the individual for the politics. Labour did not and does not care how many people get hurt as long as they get votes. And that's the long and short of it. So that is the idea that the ideology is more important than the individual human beings. And individual human beings are disposable in the pursuit of the left wing utopian dream. A few separate events taught me that. But rather than go into it in any more detail. I'm not trying to pitch my book, I just recommend it. Beyond terror, I talk about it in a lot more detail. Anna, you have to use the law against these liars but then it becomes law fair and they have unlimited resources. Anna, well said. Yes they do. And law fair, it's really difficult for us even to do law fair because solicitors have to find a solicitor who would represent you very few will. This is what I was referring to at the start when I said we can't even have basic services that other people take for granted. That is how oppressed and suppressed we are in society. It's political oppression, it's political suppression on a grand scale. And they do have unlimited resources and of course they'll come out all gong ho of we're fighting against racism. And they'll get donations from the usual suspects whereas we struggle even to get a solicitor. That's the culture we're in and what we need to do is change that culture. What we need to do to do that is to change who governs us. This is the last one. I didn't know that Anne Boleyn was black and came from Batley. This is part of the backlash. This is what's creating it. This is ridiculous. It's ridiculous. I don't know how many people have actually watched it. Part of me wants to watch it, part of me just cannot stomach it. But in case you're wondering what I'm talking about, it's a drama. It was on Sky, I think, about Anne Boleyn and she is played by a black actress. In other words, they're trying to tell us that Anne Boleyn was black. History is being rewritten, like communist revolutions before. Tear down the statues and rewrite history. I've been told as well that the suffragettes were Muslims. One of these days, the Queen will be black. The First Britons were black as we know. People are not stupid. They know Anne Boleyn was not black. They know that every single family in this country that buys a washing powder advertised on television isn't black. There will come a backlash against this and I fear it won't be pleasant. If we just left people alone, just let them be and stopped emphasizing race every five minutes, we would be much better off. But actually, of course, the left wants this kind of division. It wants hostility. It wants chaos. It wants trouble. It wants trouble to be clear because trouble will bring down the decadent Western society. They so loathe and then they can build their socialist communist utopia on the rubble. Thank you, Brian, for sending me a video from GB News about the grammar school. I'm going to have a look at that in a couple of minutes. So, Anna, again, I want you to let me know what that question, email me if you'd like, because I'm interested in what you're referring to. It's probably going to push the political representatives for police protection. I really do want to know what you're referring to, Anna. If you would email me about that, I promise to give you an answer. Okay, that's time up for this evening. Next Saturday, it's our day of action in Butler and Span. Please, please do come along if you can. Please. We have to do this. We have to get feet on the street. We have to get out there talking to people. And I'm told, by the way, I'm told just as a final point, I'm told that the police are now telling people to stay out of Butler next Saturday. We are going to, as quietly and peacefully speak to people and campaign and leaflet, any trouble, as I said at the start, will be laid at our door, but any trouble will not be because of us. But do, oh, look, please do come along. We will not be, if you're worried about it, we're not going to be marching in to the Muslim areas. We're not going to be standing outside any mosques. We are going to talk to the people that Kim led better certainly isn't talking to. She doesn't give a damn about them. She's made that clear. Before I finish, I've been meaning to do this. I meant to do this last week and I really want to do it this week. It won't take me long. Someone sent me an email last week and I said I would read it out last week and I didn't. So I want to read it out now. It won't take me a couple of minutes. He said, I thought I might mention to you about a place in badly called the Al-Hikmah Centre. Back in 2008, I was working at BMW in Bradford. We were smack buying in the middle of Munningham, which was a huge Asian population. The, I'm trying not to give away too many names here, but the BMW sales plan, what are they called? Where do you sell cars? I won't even try. I'll waste time trying to remember the word I'm looking for. I sold a BMW to an Asian baker from Batley who turned out to be quite an influential man in his community. The place was burned down where they sell their cars. I can't remember his name unfortunately, but that's by the by. I delivered his car to the Al-Hikmah Centre on his instruction. The centre used to be a boys home or something and had just gone on, undergone a huge reformishment with council grants and become a centre for the whole, quote unquote, whole community. There's obviously been huge sums of money spent on the place. The toilets were the first thing that picked my attention as they were all the holes in the floor type. So I thought so much for being for the whole of the community. They had their own printing press and printer, the newspaper there in five or so different languages. I picked up an English copy and took it home. It was pure anti-West, pro-Islam, chest beating material. At the time the World Corp was on and the paper was forbidding Muslims to take part in this country's obsession with its national sport. They used terms like do not turn on the demon box in the corner. There were loads of other articles spewing the same bar. They were claiming the USA was lying when it said that Christianity was the biggest religion over there. They claimed they had proof Islam was the biggest religion and it soon would be in the West. I remember leaving and thinking I was going to deal with this guy again or his pals. He wanted me to bring a range of BMWs to wealthy Asian weddings as a bit of a show, but I never dealt with him again. The Asian weddings were massive, for fairs and publicly paid for on taxpayers' money. I just saw the paper still printed there. It might worth you doing a little digging. There are two things that stand out to me and the reason I wanted to read it is because it's yet another example. A few people tell me about this and a few people I've read about it in a few places. Money spent on community projects with only one community at the helm and that community takes the money and resources and uses it to spew hatred, actual hatred against everyone else. That really is it everyone. Thank you very much for joining me. A couple of things this week. Do please come next Saturday. Do please come. We have to get out there. We all know how horrifying the situation is and it's not exclusive to battle and spend by any means. We all know how horrifying it is. We all know the avenues that are closed after us. So we have to do this. We have to. It's extremely difficult to break through. It's extremely difficult to fight back. We all know that but we have to do it. We have to. What else is there? What else? Do you just capitulate and go home and let it all happen without opposition? No. So please do come along next Saturday if you can. A couple of bits from me this week. I am away on Wednesday. So my usual Wednesday morning live stream will be on Thursday morning at 10 o'clock instead. I will be talking to David Vance on Thursday night on his programme. Saturday is obviously the big day in battle. But also something we want to throw out there and this is my very final point I promise. We would like to organise an online hostings between the candidates in battle and spend. We will send individual invites to them. This will be next Monday in place of this live stream. However, I can pretty much guarantee you that it's not... Look, let's see. Maybe one or two will get back to us. If they do, we will organise an online hostings here for next week. If they don't, I will have my own hostings. So I will take questions and I will take them from the side of the screen or I will take them by email. So be no filtering. I'm not afraid of questions as I'm sure you know by now. If you're watching this, if you live in badly, send me whatever question you like and I will answer it in my own hostings here next Monday night at half past seven. So we'll have a hostings of some type one way or the other next Monday. We'll have a hostings at half past seven here. We will invite other candidates on. If they are, I will be very, very, very... I would have my utmost respect if any of them come on. And let's hope that one or two might just do it. But if they don't, I will take questions as if we are at a hostings and I'll take them live at the time and I'll take them by email prior to that. So anyone in badly or anyone? I'm not expecting the comments here to be all from people in badly. Any questions at all? And I'm not afraid of any of them and I won't run away from any of them. So that's what we'll do on this live stream next week at half past seven. And we'll invite as many of the other candidates as we can and let you know if we'll get any responses. Okay. Thanks very much everyone. Take care of yourselves until I see you back here next week. And don't forget, I'll be on with David Vance on Thursday night. I'm pretty much guessing what we'll be talking about. Okay. That's it. Take care. See you soon. Bye-bye. Thank you.