 Here we are going to talk about the ethical issues in arm services. There are a few specific ethical issues in any kind of the government setup where the psychologist is working and they could be varied. Probably it could be related to the arm services, it could be related to the school which includes both public and private schools, then criminal justice settings, then community agencies, business and industries, then it can be the medical institution, it could also be the independent practice and then postural counseling context could be the one reason. So they could be the many medical and government settings where we see that the psychologist is working and going through different challenges but particularly I am going to talk about the arm services here. The arm services, in the arm services we can see that they are the variety of the roles which behavioural scientists are trained and they portray in arm services and most frequently we see the psychological students that they give their tests for the arm services and build their portfolio so that they get a chance to work as a mental health practitioner in the arm services. We see that the psychology of the military also shows us a clinical relief and a non-clinical relief also shows us a clinical relief. The clinical relief only shows us that when we see that there are a lot of mega wars, like after World War I and World War II, the need for multi-psychology started to come to people with such psychosomatic symptoms and no explanation was given to the medical science. For example, when a lot of young people came to know that the army will hire them because the army needs them and they need people, so there were a lot of symptoms created in the people who were psychosomatic, like when they were blind or they had paralysis and research later proved that this is only because of the stress they were having that they were unwillingly hired in the military. So in this kind of place when we talk about assessment, we talk about clinical or non-clinical relief, so the role of the psychologist in the army shows us a lot of importance. Then the important thing which produces training, skill acquisition, leadership development, teaching and effectiveness and enhancement. Now you can see that when a new recruit comes to the army as an officer, the upbringing in his profession has a lot of aspects, his professional grooming, his development, his soft skill and his professional leadership skills, inculcating him, brushing him up, all these things are hired by a psychologist in his training, which in a very important way, in different group exercises and in individual training, he is equipped with these things. Then development of specialized training, for example, simulators and assessment centers. Now when we are training, at that time there is no such stress that a force has attacked or there will be such a situation in which you will get bloodshed, so such simulations are created so that stress tolerance level can be increased, they can be told that if someone attacks in the middle of the night, then they are taken from deep sleep to be practiced, it is simulated that if there is such a situation then how will they manage it? All these exercises are under the training of a psychologist. Then personal functions, for example, selection, assessment, classification and retention of army personnel. Similarly, their personality profiling, their behavior assessment and their profiles are continuously created by the help of the psychologist because when an individual goes into such a specialized field, it is very important to know that there is no such psychological tendencies, there is no individual with a criminal mind, how is his stress tolerance level, whether he will self-harm himself in a situation of stress, such individual's training is through all the psychologists and they make their personality profiles. Then health related research is very important because getting an army job is something which is very stressful and a lot of days come in which you get sleep deprived, in which you do not get proper food, fatigue, physical tiredness. In such a situation, how can an individual cope? How long can he work if he does not complete his sleep, his work efficiency, how long does he get disturbed? To see all these clinical correlations, the research is done by psychologists and also by army personnel and based on their data, different rules and regulations are made. Similarly, human performance research is done by job design, information process and decision making studies. If in a critical situation, in a strike, you have to make a foreign decision, whose decision making skills are good, who should lead, who should command, who would be the team leader, who would be the part of the team who would be the second year leadership and who are the people who will not play any role in decision making, they will only act. All this design is also possible through the help of psychologists in the army. Confidentiality issues are the key source of concern in mental health services delivery to military professionals by military personnel. Now you can imagine that in such a sensitive scenario, if a psychologist is working, then keep all this confidentiality because you have to sensitively handle the army officers' profiles and there are a lot of ethical concerns. How will you deal with them? This actually goes towards a very challenging work setting which we will talk about today. Then how to deal with confidentiality issues? One way to deal with the issue, as noted, is to make certain that clients are informed from the outset of professional relationship of all limitations placed on their confidentiality. The obligation to provide such information applies in both military and civilian settings. Now when we are doing their profiles as a psychologist, assessing the different shades of their personality, then it is important to keep confidentiality issues in this manner because individually, the army officers have not hired you as a mental health professional and you will only give their reports to them. Their report will basically be given to the army headquarter so that they can decide where to place the cop, which role to assign to the individual. In this, confidentiality will be breached by the general public but the results and reports will be given to the concerned departments for the purpose of holding that assessment. Other than that, the basic confidentiality rights will remain the same for the army and civilian settings.