 Hi, everybody. I hope you can see me and hear me clearly. Great. Hi, everybody. Good afternoon, good morning, good evening. So this golden egg is about gender. And it's specific about the journey of integrating gender analysis and the CRP. We think that this journey itself was worth a golden egg. And this work, of course, has been done with the Carta, World Fish, Kate Seat, a lot of other partners. So what I'll do, I don't have a fancy, unfortunately, one figure. But I'll take you through the progress we have done in both research and the programming level in both phase one and phase two. Peter, do you mind? Thank you so much. Yes. So phase one, the general work that we did in the livestock and fish CRP was very much setting up our work. So in terms of the research, we somehow started from scratch. There was some evidence and some studies on gender analysis done, but not so many. We did a lot of diagnostic ad hoc research work. We were asking questions such as, how do gender considerations fit into the research that other scientists are doing in livestock? Or what do women and men do in livestock? What is the division of labor? Or maybe also some basic strategic questions. What does ownership mean? So it was quite ad hoc. So what's happening, but actually we're up, huh? Can't talk, easy. One is easy, easy. List view to yourself. Sorry. Thank you. So we engaged with quite a lot of ad hoc basic research questions. We also, of course, had to develop tools. So we had some diagnostic tools. We engendered some of the existing tools, such as, for example, GIFIST. And we also developed the first women's empowerment in livestock index, the WELI. So here, the focus was very much on women at production level, mostly integrated work and ad hoc work. At programmatic level, we had to really set up everything. So in terms of capacity building, we worked a lot with no gender scientists and also partners, a lot with the CARNA. And we were really trying to explore with them, what does gender analysis mean in your research? But also, is this gender research? And once you have gender data, what do you do with it now? How do you integrate it in a project? Or even discussions about whether qualitative data was publishable. And then budgeting, important issues. At the beginning, we had some colleagues who, of course, wanted to do gender analysis. But we didn't have a gender budget yet in the project. Or we didn't have the time of a gender scientist covered. So a lot of discussions. Many of you will remember the 10% gender tax, as it used to be called, which wasn't a very fashionable approach. But it did set some standards, I believe. But also, it was interesting to discuss what is eligible. What costs are eligible under gender research? If you have some women sitting in a survey, is that gender research really? And finally, of course, the discussion of where does the budget come from when we do gender research, particularly the integrated one. And in terms of gender team alignment, at the beginning, the gender scientists were aligned or assigned to value chains. So when I joined Ilri, I was working in the livestock CFP. I was working in the Tanzania value chain. And finally, very important here, the gender analysis or the role of gender analysis, I think, was very much understood as a means to improving livestock research. Peter, can you please move on to the next slide? So then in phase two, we actually did, I think, move one step further. In terms of research, we did not do anymore like only ad hoc and basic diagnostic research. We developed some very strategic overall questions, such as, for example, the correlation between women's empowerment and livestock. Or in terms of integrated research, we developed frameworks that really spell out what are the key gender considerations in the other flagships. For example, what are the key gender considerations in animal health, or in one health, or in breeding. And then we have also looked into what the relationship between gender transformative and gender accommodative approaches. So we've really expanded our thinking. We have engaged with the importance of transformative approaches in livestock. We started engaging with the concept of intersectionality with new dimension of empowerment. We worked on tool. We developed a new women's empowerment and livestock index, and also women's empowerment and livestock business index, the WELBI, and also started developing and implementing gender transformative approaches. So as you see, the focus here was not so much anymore women, but more like gender relations and women's empowerment, strong focus on women in business, not just women at production level, plus strategic work and integrated work hand in hand. At the programmatic level, we continue doing the capacity building, as I said before, but also we engage in more strategic capacity building. For example, we have been developing the capacity of our consultants doing business incubation for them to develop a gender responsive business incubation that really addresses the systemic inequalities that women agripreneurs may face. In terms of budgeting, I think it's quite clear now that to integrate gender in a project, you need to have the time of a gender scientist and also some budget for gender activities. And it's quite also clear that if you do strategic work, the budget comes from labs. If we do integrated work, the budget comes from the other flagships. The gender team is not aligned anymore to value chains, as it used to be. It's aligned to labs where gender is home than to the other flagships, and often reports to both. And finally, very important again, I think the role of gender analysis has changed. Now we understand gender analysis to be a research field in its own right. We really see that we're not just looking at gender as a means to improve livestock development, but we also argue and have support that livestock development is a means towards gender equality. And there is an agreement by now that we also need to progress on our strategic analysis to better get the grasp of gender issues in livestock