 Welcome to the Knuckleheads of Liberty. One of the things is the apparent sort of hypocrisy with the left on, I guess, on issues of insurrection and, you know, destroying confidence in the institutions. And certainly we did talk about the fact that we had these riots going on that were sort of celebrated by the left all through 2020, but then when the riot came to the Capitol, suddenly they were completely against riotous protesting at that point. But more importantly, when they talk about the whole institution, because they're trying to claim that the election was, this was an attempt to steal the election. And, you know, perhaps there might have been something to that. It's hard to know given the biasness of this committee. I mean, in fact it was handpicked by Nancy Pelosi. We talked about that in the last one. One of the things that is crazy and the irony of this is while this was getting ready to happen, it turned out that somebody actually tried to kill Justice Kavanaugh. A protestor showed up near his home and the police caught him. He had a gun and he had traveled all the way from California to the East Coast so that he could assassinate Brent Kavanaugh and he's already admitted as much to the police. So this isn't speculation at this point. But the issue is that all this happened because of a breach of government protocol, the way our government is supposed to operate, which is the Supreme Court is supposed to deliberate internally about their decisions and then they have an organized release of this information once they finish their deliberations. Well, somebody leaked the story. We talked about that before on the Roe vs. Wade decision that was coming up where they were looking to overturn Roe. And so this got a lot of people started protesting outside the Justices' Houses, which is a no-no. That's supposed to be against the law. It is a federal crime. Yeah, and yet the White House was not willing to condemn it. They were, you know, Jen Psaki and Joe Biden were saying, you know, this is how we do democracy, pretty much. So they just said, just keep it peaceful. Well, I mean, you know what they were literally saying was against the law. And of course, Eric Garland doesn't seem to have any concerns about it. You mean they were inciting the breakage of the law? Yes. They were inciting, like Trump was inciting, apparently. And amazing that we're supposed to believe that Trump was and now Biden can do it with reckless abandon and no repercussions whatsoever. Is that what you're telling me? Yes. That's because his wingman, Merrick Garland, really doesn't, he is solely focused on white supremacy. And this does not fall into that category. So therefore it's not a threat. So, you know, if a Supreme Court justice gets killed, you know, it didn't have anything to do with white supremacy. So we're cool with that. Well, Jason, in defense of Merrick Garland, it is not only white supremacy he is focused on. He's also focusing on those large group of terrorists known as parents who go to school board meetings. Yeah. That is also a big focus of his putting those people on terrorists. Just in case they're overly concerned about what their kids are. Exactly. Exactly. Those are some very gross terrorist acts that he must spend the resources of the federal government to go after. Yeah. I'm just wondering where the Democrats are to announce this leakage of the writings of these Supreme Court justices in this situation because that's part of the deal. They're supposed to do this in secret. And then they come out with the decision afterwards. Okay. But in the meanwhile, they don't get pressured anywhere. Otherwise, that's a new surpation of the, what do they call it when the January 6 riots occurred? What did they call that? What was the term they used? Insurrection. Well, it was insurrection. But it was something about the process of government. They're interfering with the process of government. Right? Well, what, what is that when you, when you leak documents or yeah, you leak documents of what's going on in government. That's a branch of government. The judiciary is a branch of government. So what happens there? Where's the outrage there? Is there hypocrisy going on here? Is it because Roe v. Wade is the Democrats? Holy grail. Is that why they don't have an issue with, with the leakage of the documents and, and the subsequent pressure being applied to the, to the Supreme Court justices. They don't have an issue with that. They only have issues when their Democrat gets elected by a fantastic landslide. The dumbest person on the planet is elected with more votes in favor of him than anybody in the history of mankind in the United States. Okay. US history. So, so yeah. So, so, so there, that's, that's sacrosanct. Okay. But if it, if it goes the other way, I just see some hypocrisy. It's still government, the, the, the, the, the gears of government rolling and they had, you know, they're supposed to have the ability to roll even when it doesn't go your way. They're like a ratchet to him. It