 Okay, thank you all for joining our breakout sessions and welcome back. Now we're gonna hear from all moderators about what they got from each breakout sessions, from four aspects, biophysical, economy, social, and governance. Let's start from Danial. Thank you, thank you, Kania. We had a very exciting and interesting dynamic discussion in our group attended by more than 45 people. I think it was almost 50 and then on and off and we were discussing a lot of issues from the panelists and then confirm or tragic or challenged by our discussion. But let me show you what we'll be discussing very quickly because I only have five minutes here. So the group identified or think about proposed principles that heat land must be vegetated wet. We were arguing whether wet first or vegetated first depending on the condition. Sometimes vegetation comes first and then it's flourished when water is come back but suddenly the system should emit less carbon. That's the principle we were discussing and I do not want to read this but in general we identified four criteria. At least that's what I try to capture quickly. Group them in very neutral kind of word or term like lengthover. We do not say it's primary or secondary etc. etc. So it's not what we thought it is neutral. It's not leaning towards whatever objective. Hydrology is the same and then vice susceptibility is just characteristic also the heat properties. So we managed to discuss the number of indicators from each of these criteria and to some extent we also discussed the verifier or units of this thing and certainly we arrived in a very deep discussion about the water table as well as water content. That's very different context and all in all we were thinking of very carefully considering at what reference we are talking about when we say 40 centimeters, 60 centimeters. So the reference is important. So that's very quantitative and as well as practical I'd say. We're also thinking about the adaptability of the criteria and indicators here when we are working with communities and also in the spirit of adopting their ideas as well. So we try to think about the tradeoff between reliability of the criteria and indicators especially indicators but also the accuracy. So sometimes we have to have expensive equipment now it's not affordable and we can listen what the people say and what they observe and do it very easily in the field and some sort of applied technology is also discussed the possibility of quantifying soil moisture etc. It's very easy and quick not accurate but useful to quantify what you have in the field. So that's in a nutshell from the biophysical group. I hope that's clear enough to give you a taste of what we've been discussing and carbon is very very intense in term of content flux etc etc but let's let's do it later. Thank you very much. Thank you Kania for Exxon's report. Now we're ready to move to another moderator. Yeah. So let's forward the conversation on Kania, the floor and one is yours. Thank you Kania and also I'd like to thank the panelists, Baba Budi and Ibu Sipi in our discussion. So Baba Budi presented an extensive review on how economic attributes embedded within the environmental services and goods provided by the pit lane hence the valuations of the pit lane benefit is actually critical. He confirmed many potential indicators related to the cost saving and value of avoided environmental disaster and emission, value of economic ecosystem services, sustained and long-term growth among others and then Ibu Sipi emphasized the economic security infrastructure, well-being industry and dependency and also proposed to the alternate indexing methods referred and adapted to the Indonesian village development index, cat's milk matter and the circles of costal sustainability framework and then Darsana as our discussion provide critical response on how to see restorations in a broader perspective. We have to be very sensitive on livelihood issue while also balancing the ecological integrity. We should see the underlying point such as educations and awareness of all parties involved including the community and government. Also it's important to reconcile restorations involved with the value addition on sustainable business development for the community. Basically all of us agree that there should have been a behavioral change to the community and also combine with incentivizing the community with economic development. Thank you. Yeah for the quick and precise report, we move on to the third aspects, social aspect. It will be delivered by Rupesh Bomian. So Rupesh exploring the issue. You have five minutes. Thank you. Thank you Kanya. My apologies, my video is not on because what Padani was saying, the connection had some issues and I'm calling from the phone so limited capacity. I won't be sharing any screen either but I hope my voice is not interrupted. So I would also like to start with a big thanks to our panel members, Ibu Yuti, Ibu Moera and Ibu Sera and our distinguished discussant Yusie Katrina. We had very interesting discussion where we all came to one big conclusion that social aspects is very complex and not easy to tackle. So this entangled nature when we talk about social issues in connection to peatland restoration, whether at local level, whether at landscape level, bring about a lot of challenges and it is, it will require a lot of coming together participatory approaches to address those complexity and how we can do this using criteria and indicators approach. So we didn't have a lot more solutions or answers but we did have a very important and thought-provoking discussions. We all agreed that at a very high level, at a principal level, community well-being and equity could be widely demonstrated in those peatland restoration intervention and activities. So some of the things that we touched upon at the level of criteria is that it's very important to look at social capital, one of the things, and under social capital there could be indicators of gender equality, power sharing, that is empowerment, and then social networking. So social networking bring about another important aspect which was connectivity and by analysis, the social network analysis, one can understand how information flows and who makes the decision, who has most say in those decision-making. So that needs to be one of the criteria. How do you measure that connectivity amongst the stakeholders? Third would be sustainability. So overall, if the sustainability of that, which itself is a very broad topic but if there are actions that improve sustainability as a whole, then the indicators for those could be useful in identifying whether peatland restoration is a making success or not. Our discussion, Yossi highlighted the importance of data availability and relevance. Many a times these complex issues are not able to be resolved because lack of data access or even collected data. And so to have that relevance and data availability in our indicators will be very, very important as we go about. That's all. Thank you. Rupesh, now we move to the last aspects, governance aspects. Okay. Thank you, Kania. So again, I would like to thank the panelists, Ibudia, Mr. Aspidui, and also Mr. Masan for lively discussion in the governance aspect. So during the discussion, the big discussion, first Ibudia mentioned for governance aspect, the importance of participation, profitability and productivity of small rulers in fair commodity supply chains and also reducing social conflict, protecting human rights, including labor and indigenous land rights. So it is very important to understand the participation and also reducing social conflict. And from the second speaker, again, the