 We are an NGO, so we are looking at this issue from a development point of view. And for us, it's mandatory, it's the importance of the local authorities, I mean local authorities, I mean the national authorities local in the country, because if they are aware of the needs of the rural areas, the funds might be channeled through programs that have a result for things. So our thinking is to have result-based funds, grants basically, to avoid basically that all the funds are channeled to the main grid, the main infrastructures. We have to remember that the infrastructures are quite costly, so mini grids are not a step between non-letrification and national grid electrification, can be an alternative, and the cost, avoided cost to bring there the national grid can be the key to turn and to show to the donors that that is a way to where to channel the funds. So not from centralized investment, but to the region, rural areas, authorities. In the rural areas there are resources, financial resources are few, but there are. So basically we found out that the more problematic part in the distribution is not to pay the bills, but to pay the connection. So the connection cost is the one that have to be somehow helped, that can be done all through programs that are financing this last part of the distribution or as using a sort of system in where you put inside the tariff even the cost for the connection in a way to have a loan that is repaid through the connection, the bills, electricity bills. Another issue that we are, that I think is very important, is that the implementation of pay-as-go system, so with prepaid meters, is something that is for sure useful for the utility that is managing the system, but as well for the people, because allows people to understand better their consumption. We have to think about that normally in the rural areas people never had electricity, so they don't know how to use it and don't know how to basically regulate their consumption. So the pay-as-go systems or prepaid meters allow people to understand better the use of electricity. So this for us is a key component in granting sustainability for the families in the payment of the bills and consequently to pay, to recover the investment. The private investment needs an environment friendly environment and friendly environment doesn't mean just a policy that is allowing it. Of course the policy is something that is on the top, but sometimes policies are just on the papers and then are not really applicable or applicable. So for us we think that energy sector needs to have specialized policy in terms of grants because some of the parts of a project are not profitable. For example the distribution system, since in many countries in Africa you are facing in the rural areas a very scattered village with distances that are quite far, the distribution is challenging, is a problem. It can't be profitable with the consumption that you can expect from rural areas. So to involve more the private sector you need to leverage the problematic sides of the projects. The distribution and the transmission are two aspects that have to be considered. Moreover you have the upfront cost that can be problematic sometimes. For example all the bureaucracy behind the project, if the project is not big enough then affectively the investment. So a possibility to have a different procedure that address different size of project that for sure help. Just to give an example in Tanzania to have a 10 megawatt project or a 10 kilowatt project from the point of view of the environmental assessment doesn't change at all. So the cost is the same. That of course is not a problem for a 10 megawatt project but if you have a mini grid, a very isolated mini grid with very few customers becomes a problem.