only goes their way. But let me bring up an image here because, you know, one thing we didn't get to, aside from the Democrats sort of promoting this from the White House, Chuck Schumer himself, literally when this item was being debated in front of the Supreme Court, he literally said words that could be seen as threatening. What he said is I want to tell you Gorsuch, I want to tell you Kavanaugh, you have unleashed the whirlwind and you will pay the price. You know, you won't know what hits you if you go forward with these awful decisions. That's what he said. While this is now, you know, now somebody shows up to, to kill Kavanaugh and somehow Trump saying to peacefully protest outside the White House is, but, but fight is, is insurrection. This guy saying this, when these are, these guys are appointed for life. So there is no, you know, price that they pay, you know, in, in the civil society, right? They literally, whatever decision they make, they get to leave whenever they feel like it because their appointment is for life. So it's not like they have to worry about what happens in the polls. And that's by design. And the idea that he's saying you will pay the price. What price is he talking about? What price is he talking about? That's a very good question. What price is he talking about? It is a member of the legislative branch. What's the word I'm thinking of bribing or not bribing, but pressuring. Well, he's threatening. The legislative branch is threatening a member of the judicial branch. Is that what I'm hearing here? Yes. Everybody's okay with it. This is okay. That's what I'm hearing from the Democrats. The Democrats are all okay with this. They weren't okay when, when January 6th came around. They weren't okay with that, but now they're okay with this. That's the point I'm trying to make. Remember AOC felt threatened so threatened by January 6th. And she wasn't even in the building. Whereas Kavanaugh literally had an assassin with a, with bullets, with his name on it, you know, so to speak, um, you know, right outside his house. And you know, I, I haven't seen the angle of Kavanaugh crying on TV about this yet the way AOC did. And guess, guess what? Guess what? I abhor the idea of somebody threatening to kill AOC just as much as I abhor the, the, the threat against Kavanaugh. Okay. I put them at the exact same level. I don't put one below or above the other. Okay. They're both wrong in my opinion at the same amount of wrong, even though, you know, I disagree with AOC. Okay. So, you know, see this is, this is called principles Democrats. I'm principled you're not. But you know, you know, the hypocrisy here is, is goes deeper than this and it's dangerous. Okay. It rarely is when you think about it because a few years ago, a supporter of Bernie Sanders went to a baseball game in somewhere in Maryland. I believe it was and he shot Steve Scalise and some other people. And he was a supporter. He was a known supporter of Bernie Sanders. Nobody was outraged at Bernie Sanders for that. Okay. Nobody was. The guy was arrested. I think a Capitol Hill police did that, did end up shooting, shooting him at that day. So justice was easily dispensed with in that case. But to this day Steve Scalise is walking around with a bullet I believe in somewhere lodging his back on his spine or some kind of stuff and things like that. We have Chuck Schumer, you mentioned him, standing on the Capitol's step, threatening the justices of the Supreme Court. Right? He named them Kavanaugh and Gosher. He named them. Where is the outrage? Where's the outrage? Trump told his supporters we shall march to the Capitol where we shall peacefully and patriotic let our voice be heard. I am no supporter of Donald Trump. I voted for him, but I'm no supporter of his. Okay. Because you're saying some idiotic things that will really get to me. But he said that. He said peacefully and patriotically. And okay, we had the riot. And all of a sudden he's responsible. But nobody's talking about the responsibility of Nancy Pelosi. So these things are becoming dangerous to us. We are, the left is allowing, is creating a society, so influencing our society, where lawlessness has become tolerated, has been tolerated as long as it's the right cause. Okay. So if Chuck Schumer could get on the Supreme Court and stand up in defense of Roe v. Wade, and he could threaten the Supreme Court justices, that's okay. If Steve Scalise could be shot in Maryland, that's a big deal. Schumer could threaten whoever could do whatever they want. This guy could go to Brent Kavanaugh's home, where his wife, his kids live. And he could attempt assassinating him, but he didn't actually attempt it, but he was there to do that. And where's the outrage? There's no outrage about it. Yes, they reported on it and they knew. Where's the outrage about this? But this is what's going on in our society. Lawlessness is becoming normal. And this is a big problem. It's a very big problem. Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness always and forever.