participation is key and he, as we propose several indicators such as the effective public consultation, representative from the authority. Also, mechanism for public participation must be available, space must be available. Also, the importance of transparency in providing information and progress and ensuring access for all stockholders. And then the accountability, the public accountability of government agency related to their performance is from the second speaker. And then for the third speaker, again, the principle is participation and we propose three indicators, first is recognizing the right custom and culture, also understanding the special relationship between stakeholders and side, because each side will be quite different. Also, engagement of all stakeholders throughout all steps. And then Marshal provide ideas on the land tenure is key to mention in governance aspect and also link to decentralization as well as whether we are process oriented or outcome oriented indicators. Also need to understand that restoration means different things for different stakeholders. Some stakeholders mentioned more on their biophysical aspect and some stakeholders more concerned on their livelihood from a restoration. Also cost effectiveness for stakeholders coming from the restoration. And from the discussion from the floor, we discussed what kind of a good approach to institutionalize the proposed indicators. So we developed indicators, but nobody recognized if we are not developing, this is another thing to do, CNI should be developed in a multistakeholder way. It's not only CNI itself should be participatory, but where we develop should be a participatory way. Also they understanding the need, the landscape of platform. So finally we suggested the criteria, something like decision making process should be participative for all stakeholders, transparency, public accountability, commitment, recognition human rights, land tenure and local wisdom, general aspect also recognition of the local context. That's all what I consider Kamiya to be a primary. Thank you. But Harry, and thank you to all our moderators, panelists and discussions from the breakout sessions, who already gave us very insightful information about developing the criteria indicators for aspects. Now we move to the questions. There will be Dr. Harris Boonawan, who will deliver the concluding remarks and the way forward. Dr. Harris is a deputy from the Peterland Restoration Agency or Badan Restoration Gambut. So Dr. Harris, if you're ready now, the time and flowers is yours. Yeah, hello, Kaniya, thank you. Okay, thank you. Good afternoon, everybody. And I said my slide before I making the conclude for the our meeting. Yeah, can you see the my slide? Yeah, before I start, I use this very limited time for say happy New Year's, stay healthy. Even just very earlier to say, because I think for the next year, we have to follow up the our very organized discussion and very serious discussion in the four webinar that I follow. And thank you for Daniel and Tim for also maintain and also keep this program. Before I make a conclude, I just also show you when we talk about the Peterland. So please come to this area. This is really, how can I say, very complete, I think we say that wet wet land and then also the people are very happy, the children, even in the in the pandemic era, I think they they don't use a massacre like like me. So independent right now. So I think this is real. How can we hope for the future, the generation will be happy, stay on leave on the tropical pitland ecosystem. Ladies and gentlemen, I think during four webinar, we have a laboratory more than 30 talk about the criteria and indicator. We synthesize four aspects, powering biophysics, social economy, and governance. We have to acknowledge ourselves who have been so the ideal process to develop criteria and indicator. We acknowledge also the enablers to way forward to pit restoration and assess the criteria and indicator. As example work, monitoring criteria and indicator in terms of biophysics, shall be able to be integrated part of everything in the chapter one. So we have we have monitoring system in all of our Indonesia, which can be more developed together, more insightful data for criteria and indicator in biophysics. Not to mention, this also provide lesson learned about social integration so we cannot spirit each other. And and how economic example we promote green economy for for the future can be developed on the support with restoration. So my colleagues, Ba Budi, has mentioned BRG activities provide insight, insight toward criteria and indicator development. Suitable and precise data must be used to establish comprehensive criteria and indicator for pitland restoration. Yes, we have several monitoring, as mentioned before, also restoration plot and implementation, which can be listen, listen, learn to apply the criteria and indicator we have elaborated. We have modalities to provide more insight for how pitland has restored based on the criteria and indicator, not only biophysics, but also social economy and how policy would enable the restoration. So the last slide about the conclusion. The existing biophysics criteria that BRG has been enriched by the social economic and government criteria and indicator. Pa Nazir also give us the opening speech in our past webinar. Criteria and indicator is progressive and dynamic for measuring and monitoring restoration success. It is not it study it steady art. So I think we need continue our collaboration and discussion. Particularly the changing by a behavior and practices should be evaluated to including the involvement of private sector and non state. So because I also listen that we should be consider walk at the landscape scale. The criteria and indicator for pitland restoration are set covering biophysics, social economy and ecology which are set to be off and supported by policy measure. The modality way forward are available covering the transdisciplinary multi-export, several monitoring equipment and models, tremendous action research from BRG and cooperation with multi-parties including government, NGO, national and international parties. Develop participatory approach at the local scale. Example, action at many locations from research and implementation are available which can be assessed at the plot level from 20, from 2.5 until 20 hectares or one zone. I mean that water zone. So pitland hydrochloric unit or water zone and how the way forward for larger scale landscape or pitland hydrochloric unit shall be more research. So I think that's all my conclusion. Thank you. And let's continue our working to make more robust our criteria and indicator for tropical pitland restoration in the future. Thank you, Ganya. Paheris, now back to you Rupesh. Yeah, thank you all. Thank you Paheris and all the participants and discussants, panelists, members. I really thank you for your time making this whole series, the four events, a very successful engagement and learning experience and this is just kind of charted out a few thoughts or ideas to move forward next year. Paheris was saying in 2021 we have to do a lot more work. So let all stay good, stay happy, wish you a very happy new year in advance and we will all come back to you and in 2021 we will continue with more work on this topic. So thank you again. Thanks a lot. For panelists we will be joining a debriefing room and the link was shared by Kanya so we can go over some of the discussions if you have time. So with that I say goodbye to this Zoom. Bye-bye. Bye-bye, Rupesh. Thanks all. Just done. Thanks. Ayo. Thank you Paheris. Thanks Paheris. Thank you Paheris.