because this will also help us with integrated work. Peter, can we go to the next slide, please? So I think overall is a beautiful evolution from focusing on women to focusing more on gender dynamics and norms. And I think what we have created is a solid basis to build on. We have these important benchmarks and diagnostic evidence that we can really build on. We have really made progress in terms of conceptual and innovative goals. You know, all the thinking we've added on empowerment, gender dynamics and norms, intersectionality, gender transformative approaches. I think we've been better able to position gender analysis strategically in our livestock research with this key bodies of knowledge, for example, on women's empowerment and livestock. We've also been able to create our own agenda. We're not just doing ad hoc anymore, but we have our own agenda that includes strategic work and integrated work. So in a way, you know, we really know where we want to go. And then we've been incremental by, you know, strategic plus integrated are both accepted. Gender science, it's a science in its own right, as I said already. And also, as you know now, gender equality is an impact area in the one CGIR. Very importantly, we also, I think have made progress because we have projects and funded with gender at the entry point. We had a project in Ghana, that is about animal vaccine systems and the entry point is gender. And we also have a larger team. Now, this year maybe was very special, but we have 15 people, including consultants that are working with us. We have increased our visibility within Ilvi, beyond Ilvi and the CG. You can look at the number of citations, mentions, requests for collaborations. And finally, some of the tools we have adopted have been adopted at Ilvi, within Ilvi and outside of the CGIR, even such as the Wehli. So the last slide in terms of what next? Well, what next? I think started from the golden egg to the little cheek on to the chicken. I think there is a lot of work to do, very exciting work, given the basis that we have created. I think we need to look and create more evidence on how livestock development can support gender equality. We have to engage with intersectional analysis, which is very important for gender analysis and the whole issue about youth and so on. I think we need to really get projects, or even a program, on comparing transformative approaches and accommodative approaches. We can't do diagnostic work only anymore. We really need evidence on what works on the ground to support women's empowerment and progress on gender equality through livestock. And finally, the work on empowerment has a lot of potential and there's a lot to do there. We have a lot of large data sets coming up through the different implementations of the Wehli. We need to analyze that data. We need to indeed continue to improve the Wehli and the Well-Be. We want them to become participatory. We have many ideas there. And finally, we are also at the programmatic level. We are also discussing, for example, having a dedicated team for empowerment, Well-Be and Well-Be. And that was it. I look forward to your feedback. Thank you. Alessandro, so it's clear that there seems to be a genetic element to all these presentations. So it's not just an egg, but it's the chicken and the day old chicken, the whole chicken. So I'm going to move on. We're a little bit behind time. So that's the, I hope you understood the essence of the egg, though it's not really, it's much more than an egg. I'd like you to do the same thing, please. If you can post in the chat. And I'm seeing, actually, there were already some questions and comments arriving in the chat. So if you could please go, oops, I need to go back. Where and how could you see this approach being widely applied? Which elements of this do you think are the most exciting, the most applicable? Where and how could they be applied? And there's already comments coming in. If you could just type in the chat and to put in your comments in the chat, that would be most perfect. Just like before. And Alessandro, if you see any of the specific questions that are coming in, you can reply to them in the chat, perhaps, or in the plenary. I'm hoping that some people will be replying in the chat now to the message that chats are high, just posted. Where and how do you see this gender approach and maybe it's gender approaches being most widely applied? If you could then type in the chat again, give us your feedback, give us your comments. We don't just want to have a one-way presentation of content. I'm going to give you another 20 seconds or so. Thank you very much. That's good. Paul, in there. Very good, yeah. Youth, okay, yes. Raising some interesting issues there. If you could type a few more comments, I'm going to wait, give you another few more minutes, not few more minutes, a few more seconds. There's some comments coming in. So, Alessandro, as people are typing, is there anything that you've noticed in the chat or in the earlier messages you want them briefly replied to? That would be great. There was a question on the business component. Indeed, Pat, thanks for the question. We are doing work specifically focused on women as agripreneurs, and this refers also to the business incubation. And what is new there is that we are not just trying to support them, women to get into livestock business. We are trying to create an enabling environment for them to actually successfully perform in that business. And these are doing transformative approaches. There is a question about youth and animal-generalized groups. Indeed, this comes for me under the issue of intersectionality. So you see how different people have different social markers that affect how they are advantaged or disadvantaged. At the same time, already trying to support young women specifically we are focusing on in agripreneurs needs a very, very specific focus. So anyway, we will not be able to just address any marginalized groups. So we need to be focused and strategic to be able to actually make progress. But thanks for the questions.