 Hello, everyone. Good morning, good afternoon, good evening, depending on where you are. Welcome to the webinar, series number four on the Exploring Criteria and Indicator for Tropical Kittland Restoration. This is the fourth because we would like to synthesize the first three webinars. So it's nice to have you here, especially those who are new, not in the previous webinar, but for those who were there before, welcome back and nice to see you again. We were told that we have around 200 participants registering, so we hope we will be having more and more people joining later. But while we are waiting for them, I just would like to thank all the resource person that we have today. It's been amazing to have your response, positive response that we have more than 20 people being the panel member, discussing and also facilitating this process. So it's our pleasure to have you as supporting this event today. I would also like to thank the RG for their continued support from the first series until today, and we will be with them to work together synthesizing what we've been learning in the past three, four months in the four series of webinar. We have organized support from our partners like USAID, Nick Fee from Norway, Alfeo in Rome, and Jakarta, and UNEP in Nairobi and also other places where they have people joining and supporting this event. So it has been very fruitful processes in the past three months when we try to synthesize and try to identify what we've been learning with regard to pitland tropical pitland restoration. And certainly, thank to all of you, the participants who have been registering and some of you have been attending this for three, four times. Your faithfulness has been very supportive to us and we recognize that as we look at the laser participant. So, in trying to wrap up what we've been learning in the past three webinar, let me share with you a kind of summary or expression from the previous webinar about what we've been doing so far. So, when Nasir opening up this session three months ago, he underlined the importance of biophysical aspect when they started the operation of PRG. So it was very much the biophysical, the environmental issues when they were trying to implement the PRG agenda. And as the time goes by, the economic and the social aspect of course was engaged, but the emphasis was very much on restoration, physical issues, environmental issues. I think this is quite natural. Being a biophysicist myself, I would do the same and perhaps tend to ignore the rest. And in fact, it's reached out now and if we are an economist, maybe we will do the same. We emphasize our work on the economic aspect and try to reach out or cover or engage with environmental or social issues. Again, that's great in their own right. Likewise, if we are we are social scientists or social worker, NGO type of activities, I think people are in the center of our business. And gradually we start to understand what's the environment implication, what's the economic perspective of that. So we've been going to all kind of direction. And that's why we try to nurture what are the importance issues in those aspects. So we try to look at the environmental issues in the beginning when we started off three months ago, and then looking at the economic and the social aspect. Certainly we've been learning a lot of overlap or some overlap between those three aspects, as we discussed about raising the awareness about improving the household income, etc. Those are overlapping. One thing which was missing that we tried to do it in the last webinar is the government issues. So this will be embracing all this thing. Environmental issues need to be governed, economic objective need to be governed as well as the social imperative. So governance should be overarching thing that again we are trying to embrace and try to work with people who've been working on this area. So in this series we've been working like a marathon during the pandemic, one by one in the past three months, we've been trying to understand all those things. And we still rather puzzle. That's why we need you to get together here to again confirm that what we've been identifying has been, you know, it's a common sense. Understandable, it is, yes, logical, but we need to fairly data if that is really true. So today, we will have to sympathize this with the help of all this resource person I mentioned 20 people working with us today, as well as your contribution as partners as participants in the discussion later. So this series of webinar has been a very long but with pertinent and also determined objective. And we are privileged to have you all here as a resource person discuss on etc we will have very long day today in terms of speaking. But to make that short, we organize the session in such a way that we will be learning in a very particular area that we are interested in. I heard that the bio physical people will be dominating in the participant list, but many more coming for the economic and social issues, but certainly governance issue is very interesting to learn more today. So after the plenary we will be split up to four working group. So you've been as participant registering yourself and pick your choice with session you would like to go and you will be migrated automatically when we are breaking out to the session. And we run that in parallel in one hour so we have relatively a lot of time to discuss these particular aspects in our own liking and our own interest and please nurture this issue and help the facilitator and speaker to you know broaden the perspective so that we will be able to synthesize what we as community of work trying to understand about restoring it land in the future. So we will be gathering back in the plenary room and Harris will later be wrapping up what we've been learning not only today but in the past three months or so. And we will be guided also how to to move on next year. And we will be working with you with new jacket and suddenly new ideas and objective, etc. So we look forward to that and we are going to be with everybody all the stakeholder to deliver what we've been learning together in the past three months by having set of identified principle criteria and indicator on those aspects. And we will be able to see the physical social economic and governance. So with that, we would like to familiarize ourselves and next year we hopefully will be able to validate those so that the knowledge that we are exchanging today and in the past three webinars will be useful for the future of our people and which are threatened which are growing but also facing a lot of pressure. So, without further ado, I would like to invite but booty, who is going to talk on behalf of the RG because for some reason cannot be with us. And for something that you cannot avoid. Thank you, Daniel greeting to all of the participants. I'm not switching on camera because it's supposed to be delivered by NASA. First of all, the RG would like to convey our gratitude to the Ministry of Environment and Forestry to see for a course and all supporting institutions, organizations and initiatives such as FAO, UNEP, MIGV, USAID, as well as GPI for enabling these four series of webinar on exploring the criteria and indicator for tropical populations. We are now at the fourth of the webinar series with the synthesis and way forward to conclude the webinar series run since September this year. SBIG, our main task is to coordinate and facilitate restorations of tropical peatland in Indonesia, mainly in the seven provinces of Riyadh, Jambi, Sumatra, Selatan, Kalimantan, Barat, Kalimantan, Tengah, Kalimantan, Selatan and Papua. Restoration of degraded peatland should be conducted in careful actions that start to accelerate the recovery of degraded peatland and should also be a significant phase to stop further damage or loss. As an ecosystem, tropical peatland is also dynamic and quite diverse. The underlying cause for its degradations are also as complex as its ecosystem process. Therefore, proper interventions are required to adaptive approach towards the restorations. We actually need the support from the scientific community and research institutions as well as stakeholders to enable us carrying out science and ethnology based restorations while taking also into considerations the socio-economic and governance aspect of restorations. Thus, this webinar series is very important to explore and assist and recommend the use of criteria and indicators that are easy to recognize, measure and monitor over time and are also locally relevant. The selected criteria and indicators should have a balanced approach covering all four aspects that Daniel has mentioned, biophysical, social, economic and governance. At various occasions, the president has reminded that the restorations should be conducted at a landscape or peat-hedral unit level. Thus, suggest the need to explore the criteria and indicator for a landscape such as PHO scale restorations. Since the restorations of degraded peatland requires a long-term commitment, the discussions on criteria and indicator of governance aspect is expected also to indicate governance at landscape level. Hearing the terms of PRG for the year 2016 to 2020, PRG would like to ask us all to also explore progressive indicators. For measuring and monitoring restoration success, the progressive indicators will be instrumental in monitoring the continuations of restoration of degraded peatlands and lighting foundations for consolidated restoration actions of all stakeholders and all level from village to national level. All participants, PRG would like to convey our appreciation to your support and discuss thoroughly the criteria and indicator for peatland restorations so that we can measure the changing behavior and practices of key stakeholders, including the enforcement of private sector. I wish you all fruitful deliberations and PRG is looking forward to continuous collaborations in the future. So that's the keynote from Pa Nasir that I was asked to deliver to you all. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. That was very inspiring, especially when we hear about the progressiveness of the thing that we are discussing here criteria and indicator. That makes our future work even busier because everything is not set on stone. It will be dynamic and we'll be moving around following the progress of our understanding and the challenges on the ground. So I think it's a good reminder how we should be behaving ourselves, maybe as assessor, scientist or body of work in peatland restoration. Thank you. That's very inspiring.